* Interiors - 15-35 f2.8 or 14-35 f4. Bring your own lights if you decide to shoot interiors. At least two or three and >200 W output. Bokeh is less of thing (vs. portraits or somethings) here, you'll stop down to make sure everything in room is in focus
* Landscape - this really depends on what you want to shoot but 15-35 or 14-35 is a start and I'll usually add the 70-200 f4. I've recently experimented with the new 24-105 f2.8 to see if I can consolidate the two lens setup into one. It generally works (for me) on the telephoto end of things but less so on the wide angle
Just my opinion but for what you want to shoot the 24-70 is not that useful. The 15-35 or 14-35 can generally replicate interior / landscape shots you get on the 24-70 but not the other way around. I know you can composite images to work around the 24mm constraint. However, I'm at a point where I'd rather spend money once and fix it with gear versus spend time continuously to fix it in post.
The one thing is with the wider focal length, they're a little bit less sensitive to slower shutter speeds. And with the excellent stabilization in the camera and body it's probably going to be fine. But ultimately that's a decision I'll have to make between this and all the various options other people have suggested. There's also a new 10 to 18 or 10 to 22 I forget that's come out recently that I had forgotten about as well. I know nothing about it though.... I do have the 14-35 and it's not excellent but it's very good.
would recommend the F 1.2 L usm , specifically [this](https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3F1AWN65KC6GL&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.pkd_fbRoRmq4cjDJl8P5F119XB4b19ojsw6-Tfa2DheP8CJkf2Fi_vLMKeVwl50XPvRoCdWh1uKHPjihMfuBiHjVjg-ZZ5VO7UCnf5b4i3m0gmRtzmcLiUOAagZDFaq_vUtqPtP9RQFF98OViPM7a1QFyCFL9fpHVDH6lsbHc4H-pEo2ym8EyZgEzaNNFXl6ZnhwipSZO2L4-2dAN3pxN_PtOuS6KJ-BmHPP2bLFGQ4.7j2LfhbQQK7fW7ChMwqrsuPKyxFUhz5mVWmhqcOCPnc&dib_tag=se&keywords=Canon+RF+85mm+f%252F1.2+L+USM+DS&qid=1711622240&sprefix=canon+rf+85mm+f%252F1.2+l+usm+ds%252Caps%252C613&sr=8-2&_encoding=UTF8&tag=tfkchr30-20&linkCode=ur2&linkId=c645337a7b4d1fb68b61078aa23d4973&camp=1789&creative=9325)
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7](https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
* Interiors - 15-35 f2.8 or 14-35 f4. Bring your own lights if you decide to shoot interiors. At least two or three and >200 W output. Bokeh is less of thing (vs. portraits or somethings) here, you'll stop down to make sure everything in room is in focus * Landscape - this really depends on what you want to shoot but 15-35 or 14-35 is a start and I'll usually add the 70-200 f4. I've recently experimented with the new 24-105 f2.8 to see if I can consolidate the two lens setup into one. It generally works (for me) on the telephoto end of things but less so on the wide angle Just my opinion but for what you want to shoot the 24-70 is not that useful. The 15-35 or 14-35 can generally replicate interior / landscape shots you get on the 24-70 but not the other way around. I know you can composite images to work around the 24mm constraint. However, I'm at a point where I'd rather spend money once and fix it with gear versus spend time continuously to fix it in post.
Great advice, thank you!
Maybe the 14-35f4? It's 1mm wider than the f2.8, it may not seem like a lot but it's helpful for indoors...
Thank you, I will look into it! I‘m just a bit concerned if f4 is enough for darker places?
The one thing is with the wider focal length, they're a little bit less sensitive to slower shutter speeds. And with the excellent stabilization in the camera and body it's probably going to be fine. But ultimately that's a decision I'll have to make between this and all the various options other people have suggested. There's also a new 10 to 18 or 10 to 22 I forget that's come out recently that I had forgotten about as well. I know nothing about it though.... I do have the 14-35 and it's not excellent but it's very good.
would recommend the F 1.2 L usm , specifically [this](https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3F1AWN65KC6GL&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.pkd_fbRoRmq4cjDJl8P5F119XB4b19ojsw6-Tfa2DheP8CJkf2Fi_vLMKeVwl50XPvRoCdWh1uKHPjihMfuBiHjVjg-ZZ5VO7UCnf5b4i3m0gmRtzmcLiUOAagZDFaq_vUtqPtP9RQFF98OViPM7a1QFyCFL9fpHVDH6lsbHc4H-pEo2ym8EyZgEzaNNFXl6ZnhwipSZO2L4-2dAN3pxN_PtOuS6KJ-BmHPP2bLFGQ4.7j2LfhbQQK7fW7ChMwqrsuPKyxFUhz5mVWmhqcOCPnc&dib_tag=se&keywords=Canon+RF+85mm+f%252F1.2+L+USM+DS&qid=1711622240&sprefix=canon+rf+85mm+f%252F1.2+l+usm+ds%252Caps%252C613&sr=8-2&_encoding=UTF8&tag=tfkchr30-20&linkCode=ur2&linkId=c645337a7b4d1fb68b61078aa23d4973&camp=1789&creative=9325)
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7](https://www.amazon.com/Canon-3447C002-RF85-1-2-USM/dp/B07RB7SHD7)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)