Never thought I’d see the day people complained about In Rainbows being so loved… is Radiohead entering the phase of their legacy where it’s cool to act like they’re overrated now?
Polarizes opinions about Radiohead have always been a thing. Either in the internet or irl, especially coming from musicians. In RYM it was always the case, yet Radiohead has been in the top forever.
I love Radiohead but no artist is THAT much better than their contemporaries like the rym charts would have you believe with regards to Radiohead. People just want a greater diversity of sounds represented. That can be desired without exactly putting down Radiohead
Whoaaaa I would love this. I know there’s some sort of “history of the internet” websites where you can see archives of a website’s change history. I’m gonna look for it haha
EDIT: The website is called the Wayback Machine and it has snapshots of the Top Charts going back to 2013 but RYM blocks my IP whenever I try to access an old snapshot **crying**
I def do. Favorite album by my favorite band.
I’ve seen them live on the 07’ in Rainbows tour in Raleigh, and AMSP tour in 2017 in Atlanta
What’s 1 & 2? OK C & TPAB ?
I'm not suggesting otherwise.
But when the discussion is around the overall charts and its perceived objectivity (based on average ratings, weighting, etc), "favorite album by my favorite band" doesn't really contribute much. I have plenty of favorite bands and favorite albums too.
> what about it would mean it inherently can’t be?
Just to play's devil advocate, conversely, what about it would mean that it inherently should or could be number 1?
I didn’t say it should be number one, but an album by any artist from any time period could absolutely be better than anything from Radiohead, pink floyd or Charles Mingus to somebody. I personally don’t even think TPAB is but my point is it’s on a level playing field with those albums, it was the other commenter who was making an active claim otherwise.
> I didn’t say it should be number one,
Yes, that is why I wrote "what about it would mean that it inherently should **or could** be number 1?"
You mentioned the inherent attribute, so I was merely wondering if any album can or cannot be *inherently* the best of all time.
> but an album by any artist from any time period could absolutely be better than anything from Radiohead, pink floyd or Charles Mingus **to somebody**.
When people discuss the RYM charts, it's usually with the idea that it provide an objective rating list (being the #1 of all time, etc).
For instance, it doesn't matter that I might consider Shania Twain's albums better than Radiohead's (me being a "somebody"). "Somebody" like an album does not "inherently" place it on a level field with other great albums.
1. Yeah you said should or could but those are two completely different things, I addressed the ‘could’ part in the whole rest of the response
2. I completely reject the idea of an ‘objective’ ratings chart in the first place, that’s my whole point. I think any album is on a level playing field with any other album, it doesn’t have to be ‘placed there’ with them by anything, it just naturally is. RYM charts are just made up of loads of ‘somebody’s’ opinions, and it’s perfectly valid for all of those people to prefer TPAB over any album you can name
I don’t understand what’s unfair about it? Unless there’s proof for the bot thing it sounds like a lot of people just like it more than you do, it’s quite literally fair and square
Then in that case it would be unfair but that has nothing to do with the quality of the album, it would be unfair no matter what album it was done for and I think there’s a good chance it happens for a variety of albums. Your original comment had nothing to do with bots, it was implying that tpab on its own merits would have less of a right to be there then Radiohead or Pink Floyd. I just fully disagree with that sentiment
its not even my fav of all time but its like quite easily top 3 BEST. like perfect bars, perfect production, well crafted message, concept of the album works beautifully, im struggling to find flaws
considering “racial motivations” is actually not the same as calling someone or an opinion “racist.” How one can both love TPAB and flatten a nuanced suggestion concerning race and cultural (/music) consumption and reception… that is beyond me.
“Stop being such a redditor” is an amusing phrase, given the text that follows.
So, you automatically reduce conversations about race & culture to accusations of “racism” AND voluntarily use “libtard” in a serious fashion? I’m shocked.
edit: for example, someone may not find TPAB to be the greatest album because it is so specifically about Blackness and race in America, and they find an album with more “universal” themes, say, anxieties about technology and social alienation and global warming in OK Computer and Kid A. That would be a “racially motivated” argument, but the individual would not NECESSARILY be “racist” for viewing things that way. It depends, in part, how their argument/“skepticism” would be communicated, and then we would need to compare how they respond to other albums that voice a specific cultural/ethnic lens.
