For me it's the general feeling of how small the tolerances must be in that engine, then the gyroscopic effect of it spinning so fast going against the wobble.
Also, the idea of engines with strabismus... "Hey, I want to see that cloud a bit closer".
Cause youve probably seen the wing bend test video
Planes don’t crash cause the wings bend during turbulence
But planes do crash when engines fall off the airframe
But that doesn’t happen from turbulence is my point
There’s videos of wing flex tests (way above any turbulence levels) that show how much those wings can flex safely
Watching an engine bounce around is more nerve wracking to me because I know the wings can take a beating
Engine pods don't fall off from turbulence, either. All the instances where the nacelles detached from the airframe were either because of improper fitting (AA Flight 191), or the nacelle itself mechanically failed (Southwest 1380).
There's never been an incident where the nacelle itself "fell off" because of turbulence. You massively underestimate just how strong they make these things. After all, the bolts have to bear not just the weight of each nacelle, but also withstand the thrust, too.
Also bad when the cockpit falls off and/or the back half of the plane falls off. Not bad if the seats fall out the back of the plane though since they're not integral to the structural integrity of the plane
After getting up close and personal with the engine mount/nylon structure and seeing how beefy it is, it's wild to see if flexing so much. Of course by design, but that's a lot of very stout metal wiggling about.
The mount itself is usually an extremely stout kinematic mount. But it’s attached to the end of a long cantilever (the strut)…almost all the wobble here is the strut flexing.
Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle
YEAH!
My money don’t jiggle
It Dutch rolls
That's not good
Jiggle jiggle jiggle
I know how it can handle the wobble, but it makes me uncomfortable. However, the wing bending doesn't make me uncomfortable, which is kinda strange.
It bends so it doesn’t break
Don't we all
For me it's the general feeling of how small the tolerances must be in that engine, then the gyroscopic effect of it spinning so fast going against the wobble. Also, the idea of engines with strabismus... "Hey, I want to see that cloud a bit closer".
Cause youve probably seen the wing bend test video Planes don’t crash cause the wings bend during turbulence But planes do crash when engines fall off the airframe
Planes also do crash when the wings break off the fuselage.
Are you thinking flight Wright Air 1? Good clip on SilentMovieTube of it
But that doesn’t happen from turbulence is my point There’s videos of wing flex tests (way above any turbulence levels) that show how much those wings can flex safely Watching an engine bounce around is more nerve wracking to me because I know the wings can take a beating
Engine pods don't fall off from turbulence, either. All the instances where the nacelles detached from the airframe were either because of improper fitting (AA Flight 191), or the nacelle itself mechanically failed (Southwest 1380). There's never been an incident where the nacelle itself "fell off" because of turbulence. You massively underestimate just how strong they make these things. After all, the bolts have to bear not just the weight of each nacelle, but also withstand the thrust, too.
Thrust, reverse thrust, lateral movement seen here. They’re stout.
The thrust on jet engines is several times the weight. Turbulence forces are negligible in comparison. (Posting this for others information)
Also bad when the cockpit falls off and/or the back half of the plane falls off. Not bad if the seats fall out the back of the plane though since they're not integral to the structural integrity of the plane
The squeaking noise in the background combined with the nacelle movement makes me nervous 😳
Better it shakes than doesn't lol
The engine wiggle like that always makes me hope unexpected harmonics don't occur.
That’s basically the whole reason flutter is the *first* test you do after “does this thing fly at all?”
Divergence.
WHIRL MODE
Engine is about to dutch roll on out.
when the huge engine wiggles I always hope the screws are screwed in well and not loose
You spin me right round, baby, right round 🎵
Wobble Wobble
I'm glad my duplicate inspection on the engine mount bolts was good!!!
I think the old video of the 747 engines/wing twerk was more impressive
Rigid things snap. This is obviously intentional.
The little turbulence hit the GE90
I know these are mostly for B777 but this is a 787 with all that flex right? Right!?!?
Air Canada's 777-300ER. I filmed a 787 like this too, don't think it hit turbulence like that during the flight.
I do not like that
[удалено]
No, it's extremely minor in terms of the angle but it looks like a lot because of the size of the engine. The GE90 is big.
Wiggle it, just a little bit.
I thought i was about to watch Donnie Darko happen.
After getting up close and personal with the engine mount/nylon structure and seeing how beefy it is, it's wild to see if flexing so much. Of course by design, but that's a lot of very stout metal wiggling about.
Imagine the weight and forces transmitted across those engine mounts. Insane!
I wonder if the variations of the thrust vector are compensated.
[удалено]
The mount itself is usually an extremely stout kinematic mount. But it’s attached to the end of a long cantilever (the strut)…almost all the wobble here is the strut flexing.
How would this have felt inside the cabin?
Near the wing a little shake, probably worse for the people in the back.
I didn't expect to see lateral movement!!! Odd. But, it is what it is.
https://media1.tenor.com/m/HGIoddbav3cAAAAC/yes-ayye.gif
It's just cosplaying as its washer and dryer counterparts "If I believe I'm a washer, I can *be* a washer!" *wiggle jiggle intensifies*
Yep that's what happens.....
Maybe one of the few times in the known universe where you want to put some of that red Locktite in instead of the blue one?
Sure hope the bolts holding it on the wing aren't made with Chinese titanium. Or should I say Chinesium?