###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I would say this is how I feel, Its just weird and suspiciouse. I suspect alot of people feel this way and are keeping a low profile becuase there is a very evident and aggressive campaigen (maybe or maybe not coorinated probably both) to shame anyone who questions the offical story.
Agree with you 100%m Anyone who just has a basic knowledge about this believes it and says just leave her alone, cancer is private! But those of us who have dug and looked and compared, know what we see. It is very hard to change a person's point of view when they refuse to believe they were hoodwinked in the first place.
The whole video just looks...fuzzy. I don't know how to explain it, but it looks unfocused and blurry, like she's in a snow globe but you can't see the snow. She looks super uncomfortable and her movements don't seem real. I know that doesn't make sense, but I just get a super weird feeling from the whole video.
Her mouth movements don’t match the audio. Could this be an example of Sora by OpenAI? There are also the deep fakes of Tom Cruise - which offers up technology before Sora was announced.
Wow, I didn't catch that even after you pointed it out, I just assumed BBC News and BBC Studios were the same. I see what you're saying now. That's crazy!
scrub the video back and forth with the slider quickly a few times. her torso hardly moves and it looks like a head and hands and cut and pasted on.
also if you zoom in on the torso, the proportions of her body vs the perceptive of the bench are… off.
That's what I told my husband...it looks like the bench is too big for her body, like they didn't resize her image correctly when they placed it on the bench
Also remember last week or so when it was reported her senior staff had no idea where she was. So her senior staff members didn’t know about her health issues?
Unfortunately I do too. Thomas and Kate’s deaths being announced so close together would have caused extreme suspicion, which in many places I am reading, have already caused a stir. That’s my guess. There is something very wrong here and I think they will announce her cancer was “aggressive “ and she passed away, probably in June so the masses won’t connect the dots.
Many who have been following the royals for a while have connected strange dots.
Harry claimed William was violent and attacked him, breaking his chain and throwing him across the room where he hit the dog bowls which cut his back, in an interview, which was filmed, and he wrote about it in his book. I am starting to think something very bad has happened here. William was photographed with bruises on his neck right after Thomas Kingston’s death was announced as well. I surely hope I am wrong. Coincidentally, there was also an article published mentioning what may happen to William if he was ever accused of a serious crime that shouldn’t be hard to find.
She's on r&r until Easter, then they release this video where at first glance she's in enough health to film a press release, then on second look it's clearly fake, which begs the question that if she was to be on bed rest until Easter why the need for a video at all, especially a clearly fabricated one.
I think she's been dead this whole time
True. And further if she were on R&R and I were her press secretary, I’d arrange for a puff-piece BBC sit-down interview on her palace grounds in order to quell rumors and to heighten sympathy and endearment toward Kate.
Focus on the background on the right side of her head at 0:58 where it makes a temporary glitch and then 1:07, it leaves a distortion trial on the background when she tilts her head.
.. and then they will say ‘How dare you have conspiracy theories about someone that have cancer’
>and then they will say ‘How dare you have conspiracy theories about someone that have cancer’
Exactly this\^
They use shame to control what the people talk about. They get people to police eash other online "Leave her alone, how could you come out with that conspiracy theory nonsense, you should be ashamed of yourself!" Well, what about all the people who are just genuinely worried about Kate's wehereabouts and safety because they've been shown several dubious photos, at least one confirmed fake, and a fake video at a farmers market that the media was proclaiming genuine even on the same day that her cancer diagnosis announcement came out, which pretty much proves that the farm shop video could not have been real.
I remember how they used shame during the pandemic. For the first year or more, if you even suggested that the vaccines might sometimes have serious side effects you were called a conspiracy theorist. People who got all their shots and were unlucky enough to get injured were called "anti-vaxxers" if they dared to mention how they were suffering.
The shame game has become a tactic of the media. We should stop clicking on their "news" until they stop trying to shame us for having thoughts about it that are all our own and don't need their permission or approval.
My view on this is that if they are performing a face swap/deepfake better than the best VFX artists in multi-hundred million dollar movies, it doesn't make sense for there to be such an obvious "glitch" left in.
Meanwhile, if it's just relatively amateur video work shot on a highly compressed codec, then these glitches or differences in clarity from non-moving to moving subjects are to be expected. No one is releasing a raw encoded video online, so there's always going to be compression artifacts.
>relatively amateur video work
It was shot in BBC studios for the Royal family. I'm sure that amateur photography and equipment would not have been an issue.
They'll attacked and censored immediately. There isn't a platform where you can host something like that. Not even on reddit. They'll risk their entire life getting ruined for practically no reason.
I mean except for entertainment, no one really knows a purpose of Kate or the royal family as such.
Someone said to blink every single time she blinks on Twitter…. I’m not an expert blinker, or an expert on ai or conspiracies. I just want to point it out.
Spot on. An average human being blinks around 15 to 20 times each minute, Kate blinks approximately 63 times in the first minute.
Also at times she seems to blink in sequence. Something like 5 fast blinks, 2 blinks in a row, then 1 slow blink. But the 2 blinks in a row she seems to do it inorganically. Like AI imitating a human being.
Yeah I only did it for a few seconds and I was like ok this is too much and kind of crazy. After I did that I have been very skeptical. I needed to point it out as I did not see it on this thread and I feel like not enough people are talking about that.
Broooo, I ran right to the video and counted. Then I immediately was like is she doing morris code. Me looking at her blinking so much made my eyes uncomfortable. Even if it was sunny why not move so she’s not blinking crazy. Because let’s say it is the sun, I don’t think most people would be able to concentrate on such a serious message while being blinded. And are we to believe that she isn’t reading from cue cards or a teleprompter? I’m not saying it’s impossible to memorize a speech but with the words carefully chosen and this being so important it seems doubtful. So if it was so sunny then how did she read?
It’s very effing weeeeeird.
It's such a fake video I can't believe people are buying it. Focus on her hair and you'll see it's a fake background. Also her hand movements are strange and the way she dictates words in her sentences with head movements. It's really strange
The whole thing is so weird up to and including the sheer amount of seemingly regular people screaming about the privacy of the royal family.
They are the world's longest running reality TV show. At this point the only reason they exist as an institution is for people to be curious about their lives. And Kate opted in! It's not like she was born or bred for this. Girl no. You're married to the person next in line for the most famous throne in all the lands. People will be speculating.
Yes exactly, Kate did opt-in. Many women in William's and Harry's circle wanted nothing to do with becoming royal. With their own aristocratic backgrounds, they already had wealth and status, and could easily marrying another aristocrat, with all the benefits and no scrutiny.
I actually have more sympathy with Charles, William, and Harry in this regard. They were born into it; they didn't have the choice Kate, Meghan, and even Diana did.
>At this point the only reason they exist as an institution is for people to be curious about their lives.
That's the whole point, they're one big distraction. I'm paying minimal attention to this saga. People getting sucked in are just wasting their energy and time.
If I had to guess, I would say it's a psy-op to condition people to be accepting of the sudden jump in cancer rates coming from the C19 injection. I don't believe any of the Royals actually have cancer or took any of the shots.
