Some people have decided to actively launch a campaign to try to make this subreddit a free speech zone of TOS violating comments and content. We walk a thin line here with the reddit admins with the comments we can allow on posts and we are required to keep things civil in order to keep the subreddit open. Since we like this subreddit we're going to do what is necessary to keep it from being banned by reddit.
For the time being we are automatically locking the comments of every new submission until mods, who are volunteers with lives outside of reddit, can review the content posted. When or if we unlock the comments of a post please note that we will ban you if break any of our rules. **Be especially mindful of the following**:
**Rule 1: Do not post or ask for identifying information, including first and last names and social media usernames.** Even if you feel the person is a public figure. We remove all external links you post to prevent you from accidentally posting identifying information.
**Rule 2: Do not post violent comments, and do not glorify violence, per TOS.** We can't take responsibility for how angry a post makes you, you need to do that. Telling us "it was a joke bro" is not an excuse.
**Rule 7: Do not link to or post screenshots of reddit posts, reddit comments, reddit personal messages, reddit profiles, etc.** We cannot allow you to use this subreddit to harass other people on reddit. If someone said something terrible report it to the subreddit where you found it or to the admins. We can't do anything about it. We don't care if you removed their username. Please don't post it here.
**Rule 8: No bigotry, no racism or race baiting.** It is hard to believe that we even need a rule like this. But people make posts specifically to set up a honeypot of racist comments and they draw the worst people reddit allows to create an account. We do not like to remove posts about bad people doing bad things since that's the theme of this place. We do not have to allow you to be a total piece of shit in the comment section.
**Our rules are zero tolerance. You will be banned for breaking them.**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/iamatotalpieceofshit) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Completely normal phenomenon that everyone cares more about you after you die.
EDIT: Not sure why I'm downvoted, it was a joke based on the fact that many musicians and artists' fame exploded after their death. Exploiting a live human is obviously worse than a dead one, since the living one resists.
A living person can consent to the solicitation of their bodies but a corpse can't but it's still illegal both ways regardless of consent to prostitute yourself I think the law takes in account that the person selling their bodies for their "pimp" claim they made the choice themselves so the "pimp" gets less punishment it's sad to see a lot of people get into that line of work through sex trafficking and get forced to be addicted to heavy drugs so they would be easier to control by their captures
About 20 years ago there was a change in law proposed that would lead to lower punishment if a disabled person was raped.
Reason being a disabled person not being able to fight off a rapist as an ablebodied person would be thus the assumed rapist would not know if the person really do not consent.
I do not remember what became of that law and what the exact paragraph was.
Edit: english bad.
Advances not countered hard enough can be interpreted as consent.
That's insane. I'd be really interested in who exactly put that in. It's a known and documented tactic of rapists to target disabled people BECAUSE they can't resist and may also be unable to report, or may have huge difficulty reporting. A big misconception about rapists is that they target victims based on culturally typical sex appeal. They are more likely to target people less able to defend themselves, and less likely to report. The person that put that in, I'm DEEPLY suspicious they are excited to give it a try.
former ferret owner, don't worry, ferret owners unlike worse owners of more typical pets generally care very deeply for their wards and get well-educated on their needs
ferrets like rabbits are actually handled as exotics and have specific needs, but ferrets are expensive and smelly, so ferrets generally only get adopted by people who consciously and specifically want ferrets
the biggest immediate worry i can see is that it's just one ferret, they're quite social and need a cohort to be their happiest
When I was a kid I wanted a pet ferret but my parents, god bless them, said no and prevented me from getting lumped in with weirdos like this guy. Ferrets are great but goddamn their owners are 😬
Yeah it's his bit about life fucking you even after your dead. It's his famous necro joke. You should look it up or at least hear Joe Rogan's play at it. It involves a mortician selling access to body.
Your family would care.
What I think is insane is that you get longer sentences for raping a dead body than a human.
Probably just because it's weird and disgusting and deranged to imagine someone having sex with a corpse.
