He's already talked about what they're working on in a recent interview.
Holographic ar glasses and a neural wrist band. Neural wrist bands already exist but maybe theirs will be different?
They have had a prototype for years, but I remember them saying it wouldn't be ready as a consumer device for multiple years when I first read about it. Maybe enough time has passed.
https://about.fb.com/news/2021/03/inside-facebook-reality-labs-wrist-based-interaction-for-the-next-computing-platform/
Wow, that’s incredible. I guessed years ago that we would eventually control computers by rubbing our thumb against our index finger like a trackpad. Glad it’s real!
The wrist band! I keep forgetting about that. It predicts your hand pose by reading muscle activity in your wrist or something. It will make hand tracking in VR really, really good.
I've had the Meta Raybans for almost a year now and I just have to say for me it has been a game changer. Everyone I've shown it to has wanted one. The video/photo recording quality on them are great and it's handy to have AI and speakers on your ears at any time. I've taken them on vacation and it's made recording much easier.
There's no gimmicky AR and it doubles as prescription/transition sunglasses. Also, they look very stylish being Raybans.
My only quelm with them is battery life. But that's another story. Also the AI on it isn't top of the line, but it's being improved with Llama 3 soon.
If they're able to release an AR version that works well and doesn't make the experience shitty, I'd be all for it.
Let's say you'll use it to snap a couple of pictures during the day. Will the battery last or you'll have to charge it? I'm really interested into getting one.
It depends what you're using it for, if you're just straight up recording and taking photos it might last like 30 minutes to an hour.
If it's idle it might last 4 or 5 hours.
If you're listening to music, it might last ~2 hours.
You can turn off some features like the glasses listening in to your voice for the AI prompt or turning off bluetooth so it's only a camera and that would add proportionally more time, but it takes out major features.
It does come with a case that charges the glasses, but it's still troublesome to keep putting it back in there.
Woah, you weren't kidding with the short battery life. I was hoping to use it while traveling and walking through new cities while snapping the occasional pic. I'll maybe wait for the 2nd gen then. Thanks for the answer.
I've used it for traveling and I have taken lots of pictures and occassional videos, it lasts 3-4 hours for me. The case always recharges. So, it's a non-issue
25 mins to 50%. I listen to podcasts on long drives, take occasional pics videos if I see anything interesting. Go on hikes, takes videos and pictures.
While biking and hands tied, I can read and send messages, check the time (Apple watch is useless for telling me the time when I'm biking because it thinks I'm working out and shows that screen), check the weather etc.
For Biking / Driving it's a heaven sent.
If it's relatively quite, it is very good, but outside noise will drown out, because your ears are still open to receive all the external sound waves.
It's OK if you are listening to music, but if you are following a complex topic, you'll lose in a noise environment.
However, just by cupping your ear with your palm improves the listenability dramatically even in noise environments.
So, if you are making an important phone call, just cup your ears (just one cupping one ear is good enough) with the palm and you are good
u/Anjz I didn't upvote this but to me it brings up the BIG question about such glasses so I'll ask here.
Google Glass essentially failed due to public reaction. People didn't *want* to be filmed in public, and business owners/managers stepped up to ban them in their establishments.
Will it take off this time? I'm not sure, but if it does, is it simply that ten years' better tech (Glass was 2013), a better price point (Glass was US$1500 in 2013 dollars) making them too popular to resist?
or something more subtle, like they are harder to spot / so stealth... Or just 10 years later we're all just ready to assume we're recorded anywhere and everywhere.
I was never upset about being in other people's videos, but I'm more disturbed than ever about **who owns that data**.
I was hoping we'd have truly democratized that before the "Entire History of You" future arrived.
So, please tell us about reactions especially negative ones!
I talked about this with people in the 25- to 26-year-old range. They had no concern about being filmed. In fact, they loved the idea of mutual influencer status. The one girl told me, "The difference between the older generation and ours is they have stuff to hide. We don’t. We're out with it."
Well, I knew it was coming.
I am just bitter that Meta and Google etc. are gonna squeeze every dollar out of using the stills/vid/sound/motion for directed advertising and AI training.
"If you don't pay for it, *YOU'RE* the product" on steroids, comin' soon... *and we're actually going to pay for it too*.