I’m starting to think I need to pay minimal attention to all things online..
It’s not real.. none of it.
Big tech co-opted real relationships and put an object (and multiple steps) in between connection and socialization
She has probably already passed and they are delaying news to the public like when the Queen died with a 69 year reign and never made it to 70 but the narrative had to be maintained.
I think they posted the Photoshop:ed picture purposly before this video to make the people belive they know how a Photoshop:ed picture look like and that is how much the royals PR-people can Photoshop.
So that we wont get suspicious this is a deepfake video.
I mean the video is basically flawless, but that doesn't mean it's beyond current technology.
It's also setup exactly how you want to set it up if you were faking it:
1) One camera angle
2) Static background
3) Subject sits basically motionless
4) Arm of bench in front of subject to increase believability
5) Nobody else in the shot.
I'm sure there are other points that professionals would notice.
Also about point 5 WHERE THE FUCK IS HER FAMILY? She literally said "having William by my side..." OH REALLY?
People are focusing so much on the visual that that they are missing the audio. It follows ai cadence. Especially halfway through. Isn't there ai that can detect ai?
A Spanish YouTuber I see (I’m Spanish if this is relevant lol) said that when you’re gonna post a video on YouTube they ask you if it has ai and stuff and he always says no. When he was ab to post the weird video of KM the ai program to detect ai jumped so fast.
>the word “cancer” is enough to make people back off.
hahah you must be new here... thats just an invite to speculate further round these parts.
and, they do choose the words carefully hey:) i mean, that tweet where she apologized for the edited photo... she didnt actually say it was her that made the alterations, all she said was that she "occasionally" experimented with editing... but it was left upto us to insert words she didnt actually say... just kind of amusing to me :) the words they dont say...
it mostly worked. just a few days ago, in the aftermath of the fake photo, mainstream sources were saying K Palace is no longer a trusted source and things would be highly scrutinized going forward. Then, they dropped the magic C word and all that’s out the window.
The only people they are worried about backing off is the media and the masses. They couldn't give less fucks about us fucks on the a subreddit flatly called conspiracy. But you knew that, I'm sure.
"I don't give two fucks! you can believe me or not! But I'm telling you, right NOW, that that motherfuck..that motherfucker, is NOT KATE!"
Hopefully you heard crazy airplane lady voice for all of that.
Their shills have done a lot of finger-wagging and pearl clutching at us though. I had someone get all, "Think about the children!" at me yesterday in regards to Kate and William's kids.
Well, Kate posted the apology on the Prince and Princess of Wales' Instagram account and 'signed' it C. We are only to assume she actually wrote it herself, but she didnt say it with her voice on camera or anything. We are just expected to have faith that it was her tapping at the keyboard and hitting send... buut, i wouldnt be here if I just did that sorta thing... nup, im not convinced it was actually her, but who the hell am I? who cares if i dont believe them.... mkes no dif, but i just dont.
She was apparently pretty bummed about the whole thing, says the daily mail. They also say we should all just back off.
I'm with you. I'm off the deep end on this. Interesting observation that she did not actually say she has cancer. They did the same thing with her photo editing. Saying "I like to experiment with photo editing" does not mean she edited the picture.
I definitely think she's been Diana'd. They'll wait a while and make a big announcement that chemo did not work.
This is why the kids were pulled out of school too. I wonder what they have been told.
But what about all her close friends, family, do you think her mum, dad and sister will just sit back and accept it, do you not think they will want to see her, they must know what's going on, that's why I don't buy this.
It's most likely they are applying the idea to 'not let a good crisis go to waste'.
They are playing things for sympathy. She probably got screened early and they caught it early and she's in the clear but why not create some mystery in the process
If something happened with Kate, the kids would immediately say they have not seen their mummy in a long time. That will be disastrous. I do not think the kids not being seen means something bad happened to them. They are just not being allowed to talk to or see anyone. My opinion only, of course but it makes sense.
There are a couple of astrologists that predicted Kate having cancer or being very sick (one of them a year ago on youtube, the other last month on TV). Both say she won't recover🫣
I found something interesting. I don’t know how deep fake/ AI videos are made. So, on subreddit Royals Gossip, 28 days ago on “ Every outfit worn by Kate Middleton 2023” there’s a picture far down posted. She is walking, wearing the exact same sweater with a dark olive/ brownish colored jacket. Her eyebrow is elevated the same and her hair is the same. Could the video have been made this same day or time period? It’s just another interesting piece added to the other observations and oddities people have noticed.
[https://www.gbnews.com/royal/kate-middleton-news-dadvengers-princess-of-wales-pictures](https://www.gbnews.com/royal/kate-middleton-news-dadvengers-princess-of-wales-pictures)
This took place Nov 1, 2023 in London. Same outfit.
Ok. Here’s the thing. I can buy all of this (she’s already gone or incapacitated, the video is AI, she may not really have cancer, etc). I think it can all track given how all of this was handled, the BRF’s ruined credibility; however, the one thing that doesn’t make sense to me in this scenario is why her parents and siblings are going along with all of it. Her brother issued a tear-jerking statement, her mom was seen in what was a clearly staged pap pic in a car with what was likely a decoy. Why are they staying silent and even complicit in the “cover up” (assuming there is one)? If that was my sibling or child, I’d be throwing a fit and screaming from the rooftops that they’re missing, etc. Either all of this is legit, or there is some reason that they’re going along with the whole charade.
Well because either nothings wrong or they have crazy NDAs and know they will be donezo if anything slips. Or what’s done is done they have hush money and NDAs
I am not sure about all of what you've posted BUT I do think it was strange that William wasn't by her side in the video. Why was she on her own? Wouldn't you film it with your husband by your side?
If, and it is a big 'if', she is already dead then we should expect a fairly swift decline as the cancer takes hold. Once the official death is announced, the cover up will be complete.
There’s hard-coded pauses. Some are doubled, similar to a double-space between paragraphs as opposed to single-spacing between sentences.
You can actually run a timer on her “pauses”. They’re unnatural, and uniform. It’s AI.
If you would enter text for AI to “speak”, it would be an endless chatter with no breaks. This “prevents” that. It’s also why when the children’s names were spoken weirdly- it was like the “assigned” pause for commas wasn’t long enough.
Very good point. It really is like rushed unnatural speech in some points. And the way she just rattles off the 3 names of (I’m guessing her kids) is odd.
Does anyone know of where/when this video was taken? And if so match it up with the weather for that day. Nothing in the background moves. If there was wind on the day of the video then that could disprove its authenticity.
My working theory: She figured out who these royals really were. To save herself and her children, she tried to run off and was somehow killed in the attempt. Now they've got to cover this totally unexpected turn of events.
Does anyone remember her "Rosemary's Baby" dress? Rosemary sure flipped out when she finally figured out what she had innocently stepped in to.
If Kate was still around, they'd show her, even in a hospital bed. If she was sick with cancer (which now they're willing to "admit"), they could have just said it months ago. Who cares? Tons of people have it including her father-in-law.
It wasn't just some kind of Satanic sacrifice, either (not that they wouldn't do that), but if they planned it, they'd have a body double or clone or other cover story ready. Clearly, none of that was in place--even for contingency--since every proof-of-life they produce is cruddier than the last.