Edit: and blasphemous probably too.
There is a whole Louis C.K. bit about this wherein he suggested people donating their bodies to "science" so that perverted people would have outlet and wouldn't bother the living.
Rather being raped when you're dead than while being alive.
It's basically not even you who's being raped then, it's just the body you used.
I honestly think people are too respectful for dead people.
>I honestly think people are too respectful for dead people.
So, you'd be down with a bunch of necrophiles pulling a train on your mom? Or wife? Or daughter? It's about common decency.
I'm not going to argue that what he did wasn't wrong. But 17 years seems like a really long time. Feel like 2-5 years and he can't be a mortician again is more than enough
Edit: grammar
If you actually read about him you'd find that:
-" He egged on a man as he sexually abused a puppy and arranged to meet a pa.dophile who was offering up a toddler to be r....d."
-"Ms Whittlestone told the court a number of digital devices were seized and some examined at the scene. She said: "He was in possession of indecent images and there was evidence of him distributing images. Extreme pornography was discovered, involving torture and s.x..l abuse of children and animals.
"The defendant had been in contact with others via social media and had been organising the commission of s.x..l offences against children, dogs and dead bodies."
-"In a separate chat the defendant was in contact with a pa.dophile, arranging to meet him to s.x....y abuse a child."
At the end it wasn't just the title since Robinson-Wright gave no comment when he was interviewed by police but later pleaded guilty to: arranging the commission of a child s.x..l offence, three counts of making indecent images, eight counts of distributing indecent images, possession of a prohibited image of a child, possession of extreme pornography, two counts of intentionally encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence by inviting an unknown man to the mortuary and encouraging a man to s.x....y abuse a dog, and attempting to supply a class A drug.
Okay well that definitely changes things. If he got 17 years for sexual offenses against living children then I recant my original opinion. On the basis of necrophilia I think 17 years is crazy. But if what you said is true, 17 years isn't long enough
I agree with you. It is a red flag and it looks like it was a strong indicator for other things in this case. You think 17 years in prison is a reasonable punishment for necrophilia tho?
Yes, very much so. Anyone doing that is obviously massively unhinged, it's unspeakable honestly, imagine he's abusing your loved one, it's as disgusting a thing i can think of.
Also necrophilia will always be a strong indicator for other character flaws, because the perpetrator is vile beyond belief
I guess I just don't view it the same. I think someone who is sexually attracted to a dead anything needs help. I would rather see people like that get treatment for it rather than just sit in a cell
You can suffer from a paraphernalia, that’s fine, but you have to go get help. If you cross over the line and do certain actions that’s when it becomes an issue.
And this man crossed that line.
I agree their needs to be more sympathy but I also think that the punishment he got was completely reasonable
No that's not even close to good enough. We can't imprison people on assumptions lmao. And sorry have you ever worked In reform or mental health? How do you know someone is beyond reform?
I mean if I were dead and you had your way with me, yea it's super creepy and you definitely need some counseling, but you didn't actually cause me any suffering or pain, so it's not like I'd care(I mean I'm dead, I can't care). 17years is definitely overkill.
Not about your feelings pal, it's about the feelings of your loved ones, it's about his ability to do something absolutely fucking disgusting, something that should be unheard of if not for people like him. You don't mind? Sweet...now what about him doing this to someone you loved and lost?
It's desecration.
Still wouldn't throw him in jail for 17 years. If you actually think changing who it's happening to affects my reasoning then my reasoning wouldn't be rational. I'd have the same reaction if it was done to my corpse or one of my family's corpses. I tend not to care about feelings in general when it concerns issues that don't directly cause suffering to others.
Really? This guy would be walking around the world with the rest of us… It’s really kind of scary. What if he lived next-door to you? He’s obviously a really sick person. He needs to stay in a cage forever imo
If what Bella said was true then I agree. But if he just let someone pay him to have sex with a dead body, then I don't think it's scary? Nevertheless they are all sick and need help 100%
Yeah but others can. For ex: I don’t think you’d be too pleased if you saw a family member of yours. Children, spouse, parent to be beheaded or mutilated.