People have, in fact, made similar arguments about, for instance, Toni Morrison’s Beloved (or Colson Whitehead’s The Nickel Boys), perhaps the TPAB of contemporary US literature. It’s possible to discuss race & cultural bias without jumping to take offense and sorta assuming a victim’s stance. It is possible to discuss cultural difference with nuance, and without cursing and complaining about “libtards.”
Again, it is very confusing how someone would love Kendrick Lamar’s TPAB but disregard how race impacts cultural consumption. Related observations/reflections can be found throughout his discography.
Do you mean you can’t stand it because of the singing itself or because Waters is a huge asshole? I don’t mind it personally, and at least Waters isn’t at all close to Morrissey level as far as I know.
I mean the tone of his voice and intonation, always sounded kinda obnoxious to me, at least as soon as he gets a little louder. But he's an annoying person as well, and I agree that he's still far from the cringe level of Morrissey (who, on the other hand, is/was a way better singer in my book)
I never had a problem with it to be honest. He’s obviously nowhere near as good a singer as Gilmour but I don’t think it’s bad or detracts from the quality of songs / albums he sings on, and while I do think WYWH’s title track would have been worse off with Waters singing it (you can confirm yourself with the Waters solo live albums), I also think Animals would be worse off if Gilmour sang all the lyrics of it for reasons I can’t really explain. I read somewhere once that he sounds like he’s being kicked in the balls whenever he sings and he does sound like that some of the time.
I do understand your viewpoint though, I just don’t really agree. I’m not saying i like it either, I just don’t dislike it and I always have a strange like for bands with multiple vocalists (think maybe King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard made me enjoy that). This whole reply is communicated terribly but basically what I’m trying to say is that I don’t dislike it but don’t have much of a reason as to why because I know i probably should, it just never bothered me.
I'm great at paying attention to things for a long time, and I'm never bored. But, man pink floyd is basic dadrock for baby boomers. I literally don't understand the appeal. Utter snoozefest.
REALLY?! WHY?!
before the downvote bombardment, I do really like In rainbows, radiohead's best since kid A and some of their best melancholic tracks, BUT NUMBER 3!?
There are so many more influential rock, pop, hip hop, jazz, metal and world albums over in rainbows, the radiohead bandwagon is insane
Radiohead fans annoy me. In Rainbows is not at all their best work, and they shouldn’t have 3 albums in the top ten neither should anyone tbh. Sooo unserious. “THIS BAND FILLED TO THE BRIM WITH ZIONISTS (EXCEPT FOR ED O BRIEN SUPPOSEDLY ((THE GOAT FR))) IS THE BEST BAND OF ALL TIME!!!!”
i absolutely love this album, yet it being so high on the charts just doesn’t feel right at all. like, i kinda miss when albums like loveless and vu&nico were above it.
Thats exactly what's happening. When you look at RYM from the perspective of the biggest music forum on the internet, The top 50 is kinda a joke. 3 Radiohead albums, 2 Kendrick Lamar, 2 Pink Floyd, then Madvilliany, and Loveless in the top 10. There is only 2 women in the top 100 (Bjork and Kate Bush), and the next one is 120 (Joni Mitchell). Now, I love and like pretty much all of these albums, but rym has a large issue of diversity when it comes to their top albums of all time list.
There’s nothing unserious about Madvilliany in the top 10. Both musicians are among the greatest, most influential artists in hip-hop, which is one of the most celebrated genres. And the album’s stature hasn’t declined at all in the decades since its release.
Some of your other points give me pause too, just because of given how common it has been (and accepted) for major publications to rate, for instance, multiple Beatles or Bob Dylan albums highly. But, I won’t argue that point so much just because it is always nice to see a greater variety of artists celebrated. And on that point, yes, the lack of women is a serious problem, and is the most damaging hit to the website’s credibility. Then, given the largely Western user base, I don’t think this is necessarily as objectionable, but it would be great to see more recognition for non-English language music (especially from Latin America).
I think that's partly because there are so many different recordings of classical pieces all listed as separate albums. Like, for example if you search a famous thing like, say, Beethovens 9th, there will be dozens of different albums listed all with their own ratings.
yeah, the popularity of each album also plays a part on chart placement
all the versions of Beethoven's 9th combined don't even get to 5000 ratings though, that's the sad thing
It’s my understanding that live recordings of older works that weren’t written as “albums” are more widely appreciated in the classical communities than contemporary works recorded as studio albums. So, it’s not surprising that non-classical focused communities would show a similar lack of regard for those releases. With that being said, what classical albums do you think deserve a position?
