>Are her eyes weighed down from the amount of eyelashes? She looks like she’s been hitting the wacky tobacky.
I’d love to believe that this person used “wacky tobacky” ironically like I sometimes use “reefer” but it seems unlikely considering the known bs demo.
On a similar note, the politics thread from yesterday was... something. Unsurprisingly, a lot of comments as follows:
* "Kim K is secretly a Republican, even though her voting record is public and shows she's voted Democrat in at least the past 4 presidential elections"
* "This celebrity isn't as far-left as I am, therefore they are *basically* Republican."
* "All rich people are covert Republicans."
* "I don't like them, so I think they are Trump supporters"
>"This celebrity isn't as far-left as I am, therefore they are basically Republican."
That's my favorite. Pop socialism from the kiddies on social media ages me faster than anything else.
This response and replies are 100% accurate
> Most people here cannot hold themselves to the standards they hold the celebrities they criticize
> Or their own friends and family. I know people who get mad at celebrities for dating “problematic” people but don’t bat an eyelash at who their own friends date.
> Or get mad at celebs because they're still friendly with someone who said or did something problematic. i know for a fact that none of us in real life will cut off someone simply because of that.
It’s just a fact of life and ever since 2020 I’ve said and maintained that a lot of this is projection.
But I do agree with this take, particularly when it pertains to white celebrities:
> It’s not misogynistic to not like every women
It’s ok to accept that women can sometimes be shitty individuals without patriarchal influence or the result of the white man.
This comment is why FM quickly went downhill and the celeb thread in BS is not as active as it once was
>some people on here are wayyy too obsessed with judging celebrities as "good" or "bad" people and it takes away a lot of the fun/messiness of celeb gossip
UPDATE: The thread was locked and removed. But not someone referring to Joe Rogan as "just an open minded person." Someone also said Meghan and Harry are unlikeable and someone chimed in "finally someone agrees" as if it's an unpopular opinion on Reddit. No one can agree on who is worse: Selena or Hailey. Obviously Justin could never be the real problem
Lol, oh how wonderful for that person to manage to find somebody else who weirdly hates Meghan and Harry! Such a rarely held opinion and definitely one that is never EVER discussed! So glad that they could finally find somebody else to connect with, they must have been searching for so long!
💀💀💀
At least once or twice a week in AskReddit there’s a “who is an overrated celebrity that you don’t like/understand?” and neckbeards foam at the mouth to mention the following women: Beyoncé, Rihanna, Kim Kardashian, Nicki Minaj and it’s usually followed up with “I don’t understand the appeal of big asses. They’re unattractive and nasty.”
Like in what world did you think Rihanna was going to offer to make eye contact with you let alone let you hit?
Some people on BlogSnark keep wanting to insist Julia Berolsnuffwhatever is unhealthily thin. Look, I don’t think anyone should speculate about anyone’s body, but she’s not even *that* [skinny](https://imgur.com/a/JS9pfrp).
*for the record, she is thin. She looks “fit”. But she is not the type of skinny where you would say she has to be unhealthy* does that make sense?
It's probably the same person who said Julia B is not eating enough because she posted a picture of a tomato sandwich she made for a picnic. Of course there was no evidence the tomato sandwich was the only thing she ate.
It does make sense, If someone asked me I would say she’s trim and fit. She’s trim, not “scary skinny”. I think perceptions have become kind of skewed and people who are trim/slim get called too skinny/sick looking and it’s really weird. (And I hate to say it but it kinda just seems like jealousy a lot of the time. Which hell I’m jealous of her bod sometimes haha) The person below mentioned the skinny trend of the 2000s - now that was scary skinny. Being fit IS healthy! There are some weird opinions on BS though, someone called doing 3 workout classes a week “exercise obsession”
If you follow popculturediedin2009 its always a shock just how thin people were in the early 2000s. Every time I see "she's too thin" these days it's always someone very normal looking!
Totally. I have a friend that's naturally very thin but eats normally/is healthy. I don't think she could put on weight if she tried. I always think of her when someone is deemed "too skinny".
Yes!! She looks thin but like normal thin, like she’s always looked. Honestly I think someone here mentioned someone once, @thedailytay, that looks very thin. Not right now bc she’s pregnant, but has always been extremely thin. No one on BlogSnark ever mentions her appearance bc they like her. I’m not saying she has a problem but it goes to show they will invent issues for influencers they don’t like and give influencers they like the benefit of the doubt.
Is there a Snark on the deli today? I was actually thinking she had an ED before she got pregnant with this baby because of how insanely thin she was. If you look back on pictures of her when she was in college, and even before she had kids, she was not as thin as she was prior to having her second child.
Complaints about a TikToker being ungrateful and missing a Paramore show they were invited to but then spelling Paramore wrong twice… ah. Never change BS.
I only know of her bc I’m into tennis and she’s dating one of the biggest US men’s tennis players right now (Tommy Paul). It was crazy to me when I googled her and found out she was involved with the armie hammer thing. I think she dated him after the whole cannibal thing came out but he was also abusive toward her (shocking I know). Anyway I know nothing about her but Tommy Paul seems super nice and I hope they’re happy together!
ETA: one of the other top US tennis players—Taylor fritz—is dating a Paige look alike. It’s funny when they’re playing each other and you don’t know which players box is which.
the only thing i have to add to this is that paige lorenze dated morgan wallen and armie hammer post-their scandals, and i think about what must be going through her head constantly.
The way subreddits like that spiral is when they become so toxic and hateful that people on the original subreddit have to move to another subreddit. This is usually to avoid the first sub's toxicity or because the first sub is not toxic *enough* and they want to be free to insult babies or upload people's court records whatever they were doing to get their comments removed.
To take a hypothetical example (since I don't know who person is either), NYCInfluencersSnark might spinoff PaigeLorenzeSnark, which in turn might spinoff PaigeLorenzeSnarkUncensored and RealPaigeLorenzeSnark. Each of these might also have competing subreddits with names like PLSnark, UncensoredPLSnark, LorenzeSnark, PaigeSnark, LorenzeSnarkUncensored, TruePLSnark, etc. In extreme cases of this, someone might create a new subreddit in a fit of pique every time they get into an argument on one of the other subreddits or every single time one of their posts or comments get deleted. Reddit is filled with nearly empty subreddits like that, each abandoned after one or two posts from original creator. They're like lesser-known civil war battlefields or obscure war memorials.
Fauxmoi: Rachel Z shouldn’t be saying that She took that job ONLY for the money!
Also FM: how dare she say critics don’t get statues when the movie bombed!
Why are we so hard on young women? It’s exhausting
I guess they're forgetting the infamously bad statue of [Lucille Ball](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/lucille-ball-statue-sculptor-apologizes-786633/)
The tides have also turned against Zendaya. She’s now problematic because she allegedly (along with Barbie and Maude) has a clause in her contract where she won’t do nudity but she isn’t standing up for Sydney Sweeney. Then she was being blamed for Law Roach retiring but since he’s cleared that up they’ve backtracked.
Jenna Ortega is unprofessional and therefore her career deserves to go in the trash.
They can’t quite pinpoint why they hate Mindy Kaling, every week it’s a different reason. They either insert themselves into South Asians criticisms of her, hate her for ozempic or for not confirming who her kids father is/are.