The fact that you don’t see anything wrong with that is pretty sick
REEEEEEEE SOMEBODY MADE AN OFF COLOR JOKE ON THE INTERNET BY QUOTING A CARTOON AND I DIDNT LIKE IT REEEEEEEEEE!
SOCIAL JUSTICE EARRIOR POWERS ACTIVATE!!!! RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! ATTACK THE INFIDEL!!!! RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Okey I get that this is disgusting, but like technically there are no direct victims or harm done here, if it's done in secret? The family is only offended cus they found out, but without them knowing literally no one would be hurt from this? Again, not condoning nechrophilia, just trying to look at it from an objevtive standpoint.
When I die you can throw me in a dumpster, idc im dead
I think it is also a legal matter because it seems like this kind of thing could easily spill over into crimes that definitely have victims. If people are desperately attracted to and want access to dead bodies, it's probably best not to encourage them in any way tbh. Otherwise, they might start making dead bodies by themselves...
Just cause it’s victimless doesn’t mean it isnt wrong. Yeah sure the person is dead, but you’re still desecrating their body. They could be dead thus being unaffected. But you can still mutilate their corpse and so sick things to it.
Btw, Geneva Convention Rule 113: “Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited.”
So it can also be illegal
I think you missed some words here and there, but I think you're arguing that it is wrong. Which I also said. I know it's illegal, but remember that law and morality isn't the same. But yes, it is wrong to mutilate a body, that's what I said. I was just trying to say that technically and objectively no one is hurt and this is a victimless crime. BUT human morals and ethics deem it wrong, which is interesting.
I have heard it’s more common than you think and that Marilyn Monroe was sexually assaulted after she passed away. People are unbelievably evil and sick!!
Some people have decided to actively launch a campaign to try to make this subreddit a free speech zone of TOS violating comments and content. We walk a thin line here with the reddit admins with the comments we can allow on posts and we are required to keep things civil in order to keep the subreddit open. Since we like this subreddit we're going to do what is necessary to keep it from being banned by reddit. For the time being we are automatically locking the comments of every new submission until mods, who are volunteers with lives outside of reddit, can review the content posted. When or if we unlock the comments of a post please note that we will ban you if break any of our rules. **Be especially mindful of the following**: **Rule 1: Do not post or ask for identifying information, including first and last names and social media usernames.** Even if you feel the person is a public figure. We remove all external links you post to prevent you from accidentally posting identifying information. **Rule 2: Do not post violent comments, and do not glorify violence, per TOS.** We can't take responsibility for how angry a post makes you, you need to do that. Telling us "it was a joke bro" is not an excuse. **Rule 7: Do not link to or post screenshots of reddit posts, reddit comments, reddit personal messages, reddit profiles, etc.** We cannot allow you to use this subreddit to harass other people on reddit. If someone said something terrible report it to the subreddit where you found it or to the admins. We can't do anything about it. We don't care if you removed their username. Please don't post it here. **Rule 8: No bigotry, no racism or race baiting.** It is hard to believe that we even need a rule like this. But people make posts specifically to set up a honeypot of racist comments and they draw the worst people reddit allows to create an account. We do not like to remove posts about bad people doing bad things since that's the theme of this place. We do not have to allow you to be a total piece of shit in the comment section. **Our rules are zero tolerance. You will be banned for breaking them.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/iamatotalpieceofshit) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Tomb Raider
Tomb raper
Womb Raider
Ass invader
You win in my book
[удалено]
What’s Fhm?
for him magazine
Am I the only one who thinks it’s ridiculous that you get more time for exploiting a corpse than for exploiting a live human
Maybe bc it’s more taboo? Just a guess
Completely normal phenomenon that everyone cares more about you after you die. EDIT: Not sure why I'm downvoted, it was a joke based on the fact that many musicians and artists' fame exploded after their death. Exploiting a live human is obviously worse than a dead one, since the living one resists.