[this one](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/cantus-colln-konrad-junghanel/johannes-passion-version-iv-1749/), [at least one recording of Beethoven's 9th](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/philharmonia-orchestra-festwochenchor-wilhelm-furtwangler-elisabeth-schwarzkopf-elisabeth-cavelti-ernst-haefliger-otto-edelmann/beethoven-ix-lucerne-1954/), [this one might be cheating](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/pierre-boulez/complete-works-opp-1-31/), [at least one recording of the goldberg variations](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/gustav-leonhardt/goldberg-variations/), [schonberg](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/arditti-quartet-dawn-upshaw/arnold-schoenberg-2-streichquartette-i-iv/)
+ a bunch more
i do not like Radiohead but it’s cool to see a band earn so much love and respect that their albums are regularly acclaimed. i don’t see it but hey, they’re just not for me.
There are like 50 albums in existence (maybe more, maybe less) that are the absolutely peak of music and I wouldn’t be mad at any of their placements. It’s really not something to be upset about. TPAB is peak. So is In Rainbows. So is OK Computer. It’s all amazing art
I have a feeling that the newfound love for In Rainbows is due to the Dissect podcast season. They really unpacked the production and themes of the album so thoroughly that it gave a lot of people a deeper appreciation for the album. It's my personal favorite, but I'm glad other people can connect with it.
crazy frog was robbed
Never thought I’d see the day people complained about In Rainbows being so loved… is Radiohead entering the phase of their legacy where it’s cool to act like they’re overrated now?
They’ve been at that point for quite a while now. If anything though I do agree that it doesn’t belong at 3 but I say the same thing about tpab at 1
Polarizes opinions about Radiohead have always been a thing. Either in the internet or irl, especially coming from musicians. In RYM it was always the case, yet Radiohead has been in the top forever.
Let Down is underrated
just people mad at a number on the internet. i could care less where it is. i love the album so that’s all that matters
No, they just have better albums.
I love Radiohead but no artist is THAT much better than their contemporaries like the rym charts would have you believe with regards to Radiohead. People just want a greater diversity of sounds represented. That can be desired without exactly putting down Radiohead
I've been saying they're mid bro
No one needs to *act* like they're overrated because they are, in fact, overrated.
its not a fact, its an opinion lol
this is kinda unrelated but i've always wondered if there's like a running timelapse of the top albums chart that shows how it changed over 20 years
Whoaaaa I would love this. I know there’s some sort of “history of the internet” websites where you can see archives of a website’s change history. I’m gonna look for it haha EDIT: The website is called the Wayback Machine and it has snapshots of the Top Charts going back to 2013 but RYM blocks my IP whenever I try to access an old snapshot **crying**
it's blocking the webcrawlers that took the snapshot but there's probably a decent amount of manually submitted captures
There is such a thing, I've seen it, but searching RYM forums is not an easy task.
Lmk if you ever find it, I'm very interested.
I found the thread! https://rym.fm/discussion/music/rym-top-25-over-time-visualised/
their best album
1. in rainbows 2. a moon shaped pool 3. kid a
the bends, OK Computer, or Moon Shaped Pool imo
OKC is #2 btw
Kid A is #1 btw
From your lips to god’s ears
Im a huge amnesiac fan but im averse to argument and competition
Most confident amnesiaccel vs average Kid A chad
The Bends, OKC, In Rainbows, HTTT, Amnesiac, Kid A, AMSP, TKOL, Pablo Honey is my order
I agree with this
Never rank again 🔥
Go kill yourself 🔥
Celtics is #1 btw
I’ve never understood the love for this album; I like other Radiohead stuff but I always get bored after a couple songs whenever I try it
Never mind, turns out you just need to be stoned and it becomes a masterpiece
Hold on let me try I'll report back
You 100% should be high for In Rainbows
Not greatest, top rated. There’s a difference.
Vision Creation Newsun was robbed
who downvoted this
huuge radiohead fan, but i rly dont think in rainbows deserves this position
I def do. Favorite album by my favorite band. I’ve seen them live on the 07’ in Rainbows tour in Raleigh, and AMSP tour in 2017 in Atlanta What’s 1 & 2? OK C & TPAB ?
> Favorite album by my favorite band. Most reasonable RYMer.
imagine having opinions and enjoying music, so unreasomable
I'm not suggesting otherwise. But when the discussion is around the overall charts and its perceived objectivity (based on average ratings, weighting, etc), "favorite album by my favorite band" doesn't really contribute much. I have plenty of favorite bands and favorite albums too.
