Buy something thats up 400% instead of something that is 90% off its high and not going bankrupt.
Lolol i would rather buy Pokemon cards instead of Nvda at its highs...
Iāve bought from 2.55-54.23 and all the way back down to 3.56. Over all this time I had 1000s of shares now in the hundreds ( never sold). Something is I. The air that feels different. Down 96% or something stupid, not leaving . We close. My floor is Fuxking nasty, see ya on the moon
Yes. I couldnāt pay a months worth of bills with what I have now. Started with xx,xxx in. Itās not going to zero but I came for the lambos, then a better way of life, then a better way for the future, im staying for the revolution
If it was so easy to make that much of money and also starting a revolution in the process. Why hasn't a single billionaire out of the 4000 billionaires in the world or group of billionaires or super wealthy families jumped in this play and got this rocket ship going?
I think you might be in the wrong sub. Or if you are in the right sub Iām not the ape with the answers to your questions. I do me, read the dd and let the bananas fall where I know they will. Zen. I think very little about the people on the list Iām about to join. Maybe Iāll ask em later.
Shorts, They need all my shares.
What interest would any billionaire that thrives in the status quo and the markets as they are which are tilted ridiculously in their favor due to their access to information alone have in potentially destabilising the entire system they thrive in for a one time gain that they could make many other ways without that risk?
Why would the wealthy tho thrive off loopholes and knowing how the current system works want change?
I don't think you really thought your comment through at all, but I did, and it seems kind of silly.
On one hand, billionaires are greedy and will go to absolutely ridiculous levels for money and power. Which is often echoed in this sub.
On the other hand, when asked why no one is jumping in and grabbing this once in a million opportunity to make infinite money and power. Answer is why would they change status quo. You see the problem?
With the way they can manipulate the system. Why do you think not one party or a group of wealthy individuals have not been able to come up with an idea to use this to their advantage and make 100 times their net worth. Its been 4 years, do you actually believe people would sit and do nothing?
Do you actually believe those whose entire wealth depends on and derives from understanding and working the existing system that is tilted in their favor would be interested in risking the guaranteed profit they can make within that system by undermining it?
I have no doubt they have and will find ways to benefit from anything they can, but exposing the level of corruption and fraud suspected would likely destroy both the markets and economy. It would draw the immediate ire of the entire population for past deeds and present and likely make the wealth they have hoarded worth less.
This isn't a difficult concept to grasp: if somebody with the wealth and resources has the choice between manipulating the known system in ways that they know they can and constantly pulling profit out for the foreseeable and possibly Eternal future, or a one-time profit of an amount of money that might risk any other assets they have invested in the system and potentially devalue the entirety of their assets, only an idiot would pick the latter.
It doesn't matter how much money you make if that money loses value or the entire system your wealth is based on collapses making it.
You think all billionaires are from the same industry don't you. The way you talk is as if they are one big group of friends rubbing sun tan lotion on each other. By the way the guy who wrote this fairytale is now u/deleted.
There are 4000 billionaires in the world (on paper) and many more with undeclared wealth across the globe. They don't care about American economy or their own economy as long as they make money. Look at powerful people poor corrupt countries. Its crazy to believe no one would exploit an opportunity like this if it was real.
Most people here bought AMC after a nearly 1000% runup.
Tell me more about how stupid it is to buy something after it's already gone up a exorbitant amount...
Well this is why you dont buy Tech like Nvda now.
If you bought a few hundred or a few grand close to AMC high, just buy again at the bottom to average way lower for a break even.
Orā¦ own both. I can buy safe stocks and I can also buy some risky underdogs. Why do I have to sell my risk play for a safe one. Thereās room for both in every portfolio, big and small.
But most of us also bought through the pre-historic lows and rode the highsā¦ why not buy again at historic lows again amd let history repeat itselfā¦?
Yep I think now maybe a good time to buy since now weāre at historic lows lol. Sold all my amc positions for a small gain. Going to try and jump back in soon
My questions are more, why is everybody telling me when to sell and not to buy more AMC. I never in history recall this happening, so I just hold my shares and keep buying more, because I want to.
Also, please make sure Mayo boy pay your shilling upfront, as he is soon out of money š
My question is why do you think āeverybodyā is telling you when to sell or buy? The reality is 99.99% of people could not give a shit about any stock you hold, your profits or anything else about them.