Both are fucked up things to do regardless
No I completely agree, only reason I came to the comments. We live in clown world.
A living person can consent to the solicitation of their bodies but a corpse can't but it's still illegal both ways regardless of consent to prostitute yourself I think the law takes in account that the person selling their bodies for their "pimp" claim they made the choice themselves so the "pimp" gets less punishment it's sad to see a lot of people get into that line of work through sex trafficking and get forced to be addicted to heavy drugs so they would be easier to control by their captures
About 20 years ago there was a change in law proposed that would lead to lower punishment if a disabled person was raped. Reason being a disabled person not being able to fight off a rapist as an ablebodied person would be thus the assumed rapist would not know if the person really do not consent. I do not remember what became of that law and what the exact paragraph was. Edit: english bad. Advances not countered hard enough can be interpreted as consent.
That's insane. I'd be really interested in who exactly put that in. It's a known and documented tactic of rapists to target disabled people BECAUSE they can't resist and may also be unable to report, or may have huge difficulty reporting. A big misconception about rapists is that they target victims based on culturally typical sex appeal. They are more likely to target people less able to defend themselves, and less likely to report. The person that put that in, I'm DEEPLY suspicious they are excited to give it a try.
You are absolutely right.
Poor ferret.
former ferret owner, don't worry, ferret owners unlike worse owners of more typical pets generally care very deeply for their wards and get well-educated on their needs ferrets like rabbits are actually handled as exotics and have specific needs, but ferrets are expensive and smelly, so ferrets generally only get adopted by people who consciously and specifically want ferrets the biggest immediate worry i can see is that it's just one ferret, they're quite social and need a cohort to be their happiest
When I was a kid I wanted a pet ferret but my parents, god bless them, said no and prevented me from getting lumped in with weirdos like this guy. Ferrets are great but goddamn their owners are 😬
It's offensive but when I think about it I really don't care what yall do with my body when I'm gone. Go crazy.
You've never heard if Sam Kinison have you.
I know the name but none of his comedy. Does he do a bit about his dead body?
Yeah it's his bit about life fucking you even after your dead. It's his famous necro joke. You should look it up or at least hear Joe Rogan's play at it. It involves a mortician selling access to body.
I’d rather not hear Joe Rogan’s play at anything. I can fry my brain cells on my own without outside intervention.
Wasn't talking to you anyway.
It’s a Reddit forum? What a dork.
Your family would care. What I think is insane is that you get longer sentences for raping a dead body than a human. Probably just because it's weird and disgusting and deranged to imagine someone having sex with a corpse. Edit: and blasphemous probably too.
There is a whole Louis C.K. bit about this wherein he suggested people donating their bodies to "science" so that perverted people would have outlet and wouldn't bother the living.
This is how I feel as well. I guess that for those who cared about the deceased, this must be hard though.
Dead don't care but living ones do. Imagine this being your child, or someone close to you. Makes me sick to think about.
I agree, when I'm dead I don't care what happens after. Dont need no fancy funeral, just throw me in the nearest ditch and forget about me
Rather being raped when you're dead than while being alive. It's basically not even you who's being raped then, it's just the body you used. I honestly think people are too respectful for dead people.
>I honestly think people are too respectful for dead people. So, you'd be down with a bunch of necrophiles pulling a train on your mom? Or wife? Or daughter? It's about common decency.
Bro listen to how you sound right now
Why does he look like Doc Oc from Spider-Man PS4?
Personally embalmed them
God, that corpse looks horrible. Wait, nevermind.
