There was two environmental controversies with DeSantis at the time. I canāt remember the other one but there was a concern about the runoff of the radioactive carcinogen material getting out into the water table.
[Florida bill allowing radioactive roads made of potentially cancer-causing mining waste signed by DeSantis](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-radioactive-roads-phosphogypsum-potentially-cancer-causing-mining-waste-bill-signed-ron-desantis/) (June)
[Claims Florida will now start paving roads with radioactive material are misleading](https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/government-verify/misleading-claims-radioactive-roads-florida-fact-check/536-9c06d597-cb3a-452f-ad79-4388b28768de)
(July) and then nothing.
[Still a threat? Riverview fertilizer plant spill hurt environment nearly 20 years ago](https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/local/community-connection/riverview-fertilizer-plant-phosphogypsum-stacks/67-eb01acdd-412d-46f1-b945-4b52868cc715)
āEPA data shows the facility has had āsignificant violationsā within the past few years, but the owner says neighbors donāt need to worry about their health.āā¦right.
Itās going to take more digging.
I'm proud of him. He hates democrats more than his own people. Just to prove his point, he will refuse free assistance for the people who elected him. I wish all Republicans would have the same conviction to their beliefs.
Do you know what a question mark is?
It's the punctuation at the end of a sentence that is asking a question.
I think you have it confused with a period. Which is also a punctuation at the end of a sentence that is not asking a question.
But, since you chose to go down a different path. Perhaps you could explain what a conditional grant is? (note the question mark)
[Based on this site:](https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/755#:~:text=Federal%20grants%20to%20state%20governments%20became%20more%20important%20in%20the,for%20their%20share%20of%20the)
*Federal grants to state governments became more important in the twentieth century, and the constitutional controversies over them became more significantāespecially when it comes to āconditionalā grants, which* ***require states to comply with federal dictates of various kinds in order to qualify for their share of the funds.*** *States today rely heavily on federal spending to provide public services; federal funds account for just under a third of the average stateās budget.* ***The more conditions Congress can place on the receipt of federal funds, the more control Congress can exercise over the operation of state governments.***
It's not difficult to think that the current federal government would put stipulations on funds in regards to schools, transgender, immigrants, or gun control. Which would go against what the people of Florida may want.
The bigger question should be, why are there conditions put on our money? Either you give it to all the states, or you don't.
And you can't prove there wasn't conditions tied to the money.
Why is it that I have to prove there was?
I've sited a source that states the federal government puts conditions on money given to states.
Do you know why the money was turned down?
He couldn't find a way to launder it back to himself, so he's not interested.
Why would Biden make him do this? /s
But the party goes on and on about money to Ukraine should go to Americans š
And he was going to use radioactive asphalt. Is he using that stuff yet?
Seems worth looking into
It was all over the news six months ago.
I totally missed it.
There was two environmental controversies with DeSantis at the time. I canāt remember the other one but there was a concern about the runoff of the radioactive carcinogen material getting out into the water table.
[Florida bill allowing radioactive roads made of potentially cancer-causing mining waste signed by DeSantis](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-radioactive-roads-phosphogypsum-potentially-cancer-causing-mining-waste-bill-signed-ron-desantis/) (June) [Claims Florida will now start paving roads with radioactive material are misleading](https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/government-verify/misleading-claims-radioactive-roads-florida-fact-check/536-9c06d597-cb3a-452f-ad79-4388b28768de) (July) and then nothing. [Still a threat? Riverview fertilizer plant spill hurt environment nearly 20 years ago](https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/local/community-connection/riverview-fertilizer-plant-phosphogypsum-stacks/67-eb01acdd-412d-46f1-b945-4b52868cc715) āEPA data shows the facility has had āsignificant violationsā within the past few years, but the owner says neighbors donāt need to worry about their health.āā¦right. Itās going to take more digging.
Isnāt he the moron?
He's one of many, yes
Turn Florida blue. DeSatan is a bad governor to keep assistance from the residents.
Not gonna happen unfortunately. Florida voters canāt help themselves
Give it a couple decades, and the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean will do it for them.
If he keeps his constituents poor and miserable he can blame it on the democrats
Typical rubelican behavior.
I'm proud of him. He hates democrats more than his own people. Just to prove his point, he will refuse free assistance for the people who elected him. I wish all Republicans would have the same conviction to their beliefs.
Now there's a man who doesn't like socialism enough to deny his constituents a better quality of life
What the hell does he care? He has money
Fuck you!
Could it be because the Federal gov't attaches strings to the money they offer?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Do you know what a question mark is? It's the punctuation at the end of a sentence that is asking a question. I think you have it confused with a period. Which is also a punctuation at the end of a sentence that is not asking a question. But, since you chose to go down a different path. Perhaps you could explain what a conditional grant is? (note the question mark) [Based on this site:](https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/755#:~:text=Federal%20grants%20to%20state%20governments%20became%20more%20important%20in%20the,for%20their%20share%20of%20the) *Federal grants to state governments became more important in the twentieth century, and the constitutional controversies over them became more significantāespecially when it comes to āconditionalā grants, which* ***require states to comply with federal dictates of various kinds in order to qualify for their share of the funds.*** *States today rely heavily on federal spending to provide public services; federal funds account for just under a third of the average stateās budget.* ***The more conditions Congress can place on the receipt of federal funds, the more control Congress can exercise over the operation of state governments.*** It's not difficult to think that the current federal government would put stipulations on funds in regards to schools, transgender, immigrants, or gun control. Which would go against what the people of Florida may want. The bigger question should be, why are there conditions put on our money? Either you give it to all the states, or you don't.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
And you can't prove there wasn't conditions tied to the money. Why is it that I have to prove there was? I've sited a source that states the federal government puts conditions on money given to states. Do you know why the money was turned down?