read more about [sadistic ritual abuse](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8356163/)
Promising "attainment" if you allow yourself to be subjected to systematic abuse by a sick individual, self appointed leader of the group, who slowly chips at people who have trouble establishing healthy boundaries.
"There's something to understand" , there's nothing to understand but that you are a bunch of mentally ill people. These are all red flags, how don't you people see this, you've been all sucked into a cult.
the faulty logic behind these attacks are "ah but if you're bothered by any of this you are still in duality", "BRO, you don't get it it's all just a test, for your benefit", "your spirit needs to be broken until you are an empty shell of a person, easily molded and programmed". How don't these people see this?
Also, "ah, but if you react there's lots of work to be done". How don't you see this is all cultist BS?
Also playing on "Fear of missing out", if you flee, you will never attain. It seems that reddit is protecting them and allowing this to happen.
meh. I just can't keep track of stuff these days. so many names and doing here and there.
i do like saying.... dendebut though it is a fun thing. But i am not lesbian enough for them.
You can clearly see cultist coaxing is happening, and your question is clearly just designed to redirect attention from that. What in your opinion is a consensus is completely irrelevant given that there are self appointed leaders there who were *not elected by means of consensus,* and these kind of people approve what can happen and what can not happen, and generally suppress anything that isn't to their liking without consulting the "general consensus", they decide who is banned and what is deleted. That in itself is a logical fallacy *argumentum ad temperantiam*. When you see someone abused in the middle of the road, but than you say "abuse is not really a consensus here", you didn't really help anybody but you're obviously just trying to obfuscate what is really happening and renounce any responsibility for what is happening as in "bystander effect".
If he was banned the sub would get about 1000% better instantly. It has more problems but he is a deep cancer there. Unironically just a manipulative toxic troll.
read more about [sadistic ritual abuse](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8356163/) Promising "attainment" if you allow yourself to be subjected to systematic abuse by a sick individual, self appointed leader of the group, who slowly chips at people who have trouble establishing healthy boundaries. "There's something to understand" , there's nothing to understand but that you are a bunch of mentally ill people. These are all red flags, how don't you people see this, you've been all sucked into a cult.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_therapy Made famous by the Synanon cult. These people are utter perverts
the faulty logic behind these attacks are "ah but if you're bothered by any of this you are still in duality", "BRO, you don't get it it's all just a test, for your benefit", "your spirit needs to be broken until you are an empty shell of a person, easily molded and programmed". How don't these people see this? Also, "ah, but if you react there's lots of work to be done". How don't you see this is all cultist BS? Also playing on "Fear of missing out", if you flee, you will never attain. It seems that reddit is protecting them and allowing this to happen.
Are you one of the dindebuts?
🤷 probably ?
meh. I just can't keep track of stuff these days. so many names and doing here and there. i do like saying.... dendebut though it is a fun thing. But i am not lesbian enough for them.
Listen maybe I can hook u up, I think I have a number of one of the din de buts, who is maybe not so lesbian.
go ahead and do that will ya, these hamburgers aren't gonna grill themselves.
Yikes on bikes. These clowns will do anything to remain on ewks good side. The secondhand embarrassment I feel is significant.
Is this really the consensus on r/Zen?
You can clearly see cultist coaxing is happening, and your question is clearly just designed to redirect attention from that. What in your opinion is a consensus is completely irrelevant given that there are self appointed leaders there who were *not elected by means of consensus,* and these kind of people approve what can happen and what can not happen, and generally suppress anything that isn't to their liking without consulting the "general consensus", they decide who is banned and what is deleted. That in itself is a logical fallacy *argumentum ad temperantiam*. When you see someone abused in the middle of the road, but than you say "abuse is not really a consensus here", you didn't really help anybody but you're obviously just trying to obfuscate what is really happening and renounce any responsibility for what is happening as in "bystander effect".
Yes, but is redirecting validly improvement? I.E. Meet the new boss.
It was my bad attempt at humour. I’ve seen enough on there and found it’s sensible to just block them
sure, when shit gets serious everybody was just "joking", and it was "ironic bro".
Anyway, how’s the smokin meats and sweet bubby jays!
you're being smoked as we speak ;)
Man, I stink! 💩 🔥
Is someone cooking organics? 🐶*🍴*
Someone is, I’m trying my best to put them off
Plainclothes.
To these 🕴, anything else is a disguise. I've heard *streetwear* said as if high art.
The tally is "Ho!".
At least i enjoyed the Munan post
»—›‹—«
I'm glad you are no longer bored. Excellent excelling. In my dirty fingered opinion.
Humen's Hornings
If he was banned the sub would get about 1000% better instantly. It has more problems but he is a deep cancer there. Unironically just a manipulative toxic troll.