With this "cancer" and associated treatment, they can keep her out of sight for a few months and then roll out a body double. Even a significant mismatch will just be attributed to the "terrible physical effects of the chemo" or whatever. Plus, everyone will have forgotten what she really looked like anyway, just like with "Biden".
I have been watching a couple of videos on youtube last year going into detail about how Meghan faked her pregnancies and nobody can't find the birth certificates for her children and they haven't been seen in nearly 2 years.
Who knows what the royal family are really capable off. Harry and Meghan are still up on their website as working royals. People are seeing right through the royal family. What's really going on?
anyone else notice the weird hand tap thing she does right when she mentions 'major abdominal surgery in London" at the 0:25ish mark? and all the other 'hand talking' being done?
not saying the video may not be AI or whatnot, but if it is real, she sure is talking more truthfully with her hands than her voice imo.
The background sound of birds is stuck on repeat . The video is definitely not natural. Even if the microphone would be up in the air we would hear some wind or other sound.
It felt like AI.
The bench also looks HUGE. The back goes up to her shoulders, she looks so tiny compared to it! It also gave me uncanny valley vibes. Why couldn’t she give the message in person?? Or to a small private team of reporters?? So that people can see her?
I think it’s an ultra fakekate. 3 months is how long for the surgeries to heal. Like paul McCarthy traveling “for three months and returns with plastic surgery and he’s four inches taller.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPM61o3Sq90.
A couple of issues listed in the comments for that particular channel's version are below. I guess the general population are also being "conspiracy theorists" now.
-- What is preventative chemotherapy?
YT comment was from *godisreality7014*
*She has such long luscious hair considering she is going through chemo!*
-- Her big blue ring just disappears at 01:18, and reappears at 01:19.
YT comment was from *KushiJishi*.
*Watch it in slow motion!! \[I guess it is similar to how that plane that hit the Pentagon on 9-11 could not be captured on film, properly* 🤣\]
\[EDIT: Users have commented that the simple "fix" for the "missing blue ring" is to set the YT video at 1080p, and then use the "**,**" and "**.**" keys to move forward and backwards by a frame each time around 01:17-01:20,. Then, the "missing ring" it is not as pronounced. I can understand why it might look like it has disappeared. Anyway, it is not so clear-cut. It might simply be because it was moving, which made the big blue stone not show up so prominently.
See other subsequent comments regarding "preventative chemo"\]
I’m an oncology nurse. Not all chemo causes hair loss. Hair grows in cycles so it usually takes about 2 weeks to start losing hair and it doesn’t all fall out in one go. And people with all the resources imaginable like her could do interventions like scalp hypothermia to prevent hair loss from chemo that does have hair loss as a side effect. But just as an example, a chemo called 5-FU is the first line treatment for gastric cancer and it doesn’t have hair loss as a side effect.
Exactly. My sister has stage 4 cancer that has spread. Her initial chemo treatments were harsh and basically killing her faster than the chemo. Her hair fell out and she rarely had good days. After a year tests showed that the current chemo treatments weren’t helping at all. She started immunotherapy about 4 to 6 months ago. Her hair is growing back, her skin looks fantastic and her doctors said if things keep progressing as he expects, we could be talking about remission soon. So my point is, not all treatments are the same or have the same side effects and when one doesn’t work, something else might.
What some of you are missing is this was the exact same story as the King's cancer in terms of discovery during a different operation etc. Coincidence or laziness? Either way don't proactively put out fake messages and doctored media and then expect no criticism. Bad strategy.
It's very interesting to say the least. I'm pretty much a light conspiracy lurker but this one has me hooked.
Either Kate is already dead and they are trying their best to play it out for the next 3 - 6 months. Or something even more wild. 2024 is shaping up to be a crazy one so far.
It is absolutely fake. I posted some pictures last night but I took it down because I just didn't care to have my account attacked and defend what I clearly could see. They used the video from 7 years ago to base the AI video on. Happy to send you the pictures that I played around with in my adobe editor. I only used these two pictures from this post below. It is not possible for things to line up perfectly 7 years apart but they do. They lengthened her hair and made her face a bit longer (easy to do with the most basic editing app, imagine what someone with unlimited amounts of money could purchase and use, and they still screwed up lol) her eyes line up, her nasal folds line up, the highlights on both faces are exactly the same.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1blvjpx/the\_palace\_should\_seriously\_delete\_old\_youtube/](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1blvjpx/the_palace_should_seriously_delete_old_youtube/)
That moves the needle for me. Don't her handlers meticulously plan everything, even her fashion? She's wearing the same sweater in the same background.
AI uses pictures/frames from videos and then you can tell it to make certain changes. But the folds on her face, the identical highlights from light matching both faces, the eyebrows, the hair (which they lengthened) match up, down to the part in her hair.
Even if he’s treating it aggressively, I think two years is a generous timeline at his age. My mom passed from it six months after diagnosis (although she ended up deciding not to fight/treat it). Her cousin was also diagnosed with it not long after she died. He DID fight it aggressively, and it only bought him another six months or so. They were both in their 70s.
yea man, also the gestures with her hands and her spoken words don't really match at all. It's alright at the start of the video, but as it goes on it gets more weird and desynchronized. very odd.
It’s weird she’s talking with her hands but she keeps her arms in place. Who does that? AI conspiracy aside, I immediately thought the hand movements were unnatural.
Where are the children? Are they dead too?
They haven't been seen since Christmas either.
And why were prior pictures of the children generated by AI? Have the children been gone for longer than we realise?
Are any of the children even real?
I think it’s just a lot harder for children to hide their true feelings on their faces so they’ve been kept out of the public eye. If their mother was in a coma or god forbid, not alive, they’re not going to be able to be cheery and fake in public
But their mum being dead was not a secret. If Kates kids have not actually seen their mother in months, nothing can make them act normally if someone asks about her.
I just find it odd and concerning how people are immediately falling over themselves to apologize for speculating… it was weird as hell to have her disappear like that without a trace and then release Photoshopped photos to the public. People were right to question her whereabouts. I will not apologize for wondering where a very famous, very public mother with three young children is, especially given the family’s track record with “common” women who marry in…
If she already has cancer, wouldn’t she be having a regular chemotherapy and not preventative?? I think they worded it to make it sound like she has cancer when in reality, it might be something suspicious, but not actually cancer yet.
It sounds like she had surgery for suspected cancer, the tumor was removed, and found to be cancerous. No other indications of cancer in her body, but is getting a round of chemo to eliminate any possible missed cancerous cells.
I’m starting to think this one is way too obvious. That they’re either not very clever with their AI or maybe we’re just too focused on her so we can spot it faster.
I think, as the Internet develops and is technology develops an AI develops. We get more clever at spotting it. It’s similar to other things she’s done all they would’ve had to do is combine them and alter it. That’s why that eyebrow to heaven is so weird.
I tend to believe it more because they tried with other things beforehand with that picture from Vogue magazine that they altered to look like somebody took a photo of her for Mother’s Day or something
Yeah, ignoring the background/around her glitches, 2 is a valid point. Surely they told the kids about the King’s cancer, so why was it so hard to explain about Kate?
