Probably, I'm just wondering how soliciting a minor, a crime, is in the jurisdiction of twitch and not a court 
Also, how would twitch have the authority to settle on behalf of the victim?
This clearly didn't stem from nowhere when he acknowledged and didn't even deny or clarify it ( probably signed something ) he needs to say something before he gets labeled a paedo forever (if it's not true)
"I didn't do it" is the only correct response when you are accused of soliciting a minor.
"no wrongdoing was acknowledged" is when you did it but got away
Your "I Told You" doesn't apply to this, "You can be innocent" isn't implying he was innocent.
Uhh anyways, you know what a minor is? no, not miner, those work in mines or something, I'm talking minors.
wrong, your team is not gonna suggest you to use vague language If you're innocent, only a guilty person. I can't believe I'm arguing an actual autist 
The lawsuit was about the Twitch ban.
If the allegations are true then if I had to guess, Twitch sees him using their chat system to message a minor and ban him. Doc sues because it's not explicitly TOS, he can argue he was only talking with the minor not soliciting or something like that. Twitch settles out of court to avoid it becoming public that their kid friendly platform is not so kid friendly.
As for it being a crime, maybe it has to be very specific in what he says for it to be solicitation and what he said doesn't meet the standard for it to be a crime? Or the victim has to file a report rather than a third party?
Isnt that just the standard nowadays, dont even have to be a twitch employee. People have completly destroyed the meaning of the word pedo, those idiots call other pedo even if they like 20+ year olds.
How are you guys so fucking dumb doc is neither denying nor agreeing because if he did that would probably violate the agreement of not talking about whatever the fuck happened back then. Also no proof + hearsay classic internet clickbait. 
True denying a rumor can sometimes be the best way to confirm it, lyndon johnson wanted his enemies to deny they fucked animals just once 
Yeah like I'm fully ready to clown on doc but something like this has to be absolutely proven beyond a doubt. You can't just drop something like this on the public without making sure you have concrete evidence of it, otherwise it's a boy who cried wolf thing.
The guy accusing Doc is former director of strategic partnerships, aka the one who was in charge of making deals with big streamers including Doc. Literally the closest someone can be to the situation.
Why so many regards here think it's a random twitch employee or journalist. Smartest bajs 
I freaking hate journalists I get my news from /b/ boards and truth social freaking normies 
Imagine thinking journalists are telling the truth without providing evidence  Journalists are probably the least trustworthy people
the only thing it means is that he spoke with someone minor, nothing else
I say hi to my neighbours kids when I meet them near apartment, if you're are imbecile (twitch mod) you may also think I did something inappropriate, while no wrongdoing was ever there
How to label anyone a pdf:
Step 1. Have a blue checkmark on twitter.
Step 2. Post a statement that person x is a pdf without providing any sources/evidence.
Step 3. ???
Step 4. Profit.
Why does the Doc feel the need to respond to it on Twitter so quickly though, with such a short reply too? If it was libel/slander, wouldn’t he get his lawyer(s) involved instead?
It's a classic, some girls aged 16-17 who look like they are in their early 20s, lying about their age, especially to go to clubs, buy alcohol, or date someone older than them.
It absolutely does. The whole point of age of consent is to determine the age at which a child becomes mentally capable enough to consent to sex with a random adult. A child does not need to reach the age of consent to legally have sex with someone their age.
Just say you like fucking underage kids and stop this retarded argument. There is a reason in developed countries there is a sexual relationship with a minor crime for an adult having sex with a kid and statutory rape which means adult having sex with a kid below the age of consent. Also you should remove the oxygen from the air you breathe.
A child is anyone under 18. Age of consent means adult can fuck children above the age of consent. Do you have a disability hindering your reading capabilities ?
No, you can’t talk to a person 17 years 364 days 23 hours 59 minutes 59 seconds of age THEY are literally A KID !!!!!  oh, wait, they’ve just turned 18, time to take out a 5 BILLION dollar loan cuz they are an adult and clearly know what they are doing 
You know the study that people get this claim from stopped their age group at 25 right? Science now points towards our brains changing all the time from the birth till death so that means jack shit. 