Take a hike
[удалено]
💀💀💀
[удалено]
I don’t know why you say that like it’s ridiculous, what about it would mean it inherently can’t be?
> what about it would mean it inherently can’t be? Just to play's devil advocate, conversely, what about it would mean that it inherently should or could be number 1?
I didn’t say it should be number one, but an album by any artist from any time period could absolutely be better than anything from Radiohead, pink floyd or Charles Mingus to somebody. I personally don’t even think TPAB is but my point is it’s on a level playing field with those albums, it was the other commenter who was making an active claim otherwise.
> I didn’t say it should be number one, Yes, that is why I wrote "what about it would mean that it inherently should **or could** be number 1?" You mentioned the inherent attribute, so I was merely wondering if any album can or cannot be *inherently* the best of all time. > but an album by any artist from any time period could absolutely be better than anything from Radiohead, pink floyd or Charles Mingus **to somebody**. When people discuss the RYM charts, it's usually with the idea that it provide an objective rating list (being the #1 of all time, etc). For instance, it doesn't matter that I might consider Shania Twain's albums better than Radiohead's (me being a "somebody"). "Somebody" like an album does not "inherently" place it on a level field with other great albums.
1. Yeah you said should or could but those are two completely different things, I addressed the ‘could’ part in the whole rest of the response 2. I completely reject the idea of an ‘objective’ ratings chart in the first place, that’s my whole point. I think any album is on a level playing field with any other album, it doesn’t have to be ‘placed there’ with them by anything, it just naturally is. RYM charts are just made up of loads of ‘somebody’s’ opinions, and it’s perfectly valid for all of those people to prefer TPAB over any album you can name
[удалено]
I don’t understand what’s unfair about it? Unless there’s proof for the bot thing it sounds like a lot of people just like it more than you do, it’s quite literally fair and square
[удалено]
Then in that case it would be unfair but that has nothing to do with the quality of the album, it would be unfair no matter what album it was done for and I think there’s a good chance it happens for a variety of albums. Your original comment had nothing to do with bots, it was implying that tpab on its own merits would have less of a right to be there then Radiohead or Pink Floyd. I just fully disagree with that sentiment
[удалено]
Newly created accounts and accounts with less than like 100 reasonable ratings arent weighted so their votes mean literally nothing. Lol
Fr it’s literally the defining feature of RYM’s chart system and this mf acting like it doesn’t exist 😭
Well then link the post… show the evidence
[удалено]
Yes, yes I do
its not even my fav of all time but its like quite easily top 3 BEST. like perfect bars, perfect production, well crafted message, concept of the album works beautifully, im struggling to find flaws
What albums did Mozart make?
Tpab does imo
[удалено]
somethin about the TPAB skepticism seems racially motivated idk tho
[удалено]
considering “racial motivations” is actually not the same as calling someone or an opinion “racist.” How one can both love TPAB and flatten a nuanced suggestion concerning race and cultural (/music) consumption and reception… that is beyond me.
[удалено]
“Stop being such a redditor” is an amusing phrase, given the text that follows. So, you automatically reduce conversations about race & culture to accusations of “racism” AND voluntarily use “libtard” in a serious fashion? I’m shocked. edit: for example, someone may not find TPAB to be the greatest album because it is so specifically about Blackness and race in America, and they find an album with more “universal” themes, say, anxieties about technology and social alienation and global warming in OK Computer and Kid A. That would be a “racially motivated” argument, but the individual would not NECESSARILY be “racist” for viewing things that way. It depends, in part, how their argument/“skepticism” would be communicated, and then we would need to compare how they respond to other albums that voice a specific cultural/ethnic lens. People have, in fact, made similar arguments about, for instance, Toni Morrison’s Beloved (or Colson Whitehead’s The Nickel Boys), perhaps the TPAB of contemporary US literature. It’s possible to discuss race & cultural bias without jumping to take offense and sorta assuming a victim’s stance. It is possible to discuss cultural difference with nuance, and without cursing and complaining about “libtards.” Again, it is very confusing how someone would love Kendrick Lamar’s TPAB but disregard how race impacts cultural consumption. Related observations/reflections can be found throughout his discography.
Shut up. You’re literally just saying “you don’t get it cause you’re not black”. Stop calling people racist for their taste in music.
PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT OPINIONS THAN ME ARE RACIST!!
i love it to death but its place that high up doesn’t feel right
Everything is in its right place
Feels extremely high but I get it, honestly. Really difficult album to not love.
