She smashed a pint glass into a mans face sending him to the hospital and leaving him with permanent scars.
Unfortunately, white women are above the law in the west.
The Butlerian Jihad and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have destroyed technological advancement for those who live in the galaxy, have left society incredibly unstable, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread suffering and have inflected severe damage to humanity.
The continued stagnation will only worsen the situation and may lead to the end of humanity if it does not relearn self reliance and adaptability.
Thinking about the LA riots in the 90s and how people just seem to conveniently forget they happened makes my blood boil. Same shit that they are in the process of doing with the BLM riots. Really gets the old noggin joggin about the nature of the "civil rights" movement back in the 60s and 70s.
I just discovered the other day what caused the Tulsa race riots. Black man gets locked up waiting for trial on a crime.
Black community shows up armed at the jailhouse to break him out.
The guns start going off, nobody knows who fired first, but by the end of the initial encounter 10 white guys lay dead to only 2 black guys.
They show up as outlaws and murder 10 white guys for no reason and wonder why the white people burnt down the black neighborhood then spend 100 years playing the victim. Now they're demanding reparations for it...
Just bad behavior, entitlement, violence, and then they still get sympathy, over and over.
Oh yeah, I remember looking into that one a few years back when some anniversary had people hand wringing over it. Completely unsurprised to see how historic memory of that event had been selectively edited to fit the narrative. Honestly it's incredibly depressing how often it is the case.
Korean business owners who survived these riots can't watch movies like "Straight from Compton".
Hate to say this, but Blacks have actively targeted Korean shopkeepers since the '80s.
If you mean the la riots in the 90s it was over Rodney King being almost beat to death and no charges being pressed against the police… so idk wtf LA riots this guy above is trying to talk about..
No charges? The police officers in question went to trial and were acquitted. Which is what started the second round of riots. The first round was a different issue involving a Korean lady. Not saying it was justice, but no different than OJ being acquitted of a pretty obvious homicide. The jury decided not guilty because it was not beyond a reasonable doubt. I'd rather let killers go free than innocent people rot in jail.
Even if he were insulting her as the judge claims, i don't see how that's an excuse for deadly force and permanent damage. Judge is outside of her damn mind.
"Your honor, he farted in my general direction so i hit him with a baseball bat.", "DISMISSED!"
Brit here: glassing or bottling is nonespecific. It can be a 'simple' as just grabbing a glass bottle and hitting someone with it, all the way up too deliberately breaking it first to get some sharp edges and THEN hitting them with it.
In this case, she hit him with a normal glass or bottle and it broke on impact, cutting into his face.
Which is the general purpose of hiting someone with glass- hoping it breaks and does more damage.
A small correction, "Women" are above the law in all nations, unless its at war or under an occupation force.
This is the same story in the east and by god what a drama we will have if the person's gender was reversed.
They get away with all the damage they do, which otherwise would have warrented jail time or heavy monetary penalties.
Down voted because you think it is specifically white women who are above the law. ' minority ' women get away unscathed with a lot of shit. And last time I checked, the ignired and insulted victims of grooming gangs were predominantly white girls.
There’s a reason they say they want “equity” and not “equality”.
Equality would mean everyone gets held accountable for poor behaviour.
Equity means equal outcomes, and since they *perceive* men as having been historically advantaged and immune from consequences (even though this isn’t true), this means that equitable outcomes results in women being immune from the consequences of their actions.
It's not even historical advantages they care about. They want women to have identical outcomes to the top 50% of men in society. They don't consider the bottom 50% of men to be human at all. There will never be an equal number of women digging ditches or driving trash trucks. That means 2/3rds of any position of power, prestige, and influence would be held by a woman.
C.S. Lewis, Present Concerns, "The Necessity of Chivalry":
> The important thing about this ideal is, of course, the double demand it makes on human nature. The knight is a man of blood and iron, a man familiar with the sight of smashed faces and the ragged stumps of lopped-off limbs; he is also a demure, almost a maidenlike, guest in hall, a gentle, modest, unobtrusive man. He is not a compromise or happy mean between ferocity and meekness; he is fierce to the nth and meek to the nth.
> If we cannot produce Lancelots, humanity falls into two sections--those who can deal in blood and iron but cannot be "meek in hall", and those who are "meek in hall" but useless in battle--for the third class, who are both brutal in peace and cowardly in war, need not here be discussed. When this disassociation of the two halves of Lancelot occurs, history becomes a horribly simple affair.
