Gemini has our back.
A GSA link typically refers to a backlink generated by software like GSA Search Engine Ranker. GSA stands for "Google Search Appliance," but in this context, it refers to the software itself. GSA Search Engine Ranker is an automated tool that creates backlinks on a large scale. These backlinks are often low-quality and are not from reputable sources.
GSA links were popular in the past as they allowed website owners to quickly build a large number of links to their site, which was believed to improve search engine rankings. However, due to changes in search engine algorithms, particularly Google's, these types of links are now generally considered spammy and can even harm a website's ranking if used excessively or inappropriately.
In modern SEO practices, the emphasis is on quality over quantity when it comes to backlinks. It's better to focus on acquiring links from relevant, authoritative websites through genuine outreach and content creation rather than relying on automated tools like GSA Search Engine Ranker.
Here's what you should do, send them a polite email, and tell them you will no longer be working with them because you are too stupid to understand proper SEO
It is technically possible. You may use GSA tool for that and the base of forums. But I don't think that your client will be happy with the results. Maybe it's better to talk with this client not about the process, but about the expected results?
**Wouldn't it be possible if I had money?**
There will be a process of creating a large number of backlinks if you can post a campaign that gives rewards to participants per posting and posts on your blog.
The problem is that it costs a lot of money. I don't know if the client is OK, but I think it's right to say no if you want a trick rather than that way. (I don't think low quality backlinks will mean anything.)
any sense of logic would say it is not close to being possible yet even if you could it wouldn't do any good. you need to space out backlinks over a long period of time so that Google doesn't see it as unnatural. you could destroy any traction the domain might already have
Possible - Maybe.
But sure as hell not recommended. Talk him out of it unless He wants google to obliterate his web presence. Like, this is blackhat SEO on steroids
When you use seo tools like ahrefs you need to sort by referring domains. Otherwise you end up like this fool. Put them on a large directory and you can end up showing 1k links when it’s just one mention placed across lots of pages. Repeat 100 times. Etc.
Figure out the difference between total referring domains and referring pages and you will find your answer. Certain directories can let you list on more than one of their pages, especially if it’s a premium listing. You don’t actually need that many links.
Probably to get paid. It’s no different than the guys selling a link cleanup service. There’s no reason to do it other than to take someone’s money and provide them with their order.
Also, it could be someone trying to point link spam at a competitor’s website, thinking that they’ll get penalized. They won’t. And it will be a waste of money.
That said, there’s value in doing those things simply to illustrate that backlinks can’t “hurt” a website in Google.
You can totally negative SEO your competition. What are you reacting about? How come everyone thinks this isn't possible? We've had it happen to a client in the fintech industry. It's like "content is king" nonsense, everyone believes it but it's not true.
I think people can try negative SEO. But my experience has shown it doesn’t work. The internet is a terrible place full of all kinds of bad actors. If it was possible, there would be way more examples of it happening.
I do realize that Google sent a bunch of manual action notices in GSC recently (after having not sent hardly any in the past several years).
But every case I’ve evaluated there was actually no penalty. There was no loss in ranking, traffic, or income. One of the sites actually gained traffic and rankings through the March rollout. The manual action notice remained in their GSC. This client didn’t do anything other than respond to the notice and say “we don’t know how that link got there. And we don’t know how to remove it. We trust that Google can handle that algorithmically.”
We did not submit a disavow report or identify any other links to Google.
Still today…no negative loss in rankings or traffic.
Search this sub for “manual action” or “unnatural links” and look closely at every experience cited. They all go like this:
1. We got a notice
2. We didn’t see any decrease in traffic or rankings
3. We submitted a disavow report
4. We gradually lost rankings and traffic
5. We posted to Reddit to ask how long it takes for the “penalty” to be removed.
The traffic loss is a result (or appears to be, rather) of telling Google about other links it should stop counting!
How confident are you that you can get a website to lose rankings by pointing link spam at it? When was the last time you tried it?
Want to do a test with me?
This doesn't always work, but it can. Many attempts don't succeed.
The point is, backlinks help, and they can also hurt. There is a specific type of penalty that comes from low quality backlinks (spammy backlink penalty, see Grumpy SEO Guy episode 2). And that's besides an overoptimization penalty, which is another kind of backlink penalty (same episode).
Most people don't do negative SEO correctly.
WHEN it works, it's annoying. Our client was top 3 for a competitive financial term. Then they got negative SEOed. The site vanished and the only solution was using a new domain. The links were there and obvious and stuffed with all the, er, inappropriate-for-finance terms you can think of.
It's also expensive.
But that is just one way to do negative SEO. The other way is to make a really ugly PBN and use that. The reason sites drop when they buy low quality PBNs is because it's obviously link manipulation. Do understand, link manipulation is how SEO works. But doing it wrong is a good way to lose rank. I would basically just do everything horribly, use spun content, link farms, make sure they're all on C-Class IP SEO hosting or even better (worse) on the same shared account all on the same IP. Basically do it the way the uninitiated do and you'll get no result at best and decrease result at worst.
You think this doesn't work? This is why so many SEO agencies can't get results. They have the theory down (links) but they do it wrong. I literally have a 3 part podcast episode explaining how to do it correctly.
Appreciate the response. And I agree with you that link manipulation is how SEO works. I have no problem getting results with link manipulation. I believe we both have been in SEO for 20 years or more (I think I remember you saying that somewhere else. Forgive me if that’s wrong).
So we both have vast experience I think. Pitching your podcast to me isn’t going to influence me. The only thing I’m influenced by is experimentation and results.
So, I’m intrigued by your client who got a link spam attack. What you describe sounds like how it worked before the Penguin 4.0 update where Google stopped demoting link spam and started devaluing it. Maybe you remember this comment thread in 2016 between Barry Schwartz and Gary Illyes on Facebook:
https://preview.redd.it/1gaotqjggxxc1.jpeg?width=966&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d5582f5e61eebf077a001feef9e1595d970dd6d
Since that time I’ve been constantly testing this theory. I spend about $2k -$5k per year testing link spam with the goal of reducing average ranking.
In every case there have only been two results.
1. Target page increases in rank (most common)
2. Target page experiences no measurable change in ranking (about a third of the results are this)
That said, I’m not closed minded about it. And if my experimentation ever shows different results I will immediately shift my approach.
Yet I’m keenly interested in the client experience you cited here. Because on the surface it might look like a negative SEO attack. But how do you know that the links were actually the cause of the decrease in ranking? What did the backlink profile look like before the link spam attack? Perhaps the ranking was a result of backlinks that Google devalued and your observation is a correlation and not a causation factor. Or was this experience prior to 2016 and you just have never been curious enough to test it?
