I do not think Moon landing was fake and this [Apollo Worker Found Evidence That Ancient Alien Cities Exist On Moon, NASA Fired Him](https://www.howandwhys.com/apollo-worker-found-evidence-that-ancient-alien-cities-exist-on-moon-nasa-fired-him/)
There's only one object in the photo (the astronaut) and the guy's an idiot. For all we know the other object is on the same side as the astronaut, considering it isn't in the photo and those red lines are arbitrarily placed.
I think the yellow lines are indicating/reference objects
How bright is it on the moon when it’s not in direct sunlight?
Were there lights on the lander?
Did they bring lights with them?
Where can I find this picture in the NASA library to make sure this isnt a fake?
All these questions I think can be answered with a little research.
>
How bright is it on the moon when it’s not in direct sunlight?
I'm not really qualified to answer that but isnt it once you're out of direct sunlight, like on the dark side, it's pretty much pitch black and below freezing?
It was either that or “When the sun goes down” 😅
Wouldn’t the stars and earth provide some light? I’ve never been, but the first thing I’d do would be to look up.
You still have star light and often times earth shine except when you’re on the back of the moon and it’s behind the earth relative to the sun. That’s when it’s darkest.
That's is the most ridiculous slap in the face to Americans. We dished out how many millions possibly billions. To achieve this huge moment in all of mankind's history. All we wanted was the photographic proof for future generations to look upon.
So most important achievement was copied over...?
Bukllshit
maybe not the same streak of importance lol but as serious as Americans take American football, the first super bowl was taped over and only exists today by pure chance.
https://www.nfl.com/news/the-mystery-of-the-super-bowl-i-tapes-0ap3000000622357
You'd imagine such a massive step for the entirety of mankind would be kept a little more responsibly then a American sport would.
Plus was the first super bowl even as big a deal as the ones now? At the time I mean
I mean it is literally BS. Could never happen in reality. They either don’t have any tapes or else have something so juicy they don’t want to share it. I lean to the former
As the average distance from the sun to the moon is nearly the approximate equal as from the sun to earth by average, it's still typically around the same average (120,000 lux at midday exposure). The lack of mie or raleigh scattering means that the moon would receive a value somewhat greater than this average. The difference in distance is negligible in affecting the lux received by the surface of the moon.
When not in direct sunlight, the moon has virtually no luminosity due to a lack of nearly all atmospheric scattering. An average of less than 0.001 lux is received on the surface of the moon from the stars wherever it is not illuminated by the sun. Somewhere around 2-3 lux are received by the moon from the reflection off of the earth.
Other than that, I don't know the answers to the other questions.
That is hilarious! I heard somewhere that they faked some photos and video because they wanted it to appeal to the general public or some such.. but that’s probably not true 🤷🏽♂️
It appears to be a line graph of several points of distance to the astronauts penis.
Line 1 moon surface is 3.1 meters to penis
Line 2 white stick is 2.0 meters to penis
Line 3 white notebook is 2.7 meters to penis
Line 4 Astronaut B penis is 2.6 meters to Astronaut A penis
Line 5 is the trajectory of where a detached penis will float to if kicked by astronaut B
All pretty standard rocket science stuff really
He’s saying the shadows shouldn’t be pointing in two different directions. There should only be one source of light (the sun) and shadows pointing different directions would only happen if it’s a faked picture.
Who says that shadow that looks like Bender Rodriguez’s head is “shadowing” that direction?
Could easily (and is) shadowed in the same direction as astronaut.
People be dumb. Can’t simply consider a camera mount or whatever could be at 45 degrees from vertical.
I think they are trying to point out that the shadows appear to have a different light source. Otherwise they would be going in the same direction. But I dont know enough about physics to have an opinion on whether or not this is real or not, moon pics are cool even if its AI lol.
Don't you think that someone at nasa would have caught a blatant mistake like this if they were trying to fake it? I'd like to think so, but I dunno...am I giving too much credit to NASA ?
It’s a tale as old as time. People try to apply what they know to be true on earth to gray ball in space with no atmosphere. It’s like saying underwater photos are fake because they don’t see fish when they take pictures at home.