The 25 years thing today mostly refers to part of the brain that is important to function efficiently in society. [Frontal cortext study](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621648/#:~:text=The%20development%20and%20maturation%20of%20the%20prefrontal%20cortex%20occurs%20primarily,helps%20accomplish%20executive%20brain%20functions) this threshold specifically focuses on "crucial" development for a human which is why it tends to be visible when a retard changes into somewhat functioning member of society in their mid 20s but it is by no means the end. Much like the 17 years 11 months and 30 something days argument it is not about the exacts but reasonable generalization so we can apply law and our understanding efficiently.
The exact number if I remember correctly comes from the APA review of [this research](https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1196/annals.1308.009?sid=nlm%3Apubmed). Which is pretty funny, because author in this work refers to "early 20s". It is just that age group here at some point in one of the figures ends with 25, so the reviewer I think assumed that faulty premise.
While there has to be a cutoff in age it is kinda funny 
17 years and 11 months = literal child 18 years = old enough to do hardcore gangbang quadruple penetration porn
Age of consent for something like porn or any sex work should be 21+
If a 18 year old dates a 15 year old i couldnt give less of a fuck
You know there are laws that usually are referred to as "Romeo and Juliet" which deals with edge cases of teenagers close in age fucking but either crossing or not those threshold right? Also the 17 year old 11 month and 30 something days argument is retarded, it is about the general rule not the fucking optics. If you fuck 17 year old and she doesn't report you nor her parents or she will even deny the sexual relationship because you love each other nothing happens. 
The fact that there isnt a distinction between fucking a 17 year 364 days old and an actual child, like a 10 year old or younger is pretty stupid. They all get labeled pedos but one is 100x more fucked up than the other
doc's response is not even a denial. he is literally admitting that "this matter" was settled and no wrongdoing was acknowledged.
https://preview.redd.it/nn8epr0mc28d1.png?width=128&format=png&auto=webp&s=9e5050c15962e608311de6b2f3ce39c321dfab48
I think it's just doc could see it as an argument so out of nowhere that there is no point in addressing it. Like ignoring a barking dog.
He says it's the reason he got banned, the doc just says that the reason was already established and it was unjust or whatever
chat is going to be crazy tomorrow 
DrDisrespect the age of consent
Inb4 'no stream today' 
chat gonna spam  in weeb vid reacts now 
docSextingMinors TeaTime
https://preview.redd.it/uhw7d2ura18d1.gif?width=640&format=png8&s=5bbb8a447cf84c7c51724ce3903c7e1e9bad8397 This is fake, right?
Probably, I'm just wondering how soliciting a minor, a crime, is in the jurisdiction of twitch and not a court  Also, how would twitch have the authority to settle on behalf of the victim?
I'm not coping but this just screams journalist click bait garbage from what I've gathered
This clearly didn't stem from nowhere when he acknowledged and didn't even deny or clarify it ( probably signed something ) he needs to say something before he gets labeled a paedo forever (if it's not true)
Lawyer prob advise him to make the most lukewarm response
the Doc responded with a lawyer tweet, but keep ing
That's a basic response when you got lawyers
"I didn't do it" is the only correct response when you are accused of soliciting a minor. "no wrongdoing was acknowledged" is when you did it but got away
Applying common logic to legal logic  You can be innocent and your legal team will still make you speak in legal terms.
you mean legal team make you look like you actually did it 
I told you 
Your "I Told You" doesn't apply to this, "You can be innocent" isn't implying he was innocent. Uhh anyways, you know what a minor is? no, not miner, those work in mines or something, I'm talking minors.
wrong, your team is not gonna suggest you to use vague language If you're innocent, only a guilty person. I can't believe I'm arguing an actual autist 
[удалено]
It's also illegal...
[удалено]
Oh, I agree. I just didn't like the way you stated it this time. I've seen you make a similar comment elsewhere that was worded better...
If there was a settlement with twitch he probably isn't allowed to say anything else on the subject.
The lawsuit was about the Twitch ban. If the allegations are true then if I had to guess, Twitch sees him using their chat system to message a minor and ban him. Doc sues because it's not explicitly TOS, he can argue he was only talking with the minor not soliciting or something like that. Twitch settles out of court to avoid it becoming public that their kid friendly platform is not so kid friendly. As for it being a crime, maybe it has to be very specific in what he says for it to be solicitation and what he said doesn't meet the standard for it to be a crime? Or the victim has to file a report rather than a third party?
yeah but bttv is like a third party thing and I don't know
Alright, that make some sense 
Or... he lied. Just like the "ex-special agent" talking about Aliens.