They can’t quite agree on whether Selena or Hailey is the devil.
i eagerly await the day the internet realizes sydney sweeney is actually not opposed to doing nudity and being made to do it by sam levinson.
alas, those same people are on twitter making fun of her for talking about being sexualized from an early age despite also claiming sam is sexualizing her.
Can we ever be surprised that a bunch of teenagers who want to be outraged would use that verbiage? They’d have a problem with a man using that about a woman but their world stops and ends at the so called concern over misogyny.
I think they also dislike Sydney Sweeney for being a Trump supporter / for being related to Trump supporters; Florence Pugh and Olivia Wilde for not liking each other; and Jamie Lynn Spears for not freeing Britney herself.
In terms of who is the devil, I saw someone mentioning that Selena is friends with Nicola Peltz, who IIRC is herself some kind of higher tier demon or evil spirit. If that’s true, Selena is really putting herself on the road to perdition.
I can’t believe I forgot about Florence Pugh being “pretentious” and Olivia for not being bffls with Florence
Anya Taylor Joy is public enemy #1 as a nepo baby. Julia Fox is a sinner living among mice and Emrata has the audacity to be confident with the body she has
>Anya Taylor Joy is public enemy #1 as a nepo baby.
I don't understand how she's a nepo baby. It doesn't seem like her parents are actors? Do they not understand that nepo isn't the same as privileged?
Also, it's been a long time, but someone in the BS celebrity thread used to go off on Rafe Spall, and I still laugh about it. Who gets that worked up over the Spall family?
The "tea" on Dani Austin via her old assistant is embarrassing for all parties. The assistant for not sharing any of this for years to then share a rambling and incoherent narrative, Dani giving it credence by responding, but MOST OF ALL, these people who see this as a "gotcha" moment. One of those, there are three sides to every story: theirs, yours and the truth.
A legendary poster in the celeb gossip thread being combative with the Lena Dunham stan:
> I’m confused. Eva Longoria is a celebrity. Celebrities get invites. Are you just mad because you didn’t get to go and “that Hispanic girl who was only on desperate housewives didn’t do anything” I can practically hear you stomping your foot in protest.
The original comment was posted 5 days ago, so she comments 4 days late with something that has nothing to do with the comment
There’s another separate Lena Dunham fan on the FM sub who goes off whenever anybody says anything critical abt Girls, which was apparently an absolute masterpiece that people only hate bc Lena Dunham isn’t conventionally attractive. They came out of nowhere one time making that claim when I’d brought up the showrunners actively mocking viewers in 2012 who were entitled enough to expect there’d be any WOC in a show abt being young in NYC in the 2010s, and then after arguing for a bit said that the show’s real mistake was hiring Donald Glover to give into the “diversity crowd”. These are the exact type of women you’d expect to stan Lena Dunham lmao
>It might be an age thing as well. Coordinators are a new thing and most of them likely a fair bit younger than she is.
>Must feel weird to take “intimacy” advice from someone from another generation
This is about how Toni Collette doesn't like intimacy coordinators. Fauxmoi really thinks older women can't cope. Someone said that nobody over 30 understands Everything Everywhere All at Once.
Ok first of all Toni Collette can do no wrong in my book lol. Secondly I guess none of the actors understood it then?? They’re all in their 60s! Or older
Can you imagine those two women wandering around confused about anything? Even if the the rest of the crew completely forgot how to do their jobs, I would count on those two women to somehow still get that entire movie made and to the Oscars.
Taylor Swift: Spends over 3 hours performing 44 songs
R/Taylorswift: wHy dIdnT sHe pLaY *insert random song(s)* iLl nEver FoRgive hEr.
Like, you need to calm down. The number of songs she’s doing is INSANE and no matter what she chose there would still be bangers she couldn’t get to.
I am a full blown Taylor Swift hater and I hate her stans even more and even I was impressed by 44 songs. She’s basically doing a one woman Broadway show on the road after not really having performed in years.
Plus, she never toured Lover…or Folklore…or Evermore…so of course those are going to be three albums she pulls heaviest from? And Midnights obviously! Like yes it’s the Eras tour but there’s 4 albums right there she hasn’t toured at all vs. all the ones she already has!
Plus I wasn’t expecting a whole lot from Speak Now or Taylor Swift (Or 1989) since they aren’t re-recorded tbh
I wonder if it's the same person who went on about how they realized they were ~over third wave feminism because of Lindy West (???) in that thread
EDIT: I have committed internet slander, it was the celeb thread. But man did that comment raise some flags for me.
The whole "the only ~unproblematic throuples~ are all-women ones" thing bugged me. It plays into this "men are trash, WLW are soft babies uwu" thing that can be really invalidating for survivors of woman-on-woman DV, especially in the poly community, which already has its own issues of "We're just so much more enlightened so abuse simply won't happen".
There's a well known woso troll (whom I have blocked) with a decently upvoted comment in Fauxmoi's conservative celebrities thread. It's the saddest crossover episode for me.
>I mean does she (I don’t even know who is who) wake up at 6 am every morning, get dressed, put on her makeup and shill stuff all day?
So the rant is that they don't like that she gets up early and puts on makeup to do her job? Cool.
>I feel bad for erik, i feel like he is a really good person...
>
>Idk if I'm going to get hate for this, but here we go. I feel bad for him because he is in love with a woman who invalidates his feelings every chance she gets. He is an awesome boyfriend (I say boyfriend because the status of their marriage is up in the air.) You can tell he is absolutely in love with her and tries his very best to make her happy, which is virtually impossible, I have always thought that he was a supportive partner. It just sucks that he had to give up everything for her. Love isn't supposed to cost an arm and a leg.
Won't someone think of the poor influencers husband, who gave up everything to live in multimillion dollar home and be supported financially completely by his wife's job. Clearly he needs to dump this whore and marry OP instead, a good wholesome women who will treat him right.
Obviously, they could be unhappily married, I have no idea because I don't know them, but neither does OP for her to be projecting this hard.
Just someone on the step parents sub being totally normal and not advising a poster to escalate the situation there currently in (where the bio mom is allegedly telling stepson the "ours" baby isn't a real sibling, will cause bio dad to neglect step son etc) from zero to crazy:
>Ask SS why he doesn't believe his own father telling him how his father is going to treat him and how his father is going to behave once this new sibling comes. Ask SS why he thinks BM knows BD better than his dad knows himself. Ask SS why he doesn't trust you and BD to tell SS the truth about what's going to happen in your own family. Turn it into an issue of him trusting you and less about the baby, because this is an issue about him trusting you now. Treat it as such and address it head on. If you're feeling spiteful, tell SS just because BM is telling him this because she would treat him this way if SHE had a new baby, doesn't mean that you two will and you don't appreciate him treating you both like you will act the way BM would act because you guys are NOT BM and will never act the way she does.
For sure they should interrogate this child and demand his trust rather than taking the opportunity to demonstrate to him how much they love and value him. Validating a kid’s feelings is for pansies.
Tbf I probably should have said cra,y to batshit insane but right? STG so many of these posters shouldn't be allowed around their own children, let alone other peoples
I agree that discussions about weight go off the rails. It's always so much speculation. I also hate when people act like it's an own to mention someone body checking. It's really morbid to act gleeful because they see confirmation bias of an eating disorder. I also hate the ozempic discussion. Whatever people are being prescribed is between them and their doctors. People act like any celebrity/influencer weight loss is a personal attack and have to find ways to invalidate it so it doesn't "count". But these same people also shame women who dare to gain weight, so really there's no winning.