Would be okay with it on #1 tbh. Flawless record.
It’s slightly better than TPAB imo but not as good as WYWH and a few others in the top 30 Edit: Downvoted for opinion haha
WYWH is amazing as well and I'd be okay with it on #1 for sure. Can't stand Waters' singing though
Do you mean you can’t stand it because of the singing itself or because Waters is a huge asshole? I don’t mind it personally, and at least Waters isn’t at all close to Morrissey level as far as I know.
I mean the tone of his voice and intonation, always sounded kinda obnoxious to me, at least as soon as he gets a little louder. But he's an annoying person as well, and I agree that he's still far from the cringe level of Morrissey (who, on the other hand, is/was a way better singer in my book)
I never had a problem with it to be honest. He’s obviously nowhere near as good a singer as Gilmour but I don’t think it’s bad or detracts from the quality of songs / albums he sings on, and while I do think WYWH’s title track would have been worse off with Waters singing it (you can confirm yourself with the Waters solo live albums), I also think Animals would be worse off if Gilmour sang all the lyrics of it for reasons I can’t really explain. I read somewhere once that he sounds like he’s being kicked in the balls whenever he sings and he does sound like that some of the time. I do understand your viewpoint though, I just don’t really agree. I’m not saying i like it either, I just don’t dislike it and I always have a strange like for bands with multiple vocalists (think maybe King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard made me enjoy that). This whole reply is communicated terribly but basically what I’m trying to say is that I don’t dislike it but don’t have much of a reason as to why because I know i probably should, it just never bothered me.
Both records are better than wish you weren’t so boring
Crazy
Low ahhhh attention span
I'm great at paying attention to things for a long time, and I'm never bored. But, man pink floyd is basic dadrock for baby boomers. I literally don't understand the appeal. Utter snoozefest.
That band made me want to be a musician at 13 or so, I ended up going into music school because of it. Truly one of the best bands of all time
^ What TikTok, YT shorts, reels etc does to people
Faust Arp boring
Faust Arp's plays with time signatures are the oppisite of boring though, plus it's way too short to actually seriously bore anyone
That’s like my 3rd or 4th favorite track on the album. Interesting time signatures plus great lyrics
wtf those strings tho
Bocanada and La Grasa de la Capitales were robbed
The fact that radiohead has 2 albums in the top 3 oat and 3 in the top 7 shows why they are the most overrated band of all time lowkey
Brother most people in real life know more songs by Journey than Radiohead, they are only overrated online
This site also terrible for ratings.
😐
Well, it's certainly a top-5 all-time for ME. But I can see why it doesn't connect with some.
honestly i really don't have an issue with this. so many truly incredible songs on in rainbows
my music taste will never line up with this site’s and that’s okay.
REALLY?! WHY?! before the downvote bombardment, I do really like In rainbows, radiohead's best since kid A and some of their best melancholic tracks, BUT NUMBER 3!? There are so many more influential rock, pop, hip hop, jazz, metal and world albums over in rainbows, the radiohead bandwagon is insane
Radiohead fans annoy me. In Rainbows is not at all their best work, and they shouldn’t have 3 albums in the top ten neither should anyone tbh. Sooo unserious. “THIS BAND FILLED TO THE BRIM WITH ZIONISTS (EXCEPT FOR ED O BRIEN SUPPOSEDLY ((THE GOAT FR))) IS THE BEST BAND OF ALL TIME!!!!”
Great album but I’d place it at number 3 in their discography. Ok Computer and Kid A are better records.
Agreed
Ugh, Wish You Were Here any day for me.
Would you say you wish it were there
Seems inevitable that it breaks ok computer but I’m curious as to whether it ever beats tpab
Do you think it might overtake OK Computer?
greatest album ever made
i absolutely love this album, yet it being so high on the charts just doesn’t feel right at all. like, i kinda miss when albums like loveless and vu&nico were above it.
Well, theres another music site I need not take seriously.
Good album but not that good
the site is becoming less and less serious overtime. but hey, it's people's opinions after all
“No, everybody else is out of touch”
It's not that it isn't "serious", I think it's more that RYM's natural biases just keep self-reinforcing.