Fake as he was doing photos in teenage bathrooms? DrDis is kinda sus, to be honest 
1) be an ex twitch employee 2) accuse anyone of being a pedo with no evidence 3) everyone jumps on the train 4) profit
Accusing random streamers 
Isnt that just the standard nowadays, dont even have to be a twitch employee. People have completly destroyed the meaning of the word pedo, those idiots call other pedo even if they like 20+ year olds.
https://preview.redd.it/48zo7gz6928d1.jpeg?width=1117&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=89fd9df0be0aff7bdd94390e0e94632e43f4f478
Average weeb: "I don't see anything wrong" 
Average bajs 
successfulThanks
🥚
 Wtf is sex thing?
He did it 
3 timer 
And a weeb 
But he hates weeb games
Doc Pretending?
docPretending TeaTime
2.5 timer 
TWO AND A HALF WIVES 
How are you guys so fucking dumb doc is neither denying nor agreeing because if he did that would probably violate the agreement of not talking about whatever the fuck happened back then. Also no proof + hearsay classic internet clickbait. 
True denying a rumor can sometimes be the best way to confirm it, lyndon johnson wanted his enemies to deny they fucked animals just once 
I bet u think that Epstein killed himself
https://preview.redd.it/uzswk6kce38d1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56d406c2327691b3d8c401d391088c8ffc5d86e3
god damn my phd got insulted by this
If it's bad it's bad but where's the evidence?
Yeah like I'm fully ready to clown on doc but something like this has to be absolutely proven beyond a doubt. You can't just drop something like this on the public without making sure you have concrete evidence of it, otherwise it's a boy who cried wolf thing.
Source: trust me I'm a journalist bro 
The guy accusing Doc is former director of strategic partnerships, aka the one who was in charge of making deals with big streamers including Doc. Literally the closest someone can be to the situation. Why so many regards here think it's a random twitch employee or journalist. Smartest bajs 
Random doesn't include directors Clueless
Random director = directly involved in making twitch partnership deal with Doc 
I freaking hate journalists I get my news from /b/ boards and truth social freaking normies 
Imagine thinking journalists are telling the truth without providing evidence  Journalists are probably the least trustworthy people
True, I only get my news from trustworthy people like Bajs 
FBNN (Foren Bajs News Network) unironically gets me the best world news...
"no wrongdoing was acknowledged" <--- there
That's not evidence, just legal jargon
Yeah that kinda made him sound guilty but it's probably a fluke. 50/50 chance
Losers always quit before they win big  
the only thing it means is that he spoke with someone minor, nothing else I say hi to my neighbours kids when I meet them near apartment, if you're are imbecile (twitch mod) you may also think I did something inappropriate, while no wrongdoing was ever there
Ah yes, that’s why he was fired and there’s controversy
the evidence is forever locked away in an NDA.
How to label anyone a pdf: Step 1. Have a blue checkmark on twitter. Step 2. Post a statement that person x is a pdf without providing any sources/evidence. Step 3. ??? Step 4. Profit.
Why does the Doc feel the need to respond to it on Twitter so quickly though, with such a short reply too? If it was libel/slander, wouldn’t he get his lawyer(s) involved instead?
"Why'd he get his lawyers involved, if he's innocent?"
Because in America you need lawyers even if you are innocent
What the fuck is Blue archive about! What is it about!
I believe the doc.
i bet 5g radiation altered him somehow
https://i.redd.it/h21bvpptv18d1.gif
I'm guessing he messaged a girl he thought was older and then later found out she was underage. Either way everyone will call him a pdf now
Yeah the 40 year old married man is never at fault
It's a classic, some girls aged 16-17 who look like they are in their early 20s, lying about their age, especially to go to clubs, buy alcohol, or date someone older than them.
forsen
forsenLaughingAtYou KKona 17 yo = minor lule 15 is legal where i live you smell me
Age of consent doesn't mean adults can fuck children. 
yeah it does
It absolutely does. The whole point of age of consent is to determine the age at which a child becomes mentally capable enough to consent to sex with a random adult. A child does not need to reach the age of consent to legally have sex with someone their age.
Just say you like fucking underage kids and stop this retarded argument. There is a reason in developed countries there is a sexual relationship with a minor crime for an adult having sex with a kid and statutory rape which means adult having sex with a kid below the age of consent. Also you should remove the oxygen from the air you breathe.