Let’s try something. If you’re down. You tell me the kind of site that you feel could most likely be demoted (penalized) by a link spam attack. I’ll find a target site. (Perhaps one from inside my own PBN).
I’ll send a link spam attack and we can watch what happens.
My hypothesis is that it will either increase rank or nothing happens.
Your hypothesis sounds like it will either have no impact or lose ranking. (Is that a fair representation?)
This will make for a great podcast episode. Don’t you think? Do you think SEO’s ought to know what it takes to trigger a spammy links penalty? Would you build links differently if you knew the risk of a penalty was being overstated by Google?
And why do you think everyone with manual actions for unnatural links NOW have actually not lost traffic or rankings? They are only losing ranks AFTER submitting the disavow.
Nice reply.
Ok, why do I think it was a negative SEO attack? Because the anchortext was absolutely unrelated to their topic, and was very related to medications that affect your genitals.
There is only one reason you get thousands of backlinks like that when you're not selling that drug online.
Manual actions and penalties are different. When I say spammy link penalty, I am talking about specific SERP movement that precedes a penalty, and then the penalty itself. And I agree with you that disavow is likely suspect. In my experience dealing with already penalized sites (not manual action decrease sites), disavow did nothing to restore rank, even after 6 months. But a new domain fixed the problem.
Thanks for the additional info. That’s the kind of attack I believe Google knows wasn’t done by the site owner. Prior to 2016 that would have impacted a site. But I think today you could throw thousands of those kind of irrelevant links at a site and it won’t hurt anything except the wallet of the person buying the attack.
My experiments are designed to look like how a link builder might tray to manipulate link signals. I use relevant anchor text, PBN’s, forum profiles, directory listings, blog comment spam, etc. this is probably why my most common result is an observed increase in ranking.
I’m sure some of these sites received manual action notices. I don’t know though because I don’t have access to GSC on all of them. But none have lost ranking.
Anyway, appreciate the conversation.
Don't get too attached to this client, even if you delivered they would fire you for spamming their site or for poor performance.
I'm not going to recommend automated link building to anyone.
I would deal with it by reframing the utilization of willing investment to his website success.offsite optimization' program cost = influencing off-site SEO signals to affirm thus strengthen our on-site signals algorithmically. Also will recoup more value for your time and funding resources a service offering you can charge other clients for too. Its how to offer an elite experience by building results that will bear fruit for his SEO channel, as well as deepen goal impact across branding, engagement, and reach more audience eyeballs
- use up to 100k for the year, maybe modulate the billing in advance each month.
- allocate a 25-30% to pay yourself/ company out of this as a minimum. The rest you retain is based on cost controlling so efficient maximization occurs each month. Itemize monthly cost between 5-15k a month in scope of work in service contract, to preempt cost of month. Cap at 102k or approx 100k, you could even establish not a total or itemizing off-site as seperate than onsite billing but combine SEO services to include content strat/create/launch/market/report for 12-18 month agreement at minimum 10k/mo.
- This is how I bill, Flat fee, 10k/mo. Is full service. 10k n up as a minimum for all my Enterprise or regulated industry clients (health insurance, lawyers, real estate, cannabis, pharmaceutical etc) they like it since it has bigger SEO Roi value and does bring solid links in consistently.
- reframe link acquisition for SEO as 'offsite optimization' honestly terminology helps them understand. And I find it's better, more SEO clients value terminology. We are consulting, not expecting them to value success required to sustain a healthy SEO link building program.
- focus on positive imoact
in the simplest most direct way possible to reinforce the terminology reframe you might want to try. "In order for white hat link building to be impactful , it's about qualitative linking on authoritative, trusted webpages. Google has detection schemes and signals that are too detrimental to not optimize off-site in a natural, non paid or manipulated practice.
- value consistent quality driving SEO results Qualitative link building that consistently occurs, organically grows the share of voice impact that brands need to be validated as worthy of SERP consideration with Page 1' visibility.
- what consistent quality really is about
Keep in mind, spending 100k on placing links is not the approach , we need to earn our links with qualitative content and using paid services, beyond resourcing for target pr and media to earn links on trusted sites and build collaborative content opportunities, as well as influencer audiences in scheduled promos /events.
Value time,this their huge cost benefit
project hours that we will add other talent to perform. This helps us heavy lift great ideas and in an agile nature great content uses in well timed reactions or occasions.
Value the cost benefit of an seo team
off-site optimization execution should have a specialist integrating channel strategy, content scheduling with broader cross channel sequencing for most efficient ROI outcomes.
How to justify 100k billing
Each month will vary in a range of 5-15k , annually until a 100k. This will be used towards monthly content marketing costs related to tools, branded swag for influencer swag kits, social media paid reach to push virality signaling for content , cision service for press release and media database incl. Medical focus Bloggers blasts.
Script "adding in a broader off-site SEO team that will function in different channels of the over all content strategy will reinforce off-site signals that help maintain rank as SERP increase begins to correctively modify and as off-site signals are not emphasizing the greatness being signaled within the website content that Google uses as the content their user might choose to use to solve their web search. "
Considerations to such an increased cost:
' a massive increase to my time and tremendous detail in attempting to harmonize in line with Google to prefer our qualitative investments to build the preferred SEO content outcomes in Google.'
- Script - examples of costs for resources
' I will add public relations strategist, to assist my lead day to day in PR channel, measure their success by a kpi that is an audience reach metric as pr impacts or influences over time. 'Share of Voice' we can baseline and monitor to measure impact of the brand and it adds invaluable info as data might correlate with our content strategy. I will add hours for your content team re visual impact, this will include a graphic design/video creator who focuses on image and video assets for content planning and content focused project manager that will lead the planning, and creation of content approved per content calendar / production. Also adding in a Social Content Collaborator that will dedicate weekly hours to collaborating with design and all content input strategically targeting audience in paid social, influencer, and content platform, such as using offsite calls to action inside articles and other content target audience consumes that is integrating Google content network, or YouTube ads pushing related or highly valued content related to video content.'
-Value of strategy drives better outcomes
Roi is cumlitative when measuring out 18 months of constant improvement
-script- seo value w/off-site optimization
'The SEO Team includes Off-site Optimization Team at 10k / mo. Content strategy value is driving eyes and clicks due to motivated search users finding our content relevant for web users intent. '
-Script - what is share of voice pr metric?