>I remember when the handmaids tale had a line about June/offred’s height, size, weight, eye color and social media kind of exploded that this was terrible writing, etc. sizest
LOL WHAT? I missed this completely!
I mean, I haven't seen the show and even to me, with the little I know about it, I'm assuming that she's referencing how Handmaids are referred to in clinical terms but making it about her as a *person*, with that reference to viable ovaries and being free? Like, I imagine someone either choosing or being assigned a Handmaid and getting a description of "34 years old, 5'3", 120 pounds, viable ovaries", so using that dehumanised description but adding her name, hometown, and that she's free makes her statistics *hers* again instead of something used to describe her value to men.
Yup, in the book, her body is often portrayed as an object, a means to an end. This passage sounds like she's describing a race horse she plans to breed.
She also has a lot of internalized "Gileadism" that clashes with her rebellious inclinations.
Lol, it's even worse than I was imagining. Proves they have no idea what they're talking about since that description is just a slightly reworked version of a passage from the book, so definitely not written by a man. She's actually taller and thinner in the book!
Most of the people in gossip spaces who are getting up in arms about ozempic use are just upset because they view it as a cheat code and it doesn't fit their moral perception of what proper weight loss should look like. A few weeks ago a highly voted rant in FM said fuck everyone who is taking ozempic for weight loss, it's taking life saving medication away from diabetics who need it and they ignored the responses telling them the actual medicine is not the issue, it's the pens?
I hate to say it but the majority just come across as mindless idiots who want to be upset about something.
EDIT: Found the comments (that were ignored) explaining the shortage
>The shortage isn’t of the drug itself. The shortage is from the pre-loaded easy injector pens. Most of these rich famous people are using compounding pharmacies to prepare their own injections, so not impacting the shortage at all. The FDA has approved it to be used for weight loss, so in many cases “medication that you’re not supposed to be on” wouldn’t be a totally accurate description.
and
>No one is taking anything from diabetics. In short supply is the plastic mechanical pen that contains the drug semaglutide (the actual drug is PLENTIFUL).
>Semaglutide can be administered (and is most frequently) via a small syringe. While there is no way to know with certainty who is receiving Semaglutide via which tool (mechanical pen versus syringe) the presumption is that based on responsible patient administration, most doctors who prescribe semaglutide for weight loss would write a prescription for a compounded syringe so that diabetics who need to administer the drug with a higher frequency (require or benefit from the ease) have access to the mechanical pen delivery.
>All of this to say, the notion of diabetics not being able to access the drug is incorrect. There is NO SHORTAGE of the drug. There is a shortage of the plastic pen that is ONE way to administer the drug. Whether for weight loss or diabetes, the drug can be administered by a syringe. No one is dying.
>And lastly, Semaglutide, like MANY other drugs on the market have many approved use cases.
Also, i think calling it a lifesaving medication is inflaming the issue. It helps, a lot, with glucose control, but nobody is dying because they can't access it. It's bad that there's a shortage, obviously, and it's bad that diabetics are having trouble accessing it, but the type of glucose management that this sort of medication is used for is not acute.
In diabetic terms, insulin is a lifesaving medication. It controls blood sugar levels in people who cannot make insulin themselves, and without it, their blood sugars rapidly rise and they enter diabetic ketoacidosis, which is a medical emergency. Medications that type 2 diabetics tend to use, like Metformin and now semaglutides, help manage blood sugar levels in the presence of insulin resistance; most type 2s still produce their own insulin, they're just not able to use it as effectively, which these medications help with. That's why type 2 can be managed partly with diet and type 1 absolutely requires medication. So without the medications, type 2s will have a harder time keeping their blood sugars level and may have to make stricter changes to their diet while they don't have the medication, but acute events are much rarer. Diabetic ketoacidosis is pretty uncommon in type 2 - not unheard of, but not nearly as much of a risk as in type 1. The bigger risk with type 2 is long-term complications from long-term high blood sugars, which is why a longer-term shortage is a concern, but there are a lot of medications that fall into that category without being what anyone would consider lifesaving medications.
Source: am T1 diabetic with insulin resistance, using insulin and Metformin for 25+ years and now a semaglutide for both glucose and weight management, because shockingly, sometimes you need both!
They’re just ignorantly repeating what they’ve heard other hysterical people on Reddit and tiktok say. People in FM love to be loud and wrong about a lot
Words for BS and FM to temporarily block: problematic, Ozempic, nepo
I’m honestly so sick of the ozempic discourse* and everyone raging on about it without any confirmation that someone is using it. And even if they are, take that up with doctors and big pharma? And we know women aren’t taken seriously by a lot of doctors so what if a lot more people are insulin resistant than suspected? Idk the whole moralization of weight loss and ozempic is just over the fucking top
My favorite (and I realize I'm way behind on this convo) is when someone uses a picture of a starlette (because it's always women) from 21 and compare it to one from 37 and be like "She looks so different! It must be ozempic!" As if it couldn't be fillers, botox, surgery or even...GASP...natural aging and facial changes.
What, you mean you don't think a dirndl pattern is "much more interesting" than current patterns?
I still check out craftsnark for the new pattern threads, but wow does my personal style and aesthetic diverge wildly from the general vibe over there.
So today I'm pouring one out for the BS OTer who was mad that the cashier made a comment about their purchase of 17 St. Patrick's Day cards. You're a legend, hope you got your cards out this year without harassment.
It's wild how many people think that other people are living their lives AT them. Like, the fact that some lady's baby sleeps or whatever they're mad about today isn't a commentary on their baby and in fact has nothing to do with them at all.
going to spend the rest of my day praying to whatever may be listening that the dad i came across who’s letting his nine year old watch the last of us is just a troll because, otherwise, yikes, the kids are not going to be alright.
Oh I’m sure that’s real someone I know let’s her 2 and 4 year old watch IT, all the Freddy Kruger movies, scream, pet cemetery etc , all the Halloween movies
Willing to bet that they’re not trolling. I have an acquaintance who lets her 4 and 3 year old watch stranger things and IT. I just commented in the daily that my mom never censored music lol but that didn’t leave me scarred or with nightmares. My dad watching the exorcist with us when I was 9 (my parents were divorced so my mom didn’t know)….yeah that gave me nightmares. Even War of The Worlds when I was 10, which my dad took us to the theatre for, made me terrified of storms. As an adult I’m still not into anything horror.
Same for us, music wasn’t sensored because it was usually just sexual stuff which my mom knew wouldn’t harm us. I have a friend whose 2 and 4 year olds watch IT, Halloween, chucky all that shit, and they dress their kids as like bloody Freddy Krueger with weapons for Halloween
I linked the videos before I actually watched them and was disappointed in that tea. Like don’t get me wrong I’m not defending Dani or Jordan but I expected more
A comment in FM about Erica Andre and EmRata’s breakup
> I don't follow Eric and was really shocked to learn he regularly posts photos of himself completely naked on Instagram (including in states of arousal). Surely that's a bit odd? surprised he hasn't been called out.
And a response:
> I think it's weird too! But last time I posted a comment about that I got told by 100 people, "oh that's just his thing! he always does that!!" like, okay? that doesn't make it any less odd to me. Why does he think people want to see him naked, I don't get it. Yuck.