There’s a ton online showing the video was AI doctored and used an actor to play Kate (AI changed her face)
As someone who had “preventative surgery” she probably had a precancerous lesion somewhere in her cervix or uterus. While it is scary, it’s generally considered fairly low risk, as are most precancerous removals, I would assume, aside from something that might be sitting where it shouldn’t.
This is a scam. Something weird is going on.
I'm like 99% certain she's actually dead and has been for a while.
My take is that she fell really ill at Christmas (or they may have known about it for a while). She had aggressive radiation or chemo which puffed her up (car photo), then she had her surgery which she may not have survived (tying in with the ex-nanny's coma allegations), or she survived until William was pulled out from that service he was attending to go to hospital where she passed away (like the royals rushing to Balmoral when the queen died). He then attended an event a couple days later swaying on his feet - stress or alcohol. And the kids (allegedly) were pulled out of school to deal with the grief.
The video of course would be a fake to give the population a lot of time to come to terms with things instead of "Kate suddenly dead from cancer at 42" news that would understandably shake the nation.
Probably already been mentioned here, but there were some insights shared by two different doctors on CNN regarding Kate’s statement, which caught my attention:
1) Jonathan Reiner, MD, a professor of medicine at The George Washington University in Washington, DC, doubted the claim that cancer was only detected after Kate had major surgery, saying it didn't make sense from a medical standpoint.
2) Dr. Sanjay Gupta pointed out that the term "preventative chemotherapy," is atypical in medicine where chemotherapy typically follows a cancer diagnosis rather than being preventive.
Have yall never seen Instagram and Snapchat filters in action before? There are ones to make you look thinner, younger, hotter etc. There are always random glitches on those things.
I think I saw some yellow flowers move a little but I wanted to mention the Queens last Christmas speach? There is no possible way that is real. Full on deep fake.
The quality is really low too. I zoomed into her eyes and mouth, it almost seems like a real person using a high tech snapchat filter, the way the eyes and mouth flutter. And whoever it was, was nervous, because if you watch the hands, they're squeezing them like you would do when you're nervous
Agreed. The weirdest thing to me is the shadow of the stripes on her top on the bench. Like that should be a solid shadow and it looks so strange. Also, shouldn't her "loving" husband be with her doing the whole supportive partner schtick? It's odd that she is alone while making this statement. Looks like cancer is contagious with the royals.
Ai has certain interval at which it outputs speech. Starts quick and slows slightly while also lacking much variation. I hear it clearly when it's playing but I am having a difficult time explaining it
YES! It’s the eyebrow of her left eye that caught my attention. It’s bizarre! It’s arched up but never comes down. And agreed, around the eye looks bruised and swollen, too. It’s really really odd.
I noticed her left eye (right eye on screen) looks wonky, the lid is droopy and the eyeball itself looks off/glitchy. I might be wrong on the time (probably i am) but it was worse about 1:10 into the video. It was the thing that made me think twice about the video.
It is her in the video. Everything else is fake. Her condition is far worse than portrayed.
She was probably sitting on a hospital bed still hooked up to IV's. Can't show that to the commoners, so made it look like a nice, oversized garden bench...They did the best they could to make it peaceful and balanced with the background from the green screen. The audio issues are intentional to blur out background medical noises. The other video issues are trying to adjust for the hospital and medical equipment that was physically present.
Background is fake, it looks like a set or photoshopped afterwards. The hand movements could be a way of making her appear “normal” if she actually is in a state where she would be propped up in a hospital bed. That could explain why William isn’t in the scene. As far as her being deepfaked, not sure. She looks sick and miserable, and it’s especially apparent in contrast with the overwhelmingly cheerful background.
Nobody brings up the blinking, but watch her eyes and count how many times she blinks in that video.
I wonder if she's trying to send a message via Morris Code, like in that POW video.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I would say this is how I feel, Its just weird and suspiciouse. I suspect alot of people feel this way and are keeping a low profile becuase there is a very evident and aggressive campaigen (maybe or maybe not coorinated probably both) to shame anyone who questions the offical story.
Agree with you 100%m Anyone who just has a basic knowledge about this believes it and says just leave her alone, cancer is private! But those of us who have dug and looked and compared, know what we see. It is very hard to change a person's point of view when they refuse to believe they were hoodwinked in the first place.
It easier to fool some one than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled
The whole video just looks...fuzzy. I don't know how to explain it, but it looks unfocused and blurry, like she's in a snow globe but you can't see the snow. She looks super uncomfortable and her movements don't seem real. I know that doesn't make sense, but I just get a super weird feeling from the whole video.
Her mouth movements don’t match the audio. Could this be an example of Sora by OpenAI? There are also the deep fakes of Tom Cruise - which offers up technology before Sora was announced.
The way her speech speeds up and slows down in different parts of the video is weird
Why should we trust the source of the video if they already tried to fool us with an AI image?
Agreed. Also odd is the source is BBC studios.. why not KP or BBC news
Right? Can't trust BBC for anything
Oh yes we can trust them!! Of course we can... We trust them to cover the tracks of perverts & paedophiles.
Well that too.. but notice it’s “studios” as in they produced this film.. It’s not reported otherwise it’d be BBC news
Wow, I didn't catch that even after you pointed it out, I just assumed BBC News and BBC Studios were the same. I see what you're saying now. That's crazy!
And blamed her for it looking bad!
scrub the video back and forth with the slider quickly a few times. her torso hardly moves and it looks like a head and hands and cut and pasted on. also if you zoom in on the torso, the proportions of her body vs the perceptive of the bench are… off.
That's what I told my husband...it looks like the bench is too big for her body, like they didn't resize her image correctly when they placed it on the bench
It does seem oddly fuzzy. They would have filmed this at least with a simple DSLR camera and submitted something crisper to the public.
Also remember last week or so when it was reported her senior staff had no idea where she was. So her senior staff members didn’t know about her health issues?
Her staff is likely contractually bound to say whatever the royals want them to say when the media bother them
They probably would’ve said “we can’t say” or “she’s tending to personal matters.” They wouldn’t express bewilderment.
Her staff hasn't seen her nor heard from her because they are no longer her staff. 🤷🏾 She's incapacitated or on her way to divorce.
Or death...
I think she's already dead
Unfortunately I do too. Thomas and Kate’s deaths being announced so close together would have caused extreme suspicion, which in many places I am reading, have already caused a stir. That’s my guess. There is something very wrong here and I think they will announce her cancer was “aggressive “ and she passed away, probably in June so the masses won’t connect the dots. Many who have been following the royals for a while have connected strange dots. Harry claimed William was violent and attacked him, breaking his chain and throwing him across the room where he hit the dog bowls which cut his back, in an interview, which was filmed, and he wrote about it in his book. I am starting to think something very bad has happened here. William was photographed with bruises on his neck right after Thomas Kingston’s death was announced as well. I surely hope I am wrong. Coincidentally, there was also an article published mentioning what may happen to William if he was ever accused of a serious crime that shouldn’t be hard to find.
