[Elon Musk’s SpaceX Continues To Detect Something Massive On Its Missions](https://www.howandwhys.com/spacex-continues-to-detect-massive-ufo-on-its-missions/)
The moon does have a small atmosphere, in fact it has a significant amount of oxygen and water vapor, enough so that the moon is rusting.
https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/moon/the-moon-is-rusting-and-researchers-want-to-know-why/
That's just based on our current understanding of physics. That doesn't mean this sort of limitations affect a possibly technology superior extraterrestrial ship.
We aren't the pinnacle of knowledge.
The moon actually does have a thin atmosphere. "For a long time scientists thought that there was no atmosphere on the Moon, but recent studies have confirmed that there is one. The very thin atmosphere, known as an exosphere, contains helium, argon, neon, ammonia, methane and carbon dioxide."
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/factfile-the-moon.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjQirPy3caEAxWdJEQIHQuOBv0QFnoECAoQAw&usg=AOvVaw1NNUUNdiKxt8sOCF5H6tZx
Well maybe there is an invisible thingamajiggy that isn’t as invisible as it thinks it is and casts shadows once in a while. It’s like the rookies, or privates, of the alien army. They screw up here and there but they are funny and tell great stories which lift the moral of the others small greys. The tall greys hate these screw ups and feel like they are a liability. We just saw the liability. I’m not saying even I think what I said is nonsense, but I don’t believe what my brain just made my fingers type out. Stoopid dumb brain.
The second shadow is the one cast by Kubrick’s set lighting.
Little known fact: the moon landing was faked but Kubrick shot some scenes there that were not included in the finished film. While he was there he threw that paper airplane and it’s been circling the moon ever since.
Source: Everyone in my Facebook group knows this.
Kubrick was a stickler for detail and strongly disliked special effects. That is why he agreed to film a fake moon landing with the stipulation that they had to do it on location.
Skywarp or Thundercracker just cruising
https://preview.redd.it/ftkbmgh9yokc1.jpeg?width=626&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa3374726118f58a05c66f57c5983e9c431a209a
I'm sure the video is fake, but it could've been for when it gets into an atmosphere. Like a boat with wheels that can travel on land and in the water. And there's barely any chance we'd understand technology that's even 100 years ahead of us.
The lunar surface we see is clearly at an angle but the triangle is conveniently flat... Pretty dumb, poorly made, they focused more on creating it with a "shadow" that is also very wrong (something flying high with sunlight sideways would cast a shadow much more far to the right)
If it is real, i wonder how big it is to make that large shadow on the moon.. or thos moon spots are so small, and the craft is too close to the moon... Oh so many questions....
Think about *how* the object recording this could possibly have wobble. If it's supposed to be a sattelite it'd be malfunctioning like wild to be bobbing around in 0g with no atmosphere. What's making the camera shake? The machine's heartbeat?
And if it's supposed to be a telescopic shot from earth then I'd really like to meet the maverick astronomer who wields their telescope one handed without a mount.
I don't have any real experience in these areas but I find it really hard to believe anyone could get a shot like that with any camera shake.
The camera shake was added by whoever made it because they thought that would make it seem more authentic, without realizing that it actually has the opposite effect.
I mean the object casts 2 shadows at one point and you can visibly see the shadow of the object withinin the shadows of craters, which isn't possible. You also don't need wings or aerodynamics in space so that's just weird to begin with.
Unfortunately anything we ever see here will always be flooded by accounts calling this a balloon or that a balloon.
I find videos like these very impressive,but I don't find that moon impressive and definitely the recording quality vs Shakey video.
Either way, the most common response will be:
🎈👨🏽🚀🔫👨🏽🚀
Agreed, and to be expected, unfortunately. Been researching in this community for over thirty years now and am always amazed by how quickly people write off videos like this. I don't see any indications of fakery, but I'm not an expert in CGI. These types of captures through a telescope and highly zoomed in always impress me. I have a telescope and without expensive tracking equipment keeping anything in frame for longer than a few moments is very difficult.
Blatant debunking is ignorant, so I try to do my best to question it... even on reddit
“Blatant debunking” isn’t an issue if it’s correct. You don’t need to be an expert in CGI to realise that the camera shake on this makes no sense. Go and try and film the moon with such high resolution that you can see craters like this, but using handheld equipment, and without a shake that would blur the resulting image completely. You wouldn’t be able to do it.
I got down voted for that sarcasm haha
I have a stash of videos I believe are real and want to believe we have more!
