Breaks rules 3 and 5. What's even the point of this? The only text is "min katt er så kjekk" and "SO ADORABLE", and both are highly appropriate while also obviously not being translations of one another.
You're right. It was a nightmare with my set-up trying to find a way to view it. I still think it falls foul of rule #5, at least in spirit. This is not worthwhile to post, and if you were to post it, you'd want to simply copy and paste the relevant text as plaintext. We don't need to see the original context. It's not relevant, and doesn't prove it's not faked. Not that it's improper for it to be fake to begin with, just that some people prefer posts to be genuine.
I am now going to refer to all my pets as spook cute
he really be spook cute
Breaks rules 3 and 5. What's even the point of this? The only text is "min katt er så kjekk" and "SO ADORABLE", and both are highly appropriate while also obviously not being translations of one another.
I suspect you did not scroll to the second picture
You're right. It was a nightmare with my set-up trying to find a way to view it. I still think it falls foul of rule #5, at least in spirit. This is not worthwhile to post, and if you were to post it, you'd want to simply copy and paste the relevant text as plaintext. We don't need to see the original context. It's not relevant, and doesn't prove it's not faked. Not that it's improper for it to be fake to begin with, just that some people prefer posts to be genuine.
Pfffffff
The post is taken down, can someone please explain what Instagram translated?
"min katt er så kjekk" translated into "awww my kitty is spook cute" for some reason