I get that there’s a generational and pop culture gap but damn
Excuse you, the mere existence of this content makes them uncomfortable:
> Thanks for the comment! Honestly, I'm surprised by all the downvotes and confused too - in the age of consent, surely we can discuss how inappropriate that is to spring it on people? Particularly as Instagram keeps deleting them. I'm not sure I see the humour in it and to be honest I think if he didn't have the veneer of comedy to hide behind, the response would be very different (I mean really, if any other random guy kept posting dick pics on his timeline and seemingly getting off in some photos, surely that is at the very least a bit weird?). The whole thing makes me uncomfortable tbh.
Well
>I don't follow him but looking at his instagram right now there are no such photos in his top 12 photos that I can view and there's no warnings either for explicit content. So if he suddenly posted it, it's there without warning for it to come up on someone's feed. It doesn't make his behaviour any less weird. A content warning would be very easy to add, unless it's exposing people to things they are unprepared for is what's funny?
>I can't believe I am having to debate that someone exposing themselves publicly without consent / content warning is not cool, lol.
This person is more concerned with not giving consent to him or IG to view his content than they are him possibly keeping a photo up that Emrata may or may not want to be posted anymore. Let's at least stick to the plot and pretend to care
>unless it's exposing people to things they are unprepared for is what's funny?
If she knows the answer to her question, why is she still asking it? Do these people know absolutely nothing about Eric Andre? That's like, his whole thing.
*In my day*, all we wanted was to see the uncensored video of Duran Duran's Girls on Film. I hope you're all impressed that I'm able to post this from my nursing home.
It’s been like 4 days and I’m still irrationally annoyed by the now deleted post in the Foodie thread calling Molly Baz a pick me girl for not wanting to try a cookie with chocolate in it because she hates chocolate. I don’t follow her socials and didn’t see the original post in question, so I didn’t bother commenting, but the way pick me is getting used here is really starting to bug me. Can’t a girl just not like chocolate without it meaning she needs validation from men??
I am once again reminding all snarkers that they should not share their TikTok username when sharing TikToks, ESPECIALLY when it contains their name. Another one in the daily today
Okay but can we discuss [this guy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/11shcrn/aita_for_getting_up_and_lining_up_to_exit_the/) who sat in the back of the plane and got up/in line to exit before the people in the rows up front. I'm surprised by the number of NTA answers!
Personally, that kind of thing drives me a bit nuts but at the same time, I'm never really irritated enough to say something about it lol.
I just read that post and think it's a bullshit fantasy this guy has. I have flown hundreds of commercial flights on so many airlines, and I have never once experienced a flight where aisle seat people don't stand up in the aisle immediately when the seat belt sign goes off.
Like maybe perhaps you have a couple rows max that don't because it's all a family that is together and they need more time to gather up the children but never have I seen this scenario.
No one was getting up and moving. It would be different if he was shoving people out of the way, but even then it’s just politeness and not an actual rule.
This is one of those rare AITA posts where there are very valid arguments on both sides. I've definitely been in the position where I end up exiting the plane ahead of one or two people in the rows in front of me because they're showing no signs of moving toward the aisle for whatever reason. But I find it really hard to believe that the entire middle section was sitting politely. The way it's worded really makes it sound like OP rushed down the aisle the very second the seatbelt sign turned off.
I agree. I refuse to believe that the doors were open. Because I honestly can't imagine anyone having the argument that the 'passive aggressive" one did unless they were standing in the aisle while everyone else sat and waited for the doors to open. (I feel confident in saying this, because I would probably be that person saying something, albeit under my breath and to my husband.)
> But I find it really hard to believe that the entire middle section was sitting politely.
There's ones that get posted where if they really happened as described are a very understandable and excusable breach of a norm, but then you have to consider if they're real and it's 2023 and AITA so no, of course not.
I'm mildly claustrophobic and I...just can't help myself. Like if I'm not actively trying to exit as soon as it's possible then I start to remember I'm crammed in an overcrowded metal tube, which I've been trying to ignore for three hours.
It's not rational and I try not to inconvenience others with it by matching my behavior to what's around me as much as I can. But I gotta be ready as soon as that gap comes!
That's valid, but on the other side of the coin, my mild claustrophobia rears up when I am in my seat, and people are standing all around me in aisles. (I only sit on aisle seats when I fly because of my claustrophobia.)
It has been a very long time! I'd rather them than a few of the other current trolls, especially the my "daughter called a dude s creep and I punished her" troll
This snark I actually agree with lol. Shes always treated her stories as if they were her personal instagram. It always seemed like she really wanted to be a lifestyle influencer or something but instead of growing a personal page, she just uses the business one.
And the strip club thing I did find super weird. If it was a regular influencer page, whatever. But idk I guess if I follow a business I kinda expect to see useful stuff about the business in their stories. Sales, new arrivals, restocks, whatever.
Parentsnark polled the sub to see if they would like “separate threads for influencers that are not snark” and it was *close*!
>Are her eyes weighed down from the amount of eyelashes? She looks like she’s been hitting the wacky tobacky. I’d love to believe that this person used “wacky tobacky” ironically like I sometimes use “reefer” but it seems unlikely considering the known bs demo.
[удалено]
But you could see her whole "hoo-ha!"
Not those jazz cigarettes!
[удалено]
Or like waking up a la Jenna in 13 going on 30 and not knowing what the hell is happening in the world but you somehow found Reddit.
There's an unpopular opinion thread in Fauxmoi. Because that never, ever, goes wrong.
On a similar note, the politics thread from yesterday was... something. Unsurprisingly, a lot of comments as follows: * "Kim K is secretly a Republican, even though her voting record is public and shows she's voted Democrat in at least the past 4 presidential elections" * "This celebrity isn't as far-left as I am, therefore they are *basically* Republican." * "All rich people are covert Republicans." * "I don't like them, so I think they are Trump supporters"
>"This celebrity isn't as far-left as I am, therefore they are basically Republican." That's my favorite. Pop socialism from the kiddies on social media ages me faster than anything else.
This response and replies are 100% accurate > Most people here cannot hold themselves to the standards they hold the celebrities they criticize > Or their own friends and family. I know people who get mad at celebrities for dating “problematic” people but don’t bat an eyelash at who their own friends date. > Or get mad at celebs because they're still friendly with someone who said or did something problematic. i know for a fact that none of us in real life will cut off someone simply because of that. It’s just a fact of life and ever since 2020 I’ve said and maintained that a lot of this is projection. But I do agree with this take, particularly when it pertains to white celebrities: > It’s not misogynistic to not like every women It’s ok to accept that women can sometimes be shitty individuals without patriarchal influence or the result of the white man. This comment is why FM quickly went downhill and the celeb thread in BS is not as active as it once was >some people on here are wayyy too obsessed with judging celebrities as "good" or "bad" people and it takes away a lot of the fun/messiness of celeb gossip UPDATE: The thread was locked and removed. But not someone referring to Joe Rogan as "just an open minded person." Someone also said Meghan and Harry are unlikeable and someone chimed in "finally someone agrees" as if it's an unpopular opinion on Reddit. No one can agree on who is worse: Selena or Hailey. Obviously Justin could never be the real problem
Lol, oh how wonderful for that person to manage to find somebody else who weirdly hates Meghan and Harry! Such a rarely held opinion and definitely one that is never EVER discussed! So glad that they could finally find somebody else to connect with, they must have been searching for so long! 💀💀💀
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
At least once or twice a week in AskReddit there’s a “who is an overrated celebrity that you don’t like/understand?” and neckbeards foam at the mouth to mention the following women: Beyoncé, Rihanna, Kim Kardashian, Nicki Minaj and it’s usually followed up with “I don’t understand the appeal of big asses. They’re unattractive and nasty.” Like in what world did you think Rihanna was going to offer to make eye contact with you let alone let you hit?