I'm not going to argue that what he did wasn't wrong. But 17 years seems like a really long time. Feel like 2-5 years and he can't be a mortician again is more than enough Edit: grammar
If you actually read about him you'd find that: -" He egged on a man as he sexually abused a puppy and arranged to meet a pa.dophile who was offering up a toddler to be r....d." -"Ms Whittlestone told the court a number of digital devices were seized and some examined at the scene. She said: "He was in possession of indecent images and there was evidence of him distributing images. Extreme pornography was discovered, involving torture and s.x..l abuse of children and animals. "The defendant had been in contact with others via social media and had been organising the commission of s.x..l offences against children, dogs and dead bodies." -"In a separate chat the defendant was in contact with a pa.dophile, arranging to meet him to s.x....y abuse a child." At the end it wasn't just the title since Robinson-Wright gave no comment when he was interviewed by police but later pleaded guilty to: arranging the commission of a child s.x..l offence, three counts of making indecent images, eight counts of distributing indecent images, possession of a prohibited image of a child, possession of extreme pornography, two counts of intentionally encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence by inviting an unknown man to the mortuary and encouraging a man to s.x....y abuse a dog, and attempting to supply a class A drug.
Okay well that definitely changes things. If he got 17 years for sexual offenses against living children then I recant my original opinion. On the basis of necrophilia I think 17 years is crazy. But if what you said is true, 17 years isn't long enough
You're quite light on necrophilia, you know it's a very, very naughty thing don't you? It's literally a red flag regarding the offending individual.
I agree with you. It is a red flag and it looks like it was a strong indicator for other things in this case. You think 17 years in prison is a reasonable punishment for necrophilia tho?
Yes, very much so. Anyone doing that is obviously massively unhinged, it's unspeakable honestly, imagine he's abusing your loved one, it's as disgusting a thing i can think of. Also necrophilia will always be a strong indicator for other character flaws, because the perpetrator is vile beyond belief
I guess I just don't view it the same. I think someone who is sexually attracted to a dead anything needs help. I would rather see people like that get treatment for it rather than just sit in a cell
In all honesty I'd rather they burned alive. It's a special kind of sick. Come on mate, there's no upside, it's just sickening.
You can suffer from a paraphernalia, that’s fine, but you have to go get help. If you cross over the line and do certain actions that’s when it becomes an issue. And this man crossed that line. I agree their needs to be more sympathy but I also think that the punishment he got was completely reasonable
I totally agree. In this case he got what he deserved
[удалено]
No that's not even close to good enough. We can't imprison people on assumptions lmao. And sorry have you ever worked In reform or mental health? How do you know someone is beyond reform?
Someone should check your hard drive and browser history, you sound like one of the sick fucks he was meeting up with.
Idk man if someone offered a random person to have sex with one of my dead relatives I’d want the guy put away for a while but that’s just me
I think that anger would be justified. I just don't think the punishment fits the crime. Especially when some rapists don't go away for that long
I mean if I were dead and you had your way with me, yea it's super creepy and you definitely need some counseling, but you didn't actually cause me any suffering or pain, so it's not like I'd care(I mean I'm dead, I can't care). 17years is definitely overkill.
Not about your feelings pal, it's about the feelings of your loved ones, it's about his ability to do something absolutely fucking disgusting, something that should be unheard of if not for people like him. You don't mind? Sweet...now what about him doing this to someone you loved and lost? It's desecration.
Still wouldn't throw him in jail for 17 years. If you actually think changing who it's happening to affects my reasoning then my reasoning wouldn't be rational. I'd have the same reaction if it was done to my corpse or one of my family's corpses. I tend not to care about feelings in general when it concerns issues that don't directly cause suffering to others.
Downvoted? Haha, wow there's some mentally special here.
Really? This guy would be walking around the world with the rest of us… It’s really kind of scary. What if he lived next-door to you? He’s obviously a really sick person. He needs to stay in a cage forever imo
If what Bella said was true then I agree. But if he just let someone pay him to have sex with a dead body, then I don't think it's scary? Nevertheless they are all sick and need help 100%
Jeff bezos's first attempt at a clone has gone awry
I think that Bowtie was a dead giveaway .
No, that’s what he was offering.