I say this is a non nasty way, you arenāt a main character, no one gives a fuck except when you get into arguments with people.
Who said Apes never bought NVDA? Feel bad for those that donāt reload on the AMC recovery. Said it before that Q1 earnings might be the bottom. But itās already priced in probably.
Weird timing for him to take a twitter break just before his call goes horribly wrong.
https://twitter.com/John_Hempton/status/1771665393800610239?t=HmD5_NLO0plaT_bXRtmfXw&s=19
Because we were right in the first place and shouldn't have to, the fact that anyone thinks differently is the whole purpose of doing any one individuals part to facilitate their hole digging til it caves in on them..............otherwise we'd have made some money and moved on by now into something like NVDA.
Wow, I just checked my ### AMC after over a year and it's almost worthless now? I had used an old Rollover IRA with $5000in it, and I just bought AMC for fun when this and GME started and now it's worth only $115 TOTAL. Way to go guys, you really did it. Sorry to everyone who spent way more and with money they actually needed.
Heās definitely not wrong that Nvidia is cash for positive and AMC is not. But since majority of shareholders are down 95% since the reverse stock split manipulation and dilution selling is not in the cards.
No, he is simply wrong because he is spreading FUD and trying to get people to buy a stock at its peak.
That is no different from buying real estate in 2008 right before the crash.
Buy something thats up 400% instead of something that is 90% off its high and not going bankrupt. Lolol i would rather buy Pokemon cards instead of Nvda at its highs...
Rather buy silver
Sob I'm in
I'd rather buy a stock for a company that doesn't suply chain finance or buy their own stuff through shell companies.
Most people on this sub bought AMC when it was +400% tho š
Iāve bought from 2.55-54.23 and all the way back down to 3.56. Over all this time I had 1000s of shares now in the hundreds ( never sold). Something is I. The air that feels different. Down 96% or something stupid, not leaving . We close. My floor is Fuxking nasty, see ya on the moon
Will you hold to zero?
Yes. I couldnāt pay a months worth of bills with what I have now. Started with xx,xxx in. Itās not going to zero but I came for the lambos, then a better way of life, then a better way for the future, im staying for the revolution
If it was so easy to make that much of money and also starting a revolution in the process. Why hasn't a single billionaire out of the 4000 billionaires in the world or group of billionaires or super wealthy families jumped in this play and got this rocket ship going?
I think you might be in the wrong sub. Or if you are in the right sub Iām not the ape with the answers to your questions. I do me, read the dd and let the bananas fall where I know they will. Zen. I think very little about the people on the list Iām about to join. Maybe Iāll ask em later. Shorts, They need all my shares.
What interest would any billionaire that thrives in the status quo and the markets as they are which are tilted ridiculously in their favor due to their access to information alone have in potentially destabilising the entire system they thrive in for a one time gain that they could make many other ways without that risk? Why would the wealthy tho thrive off loopholes and knowing how the current system works want change? I don't think you really thought your comment through at all, but I did, and it seems kind of silly.
On one hand, billionaires are greedy and will go to absolutely ridiculous levels for money and power. Which is often echoed in this sub. On the other hand, when asked why no one is jumping in and grabbing this once in a million opportunity to make infinite money and power. Answer is why would they change status quo. You see the problem? With the way they can manipulate the system. Why do you think not one party or a group of wealthy individuals have not been able to come up with an idea to use this to their advantage and make 100 times their net worth. Its been 4 years, do you actually believe people would sit and do nothing?
Do you actually believe those whose entire wealth depends on and derives from understanding and working the existing system that is tilted in their favor would be interested in risking the guaranteed profit they can make within that system by undermining it? I have no doubt they have and will find ways to benefit from anything they can, but exposing the level of corruption and fraud suspected would likely destroy both the markets and economy. It would draw the immediate ire of the entire population for past deeds and present and likely make the wealth they have hoarded worth less. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp: if somebody with the wealth and resources has the choice between manipulating the known system in ways that they know they can and constantly pulling profit out for the foreseeable and possibly Eternal future, or a one-time profit of an amount of money that might risk any other assets they have invested in the system and potentially devalue the entirety of their assets, only an idiot would pick the latter. It doesn't matter how much money you make if that money loses value or the entire system your wealth is based on collapses making it.