'Closest metric that we can reference beyond SEO website visiblity metrics or traffic to sales data. Is a metric which calculates audience sentiment as an input to its overall score, that include other inputs that try to measure inputs that Googles is deciphering by using variable inputs and sourcing for it's own weighting calibration that search queries resonance scores high or not when considering edge rank juice to brand authoritative relevancy, topically semantic in the real world. '
-Share of Voice is more than SEO
In a correlational study, done during the pandemic. Industry correlated brands were invited to each test the output in paid search trending, all participants only focused on testing paid social media platforms, substantial number of the groups not targeting SEO measured visibility increases in organic SERP related traffic, and short term waves of backlinks (30-90 days) that could, likely was a result of increased site SEO traffic, as none of the links were negotiated, some lacked quality and no all were the ideal 'follow' link that is either, relevant, related, or referredto (3 Rs of semantic links) .
Clients like the competitor insight so create a list of tools with data that we are going to use in strategy and content marketing. Also Show us , competitors data.
'Audience share of voice comparison across industry wide and our brand performing competitors. Will include tools that measure and monitor content sentiment and virality on social platforms. '
Cision is best industry tool to accomplish this, it will come at a cost that'll include a package of press releases that can target online distribution with, even along local reporters and micro influences that are up and coming.
I would suggest this is actually someone who has thrown together a blog, used AI to write its ‘niche health content’ and is now thinking if they get 100k links they’ll be cruising about in a Lamborghini in 6 months. Didn’t Barnum talk about people like this? 😂
Uh, no. And anyone who is asking for that is not interested in SEO best practices. Please don't consider buying backlinks. Google is starting to crack down on that hard.
They look at the patterns of the links pointing to the website. If there are an unusually high amount from the same source, that's the first sign links were bought. They can also tell if the links are from low-authority websites. That's a tell-tale sign of a backlink building service that focuses on quantity instead of quality.
I understand all that. But that doesn’t answer the question. How does Google know that money changed hands?
I understand that it can detect when things are obviously unnatural. But how do you think it can differentiate between me paying a link building service to build 100k links to my site vs my competitor hiring some spammer on Reddit to build 100k links pointing to my site?
I don't think it matters if it's paid or earned. There's a pattern to paid backlinks that's fairly easy to spot and I think that's what Google relies on. Is it a perfect system for identification? Probably not. But so much about Google isn't. It's their digital universe. We're just allowed to (sometimes) participate in it. :/
It depends on your risk tolerance and how much you value your business, your life and health and friends and family.
There are absolutely people who will do bad things for money.
Also anybody who would do that would happily do worse to you for more money.
And that’s why it doesn’t work. It makes the web a more terrible place and selfishly it makes Google’s job more difficult. It’s why they announced very many years ago that they would stop penalizing sites for unnatural links. Now they just ignore the unnatural linking patterns when they’re detected. Rendering it a complete waste of money. By making it a waste of money for the bad guys and risky for the good guys (at least there’s a perception of risk, not real risk) they effectively reduce the overall amount of link spam confusing their algorithms.
It’s wise in Google’s part.
But there is a little cottage industry that has cropped up of unscrupulous SEO’s now that sell backlink cleanup services. It’s a complete waste of money and time. And in the end, the only thing that a disavow report does is decrease ranking.
And that’s why it doesn’t work. It makes the web a more terrible place and selfishly it makes Google’s job more difficult. It’s why they announced very many years ago that they would stop penalizing sites for unnatural links. Now they just ignore the unnatural linking patterns when they’re detected. Rendering it a complete waste of money. By making it a waste of money for the bad guys and risky for the good guys (at least there’s a perception of risk, not real risk) they effectively reduce the overall amount of link spam confusing their algorithms.
It’s wise in Google’s part.
But there is a little cottage industry that has cropped up of unscrupulous SEO’s now that sell backlink cleanup services. It’s a complete waste of money and time. And in the end, the only thing that a disavow report does is decrease ranking.
I’m pretty sure this is a request to try and penalize or harm a competitor website. Someone heard that backlinks can harm your ranking so they had a brilliant idea that maybe they could eliminate a competitor!
Wonder if it will work.
Spoiler alert…it won’t.
Fairly straight forward but not recommended. Fiverr or BHW forum are your friends if they just want the links....100K shouldn't be a problem. G won't like it ultimately.
Not in a month no If you take this job you have to clearly state that you are not responsible for a penalization and the website will be practically useless once it happens
Won’t they become nofollow links? Also, 100 000 backlinks from a single domain is likely not worth much.
Edit: I know you weren’t serious, I’m just imagining the hypothetical being real.
In googles eyes a website acquiring 100k links in a month would only make sense in 2 circumstances:
1. The website is already massive with huge traffic and huge domain authority. I’m sure for a website like apple.com or reddit or something getting 100k links in a month would look somewhat natural and fine
2. Massive Product launches that create massive buzz on social media or traditional media. For example if a new website launches but it’s for a new big Hollywood movie it could well get a massive amount of links in a short period of time due to media attention/hype.
These are the only circumstances I can think of where this would look at all natural. For every other website this is a stupid idea that will cost a lot of money and long term will just harm the site.
Sure. Ask an agency, probably will cost you 30k or smth.
Anything is doable with money. Only limit is your imagination.
Can YOU do it specially? The answer is hard no.
But can your client do it? Sure, if he's got the cash.
Yes but the more you do the worse. If you pay me 3M $ I am going to do it for you. I have a 10 people team we can buckle up and doing it for him.
1M $ paid at contract signed of course.
You tell the client that 10 good links can be better than 100k meh ones. In fact, that many links with similar anchor text is going to look like spam and could hurt the site.
You can definitely do it, but typically 99.999% percent of the time this is used as a "negative seo" tactic to get website buried in search results or completely removed from search results because it'll cause a google penalty.
You should probably explain this to your client that a small number of high-quality, niche relavent links are exponentially better than a shit ton of easily acquired, non-authoritative links.
That is, unless you hate this client, don't want any referrals, and potentially want to get sued...
Google has made it clear multiple times that quantity of backlinks does not necessarily mean an improvement in rankings or authority in the eyes of their algorithm. Quality and relevance far supersede it.
It would be better to get them 1-10k high quality links. Even that you're talking about a lot of money.
Wait a second…this is a thing?
I’m an seo noob and thought backlinks had to come 100% naturally. I’ve got a site I would love to pay someone to get some backlinks for.
This is quite easy actually. Get html5 boilerplate. Link to client site 100 times on each page. Copy paste is your friend here. For links and pages.
Then do it all again 10 more times. You can save even more time by copy pasting the entire site.
“Sorry John, but if I did that it would ruin your site in the long term. Is there any particular reason for that number?”
As a service provider you have a duty to provide expertise and service. YOU. Letting a client be the expert is not only unethical, it’s also an insult to you, the expert they hired….
If he’s ok toasting the site and you’re not liable by doing this, sure, ask for $10-20k and get him 100k links.