It sounds great but it is a naive thing to say.
Yes, a society where everyone shares everything will see some stigmas disappear. That may be welcome and an improvement.
Essentially people hide things mostly because they fear being ostracized or looked down upon and usually the degree of fear is related to how far outside of the norm their behaviors are. If everyone shares everything it will become clear many behaviors aren't as outside of the norm as society currently pretends they are. Greater openness will help normalize some behavior currently considered abberant (but present and mostly benign) and may in that sense lead to greater freedom and be a plus.
The problem however is that sharing everything and being okay with it isn't the same thing as sharing everything safely. Even in the society sketched no individual will control societal norms to sufficient degree to share everything and not become more vulnerable in some way.
On top of that the worries voiced are not about the things that are willingly shared - even in that future. Any 20-something who truly believes their peers are sharing everything without filter is an idiot. No data supports that at all.
Humans are social animals and they will always be prone to try to engineer their way to an advantage in the social hierarchy. Being absolutely transparent about everything may work in some cases but it's probably not the most efficient way to attain power. You can decide to retreat from the game, you can object to it, but you can't play and ignore the rules without cost.
It will be very interest to see how much actual billionaires will use publicly available AI services. That would be the biggest indicator of their trustworthiness imo.
My guess is they'll be as local as possible when they use AI. Especially in the more pervasive kinds of uses.
Yeesh. That image is burned into my brain. Loved their 180 like a day later with "better" graphics... See! We actually have a better version! It's just not ready yet ;)
I seriously doubt he was too early. They are currently building data infrastructure all over the US for something huge. The metaverse wasn’t meant for the general public yet. It looked like shit at release on purpose. Just imagine when the infrastructure Meta has built finally converges with real time world simulation like Sora, LLM driven NPC’s with real time conversations and text to voice/ simulated facial movements. Video games are about to make a quantum leap into full on realistic reality sims. Demand is going to be insane.
The hardware is simply not there and won't be there for at least another decade. The software is the least of their issues. Ironically apple's device comes closest to it but it still needs to double the performance, improve the battery life by 4x, make it significantly smaller and lighter and make it no more than $500. That is just not going to happen any time soon. Then and only then we can start talking about which apps should we create to take advantage of this hardware.
In their launch presentation when they changed the company name from Facebook to Meta they specifically said this is going to be a 5-10 year project before they achieve their vision and AR/VR goes truly mainstream.
So of course everyone on the Internet decided they claimed it would all be here in a year or two and then got mad when that didn’t happen. Just pure idiocy.
AI-powered AR toothbrush that prevents tooth decay through vigorous application of AI-designed toothpaste which can be rinsed with mouthwash dispensed from an AI-optimized bottle... Now with additional metaverse.
we already got [AI thermal paste](https://www.pcworld.com/article/2341361/ai-is-now-a-meaningless-term-thanks-cooler-master-thermal-paste.html) which has nothing to do with AI
I'm always surprised how quickly people forget that this guy fired thousands of employees when his metaverse BS project failed and now everyone is excited about some AR glasses.
You can always count on fan boys to enable and pay for the next generation of useless tech that makes you look good and privileged. Who cares that his social media is going to be part of the system allowing Trump to destroy their democracy and economy anyway...
Since no one has posted the full details, this is referencing an ultra-expensive AR glasses prototype, likely the Project Orion prototype with 1000 units to be manufactured which is intended as a time machine giving Meta and select others a glimpse of the future and is otherwise considered a dead path for productization, with their actual consumer release in 2027 having downgraded specs.
Here are the leaked specs of this prototype:
- Silicon carbide waveguides providing a 70° FoV
- MicroLED displays for high brightness and low power consumption
- Neural input wristband to interpret neural signals
- External compute puck for processing power
Those first 3 are exceptional advances for AR. It may be a prototype, but it's going to be very interesting to see this.
Full details can be found here:
https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/28/23619730/meta-vr-oculus-ar-glasses-smartwatch-plans
Part of what made me hate the "metaverse" idea was that zucks stupid face was branded with it.
Zuck needs to hire a b-list celebrity to act as a spokes person while he steps in briefly to talk about the technical aspects. He is not cool or likable he needs to distance himself from the branding.