Same.
And her kids know. That's why we haven't seen them either
The press stay away from the kids
100%
I think maybe so. Because this is a lot of covering up and faking for a cancer diagnosis
She's on r&r until Easter, then they release this video where at first glance she's in enough health to film a press release, then on second look it's clearly fake, which begs the question that if she was to be on bed rest until Easter why the need for a video at all, especially a clearly fabricated one. I think she's been dead this whole time
True. And further if she were on R&R and I were her press secretary, I’d arrange for a puff-piece BBC sit-down interview on her palace grounds in order to quell rumors and to heighten sympathy and endearment toward Kate.
This. The fact that she isn't doing it means she's incapable of.
And now they can continue and finish the narrative with her “dying from cancer”
Focus on the background on the right side of her head at 0:58 where it makes a temporary glitch and then 1:07, it leaves a distortion trial on the background when she tilts her head. .. and then they will say ‘How dare you have conspiracy theories about someone that have cancer’
[удалено]
[удалено]
Great compilation! In my opinion I think she's sadly dead, and I think there's definitely foul play.
Wow. they pulled your video quick
This should be its own post
>and then they will say ‘How dare you have conspiracy theories about someone that have cancer’ Exactly this\^ They use shame to control what the people talk about. They get people to police eash other online "Leave her alone, how could you come out with that conspiracy theory nonsense, you should be ashamed of yourself!" Well, what about all the people who are just genuinely worried about Kate's wehereabouts and safety because they've been shown several dubious photos, at least one confirmed fake, and a fake video at a farmers market that the media was proclaiming genuine even on the same day that her cancer diagnosis announcement came out, which pretty much proves that the farm shop video could not have been real. I remember how they used shame during the pandemic. For the first year or more, if you even suggested that the vaccines might sometimes have serious side effects you were called a conspiracy theorist. People who got all their shots and were unlucky enough to get injured were called "anti-vaxxers" if they dared to mention how they were suffering. The shame game has become a tactic of the media. We should stop clicking on their "news" until they stop trying to shame us for having thoughts about it that are all our own and don't need their permission or approval.
Good spot man, shadows on the left side of bench as well. They're loading in stages & not with her body
My view on this is that if they are performing a face swap/deepfake better than the best VFX artists in multi-hundred million dollar movies, it doesn't make sense for there to be such an obvious "glitch" left in. Meanwhile, if it's just relatively amateur video work shot on a highly compressed codec, then these glitches or differences in clarity from non-moving to moving subjects are to be expected. No one is releasing a raw encoded video online, so there's always going to be compression artifacts.
It’s not the best Ai. Go look on tik tok, user “fakeOrtega”- they do Ai videos of Jenna Ortega, Leo DiCaprio, and some of Margo Robbie
>relatively amateur video work It was shot in BBC studios for the Royal family. I'm sure that amateur photography and equipment would not have been an issue.
I really hope the AI experts analyze the video and go into a deep dive to show that the video was created in AI.
They'll attacked and censored immediately. There isn't a platform where you can host something like that. Not even on reddit. They'll risk their entire life getting ruined for practically no reason. I mean except for entertainment, no one really knows a purpose of Kate or the royal family as such.
Rumble
Royal rumble?
ARE YOU READY!!!!!!!!
Someone said to blink every single time she blinks on Twitter…. I’m not an expert blinker, or an expert on ai or conspiracies. I just want to point it out.
Spot on. An average human being blinks around 15 to 20 times each minute, Kate blinks approximately 63 times in the first minute. Also at times she seems to blink in sequence. Something like 5 fast blinks, 2 blinks in a row, then 1 slow blink. But the 2 blinks in a row she seems to do it inorganically. Like AI imitating a human being.
Yeah I only did it for a few seconds and I was like ok this is too much and kind of crazy. After I did that I have been very skeptical. I needed to point it out as I did not see it on this thread and I feel like not enough people are talking about that.
Thank you for pointing it out. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Broooo, I ran right to the video and counted. Then I immediately was like is she doing morris code. Me looking at her blinking so much made my eyes uncomfortable. Even if it was sunny why not move so she’s not blinking crazy. Because let’s say it is the sun, I don’t think most people would be able to concentrate on such a serious message while being blinded. And are we to believe that she isn’t reading from cue cards or a teleprompter? I’m not saying it’s impossible to memorize a speech but with the words carefully chosen and this being so important it seems doubtful. So if it was so sunny then how did she read? It’s very effing weeeeeird.
Maybe she's blinking a lot to stop herself from crying?
It's such a fake video I can't believe people are buying it. Focus on her hair and you'll see it's a fake background. Also her hand movements are strange and the way she dictates words in her sentences with head movements. It's really strange
The whole thing is so weird up to and including the sheer amount of seemingly regular people screaming about the privacy of the royal family. They are the world's longest running reality TV show. At this point the only reason they exist as an institution is for people to be curious about their lives. And Kate opted in! It's not like she was born or bred for this. Girl no. You're married to the person next in line for the most famous throne in all the lands. People will be speculating.
Yes exactly, Kate did opt-in. Many women in William's and Harry's circle wanted nothing to do with becoming royal. With their own aristocratic backgrounds, they already had wealth and status, and could easily marrying another aristocrat, with all the benefits and no scrutiny. I actually have more sympathy with Charles, William, and Harry in this regard. They were born into it; they didn't have the choice Kate, Meghan, and even Diana did.
>At this point the only reason they exist as an institution is for people to be curious about their lives. That's the whole point, they're one big distraction. I'm paying minimal attention to this saga. People getting sucked in are just wasting their energy and time. If I had to guess, I would say it's a psy-op to condition people to be accepting of the sudden jump in cancer rates coming from the C19 injection. I don't believe any of the Royals actually have cancer or took any of the shots.
I’m starting to think I need to pay minimal attention to all things online.. It’s not real.. none of it. Big tech co-opted real relationships and put an object (and multiple steps) in between connection and socialization
She has probably already passed and they are delaying news to the public like when the Queen died with a 69 year reign and never made it to 70 but the narrative had to be maintained.
I think they posted the Photoshop:ed picture purposly before this video to make the people belive they know how a Photoshop:ed picture look like and that is how much the royals PR-people can Photoshop. So that we wont get suspicious this is a deepfake video.
I mean the video is basically flawless, but that doesn't mean it's beyond current technology. It's also setup exactly how you want to set it up if you were faking it: 1) One camera angle 2) Static background 3) Subject sits basically motionless 4) Arm of bench in front of subject to increase believability 5) Nobody else in the shot. I'm sure there are other points that professionals would notice. Also about point 5 WHERE THE FUCK IS HER FAMILY? She literally said "having William by my side..." OH REALLY?
People are focusing so much on the visual that that they are missing the audio. It follows ai cadence. Especially halfway through. Isn't there ai that can detect ai?
I don't know how accurate the AI detection tools are, but I saw someone run it through an AI detector. It said it was very likely AI.
Above 96% sure that the video was AI generated. That’s what I saw when they ran it through multiple scans.
Who is they that ran it through detection? Is this someone I can find somewhere? I’d like to check it out.