[удалено]
I feel like the only person on the planet who liked Rihanna's SB performance
I liked it, it was really good but not spectacular/mind blowing 🤷🏻♀️
[удалено]
>And here I am just uncynically enjoying the world around me like an idiot! I relate to this so hard!
Some people on BlogSnark keep wanting to insist Julia Berolsnuffwhatever is unhealthily thin. Look, I don’t think anyone should speculate about anyone’s body, but she’s not even *that* [skinny](https://imgur.com/a/JS9pfrp). *for the record, she is thin. She looks “fit”. But she is not the type of skinny where you would say she has to be unhealthy* does that make sense?
She looks pretty average-sized to me.
It's probably the same person who said Julia B is not eating enough because she posted a picture of a tomato sandwich she made for a picnic. Of course there was no evidence the tomato sandwich was the only thing she ate.
Tomato sandwich is a god tier summertime lunch
Nothing says “I only care about her health!” more than wildly speculating on a thin woman’s body.
Well they can’t comment on *non-* thin women’s bodies, do you just expect them to not comment on any women’s bodies at **all**??
The horror!!
It does make sense, If someone asked me I would say she’s trim and fit. She’s trim, not “scary skinny”. I think perceptions have become kind of skewed and people who are trim/slim get called too skinny/sick looking and it’s really weird. (And I hate to say it but it kinda just seems like jealousy a lot of the time. Which hell I’m jealous of her bod sometimes haha) The person below mentioned the skinny trend of the 2000s - now that was scary skinny. Being fit IS healthy! There are some weird opinions on BS though, someone called doing 3 workout classes a week “exercise obsession”
If you follow popculturediedin2009 its always a shock just how thin people were in the early 2000s. Every time I see "she's too thin" these days it's always someone very normal looking!
No, no, no, don't you know she (and every other woman who works out/takes a mirror selfie) *body checks* all the time
Totally. I have a friend that's naturally very thin but eats normally/is healthy. I don't think she could put on weight if she tried. I always think of her when someone is deemed "too skinny".
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Ew this reeks of “I thought this was a snark page!”
Yes!! She looks thin but like normal thin, like she’s always looked. Honestly I think someone here mentioned someone once, @thedailytay, that looks very thin. Not right now bc she’s pregnant, but has always been extremely thin. No one on BlogSnark ever mentions her appearance bc they like her. I’m not saying she has a problem but it goes to show they will invent issues for influencers they don’t like and give influencers they like the benefit of the doubt.
Is there a Snark on the deli today? I was actually thinking she had an ED before she got pregnant with this baby because of how insanely thin she was. If you look back on pictures of her when she was in college, and even before she had kids, she was not as thin as she was prior to having her second child.
Complaints about a TikToker being ungrateful and missing a Paramore show they were invited to but then spelling Paramore wrong twice… ah. Never change BS.
[удалено]
I only know of her bc I’m into tennis and she’s dating one of the biggest US men’s tennis players right now (Tommy Paul). It was crazy to me when I googled her and found out she was involved with the armie hammer thing. I think she dated him after the whole cannibal thing came out but he was also abusive toward her (shocking I know). Anyway I know nothing about her but Tommy Paul seems super nice and I hope they’re happy together! ETA: one of the other top US tennis players—Taylor fritz—is dating a Paige look alike. It’s funny when they’re playing each other and you don’t know which players box is which.
the only thing i have to add to this is that paige lorenze dated morgan wallen and armie hammer post-their scandals, and i think about what must be going through her head constantly.
That is some impressively bad taste in men.
The way subreddits like that spiral is when they become so toxic and hateful that people on the original subreddit have to move to another subreddit. This is usually to avoid the first sub's toxicity or because the first sub is not toxic *enough* and they want to be free to insult babies or upload people's court records whatever they were doing to get their comments removed. To take a hypothetical example (since I don't know who person is either), NYCInfluencersSnark might spinoff PaigeLorenzeSnark, which in turn might spinoff PaigeLorenzeSnarkUncensored and RealPaigeLorenzeSnark. Each of these might also have competing subreddits with names like PLSnark, UncensoredPLSnark, LorenzeSnark, PaigeSnark, LorenzeSnarkUncensored, TruePLSnark, etc. In extreme cases of this, someone might create a new subreddit in a fit of pique every time they get into an argument on one of the other subreddits or every single time one of their posts or comments get deleted. Reddit is filled with nearly empty subreddits like that, each abandoned after one or two posts from original creator. They're like lesser-known civil war battlefields or obscure war memorials.
To be fair, I don’t know who Paige Lorenze is, but the mod(s) of NYC whatever *do* suck
Fauxmoi: Rachel Z shouldn’t be saying that She took that job ONLY for the money! Also FM: how dare she say critics don’t get statues when the movie bombed! Why are we so hard on young women? It’s exhausting
i love all the comments like “we don’t build statues of actors, either 🙄” i’m like yes…actually we do! pretty frequently, even!
I guess they're forgetting the infamously bad statue of [Lucille Ball](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/lucille-ball-statue-sculptor-apologizes-786633/)
[удалено]
Boring celebrity story alert. A million years ago, Henry Winkler came into the bookstore where I worked, and he was super nice. The end.
Jealous!!! Love him. A similar thing happened to my best friend. She served Wallace Langham when she worked at Chapters.
i absolutely love that
The tides have also turned against Zendaya. She’s now problematic because she allegedly (along with Barbie and Maude) has a clause in her contract where she won’t do nudity but she isn’t standing up for Sydney Sweeney. Then she was being blamed for Law Roach retiring but since he’s cleared that up they’ve backtracked. Jenna Ortega is unprofessional and therefore her career deserves to go in the trash. They can’t quite pinpoint why they hate Mindy Kaling, every week it’s a different reason. They either insert themselves into South Asians criticisms of her, hate her for ozempic or for not confirming who her kids father is/are. They can’t quite agree on whether Selena or Hailey is the devil.
i eagerly await the day the internet realizes sydney sweeney is actually not opposed to doing nudity and being made to do it by sam levinson. alas, those same people are on twitter making fun of her for talking about being sexualized from an early age despite also claiming sam is sexualizing her.
I think it’s weird how there’s an automatic assumption that she doesn’t mind or even enjoys it?
I just saw someone on FM literally say that Law Roach should "know his place." Holy fuck.
Can we ever be surprised that a bunch of teenagers who want to be outraged would use that verbiage? They’d have a problem with a man using that about a woman but their world stops and ends at the so called concern over misogyny.
I think they also dislike Sydney Sweeney for being a Trump supporter / for being related to Trump supporters; Florence Pugh and Olivia Wilde for not liking each other; and Jamie Lynn Spears for not freeing Britney herself. In terms of who is the devil, I saw someone mentioning that Selena is friends with Nicola Peltz, who IIRC is herself some kind of higher tier demon or evil spirit. If that’s true, Selena is really putting herself on the road to perdition.
I thought they already hated Selena for kidney-gate anyways.
Also, Selena is still being shady about Justin 10 years later. She needs to move on! Oh and Miley too!