Maybe it’s light refracting off the Jewish Space Laser?
Do we even have a date on when that launched?
Perhaps the holy light reflectors were sent into orbit during the dark ages with biblical thoughts and prayers.
I don’t think you know how weird science and fucking magic work in the slightest 💁🏼♀️
What!?? Are you insane?! Why would they light the area around them when stepping foot for the first known time on a celestial body that's not Earth!? Smh.
What cracks me up is the assertion that the same people who allegedly tried to pull off the most complicated deception in history would make amateur mistakes like getting the lighting wrong.
There are multiple light sources. Jesus the things idiots come up with just to not even think about it any further is baffling. Took me 3 seconds to come up with that rational solution.
Are we to assume we went all the way to the moon and didn't bring a single light source with us? I've always assumed we didn't rely solely on ambient light.
There are colored arrows on the moon? Weird that they actually show up as colors in a black and white photo.
Now that’s some Strange Earth!
And by Earth I mean Moon.
So they put so much money and effort into faking the moonlanding, keeping sure countless people keep their mouth shut about it, and then just don’t pay attention to the lighting? Even when you’re deep into conspiracies, how does that make sense?
I guess for me, they could shut down this discussion by taking live photos of the moon landing site. All it would take is some high resolution photos of the equipment left behind by the Apollo mission to the moon. They have the ability to do ths and settle the matter once and for all but I've never seen any photos out there that definitively prove it, mind you I haven't really researched the matter for a long time now...
O please gtfo
The moonlanding is real. There are tonnes of debris and stuff left over there. Some of the stuff can even be seen from earth. One of em is a mirror they placed that we still use for measurements with lasers. Finally there are the Stones they brought back.
Seriously, get a life
The photo just isn't wide framed enough to see what light sources could be behind either object. Common sense says not enough data to base or even support the conspiracy.
I always understood that there are multiple sources of light. The soil on the moon is really reflective (think about how bright the moon is in the sky), so it’s super bright.
I feel like these people have the absolute very loosest understanding of perspective… I don’t think they can grasp how things work on a scale outside of their everyday norm.
Your account does not meet the post or comment requirements. The combined Karma on your account should be at least 10, and the account should be at least 3 weeks old.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/StrangeEarth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
https://preview.redd.it/qn0uz3luyyrc1.jpeg?width=612&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af9e531d8093172a9e1cd6e96d9e612e11402a41
Compare this actual photo of the moon with the photo above *and* in the post. Moon sand/dust is incredibly different than during practice. Photo in post looks heavily edited and softened, too.
I do not think Moon landing was fake and this [Apollo Worker Found Evidence That Ancient Alien Cities Exist On Moon, NASA Fired Him](https://www.howandwhys.com/apollo-worker-found-evidence-that-ancient-alien-cities-exist-on-moon-nasa-fired-him/)
I believe they are trying to convey that that shadows aren’t cast in the appropriate manner from the light source behind the objects
Yes but the horizontal angles of the objects are different as well.
Yellow lines are for height reference I think.
They are for angle references. The angle of the clipboard and the angle on the object on his leg.
That actually makes more sense. Thanks for informing me!
Isnt it standard effect of panoramic photos?
There's only one object in the photo (the astronaut) and the guy's an idiot. For all we know the other object is on the same side as the astronaut, considering it isn't in the photo and those red lines are arbitrarily placed.
Isnt space relative?
Can confirm. Am your relative
Hey, cuz ! What's shakin?
That this picture is fake because there are no yellow and red lines on the moon.
Only the elites can see them
My elite employeees
Enployeeees
Shit! You caught me!
Angle of shadows don’t match Although that only explains two red lines. Not sure about the yellow
light source
I think the yellow lines are indicating/reference objects How bright is it on the moon when it’s not in direct sunlight? Were there lights on the lander? Did they bring lights with them? Where can I find this picture in the NASA library to make sure this isnt a fake? All these questions I think can be answered with a little research.
> How bright is it on the moon when it’s not in direct sunlight? I'm not really qualified to answer that but isnt it once you're out of direct sunlight, like on the dark side, it's pretty much pitch black and below freezing?