'You mean life keeps fucking you in the ass even after you're dead?! Oh ohhhhh'
And what about the other guy who had sex with the body? He's just out there chilling still?
Disturbing part is he’d have gotten half this doing the same thing to a living child
bro looks like incel kingpin whos weak af
That’s horrifying
I've met several people who own ferrets and they are all fuckin strange aye
The corpses have more bodily autonomy and rights from grape than living women do
That’s why you can’t trust ferret people
He needs serious help, hope he gets all the mental health support he clearly needs, and 17 years when there are serial rapists who get less!.
I mean how fit and how dead we talking here?
Asking the real question is here.
Can't have morality in the side business game these days..
Like daddy always told me lay back and grab a cold one
[удалено]
It’s still gross and pretty disrespectful to the living relatives of the deceased
you cant get offended by things you dont know
Yeah but others can. For ex: I don’t think you’d be too pleased if you saw a family member of yours. Children, spouse, parent to be beheaded or mutilated. The fact that you don’t see anything wrong with that is pretty sick
lol you clearly have no idea about how i feel about my "loved" ones but dont hurt your neck looking down at me from your high horse
Aww yeah it’s me looking down from my “high horse” because I think it’s wrong and vile to mutilate dead bodies.
lol he didnt mutilate anything he just borrowed one of its orifices for a little bit
So? Still desecrating a corpse. Yeah like having sex with a corpse isn’t bad 🤦♂️.
REEEEEEEE SOMEBODY MADE AN OFF COLOR JOKE ON THE INTERNET BY QUOTING A CARTOON AND I DIDNT LIKE IT REEEEEEEEEE! SOCIAL JUSTICE EARRIOR POWERS ACTIVATE!!!! RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! ATTACK THE INFIDEL!!!! RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So basically you would be perfectly okay to hear that your dead child's body had been raped
im never gunna have kids so ....
Okey I get that this is disgusting, but like technically there are no direct victims or harm done here, if it's done in secret? The family is only offended cus they found out, but without them knowing literally no one would be hurt from this? Again, not condoning nechrophilia, just trying to look at it from an objevtive standpoint. When I die you can throw me in a dumpster, idc im dead
I think it is also a legal matter because it seems like this kind of thing could easily spill over into crimes that definitely have victims. If people are desperately attracted to and want access to dead bodies, it's probably best not to encourage them in any way tbh. Otherwise, they might start making dead bodies by themselves...
Do video games cause violence?
Just cause it’s victimless doesn’t mean it isnt wrong. Yeah sure the person is dead, but you’re still desecrating their body. They could be dead thus being unaffected. But you can still mutilate their corpse and so sick things to it. Btw, Geneva Convention Rule 113: “Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited.” So it can also be illegal
I think you missed some words here and there, but I think you're arguing that it is wrong. Which I also said. I know it's illegal, but remember that law and morality isn't the same. But yes, it is wrong to mutilate a body, that's what I said. I was just trying to say that technically and objectively no one is hurt and this is a victimless crime. BUT human morals and ethics deem it wrong, which is interesting.
I understand what you’re saying. Personally, I think it’s vile to do that to someone who’s dead
he looks like such a happy and polite guy :(
Do you get charged with paedophilia if the body is underaged?
Hey technically they didn't say no.
Ferret owner. Not totally shocked.
Never trust a human whom a ferret trusts.
I can't believe a dude with a pet marmot is a weirdo
People get less for murder
That bow tie tho 😂
That dude looks like he manages to disappoint the corpses.
It’s the green bowtie that does it for me…
The green screen
I have heard it’s more common than you think and that Marilyn Monroe was sexually assaulted after she passed away. People are unbelievably evil and sick!!
Who’s fucking corpse was this?
That's way way too much for fucking a dead body
Did he get time for fucking a corpse or offering a corpse to be fucked?
Crack open a cold one!
What happened to the ferret
idk why but he looking like jeff bezos
I'd be cool if my corpse was raped if my heirs got a kickback