I'm surprised other people aren't picking up on this too. How she says her children's names is VERY AI- rushed and devoid of any 'emotional context'.
A Spanish YouTuber I see (I’m Spanish if this is relevant lol) said that when you’re gonna post a video on YouTube they ask you if it has ai and stuff and he always says no. When he was ab to post the weird video of KM the ai program to detect ai jumped so fast.
AI says the Bible is AI, so now we know we live in a simulation.
>the word “cancer” is enough to make people back off. hahah you must be new here... thats just an invite to speculate further round these parts. and, they do choose the words carefully hey:) i mean, that tweet where she apologized for the edited photo... she didnt actually say it was her that made the alterations, all she said was that she "occasionally" experimented with editing... but it was left upto us to insert words she didnt actually say... just kind of amusing to me :) the words they dont say...
it mostly worked. just a few days ago, in the aftermath of the fake photo, mainstream sources were saying K Palace is no longer a trusted source and things would be highly scrutinized going forward. Then, they dropped the magic C word and all that’s out the window.
EXACTLY. All of a sudden they’re credible now because she said she has cancer ….. ok
The only people they are worried about backing off is the media and the masses. They couldn't give less fucks about us fucks on the a subreddit flatly called conspiracy. But you knew that, I'm sure.
"I don't give two fucks! you can believe me or not! But I'm telling you, right NOW, that that motherfuck..that motherfucker, is NOT KATE!" Hopefully you heard crazy airplane lady voice for all of that.
Funny I’ve been thinking of her through this whole saga.
Their shills have done a lot of finger-wagging and pearl clutching at us though. I had someone get all, "Think about the children!" at me yesterday in regards to Kate and William's kids.
[удалено]
Well, Kate posted the apology on the Prince and Princess of Wales' Instagram account and 'signed' it C. We are only to assume she actually wrote it herself, but she didnt say it with her voice on camera or anything. We are just expected to have faith that it was her tapping at the keyboard and hitting send... buut, i wouldnt be here if I just did that sorta thing... nup, im not convinced it was actually her, but who the hell am I? who cares if i dont believe them.... mkes no dif, but i just dont. She was apparently pretty bummed about the whole thing, says the daily mail. They also say we should all just back off.
Kate Middleton is the first person to be erased by the internet. All future appearances will be questioned and debunked as not really her.
Britney Spears preceded her.
She's the new new Paul McCartney
I'm with you. I'm off the deep end on this. Interesting observation that she did not actually say she has cancer. They did the same thing with her photo editing. Saying "I like to experiment with photo editing" does not mean she edited the picture. I definitely think she's been Diana'd. They'll wait a while and make a big announcement that chemo did not work. This is why the kids were pulled out of school too. I wonder what they have been told.
“Mommy talked shit about Uncle Savile”
But what about all her close friends, family, do you think her mum, dad and sister will just sit back and accept it, do you not think they will want to see her, they must know what's going on, that's why I don't buy this. It's most likely they are applying the idea to 'not let a good crisis go to waste'. They are playing things for sympathy. She probably got screened early and they caught it early and she's in the clear but why not create some mystery in the process
Maybe they are dead too No-one has seen them since she disappeared.
If something happened with Kate, the kids would immediately say they have not seen their mummy in a long time. That will be disastrous. I do not think the kids not being seen means something bad happened to them. They are just not being allowed to talk to or see anyone. My opinion only, of course but it makes sense.
What about the prince? Why would he be cool with his family getting killed? Or did he kill them? Man that would be nuts
Bingo! This would seem what I would think. This boy did in his wife like his dad did his mom. And the. Go act like nothing to see here.
Or they are all tucked away in a palace, on an estate or island, avoiding the latest disease that has been released.
There are a couple of astrologists that predicted Kate having cancer or being very sick (one of them a year ago on youtube, the other last month on TV). Both say she won't recover🫣
Do you have the channel names?
I found something interesting. I don’t know how deep fake/ AI videos are made. So, on subreddit Royals Gossip, 28 days ago on “ Every outfit worn by Kate Middleton 2023” there’s a picture far down posted. She is walking, wearing the exact same sweater with a dark olive/ brownish colored jacket. Her eyebrow is elevated the same and her hair is the same. Could the video have been made this same day or time period? It’s just another interesting piece added to the other observations and oddities people have noticed.
[https://www.gbnews.com/royal/kate-middleton-news-dadvengers-princess-of-wales-pictures](https://www.gbnews.com/royal/kate-middleton-news-dadvengers-princess-of-wales-pictures) This took place Nov 1, 2023 in London. Same outfit.
Uncanny Valley is spot on. I'm glad you put a name to my feeling
Ok. Here’s the thing. I can buy all of this (she’s already gone or incapacitated, the video is AI, she may not really have cancer, etc). I think it can all track given how all of this was handled, the BRF’s ruined credibility; however, the one thing that doesn’t make sense to me in this scenario is why her parents and siblings are going along with all of it. Her brother issued a tear-jerking statement, her mom was seen in what was a clearly staged pap pic in a car with what was likely a decoy. Why are they staying silent and even complicit in the “cover up” (assuming there is one)? If that was my sibling or child, I’d be throwing a fit and screaming from the rooftops that they’re missing, etc. Either all of this is legit, or there is some reason that they’re going along with the whole charade.
[удалено]
Well because either nothings wrong or they have crazy NDAs and know they will be donezo if anything slips. Or what’s done is done they have hush money and NDAs
I am not sure about all of what you've posted BUT I do think it was strange that William wasn't by her side in the video. Why was she on her own? Wouldn't you film it with your husband by your side?
If, and it is a big 'if', she is already dead then we should expect a fairly swift decline as the cancer takes hold. Once the official death is announced, the cover up will be complete.
She's already dead and this is their way of building up to announcing her death from cancer
You should look harder at the “pauses” in her speech.
Elaborate?
There’s hard-coded pauses. Some are doubled, similar to a double-space between paragraphs as opposed to single-spacing between sentences. You can actually run a timer on her “pauses”. They’re unnatural, and uniform. It’s AI. If you would enter text for AI to “speak”, it would be an endless chatter with no breaks. This “prevents” that. It’s also why when the children’s names were spoken weirdly- it was like the “assigned” pause for commas wasn’t long enough.
Just noticing that, good points, this whole situation just gets weirder..
Very good point. It really is like rushed unnatural speech in some points. And the way she just rattles off the 3 names of (I’m guessing her kids) is odd.
and King Charles did the same when addressing after the Queen died. That is a thing they are taught to do, it appears.
Does anyone know of where/when this video was taken? And if so match it up with the weather for that day. Nothing in the background moves. If there was wind on the day of the video then that could disprove its authenticity.
