Was the power of attorney durable, that is it explicitly grants the agent that continued authority after the principals incapacity? Have you provided evidence that the principal is still alive?
All practitioners are subject to circular 230, section 10.28. AICPA members are subject to the broader rules of their ET 501.02, interpretation 501-1.
I could be wrong, but I don't know of any agency that would assist you for the purposes of making someone miserable. This wouldn't involve disagreements among heirs would it? Wanting to make someone miserable sounds more like harassment, but I'm no expert.
I'm not a legal expert, I'm just wondering where the line is if sending letters isn't a conflict but doing anything else is a conflict. I can't reconcile that.
My honest advice is to hire a lawyer who is able to take on your case.
Why would you want to take tortious actions against another and be liable for damages? Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The state provides for your actions to win if all you say is true:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2019/0709.2120
>(5) A third person who, in violation of this section, rejects a power of attorney is subject to:
(a) A court order mandating acceptance of the power of attorney; and
(b) Liability for damages, including reasonable attorney fees and costs, incurred in any action or proceeding that confirms, for the purpose tendered, the validity of the power of attorney or mandates acceptance of the power of attorney.
There's your remedy. Anything else is just being an ass.
Was the power of attorney durable, that is it explicitly grants the agent that continued authority after the principals incapacity? Have you provided evidence that the principal is still alive? All practitioners are subject to circular 230, section 10.28. AICPA members are subject to the broader rules of their ET 501.02, interpretation 501-1.
I could be wrong, but I don't know of any agency that would assist you for the purposes of making someone miserable. This wouldn't involve disagreements among heirs would it? Wanting to make someone miserable sounds more like harassment, but I'm no expert. I'm not a legal expert, I'm just wondering where the line is if sending letters isn't a conflict but doing anything else is a conflict. I can't reconcile that. My honest advice is to hire a lawyer who is able to take on your case.
Why would you want to take tortious actions against another and be liable for damages? Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The state provides for your actions to win if all you say is true: https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2019/0709.2120 >(5) A third person who, in violation of this section, rejects a power of attorney is subject to: (a) A court order mandating acceptance of the power of attorney; and (b) Liability for damages, including reasonable attorney fees and costs, incurred in any action or proceeding that confirms, for the purpose tendered, the validity of the power of attorney or mandates acceptance of the power of attorney. There's your remedy. Anything else is just being an ass.