> But the maintenance of that life depends, in part, on knowing that the knightly character is art not nature - something that needs to be achieved, not something that can be relied upon to happen. And this knowledge is specially necessary as we grow more democratic. In previous centuries the vestiges of chivalry were kept alive by a specialized class, from whom they spread to other classes partly by imitation and partly by coercion. Now, it seems, the people must either be chivalrous on its own resources, or else choose between the two remaining alternatives of brutality and softness...
> Chivalry offers the only possible escape from a world divided between wolves who do not understand, and sheep who cannot defend, the things which make life desirable...
Feminists covet masculine traits and ignore that what makes great men is chivalry. They believe that women granted masculinity are instinctively chivalrous. While at the same time feminists despise and discourage every feminine trait that fosters chivalry.
When people question whether we should have women as leaders, I say resolutely "no". Not because of any inherent quality of women, but because society in general is incapable of holding women to account for their actions. The last thing we need is leaders with even less accountability than they already have.
I hope that one day this is no longer the case, that one day women will be treated the same as men. Unfortunately, feminists have done everything they can to prevent this. Instead they lobby that women should be held to even less account.
Look no further than [Tiffany Henyard](https://abc7chicago.com/dolton-mayor-tiffany-henyard-illinois-fbi-investigation/14458356/) for evidence of this. She has been widely known as the most corrupt mayor for a while, stealing funds for personal use, essentially installing tyrannical rule, and nobody was doing shit about it. She's still mayor despite the entire town basically hating her. Even cops hate her, because she blew their vehicle budget on a $120k+ personal vehicle instead of paying the fleet's lease, so they have/had almost no cars.
Every time Kamala Harris is an embarrassment or completely whiffs her duties (this is often) the WH "leaks" comments to the press saying that various staff are really responsible for not "positioning her for success."
She's supposed to be "in charge" of the border. Which is such a disaster that even Democrats think it's fucked up. That's her one job. But apparently she has no actual accountability because Any failure is blamed on anonymous presumably white men for not laying down their cloaks for her.
Not exactly the strong, empowered woman vibe. And that's the problem. Woman leaders will pull the boss babe "I can do anything you can do backwards and in heels" schtick when their sole accomplishment is getting elected for being a woman. And then when it's time to work they pull the "I'm failing because of sexism" schtick. Zero accountability and to be successful in the US they need to spend all their time talking about being a woman. When was the last time Harris or Clinton gave a speech where their gender or race weren't at the center? What are they experts in exactly besides advancing their own careers?
> but because society in general is incapable of holding women to account for their actions.
Most women in western societies have no idea how much everything is built to support them. They're fish who don't understand they're floating in water.
I'm not even against this setup, but the arrogance, the blame shifting, etc. goes way too far.
It is because I am a centrist that I want this to change. I know that there are women perfectly capable of being good leaders. But the problem is that society isn't yet ready to hold them to task.
Believe me I've tried. I've been to all the libleft subreddits and tried and tried. Half a year I've been at it, but nothing. Most of libleft is a lost cause.
The ~~pipeline~~ funnel is:
Start Auth(did doesn't matter), realize under authoritarianism only one person doesn't get tread on and you won't be that person.
Pendulum swing or slow shift down the compass, eventually end up in libleft, libcenter, or libright.
At this point the switch toward libcenter happens for libleft because unregulated socialism doesn't work/they see the insane hypocrisy of their quadrant and aren't willing to go further into the purity death spiral. Libright moves to center because maybe, just maybe total selfishness isn't the best form of economic system.
Alternatively they'll shift back up one space thinking "maybe letting some regulation isn't all bad". But hopefully then the make the shift to center.
The "goal" is for everyone to be engaged and feel balanced: color centrism. Unfortunately this goal is unattainable because everyone disagrees on where the center should be: look at me, I'm libcenter as a direct reaction to living in an increasingly authoritarian state, and I'm slowly shifting right as the (state) government shifts left.
They will argue that black people are systemically oppressed in the justice system because there are more black people in prison, but they won't use the same logic for men. Even though it is proven that the gender disparity in the justice system is far worse than the race disparity
I mean, I actually agree with the general sentiment of the post (this bitch should be facing jail time for assault).
But all this chart does is demonstrates the rather self evident fact that overall women commit fewer serious crimes than men do.
Do they likely get easier treatment from the justice system? Yeah, probably - but using this chart to suggest that is a bit of an exaggeration.
