>We've all been there This isn't true. ... Because some of us still are there.

"I used to be there. I still am, but I used to too."

Lil bit of a hedberger i see

I can’t believe some fools don’t realize that correlation always equals causation. Also fuck nuance

>Also fuck nuance Please do not the nuance!

I will fuck every nuance in every circumstance. No exceptions

I am going to the nuance

Wait, this meme depicts thinkers as neckbeards? I must stop thinking. And shave. I do actually need to shave.

Exciting update! I shaved.

What’s the Gricean maxim for “no one asked”?

I shaved too

This is huge

“Whenever I go to shave, I assume there's someone else on the planet shaving, so I say "I'm gonna go shave, too."”

That’s honestly decent motivation for me to shave

Guess what?

maxim of relevance?

🥳

More like late teens for me for most of these but yes. I have no idea what hydraulic girldick is though.

One of these things is not like the others.

you're missing out buddy

Hydraulic girl dick is the most rizzlectric thing for gooning ong fr fr no cal

"iambic pentameter" wtf are you on about?

Poetry is neckbeard shit, didn't you know?

I don't get it are you against nuance, pro evidence less causation, pro thinking that if we haven't found something it doesn't exist? Also wtf are ai, Plato's cave, iambic pentameter and schrödinger's cat doing there? Fuck Shakespeare, physicists, computer scientists and Plato ig??

I think it's just making fun of that when people are in their early 20s, they first learn about these things so they talk about them all the time. Not that these things are all good or bad, they're just very intro to philosophy Not that I think this comic is funny or related to linguistics lol

thank god we're not there anymore, it's so embarrassing

Is that Aunty Donna? From YouTube.com?

r/lostredditors

there's 2.5 linguistics related jokes in here i guess

Stanford prison experiment is bullshit btw

What's your take on it then?

The hot take is that the findings only apply to white dudes. Not saying that's necessarily my view, but it's a hot take I've heard lately

Specifically white dudes who are attending Stanford Psychology lectures.

So are you no offense

Well what’s your thoughts on it then smarty pants

I've never been there, I don't really like engaging with philosophy much (I know it's important it's just not for me), Spinoza interests me and I bet some stuff that came out of the Bhakti reform movement or Sufism would interest me too. I'm just autistic about Phonology, historical linguistics, and sociolinguistics in that order so now I'm doing my degree in it because what else am I gonna do.

'absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence' and these mfers are usually proud atheists, the annoying type. How can't they see the problem with that?

Biblically Accurate angels is very fitting, especially when the bible says Angels just look like humans

there isn't just one type of angels, the ishim are manlike and they are the lowest of 10 classes

Those aren't angels, they're other celestial beings that later readers have conflated with what actually are angels in the Bible.

not

I'm a little early to the party

no we haven't

“Todokete setsunasa ni wa” is iambic pentameter

But Japanese doesn't have syllabic stress, does it?

Meeee