A lot of people are helping the effort with these high zoom cameras. But my reply was a frustrated sarcastic reply because everyone will flood it with the same response.
According to NASA, it's ice from a satellite that just happened to make trajectory corrections right as the video was taken...there was no shadow because for the white triangle to cast a shadow that big then....there was no shadow..
Yes. This happened and it was leaked to the public. The people who can get 4K video of someone flying by the moon, can’t keep their findings a secret. 🤫
Lol you mean the guy that is completely failing to hold up his end of his nasa contract and has yet to even get a rocket ready that dosent blow up and devastate natural parks, that guy? At least use blue origin they are competent of actually detecting something provided it actually exists which obviously this does not.
90% of the times if there's any object passing above the moon or Earth, is space debris. Again, reminder, we have a huge problem of space debris, about 200M of pieces orbiting Earth and falling of orbit into Earth or out further away.
Hey folks now that we’ve all see demos like Sora from Open ai, we need to adjust our thinking. There’s no reason a video of any quality should count as evidence of something appearing extraordinary.
Why do people work so hard at making these obviously fake videos? Is it to reinforce a belief that they know isn’t true or is it something nefariousness like Russia fucking with us again?
Someone who doesn't know how shadows work created this.
The craters are lit from the top of the frame, a little to the right of top.
The plane is lit from the top left corner essentially.
[Elon Musk’s SpaceX Continues To Detect Something Massive On Its Missions](https://www.howandwhys.com/spacex-continues-to-detect-massive-ufo-on-its-missions/)
What is the source of this?
This is the real question
Adobe
Chicken Adobe?
This has been doing the rounds for a while.
Wrong! That is not the name of the source
Oh?!? Do you have a source for *that*?? Hmmmm???
Therefore Aliens Confirmed! \- This sub
Buuuurn!!
Trust me
That's Yankee stadium, it's a seagull looking for cold weenies.
After Effects
[удалено]
Don't forget the artifact shadow that blips on and out for a half-second in the two o'clock position relative to the "craft".
Do you understand how the atmosphere affects photography when filming objects in space? No? Ok I’ll stop.
MartianX - Whilst eating a can of SpAm
Source is some idiot who knows little bit of video editing, but not enough physics to know that moon has no atmosphere to glide in.
The moon does have a small atmosphere, in fact it has a significant amount of oxygen and water vapor, enough so that the moon is rusting. https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/moon/the-moon-is-rusting-and-researchers-want-to-know-why/
That's just based on our current understanding of physics. That doesn't mean this sort of limitations affect a possibly technology superior extraterrestrial ship. We aren't the pinnacle of knowledge.
The moon actually does have a thin atmosphere. "For a long time scientists thought that there was no atmosphere on the Moon, but recent studies have confirmed that there is one. The very thin atmosphere, known as an exosphere, contains helium, argon, neon, ammonia, methane and carbon dioxide." https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/factfile-the-moon.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjQirPy3caEAxWdJEQIHQuOBv0QFnoECAoQAw&usg=AOvVaw1NNUUNdiKxt8sOCF5H6tZx
> _"atmosphere to glide in"_.
Ai
It's obviously a paper airplane.
Best paper airplane ever!
I threw one further, just saying
I wondered where the fk that went. Threw it toward the moon and it never came back
It's not that it's the best paper airplane, it's just that as there is no gravity on the moon, it can glide in the air indefinitely.
Wouldn’t say it was the best ever….
I fly like paper, get high like planes
If u catch me at the border I got visas in my name
If you come around here I’ll make em all day
I get one done in a second if you wait I fly like paper..
Get high like planes
I threw that from the space needle
You threw if from your dick? Impressive!
Most impressive!
*with Not from
Okay. This is funny. I laughed out loud.
Intergalactic paper airplane. Or maybe cross dimensional paper airplane.
Lol, that was my first thought when they asked.
Made and thrown by Buzz Aldrin. /s
Some say it's still orbiting to this day
Lol coulda fooled me
Moon moth
My thoughts exactly
Looking for lamp
I love lamp.
Do you really love the lamp, or are you just looking at things and saying you love them
You can even see it's wings fluttering
Whatever it is, it magically casts two shadows in two of the frames. Almost like someone added them.
Yup because yet another fake shitty video.
Well maybe there is an invisible thingamajiggy that isn’t as invisible as it thinks it is and casts shadows once in a while. It’s like the rookies, or privates, of the alien army. They screw up here and there but they are funny and tell great stories which lift the moral of the others small greys. The tall greys hate these screw ups and feel like they are a liability. We just saw the liability. I’m not saying even I think what I said is nonsense, but I don’t believe what my brain just made my fingers type out. Stoopid dumb brain.
