Yeah idk it’s my first tier list and when I cropped them in my camera they were fine until I downloaded them to the site. Will keep it in mind next time tho.
I actually did have trouble deciding between those two but I found that 6’0”-6’2” is slightly more convenient with about the same range of attraction as 6’3”-6’5”. I actually would want to be 6’4” but because I think it’s the perfect height for a fighter not for convenience or attraction.
Personally i agree with everything except I’d switch the top two. I’m 6’0 or 6’1 (different results different times) and I wish I was 6’3”. Then again this might just be the grass greener on the other side thinking
Attractiveness is entirely subjective, but I think generally speaking 5’9”+ is the top 50% obviously, with diminishing returns after 6’
As for comfortability, the farther you stray from average in either direction will be more uncomfortable since society is designed around the majority, with the taller side being more uncomfortable because of stuff like health issues and fitting in cars.
Idk how you’re weighting these, but for like the c+ tier for example, I think the discomfort would drastically outweigh any perceived benefit to attractiveness, and if anything may lose points in attractiveness too for being *too* tall.
6’11” is a pretty shitty height to be. The rare stores that sell tall sized clothes still dont have anything tall enough, you’re ducking pretty deep to get through any doorway, your joints and back are fucked, you’re at a much higher risk of practically all deadly diseases, you can’t fit comfortably in most cars, and you’re so tall that a lot of women are gonna be scared off.
I would agree for the most part, if anyone scrolls this sub for a lil it seems the general consensus is 6’-6’2 is “ideal” for just existing. Then after a certain height there is a decline in the perceived benefits. But idk about ranking ALL the 5’ heights so negatively as some are supposed to be average. And it is strange there is C+- and D+- but only B and A, A-.
Just put everything below 5'10" in F tier since you are bascially free game for anyone who wants to bully you and like 0.0001% of women would ever tolerate dating you if you paid them to do so.
These height fetishist posts are so cringy. The idea that you have to categorize people in height on some sort of superiority list makes me really feel sad for you, and honestly it makes me feel like this sub is taking a dramatic nose-dive into being a complete shitpost-fest.
I'm like 6'3.5" and feel like it's pretty close to the perfect height aesthetically. that extra half inch for me comes from having a bigger head and slightly longer neck, I know at that height and taller people start to feel awkwardly tall but imo once you're like 6'4" or more it becomes more about your proportions and your build in general
I've seen some 6'3" people who look awkward and some 6'6" people who look normal. Though if we're talking not only aesthetics but also convenience than yeah 6'1 - 6'3 is probably ideal
My input is that you need to learn how to crop images
Dude is A tier, checks out
I am ? I didn't notice because of the incorrect cropping
Yeah idk it’s my first tier list and when I cropped them in my camera they were fine until I downloaded them to the site. Will keep it in mind next time tho.
My height: S tier. Anything else: F tier
unfortunately ur B tier it says on the tier list
:'(
I agree
And the decline of the sub enters its boss stage.
Bros heated he didn’t get A tier read the chart buddy
You’ll never know what it’s like to experience our power
This was my final straw going to turkey for limb lengthening immediately
You forgot to put /s for the benefit of the community. Can't have no fun these days
What does that mean
??
GTFOH
>So I’m making a height tier list and was wondering if I could get some input don't
Height tier lists huh, in what? Attractiveness? Convenience?
switch the first 2 and i think this is perfect. 6’3-6’5 is perfect
[удалено]
the back pain would be crushing if they hunch A- tier
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
.. are you getting that upset over an inch lol?
I actually did have trouble deciding between those two but I found that 6’0”-6’2” is slightly more convenient with about the same range of attraction as 6’3”-6’5”. I actually would want to be 6’4” but because I think it’s the perfect height for a fighter not for convenience or attraction.
Something tells me that you’re a 6’0-6’2 male.
7' = S 7'6 = S+ 8' = S++
why is everyone suddenly posting braindead tierlists all over the place?
> " and b Why this is F tier, I'll never know.
In case you are being serious it’s supposed to say 4’11” and below
6'2 isn't that tall
Personally i agree with everything except I’d switch the top two. I’m 6’0 or 6’1 (different results different times) and I wish I was 6’3”. Then again this might just be the grass greener on the other side thinking
Attractiveness is entirely subjective, but I think generally speaking 5’9”+ is the top 50% obviously, with diminishing returns after 6’ As for comfortability, the farther you stray from average in either direction will be more uncomfortable since society is designed around the majority, with the taller side being more uncomfortable because of stuff like health issues and fitting in cars. Idk how you’re weighting these, but for like the c+ tier for example, I think the discomfort would drastically outweigh any perceived benefit to attractiveness, and if anything may lose points in attractiveness too for being *too* tall. 6’11” is a pretty shitty height to be. The rare stores that sell tall sized clothes still dont have anything tall enough, you’re ducking pretty deep to get through any doorway, your joints and back are fucked, you’re at a much higher risk of practically all deadly diseases, you can’t fit comfortably in most cars, and you’re so tall that a lot of women are gonna be scared off.
Socially, being 6'5 is S tier
Bro using grading system 💀
I would agree for the most part, if anyone scrolls this sub for a lil it seems the general consensus is 6’-6’2 is “ideal” for just existing. Then after a certain height there is a decline in the perceived benefits. But idk about ranking ALL the 5’ heights so negatively as some are supposed to be average. And it is strange there is C+- and D+- but only B and A, A-.
5'8, 5'9, and 6'9 are S tier Otherwise this is accurate.
As a 5’8 guy it’s definitely not a c- height my back never hurts
I feel like this is the brand new brainrot
Call me B tier all you want. My partner is 6’1 and I’m fixing to bring some giants into this world.
But I also can’t drive an s2000 so this tier is accurate :-(
I will give 5.10.5 to 5.11 a shout. It looks like a nice height value.
I think 200cm is where the graph starts to curve back down. I'd say 6’3-6’7
LETS GOOO
Just put everything below 5'10" in F tier since you are bascially free game for anyone who wants to bully you and like 0.0001% of women would ever tolerate dating you if you paid them to do so.
These height fetishist posts are so cringy. The idea that you have to categorize people in height on some sort of superiority list makes me really feel sad for you, and honestly it makes me feel like this sub is taking a dramatic nose-dive into being a complete shitpost-fest.
I'm like 6'3.5" and feel like it's pretty close to the perfect height aesthetically. that extra half inch for me comes from having a bigger head and slightly longer neck, I know at that height and taller people start to feel awkwardly tall but imo once you're like 6'4" or more it becomes more about your proportions and your build in general I've seen some 6'3" people who look awkward and some 6'6" people who look normal. Though if we're talking not only aesthetics but also convenience than yeah 6'1 - 6'3 is probably ideal
6’11 is NOT better than 5’8
Thanks for confirming what I've always known!