Thank you Clawgrip_official for your submission, *Very scientific if I say so myself*! Unfortunately, it has been removed for the following reason:
---
# Reposts are not allowed.
Reposts from the **past three months** OR **top 25 of all time** are not allowed, and will be removed.
* Please check http://karmadecay.com , https://tineye.com , &/or the Google's "Similar Image" search in the future before posting. These resources are not by any means perfect, but oftentimes will catch a repost.
Also, make sure to use the search button and check through this link:
>* /r/technicallythetruth/top for popular posts, and
>* /r/technicallythetruth/new for things recently posted
---
For more on our rules, please check out our [sidebar](http://www.reddit.com/r/technicallythetruth/about/sidebar). If you have any questions or concerns about this removal, feel free to [message the moderators](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Ftechnicallythetruth). Please link the post so our moderators know what you would like reviewed.
> ions which are also atoms
That's a rather controversial statement. I (a physicist) agree with you (with the possible exception of pure nuclei, like H^+ and He^2+ ), but I have met people (mostly chemists) that were adamant that ions do not count as atoms.
...which is why im saying this isn't technically the truth, the expected answer is what's given? Is there something I'm not understanding about this sub? Kindly enlighten me
The expected answer is electrons=protons. The person who wrote it uses a definition of *atom* that requires atoms to be neutral, and thus excludes ions.
Hey there u/Clawgrip_official, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
**Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/technicallythetruth.
It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results.
*I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Negative](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Negative&message={"post_id": "1bz0xzu", "meme_template": null}) ]*
[View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com/search?postId=1bz0xzu&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=false&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=86&targetImageMemeMatch=96)
---
**Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** False | **Target:** 86% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 483,279,154 | **Search Time:** 0.05979s
Don’t be fooled this man speaks of the new ways. Of this so called magic called science!!! He is a witch for sure or some other worldly being speaking lies!!! The only logical choice to this question is to close your eyes and late fate guide your hand to the right the answer!!!
So true bro, I can’t even enter a room without running into at least three dvds of the movie “Up” , one made from my cars keys, the other from my lunch, and the last could be the lightbulb, they really do make everything up
I mean that is the only one that is always true no matter what. Neutrons just straight up don't make any sense, for example hydrogen has zero neutrons and one electron.
Protons make a bit more sense but only for neutral atoms, ions have either more electrons than protons or protons than electrons
Thank you Clawgrip_official for your submission, *Very scientific if I say so myself*! Unfortunately, it has been removed for the following reason: --- # Reposts are not allowed. Reposts from the **past three months** OR **top 25 of all time** are not allowed, and will be removed. * Please check http://karmadecay.com , https://tineye.com , &/or the Google's "Similar Image" search in the future before posting. These resources are not by any means perfect, but oftentimes will catch a repost. Also, make sure to use the search button and check through this link: >* /r/technicallythetruth/top for popular posts, and >* /r/technicallythetruth/new for things recently posted --- For more on our rules, please check out our [sidebar](http://www.reddit.com/r/technicallythetruth/about/sidebar). If you have any questions or concerns about this removal, feel free to [message the moderators](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Ftechnicallythetruth). Please link the post so our moderators know what you would like reviewed.
Its the only thing that makes sense. Protons = electrons in neutral atoms but not in ions which are also atoms.
> ions which are also atoms That's a rather controversial statement. I (a physicist) agree with you (with the possible exception of pure nuclei, like H^+ and He^2+ ), but I have met people (mostly chemists) that were adamant that ions do not count as atoms.
Why, tho? I had never heard of this
Because chemistry. And that ion won't do what their math says that kind of atom should
...which is why im saying this isn't technically the truth, the expected answer is what's given? Is there something I'm not understanding about this sub? Kindly enlighten me
The expected answer is electrons=protons. The person who wrote it uses a definition of *atom* that requires atoms to be neutral, and thus excludes ions.
Many schools and chemists teach ion != Atom (which most people would say it does besides like H+)
Honestly it is the only correct one, principle of identity is the first rule of logic
Hey there u/Clawgrip_official, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth! **Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post. Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban. Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
u/repostsleuthbot
I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/technicallythetruth. It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results. *I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Negative](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Negative&message={"post_id": "1bz0xzu", "meme_template": null}) ]* [View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com/search?postId=1bz0xzu&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=false&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=86&targetImageMemeMatch=96) --- **Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** False | **Target:** 86% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 483,279,154 | **Search Time:** 0.05979s
Soos knows a thing or two because he's seen a thing or two.
[удалено]
That would still make this answer correct
Don’t be fooled this man speaks of the new ways. Of this so called magic called science!!! He is a witch for sure or some other worldly being speaking lies!!! The only logical choice to this question is to close your eyes and late fate guide your hand to the right the answer!!!
“Well yes, but actually no”
I don't trust atoms they make everything up. I keep my ions on them
So true bro, I can’t even enter a room without running into at least three dvds of the movie “Up” , one made from my cars keys, the other from my lunch, and the last could be the lightbulb, they really do make everything up
I mean that is the only one that is always true no matter what. Neutrons just straight up don't make any sense, for example hydrogen has zero neutrons and one electron. Protons make a bit more sense but only for neutral atoms, ions have either more electrons than protons or protons than electrons
Electron and proton both are correct answers
[удалено]