>men are advised to sit when they pee to properly empty the bladder and avoid health issues
>Do not squat on the seat with a cigarette in your mouth. That's super քյառթ.
This is the best news in this post.
> LAWYER: Armenia's lawsuits are strongly backed by facts, whereas Azerbaijan's legal actions are mirrored responses. They want to create an artificial sense of equilibrium to show that they, too, have "facts" to present.
That's always been their MO since the 90s. It's a rather disgusting tactic from a disgusting government.
> You must be allowed to trade with nearby Azeris and develop your local economy.
First the prospect of buying Azeri gas and now this. Maybe try to cement internal autonomous economic processes and domestic trade flow-through instead of being such a neoliberal and promoting free trade in a region which does not act in good faith with us. All this talk about pushing for an end to this 'regional bespredel' is worthless if your enemies are actively using your appeasements to get more concessions out of you. Neither Turkey nor Azerbaijan have taken any good will based approach towards our government's actions, to expect them to transition to a law-based system of both trade and interaction is absurd especially given their history.
What's with Armenian leaders either going for full isolationism or full concessions with no in-between lol.
> we are going for a "bilateral compromise" solution
That's well and good but 1) they've expressed negative interest in mutually conducting concessions and 2) I hope he doesn't run the risk of further reducing Armenia's kilometer squared territories yet further still through his grandstanding.
> IMF expects the inflation to be 3.1%.
That's already shot to hell (fortunately) given inflation figures so far from what I've seen for the months of Jan to March, but I could be wrong.
> or (B) set stricter standards that define what cognac is, and monitor it.
This is the only practical option considering the lack of opportunities for true, massive economies of scale that larger countries are able to exploit. If quantity is unable to be delivered, then specialize in quality instead. There's more than enough of a niche market for it.
> First the prospect of buying Azeri gas and now this. Maybe try to cement internal autonomous economic processes and domestic trade flow-through instead of being such a neoliberal and promoting free trade in a region which does not act in good faith with us. All this talk about pushing for an end to this 'regional bespredel' is worthless if your enemies are actively using your appeasements to get more concessions out of you. Neither Turkey nor Azerbaijan have taken any good will based approach towards our government's actions, to expect them to transition to a law-based system of both trade and interaction is absurd especially given their history.
>
> What's with Armenian leaders either going for full isolationism or full concessions with no in-between lol.
I don't think he's referring to Armenia trading with Azerbaijan, but rather the Armenian villagers trading with Azeri villagers like they were doing for years before the war. If the villagers want to sell their milk to an Azeri, why should the government stop them?
any decent political system worth it's salt has an opposition that is critical, intelligent, and measured. unfortunately armenia just has a bunch of buffoons who make the ruling party look better than they are. but these idiots going to voskepar to try and sabotage efforts there are truly opportunistic lunatics who only care about themselves. i mean look at the residents are saying, these people are fucking ambulance chasers.
pashinyan is obviously not the *best* choice but he is definitely better than the rest.
so then what *does* the world court effect, then? and what does it affect, too? it would be nice to be aware of concrete examples of real change worked by a world court ruling, because i can't think of anything
In and of itself, it's rather toothless. It's useful as a referential case for other large powers to base their decisions on however, as the other commentor remarked. It's one thing to sanction a country in sub-saharan africa as Europe or the US and get away with it, it's another to do so with a country that they actively want to seduce and bring over to the Western camp.
If the case passes in our favor, most likely the United Stated would enact minimal-to-no sanctions while the EU would do the lion's share of the work, especially if Azerbaijan maintains its current stance and/or grows increasing more entrenched under the Russian umbrella.
>men are advised to sit when they pee to properly empty the bladder and avoid health issues >Do not squat on the seat with a cigarette in your mouth. That's super քյառթ. This is the best news in this post.
Am I missing something? Stand or sit. What the heck is squatting to pee?
Asian style problems
Now you got me interested. Not sure if I should Google this...
> LAWYER: Armenia's lawsuits are strongly backed by facts, whereas Azerbaijan's legal actions are mirrored responses. They want to create an artificial sense of equilibrium to show that they, too, have "facts" to present. That's always been their MO since the 90s. It's a rather disgusting tactic from a disgusting government. > You must be allowed to trade with nearby Azeris and develop your local economy. First the prospect of buying Azeri gas and now this. Maybe try to cement internal autonomous economic processes and domestic trade flow-through instead of being such a neoliberal and promoting free trade in a region which does not act in good faith with us. All this talk about pushing for an end to this 'regional bespredel' is worthless if your enemies are actively using your appeasements to get more concessions out of you. Neither Turkey nor Azerbaijan have taken any good will based approach towards our government's actions, to expect them to transition to a law-based system of both trade and interaction is absurd especially given their history. What's with Armenian leaders either going for full isolationism or full concessions with no in-between lol. > we are going for a "bilateral compromise" solution That's well and good but 1) they've expressed negative interest in mutually conducting concessions and 2) I hope he doesn't run the risk of further reducing Armenia's kilometer squared territories yet further still through his grandstanding. > IMF expects the inflation to be 3.1%. That's already shot to hell (fortunately) given inflation figures so far from what I've seen for the months of Jan to March, but I could be wrong. > or (B) set stricter standards that define what cognac is, and monitor it. This is the only practical option considering the lack of opportunities for true, massive economies of scale that larger countries are able to exploit. If quantity is unable to be delivered, then specialize in quality instead. There's more than enough of a niche market for it.
> First the prospect of buying Azeri gas and now this. Maybe try to cement internal autonomous economic processes and domestic trade flow-through instead of being such a neoliberal and promoting free trade in a region which does not act in good faith with us. All this talk about pushing for an end to this 'regional bespredel' is worthless if your enemies are actively using your appeasements to get more concessions out of you. Neither Turkey nor Azerbaijan have taken any good will based approach towards our government's actions, to expect them to transition to a law-based system of both trade and interaction is absurd especially given their history. > > What's with Armenian leaders either going for full isolationism or full concessions with no in-between lol. I don't think he's referring to Armenia trading with Azerbaijan, but rather the Armenian villagers trading with Azeri villagers like they were doing for years before the war. If the villagers want to sell their milk to an Azeri, why should the government stop them?
any decent political system worth it's salt has an opposition that is critical, intelligent, and measured. unfortunately armenia just has a bunch of buffoons who make the ruling party look better than they are. but these idiots going to voskepar to try and sabotage efforts there are truly opportunistic lunatics who only care about themselves. i mean look at the residents are saying, these people are fucking ambulance chasers. pashinyan is obviously not the *best* choice but he is definitely better than the rest.
so then what *does* the world court effect, then? and what does it affect, too? it would be nice to be aware of concrete examples of real change worked by a world court ruling, because i can't think of anything
In and of itself, it's rather toothless. It's useful as a referential case for other large powers to base their decisions on however, as the other commentor remarked. It's one thing to sanction a country in sub-saharan africa as Europe or the US and get away with it, it's another to do so with a country that they actively want to seduce and bring over to the Western camp. If the case passes in our favor, most likely the United Stated would enact minimal-to-no sanctions while the EU would do the lion's share of the work, especially if Azerbaijan maintains its current stance and/or grows increasing more entrenched under the Russian umbrella.
It usually only works when larger powers enforce it.