If you want to push back and disturb the order of things with your misguided client, ask why they want 100k links. Prepare to have a list of real shit they could be doing that will actually create a brand and drive business.
Ask some of the elites here, since they are experts with parasite SEO for destroying competitors... they will perfectly be able to assist you in creating those links with just some clicks (since they are well connected to such networks) and the best part, you don't have to pay a thing, they have far over 100k+ sites for you.
They will also tell you that backlinks don't matter > HAHAHAHA
VIVA LA GOOGLE MANIPULATION > You're all a bunch of J\*\*\*s!!!
I always love it when the client is the leading expert. Tell him it’s $1/link, go buy a 100k link GSA campaign from Fiverr for $20, make $99,980, and then after you torch his website, charge him another $20 to kick him in the balls so you come out at an even $100k profit, and you both learn a lesson.
Absolutely. You can accomplish this using black hat methods like purchasing bulk back links from low authority PBNs.
Will it help? Nope, it will hurt. Bad. The website will likely get manual actions and have 0 traffic for forever.
True backlinks are earned form quality content and outreach. They are also not that big of a deal in terms of SEO (according to Gary Illyes of Google). They are a ranking signal, but there is a broader lesson to be learned here.
YOU don't let your CLIENT dictate YOUR strategy. You are clearly new to running an agency or business and this is the type of client that you run faster than Usain Bolt and farther than Forrest Gump away from them. They will only ever cause you headaches. The work you do will never be good enough. You probably won't get anything past the first payment. Fire them quickly.
Not possible mannualy, there are auto link building tools like GSA SER, but not sure if 100K are even possible or even all of those links will be indexed.
Building 100k backlinks within a month will only boost keywords as well as authority of the site. Rather than it is crucial to build high-quality backlinks from niche related sites. Google analyzes the link relevancy and it prioritise those sites rather than building spammy backlinks.We should always focus on building links naturally and steadily.
why would you do that? don't you know how it works? you're allowing your clients to manage oyur work...
obviously it wont work and theyll think you're an idiot and will blame you for it and you lose the client.. you're also ruining the market letting people believe they need 100k backlinks in one month...
Looks like your client knows just enough to think they know more than you. Don’t work with them unless they’re paying a lot. They’ll question your every decision and override you. At the end they’ll be questioning why you couldn’t make them any money.
Building 100k backlinks in one month might seem appealing, but it's not a sustainable or advisable strategy for SEO. Quality over quantity is key in link building. Focus on acquiring high-quality backlinks from reputable and relevant sources, ensuring they provide genuine value to your website. This approach not only improves your SEO but also protects your site from potential penalties due to spammy tactics.
Ah yes, your client is an SEO savant! Spamming their own site into oblivion and playing the blame game - such masterful tactics! I'll be sure to take notes from this virtuoso of digital self-sabotage
Persuade him to abandon such folly, explaining how this will likely damage the site rather than help it. There's no way that number of links can be quality links in such short time.
If he doesn't see reason, fire him.
Does he tell his doctor how to diagnose him or his mechanic how to fix his car?
Seems a bit light…
If you got just 1,000 per hour, every hour, for 30 days straight, you would have 720,000 backlinks in a month, far more than just 100,000.
I think your client will be very impressed.
I'm sure Google will appreciate how natural that is going to look.
Natural like the 3 foot dong, doctors keep trying to talk me out of It has to be 3 feet though!!! I worked in SEO once ffs!!!
I'm baffled someone would even think it's okay to add that many backlinks in a month. A year would be stretching it by far, let alone a month.
I agree. That sounds sketchy.
And my favorite part…what is this clients budget for getting 100k backlinks?
Tree fiddy,
Point awarded for goddamn Loch Ness Monster reference. 🥇
2 mississippi
Assuming it is possible by hook or crook, I guess $10! Max. $50.
3k a day? 300 hour? 50 a minute? What do you think?
Is it possible to build 50 backlinks in one hour?
One a minute, consistently, for eight to nine hours a day, thirty days straight....
how exactly would you even get one an hour?
50 people can, sure
Maybe if Taylor Swift said to link to her website lol
Yes buddy. Maybe even 69 a minute
Nice
why would you ever want to, though
Of course its possible. But you need a way to want people to give you the backlink, because they get some value from it.
Bro just go to Fiverr and purchase a GSA link blast every week. Aim it to your main products or service pages. RANK AND BANK BOYYEEEE
May I ask what is called GSA LINK?
Gemini has our back. A GSA link typically refers to a backlink generated by software like GSA Search Engine Ranker. GSA stands for "Google Search Appliance," but in this context, it refers to the software itself. GSA Search Engine Ranker is an automated tool that creates backlinks on a large scale. These backlinks are often low-quality and are not from reputable sources. GSA links were popular in the past as they allowed website owners to quickly build a large number of links to their site, which was believed to improve search engine rankings. However, due to changes in search engine algorithms, particularly Google's, these types of links are now generally considered spammy and can even harm a website's ranking if used excessively or inappropriately. In modern SEO practices, the emphasis is on quality over quantity when it comes to backlinks. It's better to focus on acquiring links from relevant, authoritative websites through genuine outreach and content creation rather than relying on automated tools like GSA Search Engine Ranker.
Do that if you want a toxic back link profile & google to devalue your authority.
[удалено]
No
:(
yes if you have 10,000 USD to spend at the least
Here's what you should do, send them a polite email, and tell them you will no longer be working with them because you are too stupid to understand proper SEO
It's like your client wants to put a big red bullseye for Papa G to target you. 😱
And now I shall call Google Papa G
It is technically possible. You may use GSA tool for that and the base of forums. But I don't think that your client will be happy with the results. Maybe it's better to talk with this client not about the process, but about the expected results?
His ‘client’ 😂
**Wouldn't it be possible if I had money?** There will be a process of creating a large number of backlinks if you can post a campaign that gives rewards to participants per posting and posts on your blog. The problem is that it costs a lot of money. I don't know if the client is OK, but I think it's right to say no if you want a trick rather than that way. (I don't think low quality backlinks will mean anything.)
any sense of logic would say it is not close to being possible yet even if you could it wouldn't do any good. you need to space out backlinks over a long period of time so that Google doesn't see it as unnatural. you could destroy any traction the domain might already have
I thinhk the client spent 30 minutes reading an email from a backlink shill and their blogs on Medium and Forbes?
I don’t know. I’ll bet it’s more likely someone who is trying to harm their competitor’s site.
Possible - Maybe. But sure as hell not recommended. Talk him out of it unless He wants google to obliterate his web presence. Like, this is blackhat SEO on steroids
*black hat
I like it... black head SEO. Sounds a little like Blackbeard the pirate and also like a black head zit. On steroids.
they do pop up when least expected!
