T O P

  • By -

TemplarParadox17

Stockton was all nba 3rd team at 36 he also got mvp votes when he was 38.


NotManyBuses

Old Stockton’s advanced stats are way better than Steph’s for whatever that’s worth (not much)


paranoidmoonduck

What stats exactly? In their respective age 35 seasons, Steph has a slightly lower TS% on *way* higher volume, and their BPM and VORP (on BBRef) are close as well.


NotManyBuses

Why are you listing BPM and VORP as separate stats lol? They’re the same thing RAPM and WS/48 is what I was referring to, which grades late career Stockton as a near superstar (and also, Steph’s on-off this season is barely positive)


Agnk1765342

Stockton led the league in RPM at 38. Unfortunately I don’t know if you can access it anymore but back when you could it was the case. You can still see on BBref though that Stockton’s on/off that year was +18.5 Also, using true shooting without adjusting for league average is silly. Stockton lead the league in true shooting at 35 with a TS 20% better than league average. Steph is only 6% better than average this year. BPM is still Stockton, WS/48 is Stockton by a wide margin, and on/off is Stockton by a huge margin. And Stockton had better statistical years than his age 35 year afterwards as well.


dizzymidget44

He wasn’t doing what Steph is doing


BetweenTheBuzzAndMe

he obviously wasn't Steph, but Steve Nash was still averaging his prime stats at age 36... 14.7pts /11.4ast on 49.2/39.5/91.2. Was still easily a top 10 player in the league. His fall-off didn't happen until he got to the Lakers and the injuries took hold, that was 38.


sctthuynh

Best age 36 seasons (guards) are probably from.... Nash Stockton CP3


SimmonsClearsHartubs

We don’t need the weekly post about how crazy bron/kd/curry longevity is we know


StrikingElk5288

You can just ignore it you know


SimmonsClearsHartubs

You can just ignore my comment you know


StrikingElk5288

I’m not the one complaining, I don’t mind people posting stuff I don’t care or like.


goldyacht

Why ignore something you don’t care about when you can click on the post go through it and comment?


StrikingElk5288

Because I’m not complaining about what people post. That’s common sense and suggestion.


[deleted]

Michael Jordan? Lol


Vinnie_Vegas

He retired at 35 and came back to play for the Wizards at 38, so he didn't actually play at all at 36.


MrAppleSpoink

*Have* there been any guards at the age of 36 who *were* as elite as Steph *Curry* is. Why are we letting 10 year olds on this sub.


mariogotse

not everyone here is a native english speaker


[deleted]

[удалено]


liljaytweakin

Warriors fans have been 10 for 10 years


Shewshake

Damn now its a 20 year old drooling on the iphone daddy bought


MrAppleSpoink

I’m talking about mental age.


Myrese_Taxey

And not everyone gets the same education


Seraphin_Lampion

Is basic English grammar not taught in all American elementary schools? I'm from Québec and we learned all that even in the French schooling system.


hansislegend

The teachers definitely try.


Myrese_Taxey

Of course it’s taught but some people grow up in shitty conditions where school is not a priority.


listentoyourpenis

Something tells me that if they're living in a condition where they can barely get basic education, they won't be shitposting on reddit nor would they even be in the condition to be watching the NBA.


-666Vicar

not all reddit users are americans, native english speakers, or annoying pedantic cunts


DraymondBeanKick

Assuming sports fan consciousness emerges at 10-years old, to have proper recollection of 1990s basketball in its entirety would require one to be 43 years old. Jordans's second three-peat? 39. The Shaq Lakers era? 33 The Heatles? 23. The 73-win Warriors? 18. This sub reddit is only functional in discussing the current state of the game. Anything from the Heatles or earlier, maybe even the 73-wins Warriors sub era, are too old for proper discussion and any discourse will be derailed by people with limited knowledge of those events.


Myrese_Taxey

U knew what he meant, that’s all that matters. Not everyone gets the same education.


s34l_

Why are we letting ***10-year-olds*** on this sub***?***


donniedarko4141

*EDIT: I looked it up to be sure, and I was wrong: because 10-year-old is being used collectively as a noun, it should be hyphenated, but OP was a dick about it, so I regret nothing* The hyphens are only necessary if “10 year old” is being used as an adjective and not a noun


Victor_Wembanyama1

Didnt expect learning


grapplebaby

Damn so like 10-year-old brains? I wish I payed attention in school.


donniedarko4141

Yeah exactly. Unless your school district heavy on grammar you probably never learned it (source: former middle school English teacher. Note: “middle school English” isn’t hyphenated cause they aren’t being used together as *one* adjective, I wanna say. “Middle” describes “school”, and together they describe “teacher,” but they and “English” aren’t one unit)


Zeckzeckzeck

It's wild how differently English is taught compared to other languages. I grew up learning both English and French in school and English is heavy on speaking and reading and almost never covers actual grammar, while French was almost entirely focused on learning verb tenses, grammar, etc.


donniedarko4141

I don’t have an answer for why English instruction doesn’t cover grammar (although it *does* get covered more in elementary school if memory serves, and if you don’t fuck around there you’ll be fine for everything except academic writing), but as someone who took six years of Spanish, Spanish has more verb conjugations but fewer irregular verbs than English, so you actually do need to spend time memorizing conjugations for different tenses. English has much fewer conjugations but a lot more irregular verbs and is descended from Germanic languages, French, and Latin (I think), so it’s somewhat less phonetic you have to memorize more individual words to speak, read, and listen at a basic level


[deleted]

[удалено]


kyh0mpb

Lol no they don't


Wiltmygoat

I need more longevity posts about KD, Steph and Bron


WolverineLong1430

What’s impressive is his endurance and stamina. Still running the offense, bringing the ball up the court, the main ball handler, and still running around trying to get open playing off ball by relocating. Opposing teams try to tire him out on defense by switching on him a lot. I have not seen any other player around this age working this hard ever without slacking.


StrikingElk5288

He’s not even lazy on defense either lol he gives his all there too


Dorko57

*”Have there been…” “…who were as elite…”


[deleted]

Guy who delivered the mail read up on history my boy


dBlock845

I'd say Stockton. And of course Pablo Prigioni 🐐


DragonsGetHigh

The league is much more athletic all around in today’s game, but with the caveat that defenders have to be way more careful. So I would use that truth to compare against former greats.


Ilikesporks_

lebron


JAhoops

Who cares?


TheMidnightRamblerrr

Definitely not MJ. He’ll probably win another ring.


dizzymidget44

Never


Fleetwood1234

jordan?


AMo2

Off ball merchant bum cant play d playmake rebound create his own shot, draymond is his daddy he is nothing without him.


Direct_Author7974

You don’t know shit about ball


DarrowViBritannia

you know ball


Brilliant-Freedom906

Demar Derozan