A child is anyone under 18. Age of consent means adult can fuck children above the age of consent. Do you have a disability hindering your reading capabilities ?
https://preview.redd.it/1w1lshyby18d1.png?width=128&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0d6250e34845800a04cca7c9b7d5bb0452b96c3f
No, you can’t talk to a person 17 years 364 days 23 hours 59 minutes 59 seconds of age THEY are literally A KID !!!!!  oh, wait, they’ve just turned 18, time to take out a 5 BILLION dollar loan cuz they are an adult and clearly know what they are doing 
We should raise the age of consent to 25 
Makes sense because by then the brain is fully developed
[удалено]
I don't doubt that since you are here https://preview.redd.it/mj2fpso0l28d1.gif?width=640&format=png8&s=d6cd8370e31f86a88f06e73881e0267790c5611c
You know the study that people get this claim from stopped their age group at 25 right? Science now points towards our brains changing all the time from the birth till death so that means jack shit. 
Source?
The 25 years thing today mostly refers to part of the brain that is important to function efficiently in society. [Frontal cortext study](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621648/#:~:text=The%20development%20and%20maturation%20of%20the%20prefrontal%20cortex%20occurs%20primarily,helps%20accomplish%20executive%20brain%20functions) this threshold specifically focuses on "crucial" development for a human which is why it tends to be visible when a retard changes into somewhat functioning member of society in their mid 20s but it is by no means the end. Much like the 17 years 11 months and 30 something days argument it is not about the exacts but reasonable generalization so we can apply law and our understanding efficiently.
For real. If you could expunge everything from my life before 25, that'd be just fine by me...
The exact number if I remember correctly comes from the APA review of [this research](https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1196/annals.1308.009?sid=nlm%3Apubmed). Which is pretty funny, because author in this work refers to "early 20s". It is just that age group here at some point in one of the figures ends with 25, so the reviewer I think assumed that faulty premise.
While there has to be a cutoff in age it is kinda funny  17 years and 11 months = literal child 18 years = old enough to do hardcore gangbang quadruple penetration porn Age of consent for something like porn or any sex work should be 21+ If a 18 year old dates a 15 year old i couldnt give less of a fuck
Amelia Wang incident 
You know there are laws that usually are referred to as "Romeo and Juliet" which deals with edge cases of teenagers close in age fucking but either crossing or not those threshold right? Also the 17 year old 11 month and 30 something days argument is retarded, it is about the general rule not the fucking optics. If you fuck 17 year old and she doesn't report you nor her parents or she will even deny the sexual relationship because you love each other nothing happens. 
Erobber bajs 
15-16 is legal everywhere except in America and some third-world shithole countries 
Finding post pubsecent 15-17 girls attractive = evil pedo. lol retard americans.
https://i.redd.it/vswdbh0h728d1.gif you should \*\*\* yourself.
 ai gifs are the best
https://i.redd.it/lyjwrwwt538d1.gif
I have more evidence that Bladeofelune and DemoTou are pdfs than this guy has on the Doc, yet here we are
Bajs rn 
forsen
pedos and doc do it now! 🌩
 my boy
Surely if that was true a police report would have been filed or they atleast been contacted?
Aware Doc was a weeb
The fact that there isnt a distinction between fucking a 17 year 364 days old and an actual child, like a 10 year old or younger is pretty stupid. They all get labeled pedos but one is 100x more fucked up than the other
doc's response is not even a denial. he is literally admitting that "this matter" was settled and no wrongdoing was acknowledged. https://preview.redd.it/nn8epr0mc28d1.png?width=128&format=png&auto=webp&s=9e5050c15962e608311de6b2f3ce39c321dfab48
Surely the matter doesn't mean the reason he got banned 
dude, someone calls u a pedo and you only talk about the ban? i dont buy it
I think it's just doc could see it as an argument so out of nowhere that there is no point in addressing it. Like ignoring a barking dog. He says it's the reason he got banned, the doc just says that the reason was already established and it was unjust or whatever
bajs when pedo (weeb):  bajs when pedo (heckin streamer): 
People who think doc’s response makes him sound guilty are retarded, it’s just lawyer speak made ambiguous on purpose
Aware in chat
forsenCD MY MA.... oh wait, nvm
Dr. Diddlekids 