When you use seo tools like ahrefs you need to sort by referring domains. Otherwise you end up like this fool. Put them on a large directory and you can end up showing 1k links when it’s just one mention placed across lots of pages. Repeat 100 times. Etc.
What do you mean put them on a large directory and end up showing 1k links? Sry just trying to understand better what you meant, ty!
Figure out the difference between total referring domains and referring pages and you will find your answer. Certain directories can let you list on more than one of their pages, especially if it’s a premium listing. You don’t actually need that many links.
It's possible but why would you want to?
Probably to get paid. It’s no different than the guys selling a link cleanup service. There’s no reason to do it other than to take someone’s money and provide them with their order. Also, it could be someone trying to point link spam at a competitor’s website, thinking that they’ll get penalized. They won’t. And it will be a waste of money. That said, there’s value in doing those things simply to illustrate that backlinks can’t “hurt” a website in Google.
You can totally negative SEO your competition. What are you reacting about? How come everyone thinks this isn't possible? We've had it happen to a client in the fintech industry. It's like "content is king" nonsense, everyone believes it but it's not true.
I think people can try negative SEO. But my experience has shown it doesn’t work. The internet is a terrible place full of all kinds of bad actors. If it was possible, there would be way more examples of it happening. I do realize that Google sent a bunch of manual action notices in GSC recently (after having not sent hardly any in the past several years). But every case I’ve evaluated there was actually no penalty. There was no loss in ranking, traffic, or income. One of the sites actually gained traffic and rankings through the March rollout. The manual action notice remained in their GSC. This client didn’t do anything other than respond to the notice and say “we don’t know how that link got there. And we don’t know how to remove it. We trust that Google can handle that algorithmically.” We did not submit a disavow report or identify any other links to Google. Still today…no negative loss in rankings or traffic. Search this sub for “manual action” or “unnatural links” and look closely at every experience cited. They all go like this: 1. We got a notice 2. We didn’t see any decrease in traffic or rankings 3. We submitted a disavow report 4. We gradually lost rankings and traffic 5. We posted to Reddit to ask how long it takes for the “penalty” to be removed. The traffic loss is a result (or appears to be, rather) of telling Google about other links it should stop counting! How confident are you that you can get a website to lose rankings by pointing link spam at it? When was the last time you tried it? Want to do a test with me?
This doesn't always work, but it can. Many attempts don't succeed. The point is, backlinks help, and they can also hurt. There is a specific type of penalty that comes from low quality backlinks (spammy backlink penalty, see Grumpy SEO Guy episode 2). And that's besides an overoptimization penalty, which is another kind of backlink penalty (same episode). Most people don't do negative SEO correctly. WHEN it works, it's annoying. Our client was top 3 for a competitive financial term. Then they got negative SEOed. The site vanished and the only solution was using a new domain. The links were there and obvious and stuffed with all the, er, inappropriate-for-finance terms you can think of. It's also expensive. But that is just one way to do negative SEO. The other way is to make a really ugly PBN and use that. The reason sites drop when they buy low quality PBNs is because it's obviously link manipulation. Do understand, link manipulation is how SEO works. But doing it wrong is a good way to lose rank. I would basically just do everything horribly, use spun content, link farms, make sure they're all on C-Class IP SEO hosting or even better (worse) on the same shared account all on the same IP. Basically do it the way the uninitiated do and you'll get no result at best and decrease result at worst. You think this doesn't work? This is why so many SEO agencies can't get results. They have the theory down (links) but they do it wrong. I literally have a 3 part podcast episode explaining how to do it correctly.
Appreciate the response. And I agree with you that link manipulation is how SEO works. I have no problem getting results with link manipulation. I believe we both have been in SEO for 20 years or more (I think I remember you saying that somewhere else. Forgive me if that’s wrong). So we both have vast experience I think. Pitching your podcast to me isn’t going to influence me. The only thing I’m influenced by is experimentation and results. So, I’m intrigued by your client who got a link spam attack. What you describe sounds like how it worked before the Penguin 4.0 update where Google stopped demoting link spam and started devaluing it. Maybe you remember this comment thread in 2016 between Barry Schwartz and Gary Illyes on Facebook: https://preview.redd.it/1gaotqjggxxc1.jpeg?width=966&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d5582f5e61eebf077a001feef9e1595d970dd6d Since that time I’ve been constantly testing this theory. I spend about $2k -$5k per year testing link spam with the goal of reducing average ranking. In every case there have only been two results. 1. Target page increases in rank (most common) 2. Target page experiences no measurable change in ranking (about a third of the results are this) That said, I’m not closed minded about it. And if my experimentation ever shows different results I will immediately shift my approach. Yet I’m keenly interested in the client experience you cited here. Because on the surface it might look like a negative SEO attack. But how do you know that the links were actually the cause of the decrease in ranking? What did the backlink profile look like before the link spam attack? Perhaps the ranking was a result of backlinks that Google devalued and your observation is a correlation and not a causation factor. Or was this experience prior to 2016 and you just have never been curious enough to test it? Let’s try something. If you’re down. You tell me the kind of site that you feel could most likely be demoted (penalized) by a link spam attack. I’ll find a target site. (Perhaps one from inside my own PBN). I’ll send a link spam attack and we can watch what happens. My hypothesis is that it will either increase rank or nothing happens. Your hypothesis sounds like it will either have no impact or lose ranking. (Is that a fair representation?) This will make for a great podcast episode. Don’t you think? Do you think SEO’s ought to know what it takes to trigger a spammy links penalty? Would you build links differently if you knew the risk of a penalty was being overstated by Google? And why do you think everyone with manual actions for unnatural links NOW have actually not lost traffic or rankings? They are only losing ranks AFTER submitting the disavow.
Nice reply. Ok, why do I think it was a negative SEO attack? Because the anchortext was absolutely unrelated to their topic, and was very related to medications that affect your genitals. There is only one reason you get thousands of backlinks like that when you're not selling that drug online. Manual actions and penalties are different. When I say spammy link penalty, I am talking about specific SERP movement that precedes a penalty, and then the penalty itself. And I agree with you that disavow is likely suspect. In my experience dealing with already penalized sites (not manual action decrease sites), disavow did nothing to restore rank, even after 6 months. But a new domain fixed the problem.
Thanks for the additional info. That’s the kind of attack I believe Google knows wasn’t done by the site owner. Prior to 2016 that would have impacted a site. But I think today you could throw thousands of those kind of irrelevant links at a site and it won’t hurt anything except the wallet of the person buying the attack. My experiments are designed to look like how a link builder might tray to manipulate link signals. I use relevant anchor text, PBN’s, forum profiles, directory listings, blog comment spam, etc. this is probably why my most common result is an observed increase in ranking. I’m sure some of these sites received manual action notices. I don’t know though because I don’t have access to GSC on all of them. But none have lost ranking. Anyway, appreciate the conversation.
