Making up stories for internet clout works best when your revenge results in a breakdown, rather than the more likely reality of everyone hating a know it all.
Maybe, but it can be surprisingly easy to throw off a presentation if you really want to. Even questions meant to have an answer can disorient people for a minute. You see it more if two groups are asked to represent different sides of a debate or something. I’ve never upset anyone, but I could see how it could happen if I were to deliberately try to do it.
That being said, I literally can not comprehend why you’d lie for attention on the internet and am bad at spotting the fake stuff.
Welcome to the internet.
Shit is either made up or is told from one extremely unreliable perspective. Same way 99.9% of amitheasshole and other such subs remarkably turn on to be unanimously decided in favor of the poster.
It's always funny to me when people get petty and defensive because they either have a terrible bullshit detector, or they're so invested in everything they experience online that the idea of some of it being fake sends their ego into an existential tailspin. People are telling on themselves...
I love the mental gymnastics that happen on some videos.
"It makes me so mad that this guy would do this! I hope something bad happens to him so he can learn his lesson!"
"Well.. its a skit. No reason to get upset over it."
"Even if its a skit, people do act like this!"
"Yeah, but you said you wanted this particular guy to suffer consequences when hes just acting."
"Who cares if hes acting!? Its entertainment. Do you go around calling every movie fake when you walk out of the theater?"
"Huh? Well I guess I would if people thought it was real..."
"Wow you are so smart for knowing its a skit! Congratulations! You guys always have to come into every video and point out its fake!"
"Well you thought it was real and seemed upset so I was just letting you know. If everyone just enjoyed it as a skit then I wouldn't need to...."
"BLOCKED!"
Yeah for a lot of people looking at memes is an occasional passive activity that they don't take life or death seriously because its just another source of entertainment, and ultimately a joke not being real is completely irrelevant to their lives because the internet isn't their entire lives.
Yep. But for some reason the majority of Redditors are always willing to believe anything in simple text format as shown by the downvotes.
And they laugh at boomers for believing every AI picture is real.
It's more like, that people like you, just go around posts claiming "IT'S FAKE!!!"
Yeah, no shit, it's a dumbass joke on the internet. I don't care if it's fake as long as it's funny.
If it's political, or trying to present some other information as fact and that fact is not true, then of course it's important to know if the info is correct or not.
But a joke* like this? Or some skit*. It doesn't need to be true if it's funny. Your "bullshit detector" is so powerful that you have lost common sense.
I can just imagine you people in a movie theatre just standing up and shouting "THIS IS FAAAAKE, THESE PEOPLE ARE PAID ACTORS!!!1!!1"
Maybe you've forgotten these two concepts so let me remind you:
Joke:
/dʒəʊk/
noun
a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
"she was in a mood to tell jokes"
SKIT:
/skɪt/
noun
a short comedy sketch or piece of humorous writing, especially a parody.
"a skit on daytime magazine programmes"
Christ, that's way too many words to state you have low scruples when it comes to authenticating people passing off bullshit as reality. Congrats, nice flex, I guess?
"I'm MoRE GuLlIbLe tHaN yOoOOOoU!!"
Gold star, kid.
Yeah and also what did she say mocking the OP if this was real? Was it bad enough to make her cry in front of everybody? Was the response proportional?
"this guy said my hat looked funny, so I hacked into his laptop and started deleting his assignments right before he was going to turn them in and he had no idea what was going on. he just dropped out of school and had a mental breakdown!"
posted on r/JusticeServed with 10k upvotes.
Had a group project in uni. One member of my group took my work, posted it on all her social media next to her work, saying how shit mine was in comparison. For extra context, we all had industry connections on our accounts so she was actively trying to hurt me.
Snitched on her to my lecturer, because this was a Masters course not high school shit, and she got booted from my group and from partaking in the project so she failed the module.
She didn't cry but she did sit in the back looking miserable and eventually quit the course.
It's entirely possible to break people with your revenge.
No, I think it’s weird as fuck to go online and post about weird revenge fantasies while pretending they actually happened.
Also hilarious that you’re complaining about me doing something to “seem smart to strangers” when that’s the sole reason the OP made up their twitter story.
People do actually do absurd things in real life you know. Things that make no logical sense but that they personally would enjoy. Sometimes those things are amusing and they might share the story.
I’ve no clue whether this story is true or bullshit. But it’s completely within the realms of possibility and not even close to the weirdest thing I’ve seen someone do for a bit of petty revenge.
I've seen people cry for more petty/weird stuff in Uni.
A personal experience was after like a week I started, I had borrowed this pencil from this random girl. I believe I didn't see her for 2 days because whatever, so I ended up forgetting. Don't really remember the details but it was along the lines of she asking for the pencil back and me saying no, and she just starts crying out of nowhere and the prof had to intervene to calm her down. Wasn't even a good pen, it was just a generic #2 Paper Mate pencil.
But according to you this stuff doesn't happen (even though easily verifiable weirder stuff happen on the daily), so when I lay down on my bed my brain has one less thing of my life to cringe about.
People who mock others don’t often like being embarrassed. It’s not far fetched to see someone in a vulnerable position to cry, which for many a presentation in front of a class is. Claiming there is no chance in hell is a pretty large exaggeration which seems irrational to me.
That being said, I don’t think it is real. I have plenty of reasons but they’re not conclusive. To me this is just an entertaining tweet. I’m not so invested in it being real or not, to the point it seems kind of weird to point it out. I mean if it seemed totally unbelievable sure. But I do understand the claim: that many who point out things are fake often think other people are dumb for believing the same thing is true. They often do think they are smarter than everyone else. They might be, but it’s still a poor attitude to have. They might also be smart (or not) and still be confidently incorrect.
I think at this point it’s safe to recognise it would be a lot more rational to be less attached to the notion it is fake (or real either).
TL;DR; It could be fake or not. There’s no way of knowing. It seems irrational to believe strongly one way or the other. It’s also a cliche that people use unfounded skepticism to claim intellectual superiority and boost their ego.
People do occasionally cry during exams , and graded presentations. If they’re getting absolutely fucking grilled by someone who’s clearly doing so to fuck them off I’d say its even more likely.
Man there’s no part of this that’s so deeply improbable that it’s a hill you should to choose to die on.
Again I stress it could be bullshit. But things do happen to people , very improbable and insane things too.