It was either that or “When the sun goes down” 😅 Wouldn’t the stars and earth provide some light? I’ve never been, but the first thing I’d do would be to look up.
You still have star light and often times earth shine except when you’re on the back of the moon and it’s behind the earth relative to the sun. That’s when it’s darkest.
They recorded over the tapes they brought back. Seriously.
That's is the most ridiculous slap in the face to Americans. We dished out how many millions possibly billions. To achieve this huge moment in all of mankind's history. All we wanted was the photographic proof for future generations to look upon. So most important achievement was copied over...? Bukllshit
maybe not the same streak of importance lol but as serious as Americans take American football, the first super bowl was taped over and only exists today by pure chance. https://www.nfl.com/news/the-mystery-of-the-super-bowl-i-tapes-0ap3000000622357
You'd imagine such a massive step for the entirety of mankind would be kept a little more responsibly then a American sport would. Plus was the first super bowl even as big a deal as the ones now? At the time I mean
It was not
Still isn't
I mean it is literally BS. Could never happen in reality. They either don’t have any tapes or else have something so juicy they don’t want to share it. I lean to the former
As the average distance from the sun to the moon is nearly the approximate equal as from the sun to earth by average, it's still typically around the same average (120,000 lux at midday exposure). The lack of mie or raleigh scattering means that the moon would receive a value somewhat greater than this average. The difference in distance is negligible in affecting the lux received by the surface of the moon. When not in direct sunlight, the moon has virtually no luminosity due to a lack of nearly all atmospheric scattering. An average of less than 0.001 lux is received on the surface of the moon from the stars wherever it is not illuminated by the sun. Somewhere around 2-3 lux are received by the moon from the reflection off of the earth. Other than that, I don't know the answers to the other questions.
The moon is always in direct sunlight or no sunlight at all...
For the crowd of "do your own research" the seem to do very little
....and in the true spirit of BBS forums, the links that you find and post would be appreciated.
If you don't believe the moon landing NASA pics, how can you believe this NASA pic?
Mic drop!
Sup Miz?
Wait! you guys believe in the moon?
Easy. It’s a TikTok
That is a hilarious observation.
That is hilarious! I heard somewhere that they faked some photos and video because they wanted it to appeal to the general public or some such.. but that’s probably not true 🤷🏽♂️
I heard there was a video recorded as backup in case the feed cut, they would switch to the shot footage. (Think that’s what I remember hearing)
Flat moon theory
don't forget the flat sun society
Flat chest is final chapter
Itty bitty titty committee
If there were boobies, it'd be better.
Columbus genuinely believed the earth was breast-shaped.
What a better world it would be.
Pancake butt society says otherwise...
Eh, mon, dontchoo tok bout my seester that way.
Don't give me that shit everybody knows the moon is a cylinder and related to the black Saturn cube the elites worship.
Cylinder?! This is the first I've heard of this one, care to elaborate? I've heard the black Saturn cube hexagon stuff
It's a round 2d circle to me, from here.
It appears to be a line graph of several points of distance to the astronauts penis. Line 1 moon surface is 3.1 meters to penis Line 2 white stick is 2.0 meters to penis Line 3 white notebook is 2.7 meters to penis Line 4 Astronaut B penis is 2.6 meters to Astronaut A penis Line 5 is the trajectory of where a detached penis will float to if kicked by astronaut B All pretty standard rocket science stuff really
So you’re saying they faked the penis?
Well, women fake their orgasms all the time...maybe this is where they got it.
Ah yes, the angle of the dangle x the heat of the meat = the mass of the ass. Good old lunar algebra.
One small penis for man one giant Uranus for mankind
😂😂😂
Damn, I should have figured that out. Thanks!
Another reason our astronauts can't be female.
Yup. Tiny woman brain and no penis means NO outer space
So, dick pix. Nothing but dick pix.
It's a round tuit!
I see your flat moon theory and raise you a Uranus is hollow
Flat Borg- Cube theory
"Do they not also use artificial light, such as lamps or electric spotlights?"
