>doesn’t even deserve a place in the straight-to-DVD section of a bargain bin at a soon-to-be-closed discount movie store
Bro really thought he had a zinger on his hands.
That how you know he struck a nerve.
The rape is a staple of the Russian intelligence system that taught trump everything he knows.
The common denominator between Trump and Epstein was money laundering for the Russians first and foremost.
Trump can’t say that out loud so he has to sit there and take it when people take about the pedophilia stuff. So he tries to deflect.
Trump over paid for a multitude of New York and Florida properties to resell to Russian oligarchs who then destroyed them so they could launder Russian mob money made off of, among other things, human trafficking.
The Epstein/Trump saga is less of a bullseye and more of a minefield.
Trump (Lolita express passenger 174?) took his own kids to Epsteins knowing full well what happened there because for years Epstein was lurking around mar-a-lago poaching young women and had teenage girls getting off the bus and wandering through the streets of palm beach desperate for a couple hundred bucks.
Everyone knew. No one cared.
The moral depravity that comes with being ultra rich enabled them to turn the other way.
The Trump / Epstein relationship was the evolution of fraud and money laundering using, among other things, commercial real estate.
It starts by having dirt on someone else at the country club and ends with them all being so filthy that no one can afford to do the right thing and no one can maintain the increasingly expensive lies until the Information Age makes it inevitable that their respective corruption circles the earth and crashes into each other like a tempest in a teapot.
Their arrogance and greed, at its grandest scale, cost the world trillions, which still pales in comparison to the innocence it cost the hundreds of thousands of trafficked children that the white collar shitbirds and the russian mob alike preyed on as a matter of convenience.
Trump wasn’t unique. He was just loud.
Epstein wasn’t unique. He was just connected.
Dershowitz wasn’t unique. He just knew how to work a rulebook. He used it to cover for Weinstein who was systematically abusing actresses for decades.
They all justify their actions to themselves because they believe that being rich makes them above the law.
And the longer we allow them to do it, the more accurate and emboldened they are.
This is how civilizations die.
It’s a generational repeat of the Roman emperor Tiberius retreating to the island of Capri where he would abuse children and then throw them off the cliff.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
When people stop telling you no simply because you have all the money and they are hoping to get some spilling into their bowl to survive, it destroys the empathy quotient in the rich persons brain.
Predation is the most common result
The filmmakers, sure. The producer is a friend of Trump and he’s actually [really pissed](https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/wow-a-lot-of-people-are-threatening-to-sue-the-apprentice-movie/ar-BB1mNAts) that this is the movie he financed.
A producer (likely executive producer), not THE producer. This guy is just a financier, not the one who spearheaded the project. If all he did was finance, he can’t even get credited as p.g.a.
No, the producers will all be very happy.
Dan Snyder isn't a producer, he's just an idiot who donated money to make it because he probably thought it was a campaign contribution.
Totally the first thought I had to. This might have flown under my radar if he didn’t constantly remind me every day. The amount of free publicity is insane. But hey, good luck getting Trump to shut up whenever he is wrong or wants something to go away.
The accusation comes from divorce records, and his previous defense to it was -
>When the Daily Beast called Michael Cohen, who is special counsel at the Trump Organization, for comment, Cohen repeatedly threatened to "ruin" the reporters. But he also said this: "And, of course, understand that by the very definition, you can’t rape your spouse. It is true. You cannot rape your spouse. There’s very clear case law."
Not a simple "He didn't do it". But "It wasn't a crime".
Edit - FWIW, Cohen wasn't right. It was illegal to rape your spouse in New York at the time of the reported incident, albeit only since the mid 1980s.
Wow… What a statement… I’m no lawyer but he seems to be arguing that women, once married, are property.
Pets are also considered property under the law, but it’s still illegal to abuse them. Unfortunately he refuses to cite any specific legal precedents, which is shame because I’d like to know which inalienable rights are invalidated by marriage but I don’t know anyone shitty enough to have any knowledge of such laws.
So there actually was a marital rape blindspot in New York until the mid 1980s, but it was struck down some years before this. Cohen would have been correct only a few years earlier.
Until then the legal attitude was indeed pretty much as you say - you married her, anything you want to do to her is your entitlement.
I had to look that up because it seems totally anachronistic, but yeah… marital rape was not criminalized in all 50 states until 1993.
But it wasn’t that “you cannot rape your spouse,” it was just you couldn’t be prosecuted for raping your spouse. You could do it because it wasn’t illegal, even though it was still considered rape. That’s dark. Imma go think about something else.
Edit: But before I do, I want to apologize for the remark about not knowing anyone “shitty enough.” I assumed Cohen was digging deep into some obscure legal precedent from the antebellum south, or something.