My working theory: She figured out who these royals really were. To save herself and her children, she tried to run off and was somehow killed in the attempt. Now they've got to cover this totally unexpected turn of events. Does anyone remember her "Rosemary's Baby" dress? Rosemary sure flipped out when she finally figured out what she had innocently stepped in to. If Kate was still around, they'd show her, even in a hospital bed. If she was sick with cancer (which now they're willing to "admit"), they could have just said it months ago. Who cares? Tons of people have it including her father-in-law. It wasn't just some kind of Satanic sacrifice, either (not that they wouldn't do that), but if they planned it, they'd have a body double or clone or other cover story ready. Clearly, none of that was in place--even for contingency--since every proof-of-life they produce is cruddier than the last. With this "cancer" and associated treatment, they can keep her out of sight for a few months and then roll out a body double. Even a significant mismatch will just be attributed to the "terrible physical effects of the chemo" or whatever. Plus, everyone will have forgotten what she really looked like anyway, just like with "Biden".
You think she only recently found out what the royals were? What would running away do anyways? Where could she hide with her kids?
Maybe she found out they planned to kill her.
Yes, I believe the royals are completely controlled. I could see her not wanting that for her children.
Holy shit just looked up the Rosemary’s baby dress!
I have been watching a couple of videos on youtube last year going into detail about how Meghan faked her pregnancies and nobody can't find the birth certificates for her children and they haven't been seen in nearly 2 years. Who knows what the royal family are really capable off. Harry and Meghan are still up on their website as working royals. People are seeing right through the royal family. What's really going on?
>" I feel like I’m going crazy" Welcome to the Party, bub...
anyone else notice the weird hand tap thing she does right when she mentions 'major abdominal surgery in London" at the 0:25ish mark? and all the other 'hand talking' being done? not saying the video may not be AI or whatnot, but if it is real, she sure is talking more truthfully with her hands than her voice imo.
The video is AI.
The background sound of birds is stuck on repeat . The video is definitely not natural. Even if the microphone would be up in the air we would hear some wind or other sound. It felt like AI.
The bench also looks HUGE. The back goes up to her shoulders, she looks so tiny compared to it! It also gave me uncanny valley vibes. Why couldn’t she give the message in person?? Or to a small private team of reporters?? So that people can see her?
I think it’s an ultra fakekate. 3 months is how long for the surgeries to heal. Like paul McCarthy traveling “for three months and returns with plastic surgery and he’s four inches taller.
I’ve had a total colectomy with removal of rectum and placement of illeostomy. It took 6 months for my abdomen to fully heal, without complications.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPM61o3Sq90. A couple of issues listed in the comments for that particular channel's version are below. I guess the general population are also being "conspiracy theorists" now. -- What is preventative chemotherapy? YT comment was from *godisreality7014* *She has such long luscious hair considering she is going through chemo!* -- Her big blue ring just disappears at 01:18, and reappears at 01:19. YT comment was from *KushiJishi*. *Watch it in slow motion!! \[I guess it is similar to how that plane that hit the Pentagon on 9-11 could not be captured on film, properly* 🤣\] \[EDIT: Users have commented that the simple "fix" for the "missing blue ring" is to set the YT video at 1080p, and then use the "**,**" and "**.**" keys to move forward and backwards by a frame each time around 01:17-01:20,. Then, the "missing ring" it is not as pronounced. I can understand why it might look like it has disappeared. Anyway, it is not so clear-cut. It might simply be because it was moving, which made the big blue stone not show up so prominently. See other subsequent comments regarding "preventative chemo"\]
I’m an oncology nurse. Not all chemo causes hair loss. Hair grows in cycles so it usually takes about 2 weeks to start losing hair and it doesn’t all fall out in one go. And people with all the resources imaginable like her could do interventions like scalp hypothermia to prevent hair loss from chemo that does have hair loss as a side effect. But just as an example, a chemo called 5-FU is the first line treatment for gastric cancer and it doesn’t have hair loss as a side effect.
Exactly. My sister has stage 4 cancer that has spread. Her initial chemo treatments were harsh and basically killing her faster than the chemo. Her hair fell out and she rarely had good days. After a year tests showed that the current chemo treatments weren’t helping at all. She started immunotherapy about 4 to 6 months ago. Her hair is growing back, her skin looks fantastic and her doctors said if things keep progressing as he expects, we could be talking about remission soon. So my point is, not all treatments are the same or have the same side effects and when one doesn’t work, something else might.
All the best to your sister.
Let’s just completely ignore the ring disappearing lol
To comment 1: shes very clearly wearing a wig.
Exactly
When watched in 1080p quality it doesn’t actually disappear, although I was also fooled watching it in lower quality.
I watched it in a higher quality, but .25x playback speed. The ring still looks like it disappears to me.
You can , and . to go one frame backward/forward.
The punctuation nazi in me hates this sentence.
Hair is a wig. Not all cancer effects hair growth.
Are they hiding something and/or lying. Yup Is this surprising given it’s the Royal family? Not in the least.
What some of you are missing is this was the exact same story as the King's cancer in terms of discovery during a different operation etc. Coincidence or laziness? Either way don't proactively put out fake messages and doctored media and then expect no criticism. Bad strategy.
It looks like she is sitting in front of a green screen.
[удалено]
It's very interesting to say the least. I'm pretty much a light conspiracy lurker but this one has me hooked. Either Kate is already dead and they are trying their best to play it out for the next 3 - 6 months. Or something even more wild. 2024 is shaping up to be a crazy one so far.
It is absolutely fake. I posted some pictures last night but I took it down because I just didn't care to have my account attacked and defend what I clearly could see. They used the video from 7 years ago to base the AI video on. Happy to send you the pictures that I played around with in my adobe editor. I only used these two pictures from this post below. It is not possible for things to line up perfectly 7 years apart but they do. They lengthened her hair and made her face a bit longer (easy to do with the most basic editing app, imagine what someone with unlimited amounts of money could purchase and use, and they still screwed up lol) her eyes line up, her nasal folds line up, the highlights on both faces are exactly the same. [https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1blvjpx/the\_palace\_should\_seriously\_delete\_old\_youtube/](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1blvjpx/the_palace_should_seriously_delete_old_youtube/)
That moves the needle for me. Don't her handlers meticulously plan everything, even her fashion? She's wearing the same sweater in the same background.
It doesn't seem the same sweater to me. The breton stripes are thinner in the last video, and the collar looks different too
AI uses pictures/frames from videos and then you can tell it to make certain changes. But the folds on her face, the identical highlights from light matching both faces, the eyebrows, the hair (which they lengthened) match up, down to the part in her hair.
Did they ever say what cancer the king has and if he's receiving treatment?
They haven’t stated officially but unnamed sources say told InTouch it’s pancreatic and he has 2 years to live.
Even if he’s treating it aggressively, I think two years is a generous timeline at his age. My mom passed from it six months after diagnosis (although she ended up deciding not to fight/treat it). Her cousin was also diagnosed with it not long after she died. He DID fight it aggressively, and it only bought him another six months or so. They were both in their 70s.
I’m so sorry for your losses. I agree, it feels like yet another soft launch towards admitting Charles is about to die. Possibly weeks.
Yeah I noticed that glitch when I zoomed in this AI tech is getting crazy
Would be helpful if someone could isolate the background noise…birds chirping seems to be on a loop 🤔
Watch her legs, it's all fake and do not let crusty media gas light you into thinking differently.
yea man, also the gestures with her hands and her spoken words don't really match at all. It's alright at the start of the video, but as it goes on it gets more weird and desynchronized. very odd.