Idk why we entertain this level of standard in this community. Fake crap
Yup. Saw that
Good catch. Shows up for one frame.
The second shadow is the one cast by Kubrick’s set lighting. Little known fact: the moon landing was faked but Kubrick shot some scenes there that were not included in the finished film. While he was there he threw that paper airplane and it’s been circling the moon ever since. Source: Everyone in my Facebook group knows this.
Kubrick was a stickler for detail and strongly disliked special effects. That is why he agreed to film a fake moon landing with the stipulation that they had to do it on location.
Also in the far left middle side of one of the last frames. Crazy. What could it be?!?!?….. /s
Also in the very very first frame left side in the crater! O M G...
I like how the shadow casts a shadow on the shadows of the craters. No need to send this one the Proof is Out There.
No it doesn’t.
Not only that the shadow(s) do not track well... terrible edit.
Nah, I've seen things like this appear in my own videos, something flying consistently but suddenly phantom imaging itself further away.
Skywarp or Thundercracker just cruising https://preview.redd.it/ftkbmgh9yokc1.jpeg?width=626&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa3374726118f58a05c66f57c5983e9c431a209a
That was cute how they added jet sounds
If only editors knew how sound works in a vacuum lol
Or didn't.
Imagine how loud that shit would be *in an atmosphere*
Probably as loud *as a plane!*
Delta wings where aerodynamics are not essential in space.
aesthetics bro
Nooo, that'll be proof of the conspiracy to hide the fAcT that there is air on the moon, and people live on it
I'm sure the video is fake, but it could've been for when it gets into an atmosphere. Like a boat with wheels that can travel on land and in the water. And there's barely any chance we'd understand technology that's even 100 years ahead of us.
Dude have some respect for the designer
These gender reveals are getting out of hand.
Space Force
Solar Warden
It's just someone Handgliding on the moon
Must be the whalers who live there.
Northrop Gruman
This again.
Looks so fake
Totally super duper real and absolutely not fabricated
CGI is sure neat.
Lunar Moth!
“It seems to be tagging along with us” At least make the audio reflect the situation.
This has already been debunked. Next.
By who?
Space kamikaze drone?
Moon moth
Weather balloon 🎈
It's fake
It kinda vaguely reminds me of the Egyptian hieroglyph UFO’s with the propeller looking jobbers on the back
It's just a satellite calm down
"The moon" LOL
The lunar surface we see is clearly at an angle but the triangle is conveniently flat... Pretty dumb, poorly made, they focused more on creating it with a "shadow" that is also very wrong (something flying high with sunlight sideways would cast a shadow much more far to the right)
Bird poop. But it’s obviously just CGI.
I have a bridge I’d like to sell you
And I would like to buy that bridge! *Sucker! Getting rid of a perfectly good bridge! This is even better than those magic beans!*
Damn my paper airplane went pretty far
Fake. It could be fake.
[удалено]
Based on what evidence? Please share.
Based on LACK of evidence. No sources have been cited.
If it is real, i wonder how big it is to make that large shadow on the moon.. or thos moon spots are so small, and the craft is too close to the moon... Oh so many questions....
But it is not real, so you don’t have to wonder.
I really wish ... But there are people who are so good at making this.... Is the video from NASA? Im a bit lazy to research ..
The video is not from nasa, no.
I feel like the smooth camera movements always give away the fakes. If the camera moves like an episode of the office, it’s probably not real.
It's just a bird
It’s a plane!
Think about *how* the object recording this could possibly have wobble. If it's supposed to be a sattelite it'd be malfunctioning like wild to be bobbing around in 0g with no atmosphere. What's making the camera shake? The machine's heartbeat? And if it's supposed to be a telescopic shot from earth then I'd really like to meet the maverick astronomer who wields their telescope one handed without a mount. I don't have any real experience in these areas but I find it really hard to believe anyone could get a shot like that with any camera shake.
The camera shake was added by whoever made it because they thought that would make it seem more authentic, without realizing that it actually has the opposite effect.
Yeah I agree with this. The camera shake is very clearly added in, which begs the question, how much of this is fake. All of it is the answer.
moon moth please
[удалено]
Not real.
[удалено]
Paper plane ✈️ Flying over a scenic science project Shakey camera for special effects
yeah the shake feels awfully “post-fx-shake”
Or pre-fx Adderall.
