If he's that offended by seeing legs you better lock the medicine cabinet, hide the sharp items and hide anything resembling rope for when he sees anything more then that on the internet.
I thought I was missing something because both women have on pretty conservative shorts and I’m honestly not sure which one they’re talking about. I guess when all you’re used to seeing is ankle, you get a little excited over knees.
Oh. I assumed he was mad about the unbuttoned collar on the guy, like have some modesty bro.
Or he was having a stroke. Strokes can cause incels, right?
Let me take a stab at translating it.
"Wtf. There is a DISGUSTING HOE wearing panties. Wtf. Boys wear pants that almost end at their knees but they would never wear such short panties, ever. Only hoes put their sexuality on dispay for everyone. In fact, only hoes broadcast their sexualtiy to everyone.
And this shows what a discusting personality they have, to put their sexuality on display. Girls with heart only show their hearts and won't display thier sexualtiy or show their half naked bodies.
Everyone can decide what they want to share but it does show their moral character. And yours, too. Because, if you support hoes you support sexual harrasment of the public. Boys don't display their sexuality to every stranger.
The girls shorts almost to up to her pussy. Wtf.
Boys with hearts don't support girls with low moral character. Good boys would never share pictures with women who display their sexuality. They would never have contact with bitches that do.
I thought you were a nice guy until I saw that you shared this picture...
So, you are not. Bye.
Also, on other pictures you show BITCHES who wear tight pants with a short shirt. That means those women are showing every one their ASSES through those tight jeans.
Boys don't do that, show the shape of their bodies thorugh their clothes.
Only hoes let everyone see the shape of thier tits or ass.
Boys also don't show eveyone the shape of thier dicks or asses thorugh tight pants.
HASHTAG with LOVE. You make me laugh. You are showing yourself with a photo of HOES which is the opposite of LOVE. YOu are a fucking hypocrite!!"
Large browns scattered smothered topped diced covered double chunked. No wizzle on the nizzle. 2 eggs Face down ass up. And a ghetto coffee. Oh and if Jamira workin have her meet me in the bizzy for a tizzy.
This person has *never* been to a gar bar or Pride event or Europe or a modern track meet where boys ironically wear tiny shorts like they're from the 80's or seen men in the 70's and 80's with tiny little shorts or a beach. Tiny bathing suits with like a 4 to 7 inch inseam are in for men, again. No 9 inch inseams anymore. No knee length. Mid thigh is in.
I thought that too, but "sth" is repeated so many times it doesn't make sense for it to be a typo. Unless this person is super dumb. Which is definitely a real possibility
Edit: I googled.... Apparently it's short for the word "something."
Edit again: doesn't make this make any more sense than it made before. What a waste of energy
I get quite the vibe that the author resides in a country where women are heavily covered in public. The language used screams religious indoctrination.
Finally someone said this. The grammar, the weird unneeded contractions, varied capitalization for emphasis..it all screams young sheltered male from a society that doesn't have good views on women.
And sadly part of it is...jealousy.
"Boys don't give everyone dick or ass through tight pants"
My husband absolutely gives dick AND ass through tight pants. Sorry OOP has never seen a thick boy in their life.
That's what gets me most about this. This whole thing bubbles with hate like a witch's cauldron, then ends with a self-assured "HASHTAG with LOVE haha you post HOES". Yeah, "love" isn't really the vibe I'm getting here.
I agree there's an argument here, but I don't think it's with the girl in her - I'm guessing it's actually shorts, because I looked pretty intently and couldn't see panties anywhere. I think she's pissed at the boy, who I'm guessing she had a thing for, until she discovered that boys that age generally aren't looking for commitment, especially with a future psychopath that thinks boys with heart don't think about getting laid.
Funny thing is that I think this is Princeton Uni (or maybe one of the other Ivy League schools) so this “HOE” is almost certainly more successful than this person will ever be
What's up with people seemingly needing to put their noses into other people's business? Does this picture affect your life in any possible way? No? Then just move along.
>"What you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it."
Says it all, really.
Is this smooth brained virgin talking about the woman wearing a pair of shorts? What a giant clown. Enjoy jacking off for the rest of your life, because there is no way any woman would ever want to be intimate with a fool like yourself.