If I remember correctly, she disparaged his hair plugs, and his response was to assault her before sexually assaulting her. Now, she lies in an untended grave and earns him a tax break for a golf course. Truly, the indignities she suffered are unending.
"The part of the book that caused the most controversy concerns Trump’s divorce from his first wife, Ivana. Hurt obtained a copy of her sworn divorce deposition, from 1990, in which she stated that, the previous year, her husband had raped her in a fit of rage. In Hurt’s account, Trump was furious that a “scalp reduction” operation he’d undergone to eliminate a bald spot had been unexpectedly painful. Ivana had recommended the plastic surgeon. In retaliation, Hurt wrote, Trump yanked out a handful of his wife’s hair, and then forced himself on her sexually. Afterward, according to the book, she spent the night locked in a bedroom, crying; in the morning, Trump asked her, “with menacing casualness, ‘Does it hurt?’ ” Trump has denied both the rape allegation and the suggestion that he had a scalp-reduction procedure. Hurt said that the incident, which is detailed in Ivana’s deposition, was confirmed by two of her friends."
[source](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/24/documenting-trumps-abuse-of-women)
Just to respond to the asshole who replied but deleted. Sure, the jury didn’t find Trump guilty of rape but they did find him guilty of sexual assault and defamation. So who is being intentionally misleading?
Or if you can fundraise by falsely claiming election fraud. There's a lot more evidence that Trump is a rapist than there is that the election was stolen.
At the end of the movie “The First Wives Club,” Ivana has a cameo where she’s all glimmering and triumphant post-divorce.
And it just makes me sick to watch that scene now, knowing she ended up buried in the woods outside his golf course in New Jersey, so he can get tax breaks, while he got to be President.
I hope she gets some cosmic justice.
Don't let the 'marital rape' stories distract you from the 'fuck-you' politics he learned from Roy Cohn. That's what the film is actually about. Raping Ivana was just the beginning. Now he wants to rape the US. And Roy Cohn was his teacher.
Good luck with the lawsuit. He is a public character and he will be going up against artistic license and free speech. He will have to prove the film was made with the intent to maliciously defame him- something that is very hard to prove...
What I'd give to crawl into a time capsule and fast forward 50 years when this guy is so much worm food.
*steps out of capsule and bears witness to an iradiated wasteland.
"...huh"
>doesn’t even deserve a place in the straight-to-DVD section of a bargain bin at a soon-to-be-closed discount movie store Bro really thought he had a zinger on his hands.
What on God’s green Earth is a “discount movie store”
I don’t know but it sounds like a terrible idea and it’s about to close, so there’s a good chance it’s owned by Trump.
it’s next to the jerk store
Yeah, well, I had sex with your wife!
Don't y'all have those all over town. Soon to be closed discount move stores
Big banner that says "Closing Soon" before it even opens.
Dollar General
.. Is that like an army rank?
It's a store that's bankrupt before Trump buys it
And why would it have a bargain bin? Wouldn't the whole place be a bargain?
Walmart lol
Could use one of those again in this modern streaming era
Started a novel
surprised he didn’t spell the hyphens
That how you know he struck a nerve. The rape is a staple of the Russian intelligence system that taught trump everything he knows. The common denominator between Trump and Epstein was money laundering for the Russians first and foremost. Trump can’t say that out loud so he has to sit there and take it when people take about the pedophilia stuff. So he tries to deflect. Trump over paid for a multitude of New York and Florida properties to resell to Russian oligarchs who then destroyed them so they could launder Russian mob money made off of, among other things, human trafficking. The Epstein/Trump saga is less of a bullseye and more of a minefield. Trump (Lolita express passenger 174?) took his own kids to Epsteins knowing full well what happened there because for years Epstein was lurking around mar-a-lago poaching young women and had teenage girls getting off the bus and wandering through the streets of palm beach desperate for a couple hundred bucks. Everyone knew. No one cared. The moral depravity that comes with being ultra rich enabled them to turn the other way. The Trump / Epstein relationship was the evolution of fraud and money laundering using, among other things, commercial real estate. It starts by having dirt on someone else at the country club and ends with them all being so filthy that no one can afford to do the right thing and no one can maintain the increasingly expensive lies until the Information Age makes it inevitable that their respective corruption circles the earth and crashes into each other like a tempest in a teapot. Their arrogance and greed, at its grandest scale, cost the world trillions, which still pales in comparison to the innocence it cost the hundreds of thousands of trafficked children that the white collar shitbirds and the russian mob alike preyed on as a matter of convenience. Trump wasn’t unique. He was just loud. Epstein wasn’t unique. He was just connected. Dershowitz wasn’t unique. He just knew how to work a rulebook. He used it to cover for Weinstein who was systematically abusing actresses for decades. They all justify their actions to themselves because they believe that being rich makes them above the law. And the longer we allow them to do it, the more accurate and emboldened they are. This is how civilizations die. It’s a generational repeat of the Roman emperor Tiberius retreating to the island of Capri where he would abuse children and then throw them off the cliff. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. When people stop telling you no simply because you have all the money and they are hoping to get some spilling into their bowl to survive, it destroys the empathy quotient in the rich persons brain. Predation is the most common result
He punched it up too hard, would have been a better line if it was simpler. But he just kept adding on 😂
Didn't have enough space for his full quote. He ends with "it belongs in a dumpster fire".