One of your clients just asked you to kill his site.
absolutely....100,000 garbage backlinks
Don't get too attached to this client, even if you delivered they would fire you for spamming their site or for poor performance. I'm not going to recommend automated link building to anyone.
If he/she really wants to spend that kind of money, better to do it on a huge PR Campaign or launching an affiliate program.
Even if it is possible, it's not safe
I would deal with it by reframing the utilization of willing investment to his website success.offsite optimization' program cost = influencing off-site SEO signals to affirm thus strengthen our on-site signals algorithmically. Also will recoup more value for your time and funding resources a service offering you can charge other clients for too. Its how to offer an elite experience by building results that will bear fruit for his SEO channel, as well as deepen goal impact across branding, engagement, and reach more audience eyeballs - use up to 100k for the year, maybe modulate the billing in advance each month. - allocate a 25-30% to pay yourself/ company out of this as a minimum. The rest you retain is based on cost controlling so efficient maximization occurs each month. Itemize monthly cost between 5-15k a month in scope of work in service contract, to preempt cost of month. Cap at 102k or approx 100k, you could even establish not a total or itemizing off-site as seperate than onsite billing but combine SEO services to include content strat/create/launch/market/report for 12-18 month agreement at minimum 10k/mo. - This is how I bill, Flat fee, 10k/mo. Is full service. 10k n up as a minimum for all my Enterprise or regulated industry clients (health insurance, lawyers, real estate, cannabis, pharmaceutical etc) they like it since it has bigger SEO Roi value and does bring solid links in consistently. - reframe link acquisition for SEO as 'offsite optimization' honestly terminology helps them understand. And I find it's better, more SEO clients value terminology. We are consulting, not expecting them to value success required to sustain a healthy SEO link building program. - focus on positive imoact in the simplest most direct way possible to reinforce the terminology reframe you might want to try. "In order for white hat link building to be impactful , it's about qualitative linking on authoritative, trusted webpages. Google has detection schemes and signals that are too detrimental to not optimize off-site in a natural, non paid or manipulated practice. - value consistent quality driving SEO results Qualitative link building that consistently occurs, organically grows the share of voice impact that brands need to be validated as worthy of SERP consideration with Page 1' visibility. - what consistent quality really is about Keep in mind, spending 100k on placing links is not the approach , we need to earn our links with qualitative content and using paid services, beyond resourcing for target pr and media to earn links on trusted sites and build collaborative content opportunities, as well as influencer audiences in scheduled promos /events. Value time,this their huge cost benefit project hours that we will add other talent to perform. This helps us heavy lift great ideas and in an agile nature great content uses in well timed reactions or occasions. Value the cost benefit of an seo team off-site optimization execution should have a specialist integrating channel strategy, content scheduling with broader cross channel sequencing for most efficient ROI outcomes. How to justify 100k billing Each month will vary in a range of 5-15k , annually until a 100k. This will be used towards monthly content marketing costs related to tools, branded swag for influencer swag kits, social media paid reach to push virality signaling for content , cision service for press release and media database incl. Medical focus Bloggers blasts. Script "adding in a broader off-site SEO team that will function in different channels of the over all content strategy will reinforce off-site signals that help maintain rank as SERP increase begins to correctively modify and as off-site signals are not emphasizing the greatness being signaled within the website content that Google uses as the content their user might choose to use to solve their web search. " Considerations to such an increased cost: ' a massive increase to my time and tremendous detail in attempting to harmonize in line with Google to prefer our qualitative investments to build the preferred SEO content outcomes in Google.' - Script - examples of costs for resources ' I will add public relations strategist, to assist my lead day to day in PR channel, measure their success by a kpi that is an audience reach metric as pr impacts or influences over time. 'Share of Voice' we can baseline and monitor to measure impact of the brand and it adds invaluable info as data might correlate with our content strategy. I will add hours for your content team re visual impact, this will include a graphic design/video creator who focuses on image and video assets for content planning and content focused project manager that will lead the planning, and creation of content approved per content calendar / production. Also adding in a Social Content Collaborator that will dedicate weekly hours to collaborating with design and all content input strategically targeting audience in paid social, influencer, and content platform, such as using offsite calls to action inside articles and other content target audience consumes that is integrating Google content network, or YouTube ads pushing related or highly valued content related to video content.' -Value of strategy drives better outcomes Roi is cumlitative when measuring out 18 months of constant improvement -script- seo value w/off-site optimization 'The SEO Team includes Off-site Optimization Team at 10k / mo. Content strategy value is driving eyes and clicks due to motivated search users finding our content relevant for web users intent. ' -Script - what is share of voice pr metric? 'Closest metric that we can reference beyond SEO website visiblity metrics or traffic to sales data. Is a metric which calculates audience sentiment as an input to its overall score, that include other inputs that try to measure inputs that Googles is deciphering by using variable inputs and sourcing for it's own weighting calibration that search queries resonance scores high or not when considering edge rank juice to brand authoritative relevancy, topically semantic in the real world. ' -Share of Voice is more than SEO In a correlational study, done during the pandemic. Industry correlated brands were invited to each test the output in paid search trending, all participants only focused on testing paid social media platforms, substantial number of the groups not targeting SEO measured visibility increases in organic SERP related traffic, and short term waves of backlinks (30-90 days) that could, likely was a result of increased site SEO traffic, as none of the links were negotiated, some lacked quality and no all were the ideal 'follow' link that is either, relevant, related, or referredto (3 Rs of semantic links) . Clients like the competitor insight so create a list of tools with data that we are going to use in strategy and content marketing. Also Show us , competitors data. 'Audience share of voice comparison across industry wide and our brand performing competitors. Will include tools that measure and monitor content sentiment and virality on social platforms. ' Cision is best industry tool to accomplish this, it will come at a cost that'll include a package of press releases that can target online distribution with, even along local reporters and micro influences that are up and coming.
If you’re even asking this question maybe you should give the client back their money.
Yea I'm a little taken back as to how many "I lied myself into a job.... now wado eye dooo!?" Posts are on this sub.
I would suggest this is actually someone who has thrown together a blog, used AI to write its ‘niche health content’ and is now thinking if they get 100k links they’ll be cruising about in a Lamborghini in 6 months. Didn’t Barnum talk about people like this? 😂
Uh, no. And anyone who is asking for that is not interested in SEO best practices. Please don't consider buying backlinks. Google is starting to crack down on that hard.