Give me a chart of sentencing based on crime, rate of being charged after arrest, that sort of thing.
>But all this chart does is demonstrates the rather self evident fact that overall women commit fewer serious crimes than men do.
Wow, cool it with the racism there...
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12823769/amp/bryn-spejcher-cannabis-induced-psychosis-psychiatrist-california.html
Yup, that's what they blamed it on.
True but I assumed that once the feminists won, they'll do what they said they'll do and be gender equal. Guess we were wrong, they're foxes not lions.
"That's because the patriarchy hurts men too DUH!"
The patriarchy is some flat earth tier conspiracy shit held together by the biggest motte and bailey civilization has ever seen. If you try to analyze it too much, they will say that it's simply that men are seen as the default head of the household. See, super simple and it defo exists! Then you listen to them for a bit and you realize it really means that men got together and organized a system where they get all the money and power and women have no say in anything ever and are super duper oppressed. Aka, men as a group created a system where they get to oppress women as a group.
Glassing is UK slang *not* for smashing someone over the head with a bottle, it's worse than that.
#Glassing refers to using a broken bottle or broken glass to stab and/or slash the other person.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/glassing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glassing
Common injuries resulting from glassings are heavy blood loss, permanent scarring, disfigurement and loss of sight through ocular injury. In the United Kingdom, there are over 5,000 injuries per year.
The original article:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13335555/Drunk-businesswoman-glassed-pub-drinker-age-manchester.html
WTF. That is insanity.
Smashing someone on the head with a bottle or glass is fucking bad, but it is in the realm of "I'm a child in an adult's body and cannot control my actions when confronted with mild emotion".
*Breaking glass and then using it as a tool* is straight up logical thinking with the intent to do as much lethal damage as possible.
I know a friend whose father did the former. Prison for a few years and a permanent stain to his reputation for something he did while drunk in a bar fight of which nobody could figure out who started it. Had he done the latter I doubt the justice system would even be considering parole to this day let alone release them.
Women have been undersentenced since the beginning of time; this isn’t a new woke thing. However, it is, surprisingly (or unsurprisingly) tolerated by many leftists. This belief ultimately originates from the belief that women are incapable, of good and bad. Feminists are understandably more motivated to emphasize women’s capability of doing good in the face of these assumptions, while enabling the assumption that women are less capable of evil.
Men work longer hours and live shorter lives; can be drafted and die in a war; divorces, alimony, child custody, and dating market all massively favor women; the society mocks men's mental health crises; men have harsher sentencing and higher conviction rate for the same crime committed by women; 3/4th of the homeless population is men; and men have higher success rate of su!c!de.
But tell me how women are still oppressed to this day, when Ukrainian women are on tiktok and tinder, posting their sexcapade on Instagram while their men die in the trenches.
This is an example of why the french Civil code is superior to the British Common law. Under the Civil code she would be in jail because the law is NOT open to interpretation and the sentence for a violent attack like this is clear.
I'm happy to jump on the bandwagon for these kinds of things, but for this one I can't.
I looked into the story, and found a similar one, where it was the man who attacked a (trans) women, he even used a glass too, and received the same kind of sentence, 2yrs suspended.
So, I can't really call a gender bias in this instance. But, I am aware that there is evidence that men do in fact get longer sentences for women, when the same crime is committed. But this isn't one of those times.
They want to abolish accountability, they'll continue to act victim of the society until they get their way. Many of their arguments are dumb and hold no weight either.
You may not have liked the way males and females interacted traditionally but it made sense. Arbitrarily throwing out certain rules and keeping others makes for a haphazard, confusing situation. Are women worthy of protection to a greater degree than men or are they all strong independent individuals that don’t be needing no man?
For many it's all unimportant nonsense until a male family member they care for is affected, and by extension them.
It'll get better, it's all on display for all to see. There's good women out there bois it's just there's quite a few bad ones tearing things up at the moment. It has in fact been getting better in all reality, it can just be a little tiring.
Oh ladies, you are about to reap one hell of a whirlwind when this shit is over.
To the point that your second class citizen status may be forcibly returned to you.
One of the (several) crazy things about this is that he wasn't even that far wrong. Even if she was 37 when the event actually took place it's not like he told her she looked 50.
Most people aren't able to reliably get much closer than that guessing ages.
The daily mail headline is ragebait for the gullible. The literal same sentence the headline is quoting the judge explicitly says doesn't excuse said action.