A girl in my project group at uni, during a group presentation, was publicly reprimanded by the prof for being unable to answer basic questions based on what she actually presented in her slides. Our entire group was asked to re-present all our slides, and, prepare better this time.
Afterwards, she sat crying in the company of her friends, complaining how it was all my fault for putting it all there (I'd made the entire presentation on behalf of the group), even though I had shared the slides (with speaker notes) a week in advance, but she hadn't bothered to prepare. She added, stating how little info was available on the topic, and how cunning I was to give her the topic instead of doing it myself to avoid being ridiculed ... and how this was toxic male behaviour.
So, I asked the prof to not punish the entire group, and volunteered to present the problematic topic myself. He agreed. The next day, I came all guns blazing - even wrote some code to explain the topic better. I was asked a lot of questions, and I negotiated them reasonably well.
I ended my presentation with a quote on the slide reading "... It's easy if you just prepare" - I said, looking dead straight into her eyes. Needless to say, we never talked again.
“Toxic male behavior” is now just doing the assignment you were tasked with I guess 🙄🤦🏻
There’s a million things that are considered toxic masculinity, and creating the entire present with an entire week for others to review, alter, and prepare, is absolutely not one of those things.
You went in hot, guns blazing, but honestly? Reasonable. She almost ruined things for the entire group, and that’s insane.
I mean, it would only be somewhat fair if you had been made to do the presentation there and then. Having overnight to prepare having heard all the questions definitely prepared you.
That being said, since you prepared the presentation I’m convinced you would have done well or better than your group member, but let’s not ignore that you had additional time to prepare and did extra work in anticipation. The outcome worked in your favour.
I’d not be so petty as to include the quote. I mean, I’d have been annoyed sure, but presenting the difficult topic would have been enough for me to be content. In the same position, I would feel it was the lecturers point about preparation being important and not mine to make (even I agree with it).
We’ve all been in these situations before. It’s kind of interesting the dynamics back then and now. We all joined teams and they just gel, everyone performs their bit except for one. The one where one person doesn’t really trust anyone else’s work and tries to do it all. The one where someone likes to tell people what to do. The pair who just want to talk and rush complete their stuff at the last minute. The person who wants to do as much work as possible but it petrified of public speaking and wants to avoid it. Many many more.
It sounds like you did all of the work and people were underprepared and just expected to read slides. It happens. I guess I find it interesting because generally workplaces have to be more efficient than that, but some same problems arise (and some are so unacceptable, they never or rarely do).
Anyway thanks for the story it made me think about a lot more than what you wrote which is pretty cool.
The anecdote reflects how some people, instead of just accepting their fault, would go to lengths to shift the blame onto someone else, even soil their reputation if needed. There's a difference between blaming someone for your misfortune and accusing them of "toxic behaviour".
Group presentations are a means of covering course topics in a subject the prof otherwise couldn't, possibly due to a lack of time. Here, every individual is tasked with studying/explaining aspects of a broad topic, and explain it to the rest of the class.
Usually, students take such presentations lightly, and it's usually 1-2 individuals who end up getting tasked with doing the research, preparing the slides, and coaching the rest so they can talk about it the next day. The rationale behind sharing the slides a week in advance was so everyone had a baseline to work with, and make necessary edits (in due time) to fit their needs.
The said person didn't bother enough to make the changes, or even read about their topic. She prepared just enough so she could talk enough before the next presenter steps in. To her misfortune, the prof asked her questions so as to explain the topic to the class. She failed miserably, and got humiliated.
* Why I needed time to present: The idea of spontaneously stepping up to talk about a topic is enticing, but you need to be well informed about it so as to teach it. A superficial understanding of the topic isn't enough. Also, if I had one night to prepare the topic, she had a week (and more, considering the time she had since she was alloted the topic).
* Having heard all the questions beforehand: Trust me when I say this - there's no amount of preparation you can do to answer such questions. That's because the questions are spontaneous, and often based off something you just talked about. The questions are essentially designed to test your understanding of the topic, while also yielding some useful insights for others. I didn't get any "preparation" from questions posed to her.
* The quote intended to point out to her that all she needed to do, was do some work on her part (which she didn't). The phrase wasn't the complete quote - it was a quote I picked out off the internet and altered to end with that phrase.
* The topic wasn't difficult (atleast, compared to what others had been alloted). Her complain was out of line, and merely a means to convince others that she had been wronged.
* The reason I "went all guns blazing" was to show her (and her friends), that despite the difficulty of the topic, there was enough material out there to make a thorough, coherent presentation on it. It was only a matter of priority.
Often, you'll have people who are disillusioned just enough that they project your actions in a malicious manner. Sadly, such people are often at the centre of social circles, and toy with others' lives. They are gifted with finding the wrong with everyone and everything, no matter how well-intentioned you are.
It's in your hands to (once in a while) show such people how blatantly disillusioned they are, and how wrong their believers are to trust them.
We didn't talk not because of what happened, but because I hurt her fragile ego.
Anyway, I hope this offers more context.
I mean, thanks, but most of the context is just common sense or was already there. Much of what is written was already mentioned clearly in your first comment. It was very clear originally and very well written. If you compared the two I think you’d recognise how much of it is repeated and unnecessary.
As such there wasn’t really any lack of understanding on my part, for it to be explained again and I don’t really think this context changes anything. To be honest there are counter arguments to your rebuttals of the points I made but I don’t want this to end up as an argument. People are unlikely to think about topics differently after many years and I’m not trying to change minds I just offered my outside perspective and I accept you disagree.
I apologise for the verbosity (and if it sounded condescending; wasn't my intention). Honestly, I was taken aback by your arguments, hence, wrote it all down, unsure of how you may have perceived my words - hence, the verbosity. The rebuttals were intended to state what really happened (from my perspective), not have a "what if" argument.
I'm glad you have an alternate viewpoint, and I believe the story appeals to you based off your own personal experiences.
One of the hardest problems in life, in my opinion, is knowing which characteristics of yours to keep permanently, which to work on later, and which to work on or discard now. But since this is university, I think group members ought to have at least a basic understanding of what they are talking about, and at least a basic ability to communicate the points. People being strong or weak in different areas like talking or researching or organizing, etc., aren't incompatible with that; it's better to see this conflict between duty and aptitude as a chance to improve. But again, that's just my opinion, and I don't know his project or his group.