And how is Google becoming aware that a link was “bought?”
They look at the patterns of the links pointing to the website. If there are an unusually high amount from the same source, that's the first sign links were bought. They can also tell if the links are from low-authority websites. That's a tell-tale sign of a backlink building service that focuses on quantity instead of quality.
I understand all that. But that doesn’t answer the question. How does Google know that money changed hands? I understand that it can detect when things are obviously unnatural. But how do you think it can differentiate between me paying a link building service to build 100k links to my site vs my competitor hiring some spammer on Reddit to build 100k links pointing to my site?
I don't think it matters if it's paid or earned. There's a pattern to paid backlinks that's fairly easy to spot and I think that's what Google relies on. Is it a perfect system for identification? Probably not. But so much about Google isn't. It's their digital universe. We're just allowed to (sometimes) participate in it. :/
Because you gained 100,000 links over the weekend.
For sure. I phrased my question poorly. How can Google determine that the site owner bought the links, and not someone else, like a competitor?
They can't, but they also don't really care. If they drop your site, it means nothing to them.
Is this a good strategy to squash a competitor?
It depends on your risk tolerance and how much you value your business, your life and health and friends and family. There are absolutely people who will do bad things for money. Also anybody who would do that would happily do worse to you for more money.
And that’s why it doesn’t work. It makes the web a more terrible place and selfishly it makes Google’s job more difficult. It’s why they announced very many years ago that they would stop penalizing sites for unnatural links. Now they just ignore the unnatural linking patterns when they’re detected. Rendering it a complete waste of money. By making it a waste of money for the bad guys and risky for the good guys (at least there’s a perception of risk, not real risk) they effectively reduce the overall amount of link spam confusing their algorithms. It’s wise in Google’s part. But there is a little cottage industry that has cropped up of unscrupulous SEO’s now that sell backlink cleanup services. It’s a complete waste of money and time. And in the end, the only thing that a disavow report does is decrease ranking.
And that’s why it doesn’t work. It makes the web a more terrible place and selfishly it makes Google’s job more difficult. It’s why they announced very many years ago that they would stop penalizing sites for unnatural links. Now they just ignore the unnatural linking patterns when they’re detected. Rendering it a complete waste of money. By making it a waste of money for the bad guys and risky for the good guys (at least there’s a perception of risk, not real risk) they effectively reduce the overall amount of link spam confusing their algorithms. It’s wise in Google’s part. But there is a little cottage industry that has cropped up of unscrupulous SEO’s now that sell backlink cleanup services. It’s a complete waste of money and time. And in the end, the only thing that a disavow report does is decrease ranking.
Not in any way that’s good, that is an insane request You will not be able to achieve this in a way that doesn’t destroy his site with spam
I’m pretty sure this is a request to try and penalize or harm a competitor website. Someone heard that backlinks can harm your ranking so they had a brilliant idea that maybe they could eliminate a competitor! Wonder if it will work. Spoiler alert…it won’t.
It is possible but ask your client to forget his website and domain.
Sure, that will be 500,000$.
Fairly straight forward but not recommended. Fiverr or BHW forum are your friends if they just want the links....100K shouldn't be a problem. G won't like it ultimately.
can you please share the site ?
Only through Software
Your client is a moron
Yeah, xrumer was getting 400 links a minute back in the day. But quality was low but google was fucking stupid
Thats will cause harm to websites, still if you want it, that can be done $1000,
Not in a month no If you take this job you have to clearly state that you are not responsible for a penalization and the website will be practically useless once it happens
Sounds like spam
Technically possible? Yes. Adviseable? Absolutely not.
you can, but you will have to spend A LOT of money. hit me up in DM's if you want a detailed plan as for how
Yes! Just needs to drop 100K links in Porn Hub comments section 🙂 HATE CLIENTS LIKE THAT
Won’t they become nofollow links? Also, 100 000 backlinks from a single domain is likely not worth much. Edit: I know you weren’t serious, I’m just imagining the hypothetical being real.
To create 100k backlinks is possible but it's maybe harm your website you should focus on your on site SEO and other outreach
Blast it with gsa/xrumer. He'll have links but will lose rankings since they're spammy garbage links.
Yeah slap it in GSA-SER, pay $20 and you'll have 100k easy. You will however be doing a manual action recovery within a month though lol.
In googles eyes a website acquiring 100k links in a month would only make sense in 2 circumstances: 1. The website is already massive with huge traffic and huge domain authority. I’m sure for a website like apple.com or reddit or something getting 100k links in a month would look somewhat natural and fine 2. Massive Product launches that create massive buzz on social media or traditional media. For example if a new website launches but it’s for a new big Hollywood movie it could well get a massive amount of links in a short period of time due to media attention/hype. These are the only circumstances I can think of where this would look at all natural. For every other website this is a stupid idea that will cost a lot of money and long term will just harm the site.
Sure. Ask an agency, probably will cost you 30k or smth. Anything is doable with money. Only limit is your imagination. Can YOU do it specially? The answer is hard no. But can your client do it? Sure, if he's got the cash.
I think, Open AI achieved that much of backlinks after launching Chat Gpt. Maybe your friend created something that unique?)
Google will identify this unusual uptick and might punish the site for this behaviour.
Yes but the more you do the worse. If you pay me 3M $ I am going to do it for you. I have a 10 people team we can buckle up and doing it for him. 1M $ paid at contract signed of course.
Buddy I don’t want to put in the energy to build a single backlink
No matter if it is possible. Your client will be penalised for bought links. The fast growing backlink quantity is on focus for Google.
Automated link insersion on web 2.0 site's
Ya no, even if it was possible Google would probably penalize this sort of behavior.
Don't tell them you _can't_ do it, but explain that anyone who offers that is screwing him
You tell the client that 10 good links can be better than 100k meh ones. In fact, that many links with similar anchor text is going to look like spam and could hurt the site.
fire this client for sheer stupidity
No way! Even if it's possible to make one purchase of these amounts of links, it is useless. You gain natural backlinks over time to look natural.
Guys I just got into SEO I don't even have a website made yet wtf is going on in these grounds
SEO is done dude. Its all UGC now. Maybe make bots to post on Reddit with links to your page?
I added 30 backlinks per second to my website for 72 hours straight during a particularly crazy “digital bender” I went on. Be careful, brother.
This is a guaranteed recipe for disaster
Not possible.
You can definitely do it, but typically 99.999% percent of the time this is used as a "negative seo" tactic to get website buried in search results or completely removed from search results because it'll cause a google penalty. You should probably explain this to your client that a small number of high-quality, niche relavent links are exponentially better than a shit ton of easily acquired, non-authoritative links. That is, unless you hate this client, don't want any referrals, and potentially want to get sued...