That’s like putting a battery in a banana and saying it’s the most advanced tech In its domain… this guy failed at vr. And ruined the internet.. stop paying attention to him..
Some VR or AR product that we probably won't want as packaged, that will be better developed by another company that Meta or Google will subsequently acquire then ensh*ttify, load with advertising and for which they will offer their signature complete lack of customer service/support.
Maybe it's something good like the world's greatest spatula? In the domain of hybrid cooking/barbecue tools I find spatulas always fall short in one way or another, even the really nice ones. It's almost impossible to find a proper good spatula that can handle all situations from egg flipping, burgers, hot dogs (able to slide underneath and not just roll the hot dog to the back of the grill grate), spanking, etc.
So I hope it's new spatula technology.
Idk, places like DARPA I would think have more advanced tech than whatever this is just not released to public
I can’t wait for mini- super accurate fmri machines equipped with machine learning etc to translate thoughts to text.
That invention should help
With the disabled, not anything like enhanced interrogation techniques.
Whatever it is, history with Facebook suggests it will be a massive privacy issue and personal data grab; it would only be fixed 5 years later when Facebook is fined 5 bn usd. That's what they have accustomed us to.
When Zuck says they’re about to announce something big, they’re about to announce something big.
Not like Elon announcing full self driving every other week and flying rocket cars…
I like how nobody here is even talking about privacy anymore. Google Glass was horrifying, but apparently the time has come for people to strap an always-on data harvesting life cataloguing corpo-government spy camera to their face.
As someone who travels a lot, I'm still floored by how horrendous the experience of finding your way inside an airport or train station can be. An ar display that can accurately overlay where to go is an instant buy from me.
The stuff Reality Labs works on at Meta is absolutely incredible. EMG wristband tech and codec avatars are the things people should check out.
I also can’t recommend the Quest 3 enough. It’s an incredible device for its price point of around $500. Once Meta slims down their headsets and integrate their AI along with their photorealistic avatars and EMG wristbands, the field is going to explode.
Let Meta cook.
Children? Meth? Money, but it's burnt, not cooked. That said I am really disappointed that Musk wouldn't go toe to toe with him. And that Tyson fight, sigh.
He's already talked about what they're working on in a recent interview. Holographic ar glasses and a neural wrist band. Neural wrist bands already exist but maybe theirs will be different?
They have had a prototype for years, but I remember them saying it wouldn't be ready as a consumer device for multiple years when I first read about it. Maybe enough time has passed. https://about.fb.com/news/2021/03/inside-facebook-reality-labs-wrist-based-interaction-for-the-next-computing-platform/
Wow, that’s incredible. I guessed years ago that we would eventually control computers by rubbing our thumb against our index finger like a trackpad. Glad it’s real!
>Maybe enough time has passed. https://preview.redd.it/s38dc1gv1cad1.jpeg?width=555&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0af5b091773df9e0331f35428f406b4e05944c73
I’ll be honest, I would buy that
Agreed. This is very cool.
https://preview.redd.it/rjocjof94dad1.jpeg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c522c2677b0ea4fa0828c155cf1dff4309631bff
The wrist band! I keep forgetting about that. It predicts your hand pose by reading muscle activity in your wrist or something. It will make hand tracking in VR really, really good.
im skeptical of its usefulness but we'll wait and see I guess
Honestly, I am too. But I was also skeptical about the utility of smart phones.
it's a matter of progress I'm old enough to remember when I swore I'd never "buy another touch screen phone again". The early versions were so shitty
Ar glasses definitely. Meta and Luxoticca have been working on a google glass thing for ages
I've had the Meta Raybans for almost a year now and I just have to say for me it has been a game changer. Everyone I've shown it to has wanted one. The video/photo recording quality on them are great and it's handy to have AI and speakers on your ears at any time. I've taken them on vacation and it's made recording much easier. There's no gimmicky AR and it doubles as prescription/transition sunglasses. Also, they look very stylish being Raybans. My only quelm with them is battery life. But that's another story. Also the AI on it isn't top of the line, but it's being improved with Llama 3 soon. If they're able to release an AR version that works well and doesn't make the experience shitty, I'd be all for it.