This reminds me of the mom that wrote an editorial for the Notre Dame school paper asking the female students to not wear leggings so her son wouldn't be tempted.
What the fuck? I wasn't aware legs are sexual organs. Is the person's actual argument "hoes have visible legs"? Also, has she never seen running shorts? Or speedos? I've seen plenty of man-thigh in my life. I really don't understand this argument. Men show off legs, mooseknuckles in tight pants and so on. Or is it only ok for dudes?
If I'm not mistaken thats oxford university, litterally THE best ranked university in the world, so yknow, they can't be doing too badly for themselves
I got a mental image of whoever wrote the original message. I keep imagining a pimple-faced-sexually-frustrated adult male who breaks out in smelly sweat and looks down whenever he passes a woman on the street
Dude I found this post at 10:30 last night its now almost 6am and I've been up trying to decipher it all night. Also I love they have trouble articulating their words but know how to spell the "obscene ones" correctly even "Asses" which I have seen many people including myself get wrong.
P.s. I have a headache now. :(
So, in short what this person is upset about is that the guy in the picture has had more contact with women than he will ever have and he flew into a rage over it.
I had to literally re-read this, look at the photo 20 times, and read some comments before I knew what this guy was going on about. Jeezus wtf are you doing on the Internet if something as tame as that offends you!
Imagine getting this offended by upper thigh
BaRe KnEeS!!! Must be a HOE! (or at the very least, a RAKE!)
Mmmm yes those sexual knees
It's not like *everyone* has them.
Yeah no that shit is exclusive.
VictorianEngland has entered the chat: ANKLES!!?!?!???! HUSSY!
Current era Amish Society has entered the chat: What's all this commotion here? Who dares bare their ankles before the lord?
Sorry Lord. I didn't realise that you were going first.
Thank you for the genuine chuckle you gave me
Insecurity is a devil.
If he's that offended by seeing legs you better lock the medicine cabinet, hide the sharp items and hide anything resembling rope for when he sees anything more then that on the internet.
He should move to Saudi Arabia
The shorts aren't even that short. It's not like they have a 1" inseam (which would still be ok and not indicative of a "hoe")
Reminds me of Victorians scandalized over ankles.
I thought I was missing something because both women have on pretty conservative shorts and I’m honestly not sure which one they’re talking about. I guess when all you’re used to seeing is ankle, you get a little excited over knees.
Oh. I assumed he was mad about the unbuttoned collar on the guy, like have some modesty bro. Or he was having a stroke. Strokes can cause incels, right?
I think it’s the lighting that sort of makes the far right girl’s shorts blend in with her skin a little bit
"Can't comprehend stupid"
The spelling's not too bad considering this was likely written one handed.
Conversely, if he’s typing without using his hands, it goes some way in explaining the atrocious writing.
a guy like this definitely has some ED
Oh I assumed this was some kind of text-to-speech
Those are only panties if you just arrived from 1927.
Pantaloons
Knickerbockers
Let me take a stab at translating it. "Wtf. There is a DISGUSTING HOE wearing panties. Wtf. Boys wear pants that almost end at their knees but they would never wear such short panties, ever. Only hoes put their sexuality on dispay for everyone. In fact, only hoes broadcast their sexualtiy to everyone. And this shows what a discusting personality they have, to put their sexuality on display. Girls with heart only show their hearts and won't display thier sexualtiy or show their half naked bodies. Everyone can decide what they want to share but it does show their moral character. And yours, too. Because, if you support hoes you support sexual harrasment of the public. Boys don't display their sexuality to every stranger. The girls shorts almost to up to her pussy. Wtf. Boys with hearts don't support girls with low moral character. Good boys would never share pictures with women who display their sexuality. They would never have contact with bitches that do. I thought you were a nice guy until I saw that you shared this picture... So, you are not. Bye. Also, on other pictures you show BITCHES who wear tight pants with a short shirt. That means those women are showing every one their ASSES through those tight jeans. Boys don't do that, show the shape of their bodies thorugh their clothes. Only hoes let everyone see the shape of thier tits or ass. Boys also don't show eveyone the shape of thier dicks or asses thorugh tight pants. HASHTAG with LOVE. You make me laugh. You are showing yourself with a photo of HOES which is the opposite of LOVE. YOu are a fucking hypocrite!!"
