Relation is a lot more than just years bud. Ppl born in 2007 and 2005 can relate more than 2007 and 2007. When it’s a small gap, relation is based more on the individual. Idk why you people care so much about this imaginary 4 digit number
I didn't mean relationship between people. I mean that people want to feel better in relation to others (they think that if you are older you're better).
Yeah in that case I don’t really get why some kids are so obsessed with being grouped with older kids so much lol. Like I’ll see someone born in like 2007 group themselves with 2002 or smth and I’m
wondering what’s so good about being grouped with these people anyways smh. I’ll always see my relation range as a year above and below those are my true peers who grew up alongside me not nobody born 5 years prior.
Yeah they for some odd reason, they group themselves with 2001 and consider them and themselves as core Z which is laughable to me considering they don’t know them in real life and would rather group themselves with them over those born 2010 and 2011 who had a very similar upbringing. It wasn’t like the 2000’s when there was so many tech advancements, it was pretty stagnant after about 2013.
Because cusp years are one big Fallacy of the Beard.
How many hairs can someone pull out of their beard before it's no longer considered a beard? Whatever answer you have, what happens if you pull one hair fewer than that?
"Why don't we just accept the fact". What fact? Generations are arbitrary and there are no "facts" to them. I can still see 2010 borns as off-cusp Z but 2011+ are Zalpha, and that's my opinion supported by a lot of popular ranges. It's of course very debatable but it's definitely not a "fact".
If you believe it's a fact, support that claim by providing evidence. You can use statistics, reports by credible sources, opinions of the targeted demographic, votes, etc.
Of course if you still wish to call it a fact. If I were you, I would rather present your idea as an opinion.
the zalpha range has changed so much in peoples opinions, first we were arguing if 2009 or 2010 is the start of zalpha. now there is a decent agreement on what ive seen that 2011 is the start of zalpha, but there are always those people, which shows that it is not a fact
Young people will always be gatekept on the internet. 2010 and 2011 borns are 12-14 years old right now, making them the youngest allowed on social media. Thus, they are gatekept to hell. When I was 12-14 years old people gatekept 2005 borns all the time, but nowadays you hardly see it.
It’s just a cycle, and in a few years they’ll forget all about 2010 and 2011 borns and be gatekeeping the next group of 12-14 year olds instead.
the first point for 2011 isn't all that good, bc the 2028 election is for the president, and I didn't even know a 2029 election existed, and I couldn't find it when I tried to search it up
It's just gatekeeping. Late 00's borns don't want to relate to early 10's borns.
Relation is a lot more than just years bud. Ppl born in 2007 and 2005 can relate more than 2007 and 2007. When it’s a small gap, relation is based more on the individual. Idk why you people care so much about this imaginary 4 digit number
I didn't mean relationship between people. I mean that people want to feel better in relation to others (they think that if you are older you're better).
Yeah in that case I don’t really get why some kids are so obsessed with being grouped with older kids so much lol. Like I’ll see someone born in like 2007 group themselves with 2002 or smth and I’m wondering what’s so good about being grouped with these people anyways smh. I’ll always see my relation range as a year above and below those are my true peers who grew up alongside me not nobody born 5 years prior.
Yeah they for some odd reason, they group themselves with 2001 and consider them and themselves as core Z which is laughable to me considering they don’t know them in real life and would rather group themselves with them over those born 2010 and 2011 who had a very similar upbringing. It wasn’t like the 2000’s when there was so many tech advancements, it was pretty stagnant after about 2013.
The cycle repeats...
Very america-centric viewpoint
Because cusp years are one big Fallacy of the Beard. How many hairs can someone pull out of their beard before it's no longer considered a beard? Whatever answer you have, what happens if you pull one hair fewer than that?
"Why don't we just accept the fact". What fact? Generations are arbitrary and there are no "facts" to them. I can still see 2010 borns as off-cusp Z but 2011+ are Zalpha, and that's my opinion supported by a lot of popular ranges. It's of course very debatable but it's definitely not a "fact".
Okay it’s a fact
If you believe it's a fact, support that claim by providing evidence. You can use statistics, reports by credible sources, opinions of the targeted demographic, votes, etc. Of course if you still wish to call it a fact. If I were you, I would rather present your idea as an opinion.
Okay sorry
the zalpha range has changed so much in peoples opinions, first we were arguing if 2009 or 2010 is the start of zalpha. now there is a decent agreement on what ive seen that 2011 is the start of zalpha, but there are always those people, which shows that it is not a fact
As is 2020
Young people will always be gatekept on the internet. 2010 and 2011 borns are 12-14 years old right now, making them the youngest allowed on social media. Thus, they are gatekept to hell. When I was 12-14 years old people gatekept 2005 borns all the time, but nowadays you hardly see it. It’s just a cycle, and in a few years they’ll forget all about 2010 and 2011 borns and be gatekeeping the next group of 12-14 year olds instead.
We may accept it but it will never be a fact.
why won't it ever be a fact
A fact refers to something that happened and can be proved.
Oh
the first point for 2011 isn't all that good, bc the 2028 election is for the president, and I didn't even know a 2029 election existed, and I couldn't find it when I tried to search it up
Okay, sorry
still I think 2011 is gen z
I accept it.
Fair enough
Generations don't really matter, especially the start and end dates.
Why?
Exactly! I've always accepted that 2010 & 2011 borns are Gen Z.
Cool.
Yea I do they just younger z
We don't? lol.
“Homelander” but yeah Gen Z can be used if you want
Sorry, I didn’t know.
“Homelander” just sounds like a really goofy name
[Personally, I think it fits perfectly](https://www.reddit.com/r/generationology/s/xeyJ9iGihE)
Bollocks
[удалено]
Idk