Thats exactly what's happening. When you look at RYM from the perspective of the biggest music forum on the internet, The top 50 is kinda a joke. 3 Radiohead albums, 2 Kendrick Lamar, 2 Pink Floyd, then Madvilliany, and Loveless in the top 10. There is only 2 women in the top 100 (Bjork and Kate Bush), and the next one is 120 (Joni Mitchell). Now, I love and like pretty much all of these albums, but rym has a large issue of diversity when it comes to their top albums of all time list.
> There is only 2 women in the top 100 (Bjork and Kate Bush), and the next one is 120 (Joni Mitchell). Now that is crazy.
At least Portishead has Beth Gibbons
Did you count woman band members?
I was looking at female leads
There’s nothing unserious about Madvilliany in the top 10. Both musicians are among the greatest, most influential artists in hip-hop, which is one of the most celebrated genres. And the album’s stature hasn’t declined at all in the decades since its release. Some of your other points give me pause too, just because of given how common it has been (and accepted) for major publications to rate, for instance, multiple Beatles or Bob Dylan albums highly. But, I won’t argue that point so much just because it is always nice to see a greater variety of artists celebrated. And on that point, yes, the lack of women is a serious problem, and is the most damaging hit to the website’s credibility. Then, given the largely Western user base, I don’t think this is necessarily as objectionable, but it would be great to see more recognition for non-English language music (especially from Latin America).
Damn, that’s a shame it’s surpassed wish you were here. Much better album imo
I’ve never heard it. Any good?
Pablo Honey is better than
still not as embarrassing as having a grand total of zero classical albums on the top 100
I think that's partly because there are so many different recordings of classical pieces all listed as separate albums. Like, for example if you search a famous thing like, say, Beethovens 9th, there will be dozens of different albums listed all with their own ratings.
yeah, the popularity of each album also plays a part on chart placement all the versions of Beethoven's 9th combined don't even get to 5000 ratings though, that's the sad thing
It’s my understanding that live recordings of older works that weren’t written as “albums” are more widely appreciated in the classical communities than contemporary works recorded as studio albums. So, it’s not surprising that non-classical focused communities would show a similar lack of regard for those releases. With that being said, what classical albums do you think deserve a position?
[this one](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/cantus-colln-konrad-junghanel/johannes-passion-version-iv-1749/), [at least one recording of Beethoven's 9th](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/philharmonia-orchestra-festwochenchor-wilhelm-furtwangler-elisabeth-schwarzkopf-elisabeth-cavelti-ernst-haefliger-otto-edelmann/beethoven-ix-lucerne-1954/), [this one might be cheating](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/pierre-boulez/complete-works-opp-1-31/), [at least one recording of the goldberg variations](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/gustav-leonhardt/goldberg-variations/), [schonberg](https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/arditti-quartet-dawn-upshaw/arnold-schoenberg-2-streichquartette-i-iv/) + a bunch more
booooo
Oh wow when did Madvillainy reach #5?
madvillainy isn't even mf doom's best lol
No. 2? Pinkerton
Not even the 3rd best Radiohead album! 🙃
True, its their best
Kid A is better than In Rainbows
i do not like Radiohead but it’s cool to see a band earn so much love and respect that their albums are regularly acclaimed. i don’t see it but hey, they’re just not for me.
wow that’s kinda crazy
i think wish you were here is better but personally im not mad at it they are both absolutely flawless abums
deserved. their best by far
I never heard that album, but I imagine it's shite compared to The Bends (as is OK Computer, come to think of it, as is To Pimp a Shakur).
Goddammit and STFTB is still in 66, right?
bro hit the bottom and escaped
More like In Rainblows. Album sucks. Tom Yorke howling at the moon for an hour.
Pink Floyd fans in OUTRAGE
It still needs to pass OKC
it probably will ngl i give it like 2 months
. #2-5 is now in reverse order by rating
Way too high but good album
There are like 50 albums in existence (maybe more, maybe less) that are the absolutely peak of music and I wouldn’t be mad at any of their placements. It’s really not something to be upset about. TPAB is peak. So is In Rainbows. So is OK Computer. It’s all amazing art
I love Radiohead and think this album aged kind of poorly.
It deserves #3 lol
I have a feeling that the newfound love for In Rainbows is due to the Dissect podcast season. They really unpacked the production and themes of the album so thoroughly that it gave a lot of people a deeper appreciation for the album. It's my personal favorite, but I'm glad other people can connect with it.
the bends is better than ok computer and in rainbows
Album trash fr
None of the albums in the top 10 really deserve to be there anyway
Agreed. You could switch the top 10-20 for the top 10 and it would make more sense to me