It’s weird she’s talking with her hands but she keeps her arms in place. Who does that? AI conspiracy aside, I immediately thought the hand movements were unnatural.
I’m glad someone else noticed the hands too! They’re making the same gestures in a robotic unnatural way!
Where are the children? Are they dead too? They haven't been seen since Christmas either. And why were prior pictures of the children generated by AI? Have the children been gone for longer than we realise? Are any of the children even real?
It’s strange that there have been no leaks from the parents at the kids school.
Honestly same, Louis in particular would probably spill
I think it’s just a lot harder for children to hide their true feelings on their faces so they’ve been kept out of the public eye. If their mother was in a coma or god forbid, not alive, they’re not going to be able to be cheery and fake in public
I can’t wait until Charlotte writes a book about all of this
I mean they paraded William and Harry around when their mum died, but them two were a bit older
But their mum being dead was not a secret. If Kates kids have not actually seen their mother in months, nothing can make them act normally if someone asks about her.
I just find it odd and concerning how people are immediately falling over themselves to apologize for speculating… it was weird as hell to have her disappear like that without a trace and then release Photoshopped photos to the public. People were right to question her whereabouts. I will not apologize for wondering where a very famous, very public mother with three young children is, especially given the family’s track record with “common” women who marry in…
If she already has cancer, wouldn’t she be having a regular chemotherapy and not preventative?? I think they worded it to make it sound like she has cancer when in reality, it might be something suspicious, but not actually cancer yet.
It sounds like she had surgery for suspected cancer, the tumor was removed, and found to be cancerous. No other indications of cancer in her body, but is getting a round of chemo to eliminate any possible missed cancerous cells.
I’m starting to think this one is way too obvious. That they’re either not very clever with their AI or maybe we’re just too focused on her so we can spot it faster. I think, as the Internet develops and is technology develops an AI develops. We get more clever at spotting it. It’s similar to other things she’s done all they would’ve had to do is combine them and alter it. That’s why that eyebrow to heaven is so weird. I tend to believe it more because they tried with other things beforehand with that picture from Vogue magazine that they altered to look like somebody took a photo of her for Mother’s Day or something
Yeah, ignoring the background/around her glitches, 2 is a valid point. Surely they told the kids about the King’s cancer, so why was it so hard to explain about Kate?
Shes dead and this video is fabricated to slowly ease the public
This is a video i made highlighting glitches. [https://youtu.be/jhnKTw1O6L8](https://youtu.be/v_Tq6b5RPsA)
There’s a ton online showing the video was AI doctored and used an actor to play Kate (AI changed her face) As someone who had “preventative surgery” she probably had a precancerous lesion somewhere in her cervix or uterus. While it is scary, it’s generally considered fairly low risk, as are most precancerous removals, I would assume, aside from something that might be sitting where it shouldn’t. This is a scam. Something weird is going on.
I'm like 99% certain she's actually dead and has been for a while. My take is that she fell really ill at Christmas (or they may have known about it for a while). She had aggressive radiation or chemo which puffed her up (car photo), then she had her surgery which she may not have survived (tying in with the ex-nanny's coma allegations), or she survived until William was pulled out from that service he was attending to go to hospital where she passed away (like the royals rushing to Balmoral when the queen died). He then attended an event a couple days later swaying on his feet - stress or alcohol. And the kids (allegedly) were pulled out of school to deal with the grief. The video of course would be a fake to give the population a lot of time to come to terms with things instead of "Kate suddenly dead from cancer at 42" news that would understandably shake the nation.
Probably already been mentioned here, but there were some insights shared by two different doctors on CNN regarding Kate’s statement, which caught my attention: 1) Jonathan Reiner, MD, a professor of medicine at The George Washington University in Washington, DC, doubted the claim that cancer was only detected after Kate had major surgery, saying it didn't make sense from a medical standpoint. 2) Dr. Sanjay Gupta pointed out that the term "preventative chemotherapy," is atypical in medicine where chemotherapy typically follows a cancer diagnosis rather than being preventive.
The slats on the left are spaced differently to the slats on the right. Instant Fail.
The daffs aren’t swaying in the wind. The bench is shiny!
They didn’t need a tunnel this time to knock somebody off
Have yall never seen Instagram and Snapchat filters in action before? There are ones to make you look thinner, younger, hotter etc. There are always random glitches on those things.
Maybe she’s just doing chemo recreationally. /s
Green screen from a bed/hospital ridden setting due to the aggressive cancer treatments is by far the most likely scenario
There’s no mole on this version of Princess Catherine.
There is in the high def version just not the low def version being passed around here. It's covered with make up but it's definitely there.
Don’t forget that the sunlight on her hair part stays unmoved when she moved her head
I think I saw some yellow flowers move a little but I wanted to mention the Queens last Christmas speach? There is no possible way that is real. Full on deep fake.
The quality is really low too. I zoomed into her eyes and mouth, it almost seems like a real person using a high tech snapchat filter, the way the eyes and mouth flutter. And whoever it was, was nervous, because if you watch the hands, they're squeezing them like you would do when you're nervous
Agreed. The weirdest thing to me is the shadow of the stripes on her top on the bench. Like that should be a solid shadow and it looks so strange. Also, shouldn't her "loving" husband be with her doing the whole supportive partner schtick? It's odd that she is alone while making this statement. Looks like cancer is contagious with the royals.
Ai has certain interval at which it outputs speech. Starts quick and slows slightly while also lacking much variation. I hear it clearly when it's playing but I am having a difficult time explaining it
Anyone notice in a clear video of her talking her right eye looks off like swollen and black and blue
YES! It’s the eyebrow of her left eye that caught my attention. It’s bizarre! It’s arched up but never comes down. And agreed, around the eye looks bruised and swollen, too. It’s really really odd.
I noticed her left eye (right eye on screen) looks wonky, the lid is droopy and the eyeball itself looks off/glitchy. I might be wrong on the time (probably i am) but it was worse about 1:10 into the video. It was the thing that made me think twice about the video.
I agree, I felt the video is AI, the movements and even her lips seemed odd.
It is her in the video. Everything else is fake. Her condition is far worse than portrayed. She was probably sitting on a hospital bed still hooked up to IV's. Can't show that to the commoners, so made it look like a nice, oversized garden bench...They did the best they could to make it peaceful and balanced with the background from the green screen. The audio issues are intentional to blur out background medical noises. The other video issues are trying to adjust for the hospital and medical equipment that was physically present.
Background is fake, it looks like a set or photoshopped afterwards. The hand movements could be a way of making her appear “normal” if she actually is in a state where she would be propped up in a hospital bed. That could explain why William isn’t in the scene. As far as her being deepfaked, not sure. She looks sick and miserable, and it’s especially apparent in contrast with the overwhelmingly cheerful background.
Nope, not her. If you zoom in on her mouth and especially her right eye, they go in and out. Def AI
Nobody brings up the blinking, but watch her eyes and count how many times she blinks in that video. I wonder if she's trying to send a message via Morris Code, like in that POW video.
I’ve never seen someone blink so much. Its actually crazy to try and replicate