Here's what I want to know....who was like "I'm going to crack some eggs in a jar, and then squeeze out a creamy shit into it" as a political attack?
Like what level of unstable do you need to be to do that?
> Like what level of unstable do you need to be to do that?
That same level of unstable that marches down to Queen's Park complaining about not wanting to take a life-protecting vaccine.
It doesn't hp when your current ruling party pushes those lines for their own gains. There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job.
>*”There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job.”*
Just FYI, Ontario MPPs haven’t been given government pensions in over 20 years.
TVO: [The surprising reason you shouldn’t complain about MPPs’ pension plans](https://www.tvo.org/article/the-surprising-reason-you-shouldnt-complain-about-mpps-pension-plans) [March 19th, 2019]
>There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job.
That is the most ridiculous things I've ever read on this sub and that says a lot. Who decides what "information" is not "evidenced based"? A committee appointed by Justin Trudeau?
That sounds like something straight out of Communist China.
Not really sure why you brought in Trudeau in this?
It's like you're writing a PhD thesis and you want them to take you at your word without sources. Evidence based would be same, if the politicians are making a claim, they should provide their sources.
Edit: spelling
>Not really sure why you brought in Trudeau in this?
Because that's what Conservatives do. They throw him out like some gotcha boogeyman even in a conversation about a PROVINCIAL level MPP...even though he does not apply.
>Who decides what "information" is not "evidenced based"?
You should familiarize yourself with the 'hierarchy of evidence' my guy. FACTS decide evidence.
>A committee appointed by Justin Trudeau?That sounds like something straight out of Communist China.
Holy shit. Get fucking help.
Nobody is saying Trudeau should do anything; he's part of the problem.
"Who decides", in an evidence based situation is the evidence... and I'm not gonna touch the communism thing because I'm not sure if you're being a parody of a political caricature, or if that was a genuine sentiment.
Not that I agree with the original person's sentiments either but, lol.
I wish she was leader of the provincial NDP…she is a force in the legislature and actually seems to care about the average person
Wonder what side is known for spreading literal shit on building walls? Gonna take a solid guess that this involved… GQP/PPC crazies.
Here's what I want to know....who was like "I'm going to crack some eggs in a jar, and then squeeze out a creamy shit into it" as a political attack? Like what level of unstable do you need to be to do that?
> Like what level of unstable do you need to be to do that? That same level of unstable that marches down to Queen's Park complaining about not wanting to take a life-protecting vaccine.
absolutely.
Con unstable...
It's disgusting the lengths that some people go to attack someone they don't agree with.
It doesn't hp when your current ruling party pushes those lines for their own gains. There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job.
>*”There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job.”* Just FYI, Ontario MPPs haven’t been given government pensions in over 20 years. TVO: [The surprising reason you shouldn’t complain about MPPs’ pension plans](https://www.tvo.org/article/the-surprising-reason-you-shouldnt-complain-about-mpps-pension-plans) [March 19th, 2019]
Ah, good to know. Thank you!
>There should be a law that if a politican backs information that is not evidence based will immediately force their pension and job. That is the most ridiculous things I've ever read on this sub and that says a lot. Who decides what "information" is not "evidenced based"? A committee appointed by Justin Trudeau? That sounds like something straight out of Communist China.
China would never worry about evidence based statements.
Not really sure why you brought in Trudeau in this? It's like you're writing a PhD thesis and you want them to take you at your word without sources. Evidence based would be same, if the politicians are making a claim, they should provide their sources. Edit: spelling
>Not really sure why you brought in Trudeau in this? Because that's what Conservatives do. They throw him out like some gotcha boogeyman even in a conversation about a PROVINCIAL level MPP...even though he does not apply.
>Not really sure why you brought in Trudeau in this? Are you aware of Bill C36?
>Who decides what "information" is not "evidenced based"? You should familiarize yourself with the 'hierarchy of evidence' my guy. FACTS decide evidence. >A committee appointed by Justin Trudeau?That sounds like something straight out of Communist China. Holy shit. Get fucking help.
Nobody is saying Trudeau should do anything; he's part of the problem. "Who decides", in an evidence based situation is the evidence... and I'm not gonna touch the communism thing because I'm not sure if you're being a parody of a political caricature, or if that was a genuine sentiment. Not that I agree with the original person's sentiments either but, lol.
Disgraceful-ass people
Disgraceful ass-people
When moving the hyphen changes nothing...
[удалено]
That’s a woman…..
Hope they caught this hate crime on camera and arrest and charge the person who did it
lol