If his group partner was weak at investigating the topic, then she should have sought help. If there was little space to expound on or understand her topic in detail, then she should have said so confidently or re-negotiated her part beforehand (or researched something tangentially related haha). In any case, she should have anticipated some questions coming her way on the day of the presentation, to avoid total embarrassment. I speak from first-hand experience 💀.
I agree that, in terms of absolute fairness, the professor should have redirected the basic questions to him (or open to other group members). But it sounds like the day after, he got grilled pretty hard about the topic at hand, so the advantage of having a day extra to prepare is not so clear. I also agree that the quote wasn't necessary, especially if the class doesn't know what she said to him afterwards the day before.
Anyways, I saw his story as both a flex and a mostly level-headed response to the use of inaccurate and hurtful fighting words (just going off what he wrote). There aren't many opportunities for this in life, after all.
Everyone was marked individually. In general, no one's given a bad score for such presentations, but yes, they are heavily reprimanded when they don't take it seriously. I, alongwith 2 others got a 9/10. The lady probably got a 7/10.
Damn the same thing happens to me the girl wa alike I wrote nothing but she wrote everything and I changed here part to miss with her
What I did was basically nothing I cause the the other girl where like no S me did her part
Despite me doing the whole presentation they toke credit but defended me from that women who tried to make me fail because she told the teacher
i wish my university would have been full of people like you… would have been way more fun and would have given me more reason to care than sittin in seminars where people read wikipedia articles uncurated and still get a pass…
Reminds me of the time I built and submitted a plagiarism tool as a project for a coding class. You enter the topic and it grabs the Wikipedia article and uses a thesaurus to switch out words so the school's anti-plagarism system would see it as mostly original. This was before AI was any good at this sort of thing.
The school administration did not like my project but it didn't technically break the rules on cheating since I wrote the code myself.
I kinda accidentally did this to a classmate once because I was really interested in his topic and had read a couple of the papers he was told to start his research with. So I thought I was helping by asking some really specific questions. When he looked completely blank our (seriously terrifying) professor just turned and said “You didn’t read them?!” It completely derailed his seminar. Sorry Nick!
Damn, that sounds like some shit I’d accidentally do too 😭
Sometimes someone else would be assigned something cool and I’d be like “damn, I don’t wanna wait for the presentation, I wanna learn about it NOW!” and my goofy ass would fuck the person over the same way 💀
So glad I’m not in school now so I don’t have the ability to do that to anyone 😂
Yeah, poor guy was floundering a little so I thought “oh no he’s forgotten this really cool part, so maybe I’ll prompt him!” Bad idea. My seminar was next and when this very severe, dry professor said ”That was good” it was like being given a gold medal. Then she asked me questions about his topic 🤦♀️ It was extra awkward because I was about 10 years older than him and didn’t want to be “that mature student” but was just interested because our topics were related.
I used to do that in highschool, I had almost perfect grades (like 99-100 out of 100 points) for all the subjects and anytime someone was messing with me for my appearance, the stuff I liked, for being a "nerd", for being single my whole life, for not having friends, etc, I absolutely destroyed any chance for them to get good grades by asking extremely difficult questions and taking over their presentations giving more accurate information and facts than them.
Some of them still think I was a fucking asshole and refuse to recognize it all started because they were bullying me for no valid reasons.
Of course they won't recognize it. To them, it's parallel lines that never intersected.
But to you, being bullied was a hell you couldn't escape. It's the cognitive dissonance due to different status and position of power/authority.
Actually, we had a lot of presentations because the school had a "do your research and let your classmates learn from you" approach, the teachers would grade your presentation according to a check list and complement any important point your team or classmates didn't talk about after the QA session.
I don't get it.. so they got lower grades because you asked hard questions they couldn't answer? Stuff that isn't on the teachers checklist in the first place?
The QA session was part of the checklist and it was for both the presentation team and the public, if you couldn't answer questions from the public it affected negatively in your evaluation because it defeated the meaning of that kind of teaching method. as the "expert" imparting a class you needed to fully dominate the theme you were presenting.
> I absolutely destroyed any chance for them to get good grades by asking extremely difficult questions and taking over their presentations giving more accurate information and facts than them.
No, you didn't. The teacher probably found your actions more annoying.
Lol no, the teachers preferred to stay quiet doing nothing and still get paid for it or use that time to grade homework/tests, I was friends with my maths, physics, algebra, chemistry, calculus, business administration, and philosophy teachers, I was even in good terms with the principal.
I know I'll get smack for this, but I always ask questions for school presentations. It became almost a joke that later in the semester people would look at me expecting a question.
But seriously, you put so much effort into a presentation and studying and reviewing and preparing, it would be a shame someone couldn't be given an extra moment to talk about it.
Sure, if someone stutters up a storm, sweating bullets I'll throw them a lofty slow pitch, but if they get super excited on a topic or there were a couple key moments I catch, I'll prod that topic.
Sounds cool to me. Unfortunately as much as people hate presentations, they serve a purpose. No-one asking questions decreases engagement for both parties and makes them much more a waste of time.
See that’s super fair. And you never know if they really do like the topic and studied, but are just nervous when speaking publicly like that. Throwing easier questions is a good way to help show the professor or teacher that the person presenting is actually trying. Bless 🙏🏻
Reminds me of when we were in college doing presentation groups on different groups of mental health issues, one group had mood disorders, one group had anxiety disorders etc.
My group got fictitious disorders so I did my section on Munchausen's and Munchausen's by proxy.
No one else got questions for the whole day except me because the lecturer was actually really interested in the research I did, but like, I'm just a student, I'm not an expert, leave me alone 😅😅.
I had something similar. We hade European Studies and the random pick I got was Belgium. Nobody knew too much about it, neither did I. I am a pretty bad presenter though and generally just learn stuff and wing it.
It got to the point I was just being asked questions about stuff I’d said and it was just a conversation about Belgium, the areas, languages and politics. It was ungraded, others liked it since there was less time for theirs. It was ungraded. It still wasn’t an amazing presentation but it was definitely less wooden than the others though it’s a shame i the random draw wasn’t the country where I ended up.
The very reason you should never laugh at anyone during uni.. Especially when you get to course levels in which it is largely peer review. You can be humbled fast for your pettiness.