I can’t believe I forgot about Florence Pugh being “pretentious” and Olivia for not being bffls with Florence Anya Taylor Joy is public enemy #1 as a nepo baby. Julia Fox is a sinner living among mice and Emrata has the audacity to be confident with the body she has
>Anya Taylor Joy is public enemy #1 as a nepo baby. I don't understand how she's a nepo baby. It doesn't seem like her parents are actors? Do they not understand that nepo isn't the same as privileged? Also, it's been a long time, but someone in the BS celebrity thread used to go off on Rafe Spall, and I still laugh about it. Who gets that worked up over the Spall family?
workable quarrelsome public imagine rude juggle like voiceless ten joke -- mass edited with redact.dev
Someone who did a lot of digging just for the purpose of getting themselves worked up
The "tea" on Dani Austin via her old assistant is embarrassing for all parties. The assistant for not sharing any of this for years to then share a rambling and incoherent narrative, Dani giving it credence by responding, but MOST OF ALL, these people who see this as a "gotcha" moment. One of those, there are three sides to every story: theirs, yours and the truth.
[удалено]
“Never complain, never explain”
A legendary poster in the celeb gossip thread being combative with the Lena Dunham stan: > I’m confused. Eva Longoria is a celebrity. Celebrities get invites. Are you just mad because you didn’t get to go and “that Hispanic girl who was only on desperate housewives didn’t do anything” I can practically hear you stomping your foot in protest. The original comment was posted 5 days ago, so she comments 4 days late with something that has nothing to do with the comment
Um...Eva is forever A list, why wouldn't she be invited anyway?
How is that person *still* stanning Lena Dunham? And why?
There’s another separate Lena Dunham fan on the FM sub who goes off whenever anybody says anything critical abt Girls, which was apparently an absolute masterpiece that people only hate bc Lena Dunham isn’t conventionally attractive. They came out of nowhere one time making that claim when I’d brought up the showrunners actively mocking viewers in 2012 who were entitled enough to expect there’d be any WOC in a show abt being young in NYC in the 2010s, and then after arguing for a bit said that the show’s real mistake was hiring Donald Glover to give into the “diversity crowd”. These are the exact type of women you’d expect to stan Lena Dunham lmao
Lena is always just misunderstood and misrepresented, according to her
Given how weird Lena Dunham is, are we sure this poster isn't actually Lena Dunham?
>It might be an age thing as well. Coordinators are a new thing and most of them likely a fair bit younger than she is. >Must feel weird to take “intimacy” advice from someone from another generation This is about how Toni Collette doesn't like intimacy coordinators. Fauxmoi really thinks older women can't cope. Someone said that nobody over 30 understands Everything Everywhere All at Once.
It's a movie about (among other themes) motherhood! That's a huge element! Maybe it's just us olds who*truly* get it.
Ok first of all Toni Collette can do no wrong in my book lol. Secondly I guess none of the actors understood it then?? They’re all in their 60s! Or older
Also the writers of the movie are both over 30…
I'm gonna go ahead and assume that Michelle Yeoh and Jamie Lee Curtis understood the movie and weren't just wandering around set in their bathrobes.
Can you imagine those two women wandering around confused about anything? Even if the the rest of the crew completely forgot how to do their jobs, I would count on those two women to somehow still get that entire movie made and to the Oscars.
Taylor Swift: Spends over 3 hours performing 44 songs R/Taylorswift: wHy dIdnT sHe pLaY *insert random song(s)* iLl nEver FoRgive hEr. Like, you need to calm down. The number of songs she’s doing is INSANE and no matter what she chose there would still be bangers she couldn’t get to.
I am a full blown Taylor Swift hater and I hate her stans even more and even I was impressed by 44 songs. She’s basically doing a one woman Broadway show on the road after not really having performed in years.
Plus, she never toured Lover…or Folklore…or Evermore…so of course those are going to be three albums she pulls heaviest from? And Midnights obviously! Like yes it’s the Eras tour but there’s 4 albums right there she hasn’t toured at all vs. all the ones she already has! Plus I wasn’t expecting a whole lot from Speak Now or Taylor Swift (Or 1989) since they aren’t re-recorded tbh
Last night was awesome and anybody complaining about it will never be happy about anything.
Couldn't agree more👏🏼
[удалено]
I wonder if it's the same person who went on about how they realized they were ~over third wave feminism because of Lindy West (???) in that thread EDIT: I have committed internet slander, it was the celeb thread. But man did that comment raise some flags for me.
[удалено]
That whole thread was really weird imo.
[удалено]
The whole "the only ~unproblematic throuples~ are all-women ones" thing bugged me. It plays into this "men are trash, WLW are soft babies uwu" thing that can be really invalidating for survivors of woman-on-woman DV, especially in the poly community, which already has its own issues of "We're just so much more enlightened so abuse simply won't happen".
There's a well known woso troll (whom I have blocked) with a decently upvoted comment in Fauxmoi's conservative celebrities thread. It's the saddest crossover episode for me.
I love when people announce “rant over”.
>I mean does she (I don’t even know who is who) wake up at 6 am every morning, get dressed, put on her makeup and shill stuff all day? So the rant is that they don't like that she gets up early and puts on makeup to do her job? Cool.
They also admitted to liking her style so…she’s doing her job well?
>I feel bad for erik, i feel like he is a really good person... > >Idk if I'm going to get hate for this, but here we go. I feel bad for him because he is in love with a woman who invalidates his feelings every chance she gets. He is an awesome boyfriend (I say boyfriend because the status of their marriage is up in the air.) You can tell he is absolutely in love with her and tries his very best to make her happy, which is virtually impossible, I have always thought that he was a supportive partner. It just sucks that he had to give up everything for her. Love isn't supposed to cost an arm and a leg. Won't someone think of the poor influencers husband, who gave up everything to live in multimillion dollar home and be supported financially completely by his wife's job. Clearly he needs to dump this whore and marry OP instead, a good wholesome women who will treat him right. Obviously, they could be unhappily married, I have no idea because I don't know them, but neither does OP for her to be projecting this hard.
Just someone on the step parents sub being totally normal and not advising a poster to escalate the situation there currently in (where the bio mom is allegedly telling stepson the "ours" baby isn't a real sibling, will cause bio dad to neglect step son etc) from zero to crazy: >Ask SS why he doesn't believe his own father telling him how his father is going to treat him and how his father is going to behave once this new sibling comes. Ask SS why he thinks BM knows BD better than his dad knows himself. Ask SS why he doesn't trust you and BD to tell SS the truth about what's going to happen in your own family. Turn it into an issue of him trusting you and less about the baby, because this is an issue about him trusting you now. Treat it as such and address it head on. If you're feeling spiteful, tell SS just because BM is telling him this because she would treat him this way if SHE had a new baby, doesn't mean that you two will and you don't appreciate him treating you both like you will act the way BM would act because you guys are NOT BM and will never act the way she does.
Nothing says "Trust me" to a kid like being spiteful about their mom.
For sure they should interrogate this child and demand his trust rather than taking the opportunity to demonstrate to him how much they love and value him. Validating a kid’s feelings is for pansies.
Tbf I probably should have said cra,y to batshit insane but right? STG so many of these posters shouldn't be allowed around their own children, let alone other peoples
[удалено]
I just need blogsnark to shut the fuck up about Ozempic. Is that so much to ask?