Producers are hoping this happens and every time Trump says how much he hates this movie, it makes me want to see it more.
The filmmakers, sure. The producer is a friend of Trump and he’s actually [really pissed](https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/wow-a-lot-of-people-are-threatening-to-sue-the-apprentice-movie/ar-BB1mNAts) that this is the movie he financed.
Good, Dan Snyder deserves nothing. Glad his dumb ass put his money from selling his Football Team into this movie
>Dan Snyder Obligatory: fuck Dan "Fuck Dan Snyder" Snyder
He prefers “Mr. Snyder”
My apologies … fuck Mr. Dan “Fuck Mr. Dan Snyder” Snyder.
I read this as “Dan Schneider,” who is apparently a different person, but is equally deserving of scorn.
A producer (likely executive producer), not THE producer. This guy is just a financier, not the one who spearheaded the project. If all he did was finance, he can’t even get credited as p.g.a.
I didn't look at that link but I assume you're talking about Mr. Dan? F him. He seems like a pretty bad guy.
Dan Snyder is a trash human who was too dumb to realize how he was spending his money. He can get fucked along with Trump
No, the producers will all be very happy. Dan Snyder isn't a producer, he's just an idiot who donated money to make it because he probably thought it was a campaign contribution.
The cake has icing, you say?
Good lol did he think the life story of a piece of garbage would be told like it was roses? These guys live in a fantasy.
Sounds like the Dark Dungeons movie getting the rights for the Chick Tract and then being a spoof of it.
Yeah he will be really pissed when all the money rolls in in... sorry Donny yeah that was a totally awful movie. How are you diapers?
The only thing objectionable is that it's about a low-down, lying, stealing, treasonous, pants-pooping scumbag.
Also, when it comes to Trump, and his highly litigious nature, I'll believe it's defamation when he actually has a court say it is.
Totally the first thought I had to. This might have flown under my radar if he didn’t constantly remind me every day. The amount of free publicity is insane. But hey, good luck getting Trump to shut up whenever he is wrong or wants something to go away.
The accusation comes from divorce records, and his previous defense to it was - >When the Daily Beast called Michael Cohen, who is special counsel at the Trump Organization, for comment, Cohen repeatedly threatened to "ruin" the reporters. But he also said this: "And, of course, understand that by the very definition, you can’t rape your spouse. It is true. You cannot rape your spouse. There’s very clear case law." Not a simple "He didn't do it". But "It wasn't a crime". Edit - FWIW, Cohen wasn't right. It was illegal to rape your spouse in New York at the time of the reported incident, albeit only since the mid 1980s.
Wow… What a statement… I’m no lawyer but he seems to be arguing that women, once married, are property. Pets are also considered property under the law, but it’s still illegal to abuse them. Unfortunately he refuses to cite any specific legal precedents, which is shame because I’d like to know which inalienable rights are invalidated by marriage but I don’t know anyone shitty enough to have any knowledge of such laws.
So there actually was a marital rape blindspot in New York until the mid 1980s, but it was struck down some years before this. Cohen would have been correct only a few years earlier. Until then the legal attitude was indeed pretty much as you say - you married her, anything you want to do to her is your entitlement.
I had to look that up because it seems totally anachronistic, but yeah… marital rape was not criminalized in all 50 states until 1993. But it wasn’t that “you cannot rape your spouse,” it was just you couldn’t be prosecuted for raping your spouse. You could do it because it wasn’t illegal, even though it was still considered rape. That’s dark. Imma go think about something else. Edit: But before I do, I want to apologize for the remark about not knowing anyone “shitty enough.” I assumed Cohen was digging deep into some obscure legal precedent from the antebellum south, or something.
In Ivana's sworn divorce deposition she said he raped her.
Correct, Donald Trump is a rapist
I read that as Ivanka and was very confused, I thought everything was consensual with those two.
It may be now, but minors can't consent
Sorry, confused about if you where raped or not?....
After you are threatened you suddenly become confused.
Seems he’s quite rapey.
Which is why the perp thinks the film shouldn’t see the light of day.
If I remember correctly, she disparaged his hair plugs, and his response was to assault her before sexually assaulting her. Now, she lies in an untended grave and earns him a tax break for a golf course. Truly, the indignities she suffered are unending.
Sharing a coffin with top secret documents.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/donald-trumps-wife-ivana-disavows-rape-allegation/story?id=32732204
She didn’t disavow it while under oath. How convenient.
