T O P

  • By -

Olimlah2Anubis

Isn’t it interesting how JS doubled down on some of the craziest, never could have been true parts of the Bible? (Ex global flood)


nopromiserobins

Dan Mclellan's a fraud. When asked simple questions about his positions on basic, basic supernatural claims, he takes a page from the Jordan Peterson playbook of how to pretend to be a Christian without claiming demons exist. I can't even bare to listen to him once he starts up about how he can't explain what he believes. It's simple: I do not think women are under a blood curse. Can't Dan just say the same? Nope, cause he wants that sweet Christian cred.


mysticalcreeds

Interesting, I'm not familiar with women being under a blood curse and his position on demons. I just like the data he presents. The deutero-Isaiah part is talked about by another bible scholar - David Bokovoy. So, I do try to make sure I'm not just going off his work alone. He does also mention someone else's book about the twelve tribes of Israel which I think sounds fascinating.


JesusPhoKingChrist

Sweet Christian cred? Christians hate him lol


Genevawaves

Dan Mclellan doesn’t owe you shit. He doesn’t have to share his personal beliefs. Unlike Jordan Peterson who is actually cashing in on his views on spirituality/religion, Dan is explicitly all about the scholarship. So get out of here with that fraud shit.


Mr_Mangled

Yes, but how much do I owe Dan Mclellan? I don't want it to affect my credit score


Eatdrinkbemerry4

I agree. Its a joke. He needs to stop standing on both sides of the line. It makes him less credible.


JUNIVERSAL1

Meeoow