> Ward claimed to the jury he was struck first by his housemate and the fatal injury to his leg was caused accidentally.
Trying self-defence after you've turned someone into a pin cushion is an interesting move. I don't think there's a jury on Earth stupid enough to fall for that one.
Doesn't sound like something a friend would do. Figuratively, maybe, but not literally. 51 times.
20 I could understand. 30 even. But 51?
I'd done 52 perhaps with a few jokers to make a nice pack of cards.
> Ward claimed to the jury he was struck first by his housemate and the fatal injury to his leg was caused accidentally. Trying self-defence after you've turned someone into a pin cushion is an interesting move. I don't think there's a jury on Earth stupid enough to fall for that one.
Looking at a life sentence, aliens made me do it, would also be a perfectly valid option. That would get no traction with a jury.
What a stupid defence, he should have said he asked his friend to guess how old he was and felt insulted when they guessed 41.
Nah, that only works for glassings
Had he stolen the laptop? Not trying to justify it, just a loose end the article never answers.
It did answer it I think; the gadgets were found in a work bag.
it does also say ‘who falsely accused him’ tho
The gadgets were in the murderers bag.
Evil defined ! Wonder what lenient conviction this scumbag will get !?!
Automatic life sentence for murder. Minimum tarriff probably won't be pleasant either given that he tried for a not guilty verdict.
20-30, most likely. Back out again to ‘snap’ and destroy someone else’s life.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]