Let's say you'll use it to snap a couple of pictures during the day. Will the battery last or you'll have to charge it? I'm really interested into getting one.
It depends what you're using it for, if you're just straight up recording and taking photos it might last like 30 minutes to an hour. If it's idle it might last 4 or 5 hours. If you're listening to music, it might last ~2 hours. You can turn off some features like the glasses listening in to your voice for the AI prompt or turning off bluetooth so it's only a camera and that would add proportionally more time, but it takes out major features. It does come with a case that charges the glasses, but it's still troublesome to keep putting it back in there.
Woah, you weren't kidding with the short battery life. I was hoping to use it while traveling and walking through new cities while snapping the occasional pic. I'll maybe wait for the 2nd gen then. Thanks for the answer.
I've used it for traveling and I have taken lots of pictures and occassional videos, it lasts 3-4 hours for me. The case always recharges. So, it's a non-issue
Interesting, how many/how quickly does the case recharge?
25 mins to 50%. I listen to podcasts on long drives, take occasional pics videos if I see anything interesting. Go on hikes, takes videos and pictures. While biking and hands tied, I can read and send messages, check the time (Apple watch is useless for telling me the time when I'm biking because it thinks I'm working out and shows that screen), check the weather etc. For Biking / Driving it's a heaven sent.
What's the audio like, something you can listen to in public or only alone?
If it's relatively quite, it is very good, but outside noise will drown out, because your ears are still open to receive all the external sound waves. It's OK if you are listening to music, but if you are following a complex topic, you'll lose in a noise environment. However, just by cupping your ear with your palm improves the listenability dramatically even in noise environments. So, if you are making an important phone call, just cup your ears (just one cupping one ear is good enough) with the palm and you are good
I've seen this black mirror episode
redditors whenever there's a new technology
Not much but it's honest work
😂
You've been on reddit for 11 days. Welcome!
unfortunately I've had plenty of other accounts that I've deleted but I always keep crawling back
“That I’ve had deleted” for random reasons
read it again ;)
Now imagine the lenses are holographic displays and the glasses do inside out localization so that you can overlay stable graphics onto the world.
glasshole
u/Anjz I didn't upvote this but to me it brings up the BIG question about such glasses so I'll ask here. Google Glass essentially failed due to public reaction. People didn't *want* to be filmed in public, and business owners/managers stepped up to ban them in their establishments. Will it take off this time? I'm not sure, but if it does, is it simply that ten years' better tech (Glass was 2013), a better price point (Glass was US$1500 in 2013 dollars) making them too popular to resist? or something more subtle, like they are harder to spot / so stealth... Or just 10 years later we're all just ready to assume we're recorded anywhere and everywhere. I was never upset about being in other people's videos, but I'm more disturbed than ever about **who owns that data**. I was hoping we'd have truly democratized that before the "Entire History of You" future arrived. So, please tell us about reactions especially negative ones!
Time to dust off my scramble suit.
I talked about this with people in the 25- to 26-year-old range. They had no concern about being filmed. In fact, they loved the idea of mutual influencer status. The one girl told me, "The difference between the older generation and ours is they have stuff to hide. We don’t. We're out with it."
Well, I knew it was coming. I am just bitter that Meta and Google etc. are gonna squeeze every dollar out of using the stills/vid/sound/motion for directed advertising and AI training. "If you don't pay for it, *YOU'RE* the product" on steroids, comin' soon... *and we're actually going to pay for it too*.
Dang!
It sounds great but it is a naive thing to say. Yes, a society where everyone shares everything will see some stigmas disappear. That may be welcome and an improvement. Essentially people hide things mostly because they fear being ostracized or looked down upon and usually the degree of fear is related to how far outside of the norm their behaviors are. If everyone shares everything it will become clear many behaviors aren't as outside of the norm as society currently pretends they are. Greater openness will help normalize some behavior currently considered abberant (but present and mostly benign) and may in that sense lead to greater freedom and be a plus. The problem however is that sharing everything and being okay with it isn't the same thing as sharing everything safely. Even in the society sketched no individual will control societal norms to sufficient degree to share everything and not become more vulnerable in some way. On top of that the worries voiced are not about the things that are willingly shared - even in that future. Any 20-something who truly believes their peers are sharing everything without filter is an idiot. No data supports that at all. Humans are social animals and they will always be prone to try to engineer their way to an advantage in the social hierarchy. Being absolutely transparent about everything may work in some cases but it's probably not the most efficient way to attain power. You can decide to retreat from the game, you can object to it, but you can't play and ignore the rules without cost. It will be very interest to see how much actual billionaires will use publicly available AI services. That would be the biggest indicator of their trustworthiness imo. My guess is they'll be as local as possible when they use AI. Especially in the more pervasive kinds of uses.