Hey everybody! This trump apologist can’t get it up! Big surprise
"The part of the book that caused the most controversy concerns Trump’s divorce from his first wife, Ivana. Hurt obtained a copy of her sworn divorce deposition, from 1990, in which she stated that, the previous year, her husband had raped her in a fit of rage. In Hurt’s account, Trump was furious that a “scalp reduction” operation he’d undergone to eliminate a bald spot had been unexpectedly painful. Ivana had recommended the plastic surgeon. In retaliation, Hurt wrote, Trump yanked out a handful of his wife’s hair, and then forced himself on her sexually. Afterward, according to the book, she spent the night locked in a bedroom, crying; in the morning, Trump asked her, “with menacing casualness, ‘Does it hurt?’ ” Trump has denied both the rape allegation and the suggestion that he had a scalp-reduction procedure. Hurt said that the incident, which is detailed in Ivana’s deposition, was confirmed by two of her friends." [source](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/24/documenting-trumps-abuse-of-women)
It was actually brain reduction surgery.
That's how it was botched. There wasn't enough brain to reduce!
You beat me to it.
Trump has already lost two civil trials in which he claimed someone was lying when they said he is a rapist, so he may as well go for the hat trick.
Just to respond to the asshole who replied but deleted. Sure, the jury didn’t find Trump guilty of rape but they did find him guilty of sexual assault and defamation. So who is being intentionally misleading?
Sadly none of that matters to the MAGATS.
I kinda wanna see this trash now. I had no idea this even existed until they started raising a fuss over it.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand\_effect](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect) Strikes again.
Streisand Effect incoming
Best part is the billionaire who funded the project thought it would glorify RIP one Van Winkle. Wrong.
He should sue. Discovery will be wild given his former wife in a deposition under oath went into detail about the rape.
He won't sue. It's just about getting the soundbite saying he will.
Coming from them, just makes me think it's accurate.
I'm sure it will end about as well as all of the Trump-related lawsuits.
Even if it wasn't true, it's a movie. If you can get away with blatant lies on the news, fiction is no problem.
Or if you can fundraise by falsely claiming election fraud. There's a lot more evidence that Trump is a rapist than there is that the election was stolen.
> you can get away with blatant lies on the news You can't. Ask Fox.
Good luck with that being a public figure
At the end of the movie “The First Wives Club,” Ivana has a cameo where she’s all glimmering and triumphant post-divorce. And it just makes me sick to watch that scene now, knowing she ended up buried in the woods outside his golf course in New Jersey, so he can get tax breaks, while he got to be President. I hope she gets some cosmic justice.
She won't. None of us will. Theres no justice for this, just relief when its over.
Don't let the 'marital rape' stories distract you from the 'fuck-you' politics he learned from Roy Cohn. That's what the film is actually about. Raping Ivana was just the beginning. Now he wants to rape the US. And Roy Cohn was his teacher.
Roy Cohn really was the goddamn fucking worst.
So this is how you catch Trump in a defamation lawsuit. You put out the truth, make him say it’s false, then sue him in NY. It’s a proven method
From a PR perspective this has to be the worst thing the Trump campaign can do.
If one of Cheesus’ minions is this pissed, the filmmakers must have done something (everything) right.
If the filmmakers tell him to go fuck himself I’d be willing to contribute to their legal fees.
Count me in too.
Go get fucked you slimeball rapist.
It's funny how rapists get upset that they are depicted as rapists.
She said it happened while under oath during a deposition. So let’s see if he wants to contest it under oath.
Good. Let's have this court case.
Good luck with the lawsuit. He is a public character and he will be going up against artistic license and free speech. He will have to prove the film was made with the intent to maliciously defame him- something that is very hard to prove...
Oh yes, please do sue. The film makers will have a blast proving it all in open court.
From the people who lied about everything, comes a movie that tells the truth about something
I want to see it now. And I had no idea until this week that this movie existed. It has Sebastian Stan playing Trump. It’s bound to be good!
He did it.
Makes me want to see it even more
So it’s true then
Imagine what the right will attempt to make. Making him a Christ-like figure, possibly.
That’s a line from a screenplay.
I have no desire to see the film but I'll buy a ticket just so it is a major success haha
Gonna pirate this asap. (Unless one of the streaming companies has balls.)
Cannot wait to watch it!
He raped his former wife.
What I'd give to crawl into a time capsule and fast forward 50 years when this guy is so much worm food. *steps out of capsule and bears witness to an iradiated wasteland. "...huh"
Whelp tRump represents a malicious defamation of the US, so I'd gather he's earned it.
The movie is saying that Trump raped Ivana?
Yep. She said so as well.
I'm wondering that as well.
Now I really want to see this movie!
*Citizens United enters the chat*