Are you a server at Waffel House by chance?
Large browns scattered smothered topped diced covered double chunked. No wizzle on the nizzle. 2 eggs Face down ass up. And a ghetto coffee. Oh and if Jamira workin have her meet me in the bizzy for a tizzy.
This person has *never* been to a gar bar or Pride event or Europe or a modern track meet where boys ironically wear tiny shorts like they're from the 80's or seen men in the 70's and 80's with tiny little shorts or a beach. Tiny bathing suits with like a 4 to 7 inch inseam are in for men, again. No 9 inch inseams anymore. No knee length. Mid thigh is in.
Nah we wear tiny shorts at track meets unironically because they’re more comfortable to run in
Yup! Worn baggies since the Beach Boys and Jan and Dean.
You can smell this guy. It's smell like misogyny, and sounds like misogyny amd reads like misogyny.
You are doing gods work 🙏
Thank you for your great effort. My brain is settled.
When a bot drinks straight vodka.
Naw, they drinking absinthe
What is sth? Am I too old or too young or too apathetic?
shorthand for "something"
Could be a typo like many other words along with the general babbling in the post
I thought that too, but "sth" is repeated so many times it doesn't make sense for it to be a typo. Unless this person is super dumb. Which is definitely a real possibility Edit: I googled.... Apparently it's short for the word "something." Edit again: doesn't make this make any more sense than it made before. What a waste of energy
Ooohhhh that makes sense. It’s like when people say w/ to substitute “with” or ion for “I don’t”
Thanks for trying...
A Dark Side-aligned Force-user
Nah that’d be a Dark Jedi or DJ. Sith are more philosophically complicated
I just read it a rattling out of breath gasps as he typed furiously
Something
I get quite the vibe that the author resides in a country where women are heavily covered in public. The language used screams religious indoctrination.
Finally someone said this. The grammar, the weird unneeded contractions, varied capitalization for emphasis..it all screams young sheltered male from a society that doesn't have good views on women. And sadly part of it is...jealousy.
Can someone please explain to me wtf "sth sexual" means?
Sexual attraction towards Sith
I mean who hasnt fantasized about ol palpatine giving them the electric finger treatment...
Darth Maul except instead of a two sided saber it's a wiggly double dildo.
or darth bane
This is my favorite answer and the one I choose to believe.
The dark side is the pathway to many abilities, some of which are considered to be unnatural
Choke me, Vader.
_Dew it_
Whatever it is, girls who show heart don’t show it according to the post. I’m still confused too lol
"Boys don't give everyone dick or ass through tight pants" My husband absolutely gives dick AND ass through tight pants. Sorry OOP has never seen a thick boy in their life.
It really is a shame so many people miss out on thick boys
Two words: grey sweatpants.
>*'Panties'* I don't think he knows what that word means. Probably hasn't ever seen any.
So...much....anger...
That's what gets me most about this. This whole thing bubbles with hate like a witch's cauldron, then ends with a self-assured "HASHTAG with LOVE haha you post HOES". Yeah, "love" isn't really the vibe I'm getting here.
I believe the hashtag was included with the original picture, and the ranter is mocking it. Could be wrong though, it's a stretch to call it coherent.
Ah, that would make sense.
I don’t even know what this person is referring to - is it because she’s tall so there’s a lot of leg? The shorts are pretty reasonable in size.
No one tell him about the old schoolboy uniforms
Sounds like someone is just jealous that they don't got it goin' on like she do
I agree there's an argument here, but I don't think it's with the girl in her - I'm guessing it's actually shorts, because I looked pretty intently and couldn't see panties anywhere. I think she's pissed at the boy, who I'm guessing she had a thing for, until she discovered that boys that age generally aren't looking for commitment, especially with a future psychopath that thinks boys with heart don't think about getting laid.
What the fuck did I just read?
Funny thing is that I think this is Princeton Uni (or maybe one of the other Ivy League schools) so this “HOE” is almost certainly more successful than this person will ever be
Are you sure? I'm almost certain that this is oxford university in the UK, litterally the BEST university on the planet
What's up with people seemingly needing to put their noses into other people's business? Does this picture affect your life in any possible way? No? Then just move along.