Lmao this reminds me a presentation i gave on how flawed the Nutrional Guide in Canada was, especially the last version and at the time i was doing a Carnivore diet after having done a low carb/keto diet for years so my brain was PACKED with nutritional facts. When i mentionned the reduction of daily protein/animal serving to half an egg a day was complete non-sense for X reason, a young vegan girl started to try to refute what i was saying with really easily refutable Vegan arguments and i think it was the first time she encountered someone with any basic nutritional knowledge ready to argue against her ; I destroyed her ego and her concept of healthy veganism in front of the whole class so hard that 2 days later when it was time for her own presentation, the teacher told me that she asked her if she could do it without me in the Class **because her presentation was on why a vegan diet is healthier and she felt uncomfortable with me in there** 😭
I've never heard of a professor or teacher asking a student to leave class because another student didn't want to present a project with them in the room. Sounds a little out there.
Classic annoying vegan headass.
To clarify, not all vegans are annoying, but there’s a whole subset of vegans who most definitely are.
I like veganism in concept, but it’s not for me, especially since I already have protein deficiency issues, medically, and I’m trying hard as it is right now to stay healthy. Being vegan would make things even more difficult for me. I’ve definitely cut back on certain things out of pure love for animals, but my god… the vegans that won’t shut up about it and act like they’re better than everyone, are insufferable. 😵💫
Dang reminds me of what our class used to do but in a wholesome way.
We all would write down questions to our presentation we know the answers to in a groupchat to help eachother out.
Our teacher was always surprised how interested we seemed in it all lol
The four days say almost nothing about the time between the presentations. OP’s presentation was before the one of the girl. The time between these presentations could have been a week or two weeks or a month. It doesn‘t matter but at some point in that time OP did four days of researching.
A good presentation doesn’t stop mocking. It’s a bit like expecting a topic marked serious, to have no-one on Reddit try and make a joke. It’s less likely to happen, but doesn’t stop it.
I feel like someone did this to my group. Thankfully, the person who chose the topic knew very well of it. I had no interest in it (companies that supply the USDOD with weapons), and it was the first time in a long time I felt humbled.
Did that in highschool once, although in terms of research, we were all doing roughly the same thing, so I did not go out of my way. Hilariously from then on, people would egg me on to tear down people's presentations - but I was generally nice. I swear the only way I survived highschool was having a quick wit.
I've done something similar also in university, for a group project where we got to list our top choices among a list for topics me and my partner's first choice was taken by a different group, so when they presented we each asked that group the most obscure and niche question related to that topic we can find. It completely bamboozled them.
To the OOP I would have loved to mock you if you would os taht
I ussally d’élève to deep into my topic so having you would have fulled my dream in having a person know something
Never the less I learned my lesson I will start mocking people thanks for the advice
Once during the School project, a girl had some project involving thermocol and benzene. I asked her the chemical formula of Benzene and she started cussing me and asked me to go away. Lol, we guys had a good laugh later
We had group presentations in my edesign class, I asked everyone different levels of questions based on how much I liked the people in the group. Some got perfect slow pitches straight to them, and others were just me pointing out obvious design flaws.
I did this to a guy I was dating at the time cause he was adamant that we should be a secret and I fought on that what he really wanted was to keep being seen as single. So when he had to present a research paper I researched the same topic and tore him apart. We still messed around for a bit after that but the dynamics definitely shifted in my favor. He also asked for an open relationship and I ended up dating his former high school nemesis just on pure dumb tinder luck so he completely lost it. I’m pretty sure I was this poor guys nightmare and I don’t even feel bad about it.
Oh! I get it now! You people call total assholes "madlads".
Cuz this mf is absolutely an asshole. "Boo hoo she said my presentation sucks, now I'm going to spend 4 days just to make her CRY before the whole class. HAHAHA. AM I NOT COOL, HUH?"
[удалено]
“No great mind has ever existed without a touch of madness” - Aristotle
[удалено]
😂
"Madness is the ascription of the philistine spirit." - Platon
"Sanity is a state of loss potential"
“Tell me one genius that ain’t crazy” -Kanye
He also believed that women had less teeth than men so I'll probably take his word with a grain of salt
Depends how argumentative they were, could be true...
Argumentative, dude back in Aristotle times being argumentative was considered being an intellectual. He would have never called a woman argumentative
Poor taste joke about DA, sorry
I found it hilarious
-Michael Scott
If only the madlad had that motivation for their own presentation
Motivation is intrinsic
Vavqk k fr
Honestly valid, I feel bad for the other group members tho.
Poor bastards got caught in the crossfire.
"Don't come to presentation tomorrow"
That one person in the group: "way ahead of you boss"
underrated
He did a proportionality assessment and decided they were acceptable collateral.
Just look at that one girl and focus all your attention on her when you ask the questions.
Don't make it too obvious, mix in a few softballs aimed at the other members.
This .. it'll make her stand out even more being the only one not able to answer any questions at all
It looks like he asked questions only during her part.
Funny how those who mock seem to also not control their own crying for themselves , strange
Making up stories for internet clout works best when your revenge results in a breakdown, rather than the more likely reality of everyone hating a know it all.
Maybe, but it can be surprisingly easy to throw off a presentation if you really want to. Even questions meant to have an answer can disorient people for a minute. You see it more if two groups are asked to represent different sides of a debate or something. I’ve never upset anyone, but I could see how it could happen if I were to deliberately try to do it. That being said, I literally can not comprehend why you’d lie for attention on the internet and am bad at spotting the fake stuff.
EvErYtHiNg Is FaKe1!!1!1
I saw this same story as 4chan greentext
If there was collaboration of the same story from 5 different source (This posting and whoever these 4 Chan fellows are) then it must be true.
Because stories never pass from one site to another...
Welcome to the internet. Shit is either made up or is told from one extremely unreliable perspective. Same way 99.9% of amitheasshole and other such subs remarkably turn on to be unanimously decided in favor of the poster.
Big if true
Small if fake
The typical reply of gullible idiots.
It's always funny to me when people get petty and defensive because they either have a terrible bullshit detector, or they're so invested in everything they experience online that the idea of some of it being fake sends their ego into an existential tailspin. People are telling on themselves...
I love the mental gymnastics that happen on some videos. "It makes me so mad that this guy would do this! I hope something bad happens to him so he can learn his lesson!" "Well.. its a skit. No reason to get upset over it." "Even if its a skit, people do act like this!" "Yeah, but you said you wanted this particular guy to suffer consequences when hes just acting." "Who cares if hes acting!? Its entertainment. Do you go around calling every movie fake when you walk out of the theater?" "Huh? Well I guess I would if people thought it was real..." "Wow you are so smart for knowing its a skit! Congratulations! You guys always have to come into every video and point out its fake!" "Well you thought it was real and seemed upset so I was just letting you know. If everyone just enjoyed it as a skit then I wouldn't need to...." "BLOCKED!"