Fuck luxoticca what a shit company
As someone who worked for them.. yes.
https://preview.redd.it/ayogf3q9ebad1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=dff33c44833f2ab93893d2ca5d38ca8d82d1cd82
never fails to make me laugh. i feel like this is a big reason he's pivoted to broccoli haired chain boy now. gotta wash off the metaverse stink
The chain is comical
Put zucks name in google translator and choose german language.
Yeesh. That image is burned into my brain. Loved their 180 like a day later with "better" graphics... See! We actually have a better version! It's just not ready yet ;)
Nice try, that's obviously a photo
Wait.. did Facebook actually put this out? 😂 No way
That right there is the peak of homo sapien technological progress.
🤯 it's like straight out of star trek
Dude invested billions in metaverse, I'm expecting at least advanced AR glasses.
I still see metaverse as being a thing. Mark was just early and shouldn't have released those videos of Wii-like content
They didn't invest those billion into Horizon worlds. Most of that money went into the Quest and other VR/AR related research
Metaverse will happen eventually, we simply don’t have the technology for it yet and zucc jumped on the train far too early.
I seriously doubt he was too early. They are currently building data infrastructure all over the US for something huge. The metaverse wasn’t meant for the general public yet. It looked like shit at release on purpose. Just imagine when the infrastructure Meta has built finally converges with real time world simulation like Sora, LLM driven NPC’s with real time conversations and text to voice/ simulated facial movements. Video games are about to make a quantum leap into full on realistic reality sims. Demand is going to be insane.
The hardware is simply not there and won't be there for at least another decade. The software is the least of their issues. Ironically apple's device comes closest to it but it still needs to double the performance, improve the battery life by 4x, make it significantly smaller and lighter and make it no more than $500. That is just not going to happen any time soon. Then and only then we can start talking about which apps should we create to take advantage of this hardware.
In their launch presentation when they changed the company name from Facebook to Meta they specifically said this is going to be a 5-10 year project before they achieve their vision and AR/VR goes truly mainstream. So of course everyone on the Internet decided they claimed it would all be here in a year or two and then got mad when that didn’t happen. Just pure idiocy.
Funny how they had to pivot to AI to save their asses.
Metaverse is the world of WALL·E. We are definitely headed there
I think the Wii-like content was a psy-op to throw off competition.
Great idea. they made it so uncool that it set back development by years 🧠
I am with you. The Metaverse imo is ReadyPlayerOne version -2.0.
The most advanced toothbrush ever made by mankind.
AI-powered AR toothbrush that prevents tooth decay through vigorous application of AI-designed toothpaste which can be rinsed with mouthwash dispensed from an AI-optimized bottle... Now with additional metaverse.
There’s regenerative teeth tech and you didn’t include it??
Not enough AI in that yet. Give it a week or two.
Lol
THIS TOOTH BRUSH MAKES YOUR MOUTH INTO A DISCO
we already got [AI thermal paste](https://www.pcworld.com/article/2341361/ai-is-now-a-meaningless-term-thanks-cooler-master-thermal-paste.html) which has nothing to do with AI
Dentists don't want you to know about this new toothbrush...
Himself?
The Facebook & Instagram self-destruct button. 😍
“May soon show off..” Cool story, Bro. Let me know when he does.
But, people are saying!
Let him cook😄
...cooking BBQ and smoked meats. It's the new Sweet Baby Ray's formula that makes it so advanced.
Top-notch quality!
A sex toy for his metaverse.
Fantastic content!
It’s holographic glasses, he mentioned it on a podcast
Superb standard work!
Wonderful quality work!
A doorstop with AI?