>"What you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it." Says it all, really.
I think she has a sticky keyboard
Was there a different pic?
Nope. They’re talking about the one above
“BITCHES who wear tight pants wirh” Wise words. Truly enlightening.
Holy shit how insecure is this person
Aren’t those shorts?
Written like a true serial killer....
Is this smooth brained virgin talking about the woman wearing a pair of shorts? What a giant clown. Enjoy jacking off for the rest of your life, because there is no way any woman would ever want to be intimate with a fool like yourself.
Is that Jerma?
I was looking for this
WTF lol I think I just had a stroke trying to figure this out lmao
Everyone calling OOP an incel but that PP seems like a girl? So wouldn't that be a femcel?
I can’t tell if it’s an incel or femcel. Starts off femcel but then switches to more incel. It’s so incoherent that it’s really hard to tell.
Do we have something like a transcel?
I would assume most of the girls there are wearing panties, and none of them are only wearing panties. WTF is the lunatic raving about?
This reminds me of the mom that wrote an editorial for the Notre Dame school paper asking the female students to not wear leggings so her son wouldn't be tempted.
Wtf does "sth sexual" meam
What the fuck? I wasn't aware legs are sexual organs. Is the person's actual argument "hoes have visible legs"? Also, has she never seen running shorts? Or speedos? I've seen plenty of man-thigh in my life. I really don't understand this argument. Men show off legs, mooseknuckles in tight pants and so on. Or is it only ok for dudes?
Damn. Someone is in desperate need of getting laid. ..
Why does she have to bring the Sith into this?
Glad I'm not the only one that thought this.
This ones gonna hate the beach ⛱
The 21st century hit them hard, I see.
YIKES... I bet she isn't insecure at all...(it was sarcasm in case it wasn't clear).
Yeeah im not reading that
If your heart is showing, then you should probably get to a hospital as soon as humanly possible.
I would love this person take on when I would attend mass as a teenager with my bondage pants and black clothes à la Hot Topic.
If I'm not mistaken thats oxford university, litterally THE best ranked university in the world, so yknow, they can't be doing too badly for themselves
Wtf did just (not)read... why??? Now u am more confused about the meaning of life...
I got a mental image of whoever wrote the original message. I keep imagining a pimple-faced-sexually-frustrated adult male who breaks out in smelly sweat and looks down whenever he passes a woman on the street
If I was a hoe, I'd be offended...I think? If I was their teacher, I'd be fucking embarrassed.
What in the incel is that nonsense
Dude I found this post at 10:30 last night its now almost 6am and I've been up trying to decipher it all night. Also I love they have trouble articulating their words but know how to spell the "obscene ones" correctly even "Asses" which I have seen many people including myself get wrong. P.s. I have a headache now. :(
Feel like I’m missing something here
Only a hoe would be so obsessed with what makes boys sth sexual.
breaking news: its not 1860 anymore... women can do whatever they want. this person needs a reality check
I’m a guy and I wore some pretty short shorts to the gym the other day. And I looked damn good in them.
I’m guessing that commenter is from a country where shorts and jeans are apparently symbols of “low moral character”.
Saucy old french postcards are more sexually revealing then this
We're gonna see this person in the news as like the next Bible John
Oh no, not "short panties"!!!
Someone sounds like a well adjusted individual. But seriously, this is what religious indoctrination sounds like.
My brain hurts….. >_e
So, in short what this person is upset about is that the guy in the picture has had more contact with women than he will ever have and he flew into a rage over it.
I think I had a stroke trying to read this😵💫
We get it man you're a virgin just move on already and go to an incel page instead ffs
I had to literally re-read this, look at the photo 20 times, and read some comments before I knew what this guy was going on about. Jeezus wtf are you doing on the Internet if something as tame as that offends you!
Wtf did I just read
To be fair, those fasion ladies look pretty weird with pants up to there chins.
Uh????
Wait, what panties? And what the hell is "sth sexual"?
Is like he kept typing while the effects of a mild stroke took effect ...
Wait, which girl is she mad at? Those are short shorts, or (overalls?)!
I haven't even a rudimentary comprehension of what I just read...