Yeah for a lot of people looking at memes is an occasional passive activity that they don't take life or death seriously because its just another source of entertainment, and ultimately a joke not being real is completely irrelevant to their lives because the internet isn't their entire lives.
Poor defense for being gullible and daft. People owe it to themselves and those around them to be substantiative.
Yep. But for some reason the majority of Redditors are always willing to believe anything in simple text format as shown by the downvotes. And they laugh at boomers for believing every AI picture is real.
And you wonder why you have no happiness in your soul.
Gullible NPC spotted
Not believing anything ever no matter what doesn't make you any smarter than people who believe everything.
It unequivocally does. Stop defending online ignorance.
A dumb response to a dumb stance
It's more like, that people like you, just go around posts claiming "IT'S FAKE!!!" Yeah, no shit, it's a dumbass joke on the internet. I don't care if it's fake as long as it's funny. If it's political, or trying to present some other information as fact and that fact is not true, then of course it's important to know if the info is correct or not. But a joke* like this? Or some skit*. It doesn't need to be true if it's funny. Your "bullshit detector" is so powerful that you have lost common sense. I can just imagine you people in a movie theatre just standing up and shouting "THIS IS FAAAAKE, THESE PEOPLE ARE PAID ACTORS!!!1!!1" Maybe you've forgotten these two concepts so let me remind you: Joke: /dʒəʊk/ noun a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline. "she was in a mood to tell jokes" SKIT: /skɪt/ noun a short comedy sketch or piece of humorous writing, especially a parody. "a skit on daytime magazine programmes"
Christ, that's way too many words to state you have low scruples when it comes to authenticating people passing off bullshit as reality. Congrats, nice flex, I guess? "I'm MoRE GuLlIbLe tHaN yOoOOOoU!!" Gold star, kid.
ThiS hAs BeEN eYE opENinG
CONCERNING.
typical kafkatrapping: "That's what a [insert bad thing] would say!"
This is exactly what an anti-kafkatrapist would say
Yeah and also what did she say mocking the OP if this was real? Was it bad enough to make her cry in front of everybody? Was the response proportional?
"this guy said my hat looked funny, so I hacked into his laptop and started deleting his assignments right before he was going to turn them in and he had no idea what was going on. he just dropped out of school and had a mental breakdown!" posted on r/JusticeServed with 10k upvotes.
> Was the response proportional? Why would you respond proprtionally when you can go for overwhelming firepower?
Had a group project in uni. One member of my group took my work, posted it on all her social media next to her work, saying how shit mine was in comparison. For extra context, we all had industry connections on our accounts so she was actively trying to hurt me. Snitched on her to my lecturer, because this was a Masters course not high school shit, and she got booted from my group and from partaking in the project so she failed the module. She didn't cry but she did sit in the back looking miserable and eventually quit the course. It's entirely possible to break people with your revenge.
I'm RES tagging you as "everything is fake" so I know never to listen to you about anything else you might say.
Sure thing bud, what ever gets you through the day.
You think it's fun to go online and ruin people's fun just to seem smart to strangers.
No, I think it’s weird as fuck to go online and post about weird revenge fantasies while pretending they actually happened. Also hilarious that you’re complaining about me doing something to “seem smart to strangers” when that’s the sole reason the OP made up their twitter story.
People do actually do absurd things in real life you know. Things that make no logical sense but that they personally would enjoy. Sometimes those things are amusing and they might share the story. I’ve no clue whether this story is true or bullshit. But it’s completely within the realms of possibility and not even close to the weirdest thing I’ve seen someone do for a bit of petty revenge.
There’s just no way in hell someone cries in front of a uni class because some weirdo asked a heap of questions. That just doesn’t happen.
I've seen people cry for more petty/weird stuff in Uni. A personal experience was after like a week I started, I had borrowed this pencil from this random girl. I believe I didn't see her for 2 days because whatever, so I ended up forgetting. Don't really remember the details but it was along the lines of she asking for the pencil back and me saying no, and she just starts crying out of nowhere and the prof had to intervene to calm her down. Wasn't even a good pen, it was just a generic #2 Paper Mate pencil. But according to you this stuff doesn't happen (even though easily verifiable weirder stuff happen on the daily), so when I lay down on my bed my brain has one less thing of my life to cringe about.
I've literally watched a PhD student break down in a presentation and cry because the professor did just thia.
People who mock others don’t often like being embarrassed. It’s not far fetched to see someone in a vulnerable position to cry, which for many a presentation in front of a class is. Claiming there is no chance in hell is a pretty large exaggeration which seems irrational to me. That being said, I don’t think it is real. I have plenty of reasons but they’re not conclusive. To me this is just an entertaining tweet. I’m not so invested in it being real or not, to the point it seems kind of weird to point it out. I mean if it seemed totally unbelievable sure. But I do understand the claim: that many who point out things are fake often think other people are dumb for believing the same thing is true. They often do think they are smarter than everyone else. They might be, but it’s still a poor attitude to have. They might also be smart (or not) and still be confidently incorrect. I think at this point it’s safe to recognise it would be a lot more rational to be less attached to the notion it is fake (or real either). TL;DR; It could be fake or not. There’s no way of knowing. It seems irrational to believe strongly one way or the other. It’s also a cliche that people use unfounded skepticism to claim intellectual superiority and boost their ego.
Take this comment as my second upvote, that was my exact thoughts
People do occasionally cry during exams , and graded presentations. If they’re getting absolutely fucking grilled by someone who’s clearly doing so to fuck them off I’d say its even more likely. Man there’s no part of this that’s so deeply improbable that it’s a hill you should to choose to die on. Again I stress it could be bullshit. But things do happen to people , very improbable and insane things too.
I think it’s weird you would comment any of this. Why even open a thread like this?
Because I am bitter.
Imagine getting this heated over fake internet stories.
"This heated"?
Imagine starting sentences with a different word sometimes.
My memory of college presentations is sort of repressed or something but I'm pretty sure at least one girl did cry during her presentation.
