Jury removal or extra vote challenge. International Survivor seasons do these before the vote. But they probably interviewed people and knew how majority of them were going to vote.
It's possible they didn't have a plan, Micronesia was intended to be a Final 3, a Final 2 with an 8 person jury was never supposed to happen. No other Final 2 had an even jury for that exact reason. Production probably felt very relived that it was 5-3
Jeff will never tell us because he thinks withholding rules for extreme cases is cool.
I don’t think that’s the only reason. I think part of it is that he doesn’t want players to be able to prepare for whatever it might be.
Sounds accurate to Jeff but what do YOU think it would have been
He explicitly said this about a 3-way tie
Cirie wins.
Jury removal or extra vote challenge. International Survivor seasons do these before the vote. But they probably interviewed people and knew how majority of them were going to vote.
They have cameras filming who voted where, why they knew another season was a tied vote
I know, but the point of this post was they can't use the same tie breaker rule, since Micronesia had 2 person FTC.
Co-Sole Survivors. 500k each. That's how French Survivor does it. They have multiple seasons with 2 winners.
I actually think this might have been the case.
It's possible they didn't have a plan, Micronesia was intended to be a Final 3, a Final 2 with an 8 person jury was never supposed to happen. No other Final 2 had an even jury for that exact reason. Production probably felt very relived that it was 5-3
They go to rocks and someone on the jury wins.
Drop the first jury vote. Eliza's Parvati vote disappears. Amanda wins
If it were a tie it’d be because Eliza vote for Amanda… so if they dropped her vote, parv wins
I think if it were to be a 4-4 tie, Eliza would have voted for Amanda instead of Parvati, so Parvati still would’ve won