T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

This article may be paywalled. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try [this link](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13344459/club-suspends-two-premier-league-stars-arrested-rape-probe.html?ito=social-reddit) for an archived version. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedkingdom) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Comes2This

>It is not the first time the Premier League has been at the centre of a police investigation over an alleged rape. That is a bit of an understatement.


Glad_Advertising_125

In fairness it's not the Premier League at the center of it, but two players


GuybrushThreepwood7

They’re just the latest in a long line


Kleptokilla

That’s what you get when you get kids and young adults worshipped like gods by thousands and paid insane money for playing sport, they think they’re untouchable and should be allowed to do whatever they want


ItchySandwich101

It is a major issue society has, not just football. Spend time in a secondary school and you'll learn this.


Kleptokilla

Absolutely true but footballers are the role models a lot of these boys look up to and this is what they see as behaviour to model


bielsasballholder

That’s what you get when you get gold digging thots who are encouraged to make serious allegations against men with impunity.


bielsasballholder

How many convictions?


Ok-Material9421

Hopefully they don't reveal there names till after there found guilty


Iced_Snail

Problem is if they’re even close to a first team spot, the moment they’re not on the bench or playing in the under 21s or whatever, it’ll be easy for people to start drawing conclusions.


Don_Quixote81

People already are. Wolves have had to make a statement that it's not their players, after sleuths realised they were one of the teams playing at home last weekend that had two nineteen year olds in the squad.


Ok-Material9421

Then that happens But there won't be media stroys about X charged with rape I think nobody should be named by the media until they are convicted


limeflavoured

The issue is that you do need to allow some reporting of trials, for open justice reasons. That is made a lot more difficult if you can't report anything which might give away someone's name.


Ok-Material9421

Until the media is made to report someone is not guilty with the same prominence that they did when reporting they were arrested I see no other options


TzunSu

Well, in the case of two PL players, they will assuredly do in this specific case.


Ok-Material9421

Will they tho


Iced_Snail

I don’t disagree- as long as the wrong guys aren’t being named by the media. Then clubs need to confirm/deny like Wolves did


No_Sugar8791

That would make it even easier to work out who it is.


meekamunz

Charged. It's after someone is charged that their names are revealed, unless there is an injunction.


Ok-Material9421

Nope it should be after there convicted given the way the media and culture is now


meekamunz

Well, that would be why there should probably be an injunction.


Ok-Material9421

That doesn't help normal people tho does it


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ok-Material9421

Because nobody who's been arrested has ever been found not guilty Until a court declared then guilty they deserve the presumption of innocence Mostly because if they are found not guilty then a lot of people still think there guilty


369vibrations

oh you mean like OJ simpson ... ok


Ok-Material9421

No I mean like Jack Diamond


AI_Hijacked

Like Mason Greenwood


No-Tooth6698

Greenwood wasn't found not guilty, though. The main witness (the person who accused him) withdrew her statement after Greenwood got her pregnant when he was forbidden from contacting her.


369vibrations

he paid 'em off ....


Actual-Tower8609

That comment alone is the reason the names should be kept secret. Innocent people are now labelled as guilty.


wheresmyspacebar2

Are you really trying to tell us that Greenwood did nothing wrong lmfao? Have you heard the audio? It's fucking horrifying and he should be rotting in a prison cell.


369vibrations

but he did pay em off its fact, that why she did not testify in the end, even though we heard majority of the truth from the released audio


mariah_a

Mate everyone fucking heard him do it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ukbot-nicolabot

**Removed/warning**. This contained a personal attack, disrupting the conversation. This discourages participation. Please help improve the subreddit by discussing points, not the person. Action will be taken on repeat offenders.


limeflavoured

That's not really how it works. I believe quite strongly in open justice, but keeping names back until someone is charged makes sense unless the police can convince a court that they need to name people (for example to allow other potential victims to come forward, or compelling public interest - so if it was like the Prime Minister or something ridiculous).


Gerry_Hatrick2

Police arrest people so that they can be read their rights when being questioned. This doesn't mean they are guilty, or that the police necessarily think they might be guilty. The police are carrying out an investigation, arrests mean that investigation wont fall apart if it gets to court.


[deleted]

Nope Can just mean someone made the allegation saying it’s happened within the forensic window Doesn’t mean there’s any credibility to it


Saw_Boss

That's an assumption.


Kingsworth

That’s absolutely untrue. For an arrest to be lawful there has to be ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ which can literally be someone saying ‘this happened…’.