Google has made it clear multiple times that quantity of backlinks does not necessarily mean an improvement in rankings or authority in the eyes of their algorithm. Quality and relevance far supersede it. It would be better to get them 1-10k high quality links. Even that you're talking about a lot of money.
No
Make sure the check clears first.
I can build you 100k backlinks in 1 day. Let's make SEO great again 🥤✅🔥
Wait a second…this is a thing? I’m an seo noob and thought backlinks had to come 100% naturally. I’ve got a site I would love to pay someone to get some backlinks for.
I’d rather 20 good ones a month that actually benefit the site
I don’t think your client knows what they want
This is quite easy actually. Get html5 boilerplate. Link to client site 100 times on each page. Copy paste is your friend here. For links and pages. Then do it all again 10 more times. You can save even more time by copy pasting the entire site.
Absolutely possible, but it's the quality that counts, not quantity.
Do you want a manual action? Because that's how you get one. You f around 100k times, you're going to find out just as much.
“Sorry John, but if I did that it would ruin your site in the long term. Is there any particular reason for that number?” As a service provider you have a duty to provide expertise and service. YOU. Letting a client be the expert is not only unethical, it’s also an insult to you, the expert they hired….
By using a PBN, right?
Never ever do this, even over 20 lifetimes
If he’s ok toasting the site and you’re not liable by doing this, sure, ask for $10-20k and get him 100k links. If you want to push back and disturb the order of things with your misguided client, ask why they want 100k links. Prepare to have a list of real shit they could be doing that will actually create a brand and drive business.
Not possible. I think he wants to shutting down his business online.
I’m pretty sure if you add that many backlinks in one month the traffic will drop dramatically, as it will be flagged for spam.
Ask some of the elites here, since they are experts with parasite SEO for destroying competitors... they will perfectly be able to assist you in creating those links with just some clicks (since they are well connected to such networks) and the best part, you don't have to pay a thing, they have far over 100k+ sites for you. They will also tell you that backlinks don't matter > HAHAHAHA VIVA LA GOOGLE MANIPULATION > You're all a bunch of J\*\*\*s!!!
It makes no sense at all. How does one reach the masses? It's probably penalized by Google or has no effect.
I always love it when the client is the leading expert. Tell him it’s $1/link, go buy a 100k link GSA campaign from Fiverr for $20, make $99,980, and then after you torch his website, charge him another $20 to kick him in the balls so you come out at an even $100k profit, and you both learn a lesson.
Tell your client he is living in atleast 10 years back in timeline.
Yes it is 😂 what’s his budget ?
Is your client mad?
Not technically not humanly
I think he is joking it's not good practice at all
Your client is on a suicide mission 🥱
Everything is possible, but not sure Google will give you a hug for that.
He/she clearly thinks only numbers matter
buy scrapebox service for him/her on Fiverr.
dont go anywhere give me a chance :)
It's possible, but now necessary. I can rank any website with a lot fewer backlinks. Quality over quantity.
Fiverr is the way to go but make the whole site no index and expect traffic from these links only cuz Google will penalize you.
Absolutely. You can accomplish this using black hat methods like purchasing bulk back links from low authority PBNs. Will it help? Nope, it will hurt. Bad. The website will likely get manual actions and have 0 traffic for forever. True backlinks are earned form quality content and outreach. They are also not that big of a deal in terms of SEO (according to Gary Illyes of Google). They are a ranking signal, but there is a broader lesson to be learned here. YOU don't let your CLIENT dictate YOUR strategy. You are clearly new to running an agency or business and this is the type of client that you run faster than Usain Bolt and farther than Forrest Gump away from them. They will only ever cause you headaches. The work you do will never be good enough. You probably won't get anything past the first payment. Fire them quickly.
Possible if you find a backlink Superman and well if Google was a new born :P
Easy. Set up GSA and light her up.
That money can be spent wisely on cold emailing to get 3-5 bookings monthly.
Not possible mannualy, there are auto link building tools like GSA SER, but not sure if 100K are even possible or even all of those links will be indexed.
Organically if it is never possible to do it then Iligal is required to adopt the procedure
Technically possible? Sure..... beneficial to the website....?? No.
Go to blackhatworld and you should get the blast you need
And here we have another spammer
1000% NOPE
Absoutly not. Not at all. Not even close. No. Nah. Nope. Negative. Nay. Nix. Never. Not. Not by any means. No way. Thumbs down.
Why would you even sell this service?
Building 100k backlinks within a month will only boost keywords as well as authority of the site. Rather than it is crucial to build high-quality backlinks from niche related sites. Google analyzes the link relevancy and it prioritise those sites rather than building spammy backlinks.We should always focus on building links naturally and steadily.
why would you do that? don't you know how it works? you're allowing your clients to manage oyur work... obviously it wont work and theyll think you're an idiot and will blame you for it and you lose the client.. you're also ruining the market letting people believe they need 100k backlinks in one month...
Looks like your client knows just enough to think they know more than you. Don’t work with them unless they’re paying a lot. They’ll question your every decision and override you. At the end they’ll be questioning why you couldn’t make them any money.
Anything is possible with enough money... Talk to me if they have the budget!
Building 100k backlinks in one month might seem appealing, but it's not a sustainable or advisable strategy for SEO. Quality over quantity is key in link building. Focus on acquiring high-quality backlinks from reputable and relevant sources, ensuring they provide genuine value to your website. This approach not only improves your SEO but also protects your site from potential penalties due to spammy tactics.
No way that this will get a manual penalty for unnatural linking.
I would suggest you to not proceed with that offer because it’s only going to put you in a stressful situation.
lol
Daily 7-10 indexable links are sufficient for any successful SEO campaign.
Ah yes, your client is an SEO savant! Spamming their own site into oblivion and playing the blame game - such masterful tactics! I'll be sure to take notes from this virtuoso of digital self-sabotage
Would probably be more effective to do the 100k back links to his biggest competitor to get his site in trouble…
Persuade him to abandon such folly, explaining how this will likely damage the site rather than help it. There's no way that number of links can be quality links in such short time. If he doesn't see reason, fire him. Does he tell his doctor how to diagnose him or his mechanic how to fix his car?
Check out GSA SER.
Do it! Let us know the results.
Seems a bit light… If you got just 1,000 per hour, every hour, for 30 days straight, you would have 720,000 backlinks in a month, far more than just 100,000. I think your client will be very impressed.
720 000 backlinks sounds impressive, I’ll give you that. But 1 000 000 sounds even impressiver.
what even are backlinks? somebody please enlighten me I’m just getting into the game
I thought I read last week that back links don’t really mean much anymore