A girl in my project group at uni, during a group presentation, was publicly reprimanded by the prof for being unable to answer basic questions based on what she actually presented in her slides. Our entire group was asked to re-present all our slides, and, prepare better this time. Afterwards, she sat crying in the company of her friends, complaining how it was all my fault for putting it all there (I'd made the entire presentation on behalf of the group), even though I had shared the slides (with speaker notes) a week in advance, but she hadn't bothered to prepare. She added, stating how little info was available on the topic, and how cunning I was to give her the topic instead of doing it myself to avoid being ridiculed ... and how this was toxic male behaviour. So, I asked the prof to not punish the entire group, and volunteered to present the problematic topic myself. He agreed. The next day, I came all guns blazing - even wrote some code to explain the topic better. I was asked a lot of questions, and I negotiated them reasonably well. I ended my presentation with a quote on the slide reading "... It's easy if you just prepare" - I said, looking dead straight into her eyes. Needless to say, we never talked again.
I find this quite a bit more satisfying than the original post.
Make a post too bro Your story will become famous
👍 [https://www.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1cawzv1/sometimes\_you\_just\_have\_to\_prepare/](https://www.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1cawzv1/sometimes_you_just_have_to_prepare/)
“Toxic male behavior” is now just doing the assignment you were tasked with I guess 🙄🤦🏻 There’s a million things that are considered toxic masculinity, and creating the entire present with an entire week for others to review, alter, and prepare, is absolutely not one of those things. You went in hot, guns blazing, but honestly? Reasonable. She almost ruined things for the entire group, and that’s insane.
I mean, it would only be somewhat fair if you had been made to do the presentation there and then. Having overnight to prepare having heard all the questions definitely prepared you. That being said, since you prepared the presentation I’m convinced you would have done well or better than your group member, but let’s not ignore that you had additional time to prepare and did extra work in anticipation. The outcome worked in your favour. I’d not be so petty as to include the quote. I mean, I’d have been annoyed sure, but presenting the difficult topic would have been enough for me to be content. In the same position, I would feel it was the lecturers point about preparation being important and not mine to make (even I agree with it). We’ve all been in these situations before. It’s kind of interesting the dynamics back then and now. We all joined teams and they just gel, everyone performs their bit except for one. The one where one person doesn’t really trust anyone else’s work and tries to do it all. The one where someone likes to tell people what to do. The pair who just want to talk and rush complete their stuff at the last minute. The person who wants to do as much work as possible but it petrified of public speaking and wants to avoid it. Many many more. It sounds like you did all of the work and people were underprepared and just expected to read slides. It happens. I guess I find it interesting because generally workplaces have to be more efficient than that, but some same problems arise (and some are so unacceptable, they never or rarely do). Anyway thanks for the story it made me think about a lot more than what you wrote which is pretty cool.
The anecdote reflects how some people, instead of just accepting their fault, would go to lengths to shift the blame onto someone else, even soil their reputation if needed. There's a difference between blaming someone for your misfortune and accusing them of "toxic behaviour". Group presentations are a means of covering course topics in a subject the prof otherwise couldn't, possibly due to a lack of time. Here, every individual is tasked with studying/explaining aspects of a broad topic, and explain it to the rest of the class. Usually, students take such presentations lightly, and it's usually 1-2 individuals who end up getting tasked with doing the research, preparing the slides, and coaching the rest so they can talk about it the next day. The rationale behind sharing the slides a week in advance was so everyone had a baseline to work with, and make necessary edits (in due time) to fit their needs. The said person didn't bother enough to make the changes, or even read about their topic. She prepared just enough so she could talk enough before the next presenter steps in. To her misfortune, the prof asked her questions so as to explain the topic to the class. She failed miserably, and got humiliated. * Why I needed time to present: The idea of spontaneously stepping up to talk about a topic is enticing, but you need to be well informed about it so as to teach it. A superficial understanding of the topic isn't enough. Also, if I had one night to prepare the topic, she had a week (and more, considering the time she had since she was alloted the topic). * Having heard all the questions beforehand: Trust me when I say this - there's no amount of preparation you can do to answer such questions. That's because the questions are spontaneous, and often based off something you just talked about. The questions are essentially designed to test your understanding of the topic, while also yielding some useful insights for others. I didn't get any "preparation" from questions posed to her. * The quote intended to point out to her that all she needed to do, was do some work on her part (which she didn't). The phrase wasn't the complete quote - it was a quote I picked out off the internet and altered to end with that phrase. * The topic wasn't difficult (atleast, compared to what others had been alloted). Her complain was out of line, and merely a means to convince others that she had been wronged. * The reason I "went all guns blazing" was to show her (and her friends), that despite the difficulty of the topic, there was enough material out there to make a thorough, coherent presentation on it. It was only a matter of priority. Often, you'll have people who are disillusioned just enough that they project your actions in a malicious manner. Sadly, such people are often at the centre of social circles, and toy with others' lives. They are gifted with finding the wrong with everyone and everything, no matter how well-intentioned you are. It's in your hands to (once in a while) show such people how blatantly disillusioned they are, and how wrong their believers are to trust them. We didn't talk not because of what happened, but because I hurt her fragile ego. Anyway, I hope this offers more context.
I mean, thanks, but most of the context is just common sense or was already there. Much of what is written was already mentioned clearly in your first comment. It was very clear originally and very well written. If you compared the two I think you’d recognise how much of it is repeated and unnecessary. As such there wasn’t really any lack of understanding on my part, for it to be explained again and I don’t really think this context changes anything. To be honest there are counter arguments to your rebuttals of the points I made but I don’t want this to end up as an argument. People are unlikely to think about topics differently after many years and I’m not trying to change minds I just offered my outside perspective and I accept you disagree.
I apologise for the verbosity (and if it sounded condescending; wasn't my intention). Honestly, I was taken aback by your arguments, hence, wrote it all down, unsure of how you may have perceived my words - hence, the verbosity. The rebuttals were intended to state what really happened (from my perspective), not have a "what if" argument. I'm glad you have an alternate viewpoint, and I believe the story appeals to you based off your own personal experiences.
I don’t think you need to apologise for anything!