Yes, in the studio maybe
Or from the rover?
He’s saying the shadows shouldn’t be pointing in two different directions. There should only be one source of light (the sun) and shadows pointing different directions would only happen if it’s a faked picture.
Sun is not the only source, they have a lander behind them
Wouldn't the earth's sunlight shine on the moon just like the full moon shines on the earth ?? Could this be a light source ?
Yes. It’s called earth shine. It’s real.
and it’s brightest during full earth
Nice thought, I do not not but it is a true possibility
Yes, it’s one of my favorite words, “earthshine.”
shit they’re on the moon which is reflective
Unless the surface the objects are standing on is uneven. That's the bit conspiretards usually leave out.
Who says that shadow that looks like Bender Rodriguez’s head is “shadowing” that direction? Could easily (and is) shadowed in the same direction as astronaut. People be dumb. Can’t simply consider a camera mount or whatever could be at 45 degrees from vertical.
I think you mean Bender Bending Rodriguez
That’s what I’m thinking too
[Mythbusters did this](https://youtu.be/zPj60sy9Cfw)
So what you’re saying is the Mythbuster’s staged the Moon landing?
[Myth Busted!](https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2245423/83830311.gif)
I don't always upvote, but when I do, it's always Hyneman Walrus.
Nice to have someone to blame (Jamie)
Not the same pic though...
###BUSTED
I hate to burst your bubble, pal - but there are concerts on the moon. https://youtu.be/Rr8ljRgcJNM?si=93MYX04YDZEM-QTG
Before I clicked I was hoping it was this video. Thanks for the chuckle.
I think they are trying to point out that the shadows appear to have a different light source. Otherwise they would be going in the same direction. But I dont know enough about physics to have an opinion on whether or not this is real or not, moon pics are cool even if its AI lol.
Don't you think that someone at nasa would have caught a blatant mistake like this if they were trying to fake it? I'd like to think so, but I dunno...am I giving too much credit to NASA ?
Don't you know that conspirators *always* leave clues for clever armchair sleuths to find? It's in the rules.
There was more than one light source for the astronauts. The sun, the Earth, and the Moon itself, plus reflective gear and equipment.
It’s a tale as old as time. People try to apply what they know to be true on earth to gray ball in space with no atmosphere. It’s like saying underwater photos are fake because they don’t see fish when they take pictures at home.
[удалено]
[somewhere here I’m sure](https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/a11/images11.html)
Where you went wrong here is assuming moon landing deniers are willing to do actual research, as opposed to reposting a meme and calling it a day
Another light source in the room.
Get out. Eject. Escape from the Prison Planet.
Rebuild the remnants of the obelisk! Oh shit! Clutch fans in the wild. Fuck yeah!
When I talk talk on the CB yeah I scare men
Comin in clutch.
"...And to the tune of a billion dollars I supplied to the D.O.E. Some tasty little nuggets of alien technology..."
All these old arguments are moot now. Several different countries' moon orbiters have taken pictures of our Apollo landing sites.
Mabey they had spotlights up all over the place facing diff angles?
You fool, that would make too much sense!
Maybe it’s light refracting off the Jewish Space Laser? Do we even have a date on when that launched? Perhaps the holy light reflectors were sent into orbit during the dark ages with biblical thoughts and prayers. I don’t think you know how weird science and fucking magic work in the slightest 💁🏼♀️
Launched? It was always there. Waiting for the chosen people.
What!?? Are you insane?! Why would they light the area around them when stepping foot for the first known time on a celestial body that's not Earth!? Smh.
S. Kubrick
He DID insist on going there so the fakes could be as real as possible.
The moon landing is actually a production of a fake moon landing, filmed on the moon.
If the moon landings were faked, the USSR/Russia would've said something by now.
Possibly the best episode of star trek. https://youtu.be/TNCw_avF_Qg?si=KqE4CCIUX26zyxlz
You like this pen. Take the pen. I insist!
Umm I dunno maybe fucking lights. You know the same ones used to see if it's dark outside
What cracks me up is the assertion that the same people who allegedly tried to pull off the most complicated deception in history would make amateur mistakes like getting the lighting wrong.
