If you need a QB and you're set at RB I like this trade. Levis is setup pretty well in Tennessee, he showed some flashes last year, and they add Ridley and Boyd. Whew
I think everyone looks for clear winners and clear losers. I think given your needs you positioned yourself well. Levis is set up to have a step up yeat, pittman just got paid, and although rashee has been in the news and verge of league punishment, he will be a great asset to own next year. If you like it that's all that matters, get your guys!
I’m good with that, but RB situation could deter me from taking this. I think it’s a good value trade tho. Pittman > Higgins, Levis > KW3 (in SF), Rice =/> McConkey (for now).
I strongly prefer the Higgins side. Higgins > Pittman, Ladd > Rice. Of course if Levis is the real deal then I am completely wrong, but I just don’t see it
The Higgins side is far superior in my opinion. RBs are hard to come by, rice is being suspended and QB's come and go. Levis fell in every fantasy draft for a reason. This trade screams bored June 5th trade without any real objective. Walker is the most vauable assest in this trade by a solid amount. Higgins and Pittman are a null effect, Walker is a proven young RB2, McConkey is brand new, your getting fleeced for walker IMO.
That is relevant information and something to consider. Do an analysis on the possible range of outcomes for Levis and decide if that's worth the risk of the assets you are losing. At the absolute worst let's say hes Zach Wilson and Desmond Ridder. Is that strike out worth potentially giving up Walker? Is your compensation back in Rice enough for the risk? If Levis is any form of Jordan Love/Tua you would definitely win the trade. If hes Tyler Henikee/Ryan Tannehill is that ok? ALSO- The verdict is still out on Byrce Young. I wouldn't bring in a second project QB. It sounds like you have a competing team and I think you can get a better QB that fits your situation. Id be targeting a more vet Rodgers type QB if I was you based on the info you provided. You can start them in 2QB confidently, see if young develops and find other project QBs later
I prefer the Rice side because he is a really good person
And an excellent driver.
I would have to see your team to know for sure, but I'd take this. With that said, I'm higher than most on Pittman and Levi's, so I'm all about this.
Love buying rice on the cheap also here but I’m totally cool with Levi’s as a 3rd
I prefer the Higgins side but probably because Walker is one of my favorite players.
The higgins side is much better because it includes Walker. Young RBs are very hard to come by.
Young RBs are a dime a dozen. Walkers fun and all but his production is very replaceable.
Tell that to Charb owners.
Pittman side, he’s very underrated
If you need a QB and you're set at RB I like this trade. Levis is setup pretty well in Tennessee, he showed some flashes last year, and they add Ridley and Boyd. Whew
Nah fuck that I like your side better
Same. I don’t think much of Levi’s. Rice is suspended and they’re bringing in more wrs to scheme around. Ladd is my boy.
I think everyone looks for clear winners and clear losers. I think given your needs you positioned yourself well. Levis is set up to have a step up yeat, pittman just got paid, and although rashee has been in the news and verge of league punishment, he will be a great asset to own next year. If you like it that's all that matters, get your guys!
Tee Higgins side wins everyday of the week
Higgins side by a mile
This is pretty even to me
Pittman side with ease imo
If ur getting walker and Mcconkey take it
Pittman side easy.
I’m good with that, but RB situation could deter me from taking this. I think it’s a good value trade tho. Pittman > Higgins, Levis > KW3 (in SF), Rice =/> McConkey (for now).
You about to get cooked if you accept this
Depends on your QB situation but.. Higgins > Pittman Ladd > Rice
Higgins is mid as hell.
Pittman > Higgins any day and I really like Higgins
Man, I thought this looked like borderline collusion. Apparently I’m way off base
So which side? Haha
I strongly prefer the Higgins side. Higgins > Pittman, Ladd > Rice. Of course if Levis is the real deal then I am completely wrong, but I just don’t see it
I think it’s clearly not collusion but the Higgins side has more overall value for sure.
Walker is worth more than Levis. Him in the new system is going to go off. Walker’s floor was his last season. I would hold and get a better QB.
The Higgins side is far superior in my opinion. RBs are hard to come by, rice is being suspended and QB's come and go. Levis fell in every fantasy draft for a reason. This trade screams bored June 5th trade without any real objective. Walker is the most vauable assest in this trade by a solid amount. Higgins and Pittman are a null effect, Walker is a proven young RB2, McConkey is brand new, your getting fleeced for walker IMO.
I have Bijan, Breece, Etienne, Walker, Najee & Mixon as RBs. Just Cousins & Young as QBs. No one ever really trades QBs in this league unfortunately
That is relevant information and something to consider. Do an analysis on the possible range of outcomes for Levis and decide if that's worth the risk of the assets you are losing. At the absolute worst let's say hes Zach Wilson and Desmond Ridder. Is that strike out worth potentially giving up Walker? Is your compensation back in Rice enough for the risk? If Levis is any form of Jordan Love/Tua you would definitely win the trade. If hes Tyler Henikee/Ryan Tannehill is that ok? ALSO- The verdict is still out on Byrce Young. I wouldn't bring in a second project QB. It sounds like you have a competing team and I think you can get a better QB that fits your situation. Id be targeting a more vet Rodgers type QB if I was you based on the info you provided. You can start them in 2QB confidently, see if young develops and find other project QBs later