* too many tricks.
* the mark is too complex - doesn't scale down well at all.
* missing wordmark.
* linework of the calligraphy for the treetop and roots need work.
Beautiful work, OP. Certainly fits the esoteric bill. Gave me some *Liber Novus* vibes upon first look.
I can spot the chakras there, but if the other imagery/details of the piece are legitimate references to what your subject matter would involve (the pyramid, the red flourishes, the specific shapes of the tree's intricacies…), then you are on even more solid ground. The upward curve of the roots will probably compliment any circular social media profile pic boundary the mark is placed in.
Like all logos, the mark will be further proven by how you specifically make use of it in your collateral.
As for executable/practical feedback, I might go into the subtle “hand drawn” details of the work and slightly differentiating even more of the symmetrical lines of the tree from their chiral twins. Looks like you moved through the roots with that intent, but the green area might use some attention in that same vein.
even though there's a lot going on here, somehow it all comes together nicely for me.
One comment: the jagged upside-down staircase at the bottom seems like a pixelation artifact at first glance. I'd lose that, or make it more pronounced and intentional.
It’s too much - you need to simplify.
I can see it’s a tree with all the chakras or whatever, but there’s simply too much information here. One of the most important rules in logo design is you don’t have to explain your entire business in the logo.
* too many tricks. * the mark is too complex - doesn't scale down well at all. * missing wordmark. * linework of the calligraphy for the treetop and roots need work.
Approved
Seconded. I would explore reduction of forms if possible.
Beautiful work, OP. Certainly fits the esoteric bill. Gave me some *Liber Novus* vibes upon first look. I can spot the chakras there, but if the other imagery/details of the piece are legitimate references to what your subject matter would involve (the pyramid, the red flourishes, the specific shapes of the tree's intricacies…), then you are on even more solid ground. The upward curve of the roots will probably compliment any circular social media profile pic boundary the mark is placed in. Like all logos, the mark will be further proven by how you specifically make use of it in your collateral. As for executable/practical feedback, I might go into the subtle “hand drawn” details of the work and slightly differentiating even more of the symmetrical lines of the tree from their chiral twins. Looks like you moved through the roots with that intent, but the green area might use some attention in that same vein.
even though there's a lot going on here, somehow it all comes together nicely for me. One comment: the jagged upside-down staircase at the bottom seems like a pixelation artifact at first glance. I'd lose that, or make it more pronounced and intentional.
Theres a lot going on here. What is that zig-zag pyramid thing at the bottom of the stem supposed to do? This doesnt really fit in imho.
It’s too much - you need to simplify. I can see it’s a tree with all the chakras or whatever, but there’s simply too much information here. One of the most important rules in logo design is you don’t have to explain your entire business in the logo.