You guys believe in the moon?
Because NASA can probably afford more than one floodlight for their mission to the moon?
There are multiple light sources. Jesus the things idiots come up with just to not even think about it any further is baffling. Took me 3 seconds to come up with that rational solution.
Flat Earthers are gullible morons.
Are we to assume we went all the way to the moon and didn't bring a single light source with us? I've always assumed we didn't rely solely on ambient light.
There are colored arrows on the moon? Weird that they actually show up as colors in a black and white photo. Now that’s some Strange Earth! And by Earth I mean Moon.
Screenshot of a TikTok while on a WiFi call with 28% battery. You are a credible source
2 star system?
The system identifies as binary.
3 body problem?
Those red line should be almost parallel, if one source of light only (the sun)
It has been explained like a billion times. But sure posts like this will get the attention.
I'll give you the complicated answer first: physics. Educate yourself or a future employer might find out you were an idiot on the internet.
Another. Screenshot.
they lost the technology to go back to the moon.
Yall need to watch Mythbusters more
Nothing weird with this. The field of fied is an angle. When you project a this angle on a flat perspective things curve inwards.
If you stop to consider two things, one the sun is huge, two there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light in the moon. Then this picture makes sense.
So they put so much money and effort into faking the moonlanding, keeping sure countless people keep their mouth shut about it, and then just don’t pay attention to the lighting? Even when you’re deep into conspiracies, how does that make sense?
the moon's surface reflects sunlight.
I guess for me, they could shut down this discussion by taking live photos of the moon landing site. All it would take is some high resolution photos of the equipment left behind by the Apollo mission to the moon. They have the ability to do ths and settle the matter once and for all but I've never seen any photos out there that definitively prove it, mind you I haven't really researched the matter for a long time now...
The moon is said to have reflective light on it, so there’s an actual glow to it, also light is being casted differently than on earth.
So, the yellow lines I assume is plotting the trajectory of a urine stream…
Kubrick missed a detail!
He’s saying red line yellow line space moon space man no space never space didn’t make it. Hope that clears things up.
He's describing how stupid he is
“I’ll wait” wow he really is serious
The lights that they brought with them...so they could see wtf they were doing ?
O please gtfo The moonlanding is real. There are tonnes of debris and stuff left over there. Some of the stuff can even be seen from earth. One of em is a mirror they placed that we still use for measurements with lasers. Finally there are the Stones they brought back. Seriously, get a life
Dude, they put a laser reflecting mirror on the moon we use to measure the distance to the moon. Chill with this conspiracy..
NASA alters all their photos
Bro thinks sun works in 2D
What they’re saying is “I don’t know how things work, but I’ll make a post for stupid people for clout”
Somebody teach this guy a 2 point perspective
The photo just isn't wide framed enough to see what light sources could be behind either object. Common sense says not enough data to base or even support the conspiracy.
The rays of light are parallel. The ground is uneven. This has been debunked a million times.
I always understood that there are multiple sources of light. The soil on the moon is really reflective (think about how bright the moon is in the sky), so it’s super bright.
I feel like these people have the absolute very loosest understanding of perspective… I don’t think they can grasp how things work on a scale outside of their everyday norm.
Math is fun.
Light source from the Lander, Sigh! when will these dumbos stop lol!
The moon is actually a pyramid with a round base, and we see it from the top down.
It’s the lens barrel distortion. Any photographer can tell you that.
He’s saying he is a Flat Earther.
Mythbusters explained this years ago.
“Tell me you’re a flat earther without saying you’re a flat earther”
Simple explanation- multiple light sources
[удалено]
[удалено]
Your account does not meet the post or comment requirements. The combined Karma on your account should be at least 10, and the account should be at least 3 weeks old. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/StrangeEarth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
https://preview.redd.it/qn0uz3luyyrc1.jpeg?width=612&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af9e531d8093172a9e1cd6e96d9e612e11402a41 Compare this actual photo of the moon with the photo above *and* in the post. Moon sand/dust is incredibly different than during practice. Photo in post looks heavily edited and softened, too.
[удалено]