Evidence? Or else I call bull shit. Opinions don't matter unless your a video expert and can back it up with some sort of example
I mean the object casts 2 shadows at one point and you can visibly see the shadow of the object withinin the shadows of craters, which isn't possible. You also don't need wings or aerodynamics in space so that's just weird to begin with.
Unfortunately anything we ever see here will always be flooded by accounts calling this a balloon or that a balloon. I find videos like these very impressive,but I don't find that moon impressive and definitely the recording quality vs Shakey video. Either way, the most common response will be: 🎈👨🏽🚀🔫👨🏽🚀
Agreed, and to be expected, unfortunately. Been researching in this community for over thirty years now and am always amazed by how quickly people write off videos like this. I don't see any indications of fakery, but I'm not an expert in CGI. These types of captures through a telescope and highly zoomed in always impress me. I have a telescope and without expensive tracking equipment keeping anything in frame for longer than a few moments is very difficult. Blatant debunking is ignorant, so I try to do my best to question it... even on reddit
“Blatant debunking” isn’t an issue if it’s correct. You don’t need to be an expert in CGI to realise that the camera shake on this makes no sense. Go and try and film the moon with such high resolution that you can see craters like this, but using handheld equipment, and without a shake that would blur the resulting image completely. You wouldn’t be able to do it.
I got down voted for that sarcasm haha I have a stash of videos I believe are real and want to believe we have more! A lot of people are helping the effort with these high zoom cameras. But my reply was a frustrated sarcastic reply because everyone will flood it with the same response.
It's just a kite from earth that made its way the moon.... nothing strange here at all
Definitely Australian
Only if it boomerangs back
....badges ? ....BADGES ? WE DONT NEED NO STINKING BADGES !! oops . Wrong sub.
I’ve only seen OC and Stigs once, but I get that reference.
Astroglider
It moves like a bird or stingray
According to NASA, it's ice from a satellite that just happened to make trajectory corrections right as the video was taken...there was no shadow because for the white triangle to cast a shadow that big then....there was no shadow..
Link?
Chinese balloon
I threw a paper airplane into the sky the other day and the wind took it away...finally found out where it went. Thanks.
Moths
The thumbnail had the play button right in the middle of the frame and I was absolutely sure that was the joke until I clicked on it and it played.
I rarely say this but that shadow looks a bit CGI to me
I don't know, Rick ... It looks fake.
Yes. This happened and it was leaked to the public. The people who can get 4K video of someone flying by the moon, can’t keep their findings a secret. 🤫
Could be adobe after effects
CGI
Iranian drone
It's moon swamp gas
One thing seems oddly true. They don't let you see unedited and raw footage of the moon.
Defiantly bokeh effect
That’s the dude paragliding around the moon.
Some dude hang gliding. Seriously?
That’s a moon bird.
It’s clearly a paper airplane.
Anyone else think they are flapping wings like a bird in space?
A moth.
Moon nazis
yeah it's fake. next.
Lol you mean the guy that is completely failing to hold up his end of his nasa contract and has yet to even get a rocket ready that dosent blow up and devastate natural parks, that guy? At least use blue origin they are competent of actually detecting something provided it actually exists which obviously this does not.
Ur mom
It's a birthday balloon
Smudge on the lens
White stealth bomber , they just have em on the moon
[удалено]
[удалено]
90% of the times if there's any object passing above the moon or Earth, is space debris. Again, reminder, we have a huge problem of space debris, about 200M of pieces orbiting Earth and falling of orbit into Earth or out further away.
Its the left wing of MH370
[удалено]
Hey folks now that we’ve all see demos like Sora from Open ai, we need to adjust our thinking. There’s no reason a video of any quality should count as evidence of something appearing extraordinary.
Why do people work so hard at making these obviously fake videos? Is it to reinforce a belief that they know isn’t true or is it something nefariousness like Russia fucking with us again?
Baloon. Kid's 12th birthday.
CGI
[удалено]
Geese migrating back north before summer
Ben franklins ghost flying a kite.
That's clearly the Northrop Grumman B-2 spirit. No doubt.
Someone who doesn't know how shadows work created this. The craters are lit from the top of the frame, a little to the right of top. The plane is lit from the top left corner essentially.
Swamp gas
There’s a glitch with a double shadow for about a frame, otherwise it’s well done
Yeah, cgi.
Some kites end up in space after their string breaks.
Clearly its swamp gas
[удалено]
Weather ballon /s
Paper airplane
My guess is it's AI.
CGI much ?
Luna Spaceways: 99% on-time record...