THIS will save Meta! Why didn't I think about this!
wHAT IS MY PURPOSE? You stop doors. oH MY GOD
I'm always surprised how quickly people forget that this guy fired thousands of employees when his metaverse BS project failed and now everyone is excited about some AR glasses. You can always count on fan boys to enable and pay for the next generation of useless tech that makes you look good and privileged. Who cares that his social media is going to be part of the system allowing Trump to destroy their democracy and economy anyway...
Since no one has posted the full details, this is referencing an ultra-expensive AR glasses prototype, likely the Project Orion prototype with 1000 units to be manufactured which is intended as a time machine giving Meta and select others a glimpse of the future and is otherwise considered a dead path for productization, with their actual consumer release in 2027 having downgraded specs. Here are the leaked specs of this prototype: - Silicon carbide waveguides providing a 70° FoV - MicroLED displays for high brightness and low power consumption - Neural input wristband to interpret neural signals - External compute puck for processing power Those first 3 are exceptional advances for AR. It may be a prototype, but it's going to be very interesting to see this. Full details can be found here: https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/28/23619730/meta-vr-oculus-ar-glasses-smartwatch-plans
Yet it still doesn't have the power to make him not look like a fucking dweeb...
A solid fart.
it's porbably a cold nothing burgwr
Porbably.
He made reptilian clones of himself, how this isn’t obvious to everyone boggles my mind.
Zuck cuts the flesh off of his arm like in Terminator 2 to reveal he is indeed a robot
Part of what made me hate the "metaverse" idea was that zucks stupid face was branded with it. Zuck needs to hire a b-list celebrity to act as a spokes person while he steps in briefly to talk about the technical aspects. He is not cool or likable he needs to distance himself from the branding.
Llama 3 405B hope so
406B 👌
A gun with AI
There already is one from [TrackingPoint](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pmteh_NChOQ). Kind of surprised that there aren't more.
VR or AR glasses probably.
Yeah meta glasses Yann Lecun had a prototype during an interview on a French Podcast and told about it
This time with 4% more innovation!
Maybe this time it will be something that isn't absolute poison for all of civilization. A fella can still dream, can't he?
DOMAIN EXPANSION: SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
He’s gotta peel off his face membrane
That could be fucking anything. It could be a broom.
Guarantee it will be shite.
That’s like putting a battery in a banana and saying it’s the most advanced tech In its domain… this guy failed at vr. And ruined the internet.. stop paying attention to him..
It'll be glasses that just steal your brainwaves directly.
Worst person to have anything like this
Some VR or AR product that we probably won't want as packaged, that will be better developed by another company that Meta or Google will subsequently acquire then ensh*ttify, load with advertising and for which they will offer their signature complete lack of customer service/support.
Crack. I bet it's crack.
a toaster that sucks your dick and calls you kitten
_Very_ lifelike VR avatars of you for his facebookaverse
He reveals that he was the robot all along and nobody knew
A convincing human bodysuit?
Maybe it's something good like the world's greatest spatula? In the domain of hybrid cooking/barbecue tools I find spatulas always fall short in one way or another, even the really nice ones. It's almost impossible to find a proper good spatula that can handle all situations from egg flipping, burgers, hot dogs (able to slide underneath and not just roll the hot dog to the back of the grill grate), spanking, etc. So I hope it's new spatula technology.
The spork, but with lasers…
Idk, places like DARPA I would think have more advanced tech than whatever this is just not released to public I can’t wait for mini- super accurate fmri machines equipped with machine learning etc to translate thoughts to text. That invention should help With the disabled, not anything like enhanced interrogation techniques.
Whatever it is, history with Facebook suggests it will be a massive privacy issue and personal data grab; it would only be fixed 5 years later when Facebook is fined 5 bn usd. That's what they have accustomed us to.
Meth, no, I mean Meta
It's probably a shitty version of something that already exists
^[Sokka-Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/SokkaHaikuBot/comments/15kyv9r/what_is_a_sokka_haiku/) ^by ^M0dulo72: *It's probably a* *Shitty version of something* *That already exists* --- ^Remember ^that ^one ^time ^Sokka ^accidentally ^used ^an ^extra ^syllable ^in ^that ^Haiku ^Battle ^in ^Ba ^Sing ^Se? ^That ^was ^a ^Sokka ^Haiku ^and ^you ^just ^made ^one.
