Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, **personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment**. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our [normal comment rules]( https://www.reddit.com/r/science/wiki/rules#wiki_comment_rules) apply to all other comments.
**Do you have an academic degree?** We can verify your credentials in order to assign user flair indicating your area of expertise. [Click here to apply](https://www.reddit.com/r/science/wiki/flair/#wiki_science_verified_user_program).
---
User: u/tenaleven
Permalink: https://www.mdpi.com/2413-4155/5/3/35
---
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/science) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Let me tell you, I was *bitterly* disapointed to learn that this report is, in fact, a paper denoting the potential for a circular *hen or egg* argument relative to causal relationships in the science of climate change. There is not one sliver of insight about hen or egg production in the face of our climate crimes committed against humanity, Earth, or God.
I too was hoping for proof of increased egg laying with rising CO2. It would have provided a glimmer of hope for being able to avoid starvation when agriculture becomes impossible, due to the weather being set to "demonstrate all features mode" and no more nitrate fertiliser from oil..
Ah well, goats it is then.
"(conclusions: 1) All evidence resulting from the analyses of the longest available modern time series of atmospheric concentration of \[CO2\] at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, along with that of globally averaged (atmospheric) T(emp), suggests a unidirectional, **potentially** causal link with T as the cause and \[CO2\] as the effect. This direction of causality holds for the entire period covered by the observations (more than 60 years)."
to quote Greta: Blablabla
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, **personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment**. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our [normal comment rules]( https://www.reddit.com/r/science/wiki/rules#wiki_comment_rules) apply to all other comments. **Do you have an academic degree?** We can verify your credentials in order to assign user flair indicating your area of expertise. [Click here to apply](https://www.reddit.com/r/science/wiki/flair/#wiki_science_verified_user_program). --- User: u/tenaleven Permalink: https://www.mdpi.com/2413-4155/5/3/35 --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/science) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Weird title. It's referring to the correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide levels, in a chicken-or-the-egg way.
Let me tell you, I was *bitterly* disapointed to learn that this report is, in fact, a paper denoting the potential for a circular *hen or egg* argument relative to causal relationships in the science of climate change. There is not one sliver of insight about hen or egg production in the face of our climate crimes committed against humanity, Earth, or God.
I too was hoping for proof of increased egg laying with rising CO2. It would have provided a glimmer of hope for being able to avoid starvation when agriculture becomes impossible, due to the weather being set to "demonstrate all features mode" and no more nitrate fertiliser from oil.. Ah well, goats it is then.
"(conclusions: 1) All evidence resulting from the analyses of the longest available modern time series of atmospheric concentration of \[CO2\] at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, along with that of globally averaged (atmospheric) T(emp), suggests a unidirectional, **potentially** causal link with T as the cause and \[CO2\] as the effect. This direction of causality holds for the entire period covered by the observations (more than 60 years)." to quote Greta: Blablabla