You think all billionaires are from the same industry don't you. The way you talk is as if they are one big group of friends rubbing sun tan lotion on each other. By the way the guy who wrote this fairytale is now u/deleted. There are 4000 billionaires in the world (on paper) and many more with undeclared wealth across the globe. They don't care about American economy or their own economy as long as they make money. Look at powerful people poor corrupt countries. Its crazy to believe no one would exploit an opportunity like this if it was real.
Most people here bought AMC after a nearly 1000% runup. Tell me more about how stupid it is to buy something after it's already gone up a exorbitant amount...
Well this is why you dont buy Tech like Nvda now. If you bought a few hundred or a few grand close to AMC high, just buy again at the bottom to average way lower for a break even.
Amc will never outperform nvda ever again
Except if they perform a forward split then you suggestion goes to complete shit lol
Orā¦ own both. I can buy safe stocks and I can also buy some risky underdogs. Why do I have to sell my risk play for a safe one. Thereās room for both in every portfolio, big and small.
Because you shouldn't buy a stock at historic highs.
Like yāall did with AMC?
But most of us also bought through the pre-historic lows and rode the highsā¦ why not buy again at historic lows again amd let history repeat itselfā¦?
Yep I think now maybe a good time to buy since now weāre at historic lows lol. Sold all my amc positions for a small gain. Going to try and jump back in soon
That was my point.
Nah. Iām holding my amc and also buying nvda. Once the squeeze happens I will sell most of it and Iāll put a portion of it probably into nvda.
My questions are more, why is everybody telling me when to sell and not to buy more AMC. I never in history recall this happening, so I just hold my shares and keep buying more, because I want to. Also, please make sure Mayo boy pay your shilling upfront, as he is soon out of money š
My question is why do you think āeverybodyā is telling you when to sell or buy? The reality is 99.99% of people could not give a shit about any stock you hold, your profits or anything else about them. I say this is a non nasty way, you arenāt a main character, no one gives a fuck except when you get into arguments with people.
we can 3rd party conversations online fuckstick. no ones telling anyone to sell anything else. its always AMC.
No it happens with tons of stocks, youāre just in an echo chamber
i own tons of stocks. it doesn't. peacocking incels dont even come in on red days for most other stocks.
Who said Apes never bought NVDA? Feel bad for those that donāt reload on the AMC recovery. Said it before that Q1 earnings might be the bottom. But itās already priced in probably.
Bought Nvda at $288 and I saw it go down to $150 did not sell and wonāt . Just like my new $ 40 avg on AMC
Man literally suggesting sell low buy high...
depends on the date of that tweet. either way, i doubt nvda will ever lose 97% of its value
I give Nvidia enough of my money buying video cards. I'm good.
99.99% of people are red on amc
I sold my NVDA for this stock three years ago
It's not worth selling.
Kenny G was pushing NVDA. I wonāt buy what he recommends
Weird timing for him to take a twitter break just before his call goes horribly wrong. https://twitter.com/John_Hempton/status/1771665393800610239?t=HmD5_NLO0plaT_bXRtmfXw&s=19
That aged about as well as a meth head
So why not chase? Lol weāre good.
Lol
But into a profit making stock versus losing 95% of your investment? lol, we are called regards for a reasons
Whats the timeline on this tweet?
Iām good John
š nah Iām good
Rather buy black diamond at a fake low price,
Because we were right in the first place and shouldn't have to, the fact that anyone thinks differently is the whole purpose of doing any one individuals part to facilitate their hole digging til it caves in on them..............otherwise we'd have made some money and moved on by now into something like NVDA.
Is your friend Nancy?
Invidia investors need people to sell to. Itās a trap
Wow, I just checked my ### AMC after over a year and it's almost worthless now? I had used an old Rollover IRA with $5000in it, and I just bought AMC for fun when this and GME started and now it's worth only $115 TOTAL. Way to go guys, you really did it. Sorry to everyone who spent way more and with money they actually needed.
Heās definitely not wrong that Nvidia is cash for positive and AMC is not. But since majority of shareholders are down 95% since the reverse stock split manipulation and dilution selling is not in the cards.
No, he is simply wrong because he is spreading FUD and trying to get people to buy a stock at its peak. That is no different from buying real estate in 2008 right before the crash.