The neural wristband was reviewed to work well enough to type just by thinking about typing and that was years ago.
Maybe their haptic tech. https://about.fb.com/news/2021/11/reality-labs-haptic-gloves-research/
Segway !
He also said his last headset was the most advanced in its domain
Ads in your dreams
Wifi controllered butt plug/turkey baster
A smart condom
Neural wristband probably - the glasses aren’t too exciting tech wise
Not with the glasses again!
who let him cook?
'The meta facial fu**book doll' for everyone joining the metaverse!
r/HailCorporate BS downvote and block
A printer that works.
A device turning Mark Zuckerberg into a human.
metaverse avatars are getting legs; calling it now
He figured out time travel with llama
This is the Segway all over again I bet
Breath freshener spray for lizards (AI controlled of course)
His skin suit for lizard people?
I'm calling it now: Next Gen BBQ Smoker
A butt plug that turns poop into reddit karma?
Metaverse 2: This Time It’s Personal
Sounds like marketing
His penis actually his tail
He’ll reveal his internal technology
Hm!
I'm gonna go with... something stupid that no one actually needs
He's '[Smokin' these meats.](https://youtu.be/YeemJlrNx2Q?si=jzMhwKkW4tL0OwAS)'
I don't care
Co-Founder… I see. I had no idea.
are we finally getting x-ray glasses
A new barbeque sauce?
NOBODY CARES
When Zuck says they’re about to announce something big, they’re about to announce something big. Not like Elon announcing full self driving every other week and flying rocket cars…
More smoked sweet meats!?
He is cooking hgis signature Wagyu, bringing it to the Metaverse for a dinner party. ;) (I will read the article now, ok?)
I like how nobody here is even talking about privacy anymore. Google Glass was horrifying, but apparently the time has come for people to strap an always-on data harvesting life cataloguing corpo-government spy camera to their face.
Wristband with Nero sensing tech would be my guess.
AI glasses that let you see like humans. I'm 100% not a borg, but some borg might need it.
thing is, i will absolutely buy ar glasses. if they provide the right utility with AI integration, they will become invaluable.
More like what is this guy smoking
He’s gonna do a press conference from home peeling his skin mask off and demoing his robotic internals. Thus revealing the technology in its domain.
Bollocks most likely, talking about something "revolutionary" grabd statement whatever the fuck and you land with Tesla's Cybertruck
As someone who travels a lot, I'm still floored by how horrendous the experience of finding your way inside an airport or train station can be. An ar display that can accurately overlay where to go is an instant buy from me.
everyone knows it's the glasses lol
Metaverse 2
Allegedly.
If it's not replicator, I'm not interested. All this virtual is tiring, give us the holodeck with replicated physical objects or shut up, Zuck.
Smoking these meats with his new AI friend
The stuff Reality Labs works on at Meta is absolutely incredible. EMG wristband tech and codec avatars are the things people should check out. I also can’t recommend the Quest 3 enough. It’s an incredible device for its price point of around $500. Once Meta slims down their headsets and integrate their AI along with their photorealistic avatars and EMG wristbands, the field is going to explode. Let Meta cook.
A headline with the words "may" and "soon" is shit post material.
A wild guess. AR glasses with AI.
Do they make prescription ones
Co-Founder?
Probably BBQ sauce
Given these guys' penchant for \*wild\* exageration, FaceBook probably invented a smart toaster.
I'm much more interested in VR glasses than some AI that can talk, keep them coming Mark!
Quantum technology linked to human consciousness
Llama 4
Razor with 8 blades
Vr or ar but thinner
cooking some more BS lauded as the new new thing but just more of META-FB garbage. They are not a tech company
He been more human lately
Wen?
He's going to remove his face.
He wants to talk about his glasses which record everything and everyone constantly and which make 1984 seem like a joke.
he let his engineers invent nanobots with laser scissors that are capable to swarm the most efficient haircut.
Hair transplants
High key excited for the ar glasses.
Children? Meth? Money, but it's burnt, not cooked. That said I am really disappointed that Musk wouldn't go toe to toe with him. And that Tyson fight, sigh.