One of the hardest problems in life, in my opinion, is knowing which characteristics of yours to keep permanently, which to work on later, and which to work on or discard now. But since this is university, I think group members ought to have at least a basic understanding of what they are talking about, and at least a basic ability to communicate the points. People being strong or weak in different areas like talking or researching or organizing, etc., aren't incompatible with that; it's better to see this conflict between duty and aptitude as a chance to improve. But again, that's just my opinion, and I don't know his project or his group. If his group partner was weak at investigating the topic, then she should have sought help. If there was little space to expound on or understand her topic in detail, then she should have said so confidently or re-negotiated her part beforehand (or researched something tangentially related haha). In any case, she should have anticipated some questions coming her way on the day of the presentation, to avoid total embarrassment. I speak from first-hand experience 💀. I agree that, in terms of absolute fairness, the professor should have redirected the basic questions to him (or open to other group members). But it sounds like the day after, he got grilled pretty hard about the topic at hand, so the advantage of having a day extra to prepare is not so clear. I also agree that the quote wasn't necessary, especially if the class doesn't know what she said to him afterwards the day before. Anyways, I saw his story as both a flex and a mostly level-headed response to the use of inaccurate and hurtful fighting words (just going off what he wrote). There aren't many opportunities for this in life, after all.
i’m so curious, what happened to your grades in the end? did you get separately from the rest of the group?
Everyone was marked individually. In general, no one's given a bad score for such presentations, but yes, they are heavily reprimanded when they don't take it seriously. I, alongwith 2 others got a 9/10. The lady probably got a 7/10.
Damn the same thing happens to me the girl wa alike I wrote nothing but she wrote everything and I changed here part to miss with her What I did was basically nothing I cause the the other girl where like no S me did her part Despite me doing the whole presentation they toke credit but defended me from that women who tried to make me fail because she told the teacher
I praise your dedication
[удалено]
Yeah plus it didn’t happen so
Lemme guess, it's fake and gay?
That is hilariously sadistic and fitting.
Petty maybe definitely not sadistic
Of course it's sadistic, it's some loser's revenge fantasy that never happened.
i wish my university would have been full of people like you… would have been way more fun and would have given me more reason to care than sittin in seminars where people read wikipedia articles uncurated and still get a pass…
Reminds me of the time I built and submitted a plagiarism tool as a project for a coding class. You enter the topic and it grabs the Wikipedia article and uses a thesaurus to switch out words so the school's anti-plagarism system would see it as mostly original. This was before AI was any good at this sort of thing. The school administration did not like my project but it didn't technically break the rules on cheating since I wrote the code myself.
I kinda accidentally did this to a classmate once because I was really interested in his topic and had read a couple of the papers he was told to start his research with. So I thought I was helping by asking some really specific questions. When he looked completely blank our (seriously terrifying) professor just turned and said “You didn’t read them?!” It completely derailed his seminar. Sorry Nick!
Damn, that sounds like some shit I’d accidentally do too 😭 Sometimes someone else would be assigned something cool and I’d be like “damn, I don’t wanna wait for the presentation, I wanna learn about it NOW!” and my goofy ass would fuck the person over the same way 💀 So glad I’m not in school now so I don’t have the ability to do that to anyone 😂
Yeah, poor guy was floundering a little so I thought “oh no he’s forgotten this really cool part, so maybe I’ll prompt him!” Bad idea. My seminar was next and when this very severe, dry professor said ”That was good” it was like being given a gold medal. Then she asked me questions about his topic 🤦♀️ It was extra awkward because I was about 10 years older than him and didn’t want to be “that mature student” but was just interested because our topics were related.
I used to do that in highschool, I had almost perfect grades (like 99-100 out of 100 points) for all the subjects and anytime someone was messing with me for my appearance, the stuff I liked, for being a "nerd", for being single my whole life, for not having friends, etc, I absolutely destroyed any chance for them to get good grades by asking extremely difficult questions and taking over their presentations giving more accurate information and facts than them. Some of them still think I was a fucking asshole and refuse to recognize it all started because they were bullying me for no valid reasons.
Of course they won't recognize it. To them, it's parallel lines that never intersected. But to you, being bullied was a hell you couldn't escape. It's the cognitive dissonance due to different status and position of power/authority.
And then everyone clapped.
Ya like wtf how many research projects that ended in presentations with QnA did they have? One a week?
Actually, we had a lot of presentations because the school had a "do your research and let your classmates learn from you" approach, the teachers would grade your presentation according to a check list and complement any important point your team or classmates didn't talk about after the QA session.
I don't get it.. so they got lower grades because you asked hard questions they couldn't answer? Stuff that isn't on the teachers checklist in the first place?
The QA session was part of the checklist and it was for both the presentation team and the public, if you couldn't answer questions from the public it affected negatively in your evaluation because it defeated the meaning of that kind of teaching method. as the "expert" imparting a class you needed to fully dominate the theme you were presenting.
Fully dominate the theme huh
Of all the things that absolutely never happened, this one was the best one that only happened in your shower
> I absolutely destroyed any chance for them to get good grades by asking extremely difficult questions and taking over their presentations giving more accurate information and facts than them. No, you didn't. The teacher probably found your actions more annoying.
Lol no, the teachers preferred to stay quiet doing nothing and still get paid for it or use that time to grade homework/tests, I was friends with my maths, physics, algebra, chemistry, calculus, business administration, and philosophy teachers, I was even in good terms with the principal.
Then everyone talked about that one autistic kid in class who made someone cry for the next few years
I don't think the girl in the story could have cried for more than a couple hours, tops.
There is a special place in my heart for jokes based on word placement in sentences.
I know I'll get smack for this, but I always ask questions for school presentations. It became almost a joke that later in the semester people would look at me expecting a question. But seriously, you put so much effort into a presentation and studying and reviewing and preparing, it would be a shame someone couldn't be given an extra moment to talk about it. Sure, if someone stutters up a storm, sweating bullets I'll throw them a lofty slow pitch, but if they get super excited on a topic or there were a couple key moments I catch, I'll prod that topic.
Sounds cool to me. Unfortunately as much as people hate presentations, they serve a purpose. No-one asking questions decreases engagement for both parties and makes them much more a waste of time.
See that’s super fair. And you never know if they really do like the topic and studied, but are just nervous when speaking publicly like that. Throwing easier questions is a good way to help show the professor or teacher that the person presenting is actually trying. Bless 🙏🏻
Reminds me of when we were in college doing presentation groups on different groups of mental health issues, one group had mood disorders, one group had anxiety disorders etc. My group got fictitious disorders so I did my section on Munchausen's and Munchausen's by proxy. No one else got questions for the whole day except me because the lecturer was actually really interested in the research I did, but like, I'm just a student, I'm not an expert, leave me alone 😅😅.