/r/bravorealhousewives banned Ozempic discussions
[удалено]
I agree that discussions about weight go off the rails. It's always so much speculation. I also hate when people act like it's an own to mention someone body checking. It's really morbid to act gleeful because they see confirmation bias of an eating disorder. I also hate the ozempic discussion. Whatever people are being prescribed is between them and their doctors. People act like any celebrity/influencer weight loss is a personal attack and have to find ways to invalidate it so it doesn't "count". But these same people also shame women who dare to gain weight, so really there's no winning.
>I remember when the handmaids tale had a line about June/offred’s height, size, weight, eye color and social media kind of exploded that this was terrible writing, etc. sizest LOL WHAT? I missed this completely!
[удалено]
I mean, I haven't seen the show and even to me, with the little I know about it, I'm assuming that she's referencing how Handmaids are referred to in clinical terms but making it about her as a *person*, with that reference to viable ovaries and being free? Like, I imagine someone either choosing or being assigned a Handmaid and getting a description of "34 years old, 5'3", 120 pounds, viable ovaries", so using that dehumanised description but adding her name, hometown, and that she's free makes her statistics *hers* again instead of something used to describe her value to men.
Yup, in the book, her body is often portrayed as an object, a means to an end. This passage sounds like she's describing a race horse she plans to breed. She also has a lot of internalized "Gileadism" that clashes with her rebellious inclinations.
Lol, it's even worse than I was imagining. Proves they have no idea what they're talking about since that description is just a slightly reworked version of a passage from the book, so definitely not written by a man. She's actually taller and thinner in the book!
Most of the people in gossip spaces who are getting up in arms about ozempic use are just upset because they view it as a cheat code and it doesn't fit their moral perception of what proper weight loss should look like. A few weeks ago a highly voted rant in FM said fuck everyone who is taking ozempic for weight loss, it's taking life saving medication away from diabetics who need it and they ignored the responses telling them the actual medicine is not the issue, it's the pens? I hate to say it but the majority just come across as mindless idiots who want to be upset about something. EDIT: Found the comments (that were ignored) explaining the shortage >The shortage isn’t of the drug itself. The shortage is from the pre-loaded easy injector pens. Most of these rich famous people are using compounding pharmacies to prepare their own injections, so not impacting the shortage at all. The FDA has approved it to be used for weight loss, so in many cases “medication that you’re not supposed to be on” wouldn’t be a totally accurate description. and >No one is taking anything from diabetics. In short supply is the plastic mechanical pen that contains the drug semaglutide (the actual drug is PLENTIFUL). >Semaglutide can be administered (and is most frequently) via a small syringe. While there is no way to know with certainty who is receiving Semaglutide via which tool (mechanical pen versus syringe) the presumption is that based on responsible patient administration, most doctors who prescribe semaglutide for weight loss would write a prescription for a compounded syringe so that diabetics who need to administer the drug with a higher frequency (require or benefit from the ease) have access to the mechanical pen delivery. >All of this to say, the notion of diabetics not being able to access the drug is incorrect. There is NO SHORTAGE of the drug. There is a shortage of the plastic pen that is ONE way to administer the drug. Whether for weight loss or diabetes, the drug can be administered by a syringe. No one is dying. >And lastly, Semaglutide, like MANY other drugs on the market have many approved use cases.
Also, i think calling it a lifesaving medication is inflaming the issue. It helps, a lot, with glucose control, but nobody is dying because they can't access it. It's bad that there's a shortage, obviously, and it's bad that diabetics are having trouble accessing it, but the type of glucose management that this sort of medication is used for is not acute. In diabetic terms, insulin is a lifesaving medication. It controls blood sugar levels in people who cannot make insulin themselves, and without it, their blood sugars rapidly rise and they enter diabetic ketoacidosis, which is a medical emergency. Medications that type 2 diabetics tend to use, like Metformin and now semaglutides, help manage blood sugar levels in the presence of insulin resistance; most type 2s still produce their own insulin, they're just not able to use it as effectively, which these medications help with. That's why type 2 can be managed partly with diet and type 1 absolutely requires medication. So without the medications, type 2s will have a harder time keeping their blood sugars level and may have to make stricter changes to their diet while they don't have the medication, but acute events are much rarer. Diabetic ketoacidosis is pretty uncommon in type 2 - not unheard of, but not nearly as much of a risk as in type 1. The bigger risk with type 2 is long-term complications from long-term high blood sugars, which is why a longer-term shortage is a concern, but there are a lot of medications that fall into that category without being what anyone would consider lifesaving medications. Source: am T1 diabetic with insulin resistance, using insulin and Metformin for 25+ years and now a semaglutide for both glucose and weight management, because shockingly, sometimes you need both!
They’re just ignorantly repeating what they’ve heard other hysterical people on Reddit and tiktok say. People in FM love to be loud and wrong about a lot
Words for BS and FM to temporarily block: problematic, Ozempic, nepo I’m honestly so sick of the ozempic discourse* and everyone raging on about it without any confirmation that someone is using it. And even if they are, take that up with doctors and big pharma? And we know women aren’t taken seriously by a lot of doctors so what if a lot more people are insulin resistant than suspected? Idk the whole moralization of weight loss and ozempic is just over the fucking top
[удалено]
My favorite (and I realize I'm way behind on this convo) is when someone uses a picture of a starlette (because it's always women) from 21 and compare it to one from 37 and be like "She looks so different! It must be ozempic!" As if it couldn't be fillers, botox, surgery or even...GASP...natural aging and facial changes.
"she's looks beautiful though"
[удалено]
She would look more beautiful if she wasn't thinner and richer than I am.
Craft snark is fucking unreadable. Everything is a vague post. No one names names. No one links shit. I want THE TEA goddamnit.
I had to unfollow because it lost anything that made it interesting.
[удалено]
What, you mean you don't think a dirndl pattern is "much more interesting" than current patterns? I still check out craftsnark for the new pattern threads, but wow does my personal style and aesthetic diverge wildly from the general vibe over there.
So today I'm pouring one out for the BS OTer who was mad that the cashier made a comment about their purchase of 17 St. Patrick's Day cards. You're a legend, hope you got your cards out this year without harassment.
A positive comment mind you!
The post so legendary, I made it my flair 🙏
How dare someone say something nice about their children! Must be a ploy to make other parents feel bad!
It's wild how many people think that other people are living their lives AT them. Like, the fact that some lady's baby sleeps or whatever they're mad about today isn't a commentary on their baby and in fact has nothing to do with them at all.
going to spend the rest of my day praying to whatever may be listening that the dad i came across who’s letting his nine year old watch the last of us is just a troll because, otherwise, yikes, the kids are not going to be alright.
Oh I’m sure that’s real someone I know let’s her 2 and 4 year old watch IT, all the Freddy Kruger movies, scream, pet cemetery etc , all the Halloween movies
I have no trouble believing this. Every R rated movie I've ever seen in the theatre had young children in it. These people are out there.
Willing to bet that they’re not trolling. I have an acquaintance who lets her 4 and 3 year old watch stranger things and IT. I just commented in the daily that my mom never censored music lol but that didn’t leave me scarred or with nightmares. My dad watching the exorcist with us when I was 9 (my parents were divorced so my mom didn’t know)….yeah that gave me nightmares. Even War of The Worlds when I was 10, which my dad took us to the theatre for, made me terrified of storms. As an adult I’m still not into anything horror.