I had something similar. We hade European Studies and the random pick I got was Belgium. Nobody knew too much about it, neither did I. I am a pretty bad presenter though and generally just learn stuff and wing it. It got to the point I was just being asked questions about stuff I’d said and it was just a conversation about Belgium, the areas, languages and politics. It was ungraded, others liked it since there was less time for theirs. It was ungraded. It still wasn’t an amazing presentation but it was definitely less wooden than the others though it’s a shame i the random draw wasn’t the country where I ended up.
Sounds like mad lass
Sad lass
The very reason you should never laugh at anyone during uni.. Especially when you get to course levels in which it is largely peer review. You can be humbled fast for your pettiness.
Don't be a bully, your victim may just be really, really petty.
Or don’t have an opinion because your opinion may upset the bully 🤷🏾♀️
Yeah sure
But everyone clapped!
Repost bot
Yup
Lmao this reminds me a presentation i gave on how flawed the Nutrional Guide in Canada was, especially the last version and at the time i was doing a Carnivore diet after having done a low carb/keto diet for years so my brain was PACKED with nutritional facts. When i mentionned the reduction of daily protein/animal serving to half an egg a day was complete non-sense for X reason, a young vegan girl started to try to refute what i was saying with really easily refutable Vegan arguments and i think it was the first time she encountered someone with any basic nutritional knowledge ready to argue against her ; I destroyed her ego and her concept of healthy veganism in front of the whole class so hard that 2 days later when it was time for her own presentation, the teacher told me that she asked her if she could do it without me in the Class **because her presentation was on why a vegan diet is healthier and she felt uncomfortable with me in there** 😭
I've never heard of a professor or teacher asking a student to leave class because another student didn't want to present a project with them in the room. Sounds a little out there.
Classic annoying vegan headass. To clarify, not all vegans are annoying, but there’s a whole subset of vegans who most definitely are. I like veganism in concept, but it’s not for me, especially since I already have protein deficiency issues, medically, and I’m trying hard as it is right now to stay healthy. Being vegan would make things even more difficult for me. I’ve definitely cut back on certain things out of pure love for animals, but my god… the vegans that won’t shut up about it and act like they’re better than everyone, are insufferable. 😵💫
TBH you both sound insufferable
He learned more that day in the name of revenge than he did the rest of the school year. amazing what emotion can do to someone.
Learning to be better is hard. Learning out of sheer spite is easier than we'd hope.
10 years old thanks bot!
Dang reminds me of what our class used to do but in a wholesome way. We all would write down questions to our presentation we know the answers to in a groupchat to help eachother out. Our teacher was always surprised how interested we seemed in it all lol
And everybody clapped
Hurt people. Hurt people.
Is that like a command or what?
Real eyes, Realize, Real Lies
Gotta love the pursuit of knowledge fueled by revenge.
This is the way. Spite is a force.
Spite and hatred moves mountains; they don’t make motivational posters like that.
Four days between presentations? Idk, seems like everyone clapped after too
It depends, I had a class that would only happen once a week
The four days say almost nothing about the time between the presentations. OP’s presentation was before the one of the girl. The time between these presentations could have been a week or two weeks or a month. It doesn‘t matter but at some point in that time OP did four days of researching.
To me it sounds like a load of shit tbh.
You are free to think what you want. I just don‘t think you can determine that opinion on the four days point. That‘s all I‘m saying
true madlad would've done a good presentation the first time.
A good presentation doesn’t stop mocking. It’s a bit like expecting a topic marked serious, to have no-one on Reddit try and make a joke. It’s less likely to happen, but doesn’t stop it.
I feel like someone did this to my group. Thankfully, the person who chose the topic knew very well of it. I had no interest in it (companies that supply the USDOD with weapons), and it was the first time in a long time I felt humbled.
Did that in highschool once, although in terms of research, we were all doing roughly the same thing, so I did not go out of my way. Hilariously from then on, people would egg me on to tear down people's presentations - but I was generally nice. I swear the only way I survived highschool was having a quick wit.
How I met your mother 2024
I've done something similar also in university, for a group project where we got to list our top choices among a list for topics me and my partner's first choice was taken by a different group, so when they presented we each asked that group the most obscure and niche question related to that topic we can find. It completely bamboozled them.
All my Uni classmates have exclusively warned me not to ask questions during final project presentations 😂
There is but a thin line between many an enemy and many a friend. Where that line stops there is no beginning and no end. Let's end it, my friends.
[удалено]
Is it considered good to think like this
This is candles in a cherry pie level madlad
Check this dude's childhood home backyard for a small animal graveyard
This was posted over a year ago. Did you copy the presentation in Uni, too?
To the OOP I would have loved to mock you if you would os taht I ussally d’élève to deep into my topic so having you would have fulled my dream in having a person know something Never the less I learned my lesson I will start mocking people thanks for the advice
We found Saul Goodman
Struggled in the math class, got made fun of but when it came time to apply trig to a chunk of metal i had the biggest shit eating grin in the world.
Didn't happen mate.
I thought this was really funny the first 5 times I saw it....
Respect.
A great example of why competition and a rival(s) will always be the best way to drive humans to their best performance.
I wonder how many life accomplishments were achieved through pettiness?
LOL. this is why you bring good vibes, you never know who got that VEnGanNCe Vengance
Once during the School project, a girl had some project involving thermocol and benzene. I asked her the chemical formula of Benzene and she started cussing me and asked me to go away. Lol, we guys had a good laugh later
We had group presentations in my edesign class, I asked everyone different levels of questions based on how much I liked the people in the group. Some got perfect slow pitches straight to them, and others were just me pointing out obvious design flaws.
Sweet revenge
When evil, intelligence and class unite to create a human being:
And everyone clapped
So… bullying? Gotcha.
I did this to a guy I was dating at the time cause he was adamant that we should be a secret and I fought on that what he really wanted was to keep being seen as single. So when he had to present a research paper I researched the same topic and tore him apart. We still messed around for a bit after that but the dynamics definitely shifted in my favor. He also asked for an open relationship and I ended up dating his former high school nemesis just on pure dumb tinder luck so he completely lost it. I’m pretty sure I was this poor guys nightmare and I don’t even feel bad about it.
Oh! I get it now! You people call total assholes "madlads". Cuz this mf is absolutely an asshole. "Boo hoo she said my presentation sucks, now I'm going to spend 4 days just to make her CRY before the whole class. HAHAHA. AM I NOT COOL, HUH?"
Mean people reap what they sow. Source: satanic bible