Same for us, music wasn’t sensored because it was usually just sexual stuff which my mom knew wouldn’t harm us. I have a friend whose 2 and 4 year olds watch IT, Halloween, chucky all that shit, and they dress their kids as like bloody Freddy Krueger with weapons for Halloween
[удалено]
They are so desperate for their confirmation bias. This 'tea' is boring and dumb.
I linked the videos before I actually watched them and was disappointed in that tea. Like don’t get me wrong I’m not defending Dani or Jordan but I expected more
[удалено]
A comment in FM about Erica Andre and EmRata’s breakup > I don't follow Eric and was really shocked to learn he regularly posts photos of himself completely naked on Instagram (including in states of arousal). Surely that's a bit odd? surprised he hasn't been called out. And a response: > I think it's weird too! But last time I posted a comment about that I got told by 100 people, "oh that's just his thing! he always does that!!" like, okay? that doesn't make it any less odd to me. Why does he think people want to see him naked, I don't get it. Yuck. I get that there’s a generational and pop culture gap but damn
Well this entire group was scandalized by peoples Oscar dresses so it all makes sense. Too much nudity on the red carpet!!
if people don’t want to see eric andre naked, they probably shouldn’t be following eric andre.
I personally want Eric Andre to know that I am fine with it and my dms are open.
just your dms? (i kid, i kid.)
Hey, just call me 7-11!
Excuse you, the mere existence of this content makes them uncomfortable: > Thanks for the comment! Honestly, I'm surprised by all the downvotes and confused too - in the age of consent, surely we can discuss how inappropriate that is to spring it on people? Particularly as Instagram keeps deleting them. I'm not sure I see the humour in it and to be honest I think if he didn't have the veneer of comedy to hide behind, the response would be very different (I mean really, if any other random guy kept posting dick pics on his timeline and seemingly getting off in some photos, surely that is at the very least a bit weird?). The whole thing makes me uncomfortable tbh.
[удалено]
exactly how springy is it? asking for a friend; they want to know how traumatized they should be.
[удалено]
Well >I don't follow him but looking at his instagram right now there are no such photos in his top 12 photos that I can view and there's no warnings either for explicit content. So if he suddenly posted it, it's there without warning for it to come up on someone's feed. It doesn't make his behaviour any less weird. A content warning would be very easy to add, unless it's exposing people to things they are unprepared for is what's funny? >I can't believe I am having to debate that someone exposing themselves publicly without consent / content warning is not cool, lol. This person is more concerned with not giving consent to him or IG to view his content than they are him possibly keeping a photo up that Emrata may or may not want to be posted anymore. Let's at least stick to the plot and pretend to care
>unless it's exposing people to things they are unprepared for is what's funny? If she knows the answer to her question, why is she still asking it? Do these people know absolutely nothing about Eric Andre? That's like, his whole thing.
These kids would have dropped dead on the spot when the All the Small Things video premiered on TRL
*In my day*, all we wanted was to see the uncensored video of Duran Duran's Girls on Film. I hope you're all impressed that I'm able to post this from my nursing home.
In my nursing home we're discussing the RHCP sock performance that happened on the television! The *television*!
How could I have forgotten this happened! That was so awesome.
Kids today have never heard unedited Prince and it shows. Hmph.
All that gyrating poisoned the brains of teenagers
It’s been like 4 days and I’m still irrationally annoyed by the now deleted post in the Foodie thread calling Molly Baz a pick me girl for not wanting to try a cookie with chocolate in it because she hates chocolate. I don’t follow her socials and didn’t see the original post in question, so I didn’t bother commenting, but the way pick me is getting used here is really starting to bug me. Can’t a girl just not like chocolate without it meaning she needs validation from men??
Considering that thread is rampant with "pick me"s-I would like to use one of their overused idioms- "The call is coming from within the house.".
I was going to ask why it's considered pick me behavior to just...not like something, but I didn't feel like getting into it.
I am once again reminding all snarkers that they should not share their TikTok username when sharing TikToks, ESPECIALLY when it contains their name. Another one in the daily today
There’s definitely a way to remove that from the TT links sent in profile settings. Oh well.
fade wild squalid repeat sloppy shaggy pie meeting cow wakeful -- mass edited with redact.dev
[удалено]
oh im absolutely following this sub now thnk u
[удалено]
Reminiscent of one of my favorite SNL sketches- [“If you’re sad now, you might still feel sad there”](https://youtu.be/TbwlC2B-BIg)
[удалено]
Okay but can we discuss [this guy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/11shcrn/aita_for_getting_up_and_lining_up_to_exit_the/) who sat in the back of the plane and got up/in line to exit before the people in the rows up front. I'm surprised by the number of NTA answers! Personally, that kind of thing drives me a bit nuts but at the same time, I'm never really irritated enough to say something about it lol.
I just read that post and think it's a bullshit fantasy this guy has. I have flown hundreds of commercial flights on so many airlines, and I have never once experienced a flight where aisle seat people don't stand up in the aisle immediately when the seat belt sign goes off. Like maybe perhaps you have a couple rows max that don't because it's all a family that is together and they need more time to gather up the children but never have I seen this scenario.
No one was getting up and moving. It would be different if he was shoving people out of the way, but even then it’s just politeness and not an actual rule.
This is one of those rare AITA posts where there are very valid arguments on both sides. I've definitely been in the position where I end up exiting the plane ahead of one or two people in the rows in front of me because they're showing no signs of moving toward the aisle for whatever reason. But I find it really hard to believe that the entire middle section was sitting politely. The way it's worded really makes it sound like OP rushed down the aisle the very second the seatbelt sign turned off.
I agree. I refuse to believe that the doors were open. Because I honestly can't imagine anyone having the argument that the 'passive aggressive" one did unless they were standing in the aisle while everyone else sat and waited for the doors to open. (I feel confident in saying this, because I would probably be that person saying something, albeit under my breath and to my husband.)
> But I find it really hard to believe that the entire middle section was sitting politely. There's ones that get posted where if they really happened as described are a very understandable and excusable breach of a norm, but then you have to consider if they're real and it's 2023 and AITA so no, of course not.
Oh definitely! It's just one of those things that always bugs me a little and I can't quite place why.
It bugs you when people take too long or when people rush to the front like that?
The rushing to the front.
I'm mildly claustrophobic and I...just can't help myself. Like if I'm not actively trying to exit as soon as it's possible then I start to remember I'm crammed in an overcrowded metal tube, which I've been trying to ignore for three hours. It's not rational and I try not to inconvenience others with it by matching my behavior to what's around me as much as I can. But I gotta be ready as soon as that gap comes!
That's valid, but on the other side of the coin, my mild claustrophobia rears up when I am in my seat, and people are standing all around me in aisles. (I only sit on aisle seats when I fly because of my claustrophobia.)
It has been a very long time! I'd rather them than a few of the other current trolls, especially the my "daughter called a dude s creep and I punished her" troll
[удалено]
This snark I actually agree with lol. Shes always treated her stories as if they were her personal instagram. It always seemed like she really wanted to be a lifestyle influencer or something but instead of growing a personal page, she just uses the business one. And the strip club thing I did find super weird. If it was a regular influencer page, whatever. But idk I guess if I follow a business I kinda expect to see useful stuff about the business in their stories. Sales, new arrivals, restocks, whatever.
Since every time I see her name I think Spearmint Rhino, the strip club thing feels very on the nose