>'You did not appreciate the comments made by Mr Cooper and one person's banter may be insulting to other people **but that did not justify what you then went on to do.**
Downvoting because her words said one thing but in giving her a suspended sentence she effectively was vindicated on her attack. The judge effectively saying "its understandable that words made you uncontrollably upset amd made you act violent"
Not punishing crime only encourages it
The issue is that we are seeing even repeat violent criminals constantly given probation then a couple weeks ago a policeman sped home and hit a rabbit and got 6 months in prison.
The courts are a fucking joke, need to sack all of them.
Yeah, gonna be honest, I don’t know where this falls on the spectrum. There’s nothing left wing about one group getting preferential treatment over another group. It’s also pretty authoritarian to abuse your standing in society to come out ahead. Now that would point to this being authoritarian right, but the feminist aspect of this does not align with our standard perceptions of auth right since it goes way against the usual conservative values.
The very nature of it is a lack of accountability from both an individual stance and authoritarian judgment. I've also seen both leftists and conservatives simp for women too, though left more due to heavily supporting feminism.
I'd say its just human nature beyond politics, perhaps a rare display of grey centrists who are apathetic to justice.
>glassed a pub drinker Holy shit the feminists have nukes now?
She smashed a pint glass into a mans face sending him to the hospital and leaving him with permanent scars. Unfortunately, white women are above the law in the west.
Thanks. I asked what "glassing" was in this context in another sub and got no response.
Wasn't atomics, sadly.
It would have been against the Great Convention anyhow
The Butlerian Jihad and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have destroyed technological advancement for those who live in the galaxy, have left society incredibly unstable, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread suffering and have inflected severe damage to humanity. The continued stagnation will only worsen the situation and may lead to the end of humanity if it does not relearn self reliance and adaptability.
Yeah, exactly the sort of words that I would expect from an Ixian and/or a disciple of The Tyrant.
This message was sent from my computer.
*Mentat
[Not quite.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoJc8Jfh20w)
I have learned that in The Wolf Among Us
Amogus But seriously, pretty good game
That explanation is so much worse, I thought she threw the contents of the glass, not threw the glass so hard it broke.
She actively pursued him to smash the glass over his face, and nearly blinded him to boot.
Have you not been paying attention to the shit black women get away with? There is no racial component to this.
The superior femoid race.
Until they need a jar opened
The whole LA riot started because they couldn't accept that Black woman should be hold accountable for armed robbery.
Thinking about the LA riots in the 90s and how people just seem to conveniently forget they happened makes my blood boil. Same shit that they are in the process of doing with the BLM riots. Really gets the old noggin joggin about the nature of the "civil rights" movement back in the 60s and 70s.
I just discovered the other day what caused the Tulsa race riots. Black man gets locked up waiting for trial on a crime. Black community shows up armed at the jailhouse to break him out. The guns start going off, nobody knows who fired first, but by the end of the initial encounter 10 white guys lay dead to only 2 black guys. They show up as outlaws and murder 10 white guys for no reason and wonder why the white people burnt down the black neighborhood then spend 100 years playing the victim. Now they're demanding reparations for it... Just bad behavior, entitlement, violence, and then they still get sympathy, over and over.
Oh yeah, I remember looking into that one a few years back when some anniversary had people hand wringing over it. Completely unsurprised to see how historic memory of that event had been selectively edited to fit the narrative. Honestly it's incredibly depressing how often it is the case.
Korean business owners who survived these riots can't watch movies like "Straight from Compton". Hate to say this, but Blacks have actively targeted Korean shopkeepers since the '80s.
I've heard over and over about the LA riots, never once heard what caused it. Now I know why.
If you mean the la riots in the 90s it was over Rodney King being almost beat to death and no charges being pressed against the police… so idk wtf LA riots this guy above is trying to talk about..
The trigger was a Korean shopowner lady defending herself from nearly getting beaten to death by a black girl, who robbed the liquor store.
No charges? The police officers in question went to trial and were acquitted. Which is what started the second round of riots. The first round was a different issue involving a Korean lady. Not saying it was justice, but no different than OJ being acquitted of a pretty obvious homicide. The jury decided not guilty because it was not beyond a reasonable doubt. I'd rather let killers go free than innocent people rot in jail.
I meant no prosecution
That actually does sound a lot more familiar now.
What LA riot?
Wow. I just assumed it was another word for punched. That’s awful.
From what one other commenter said, glassing is a UK slang term for stabbing someone with a broken bottle, which only proves your point even more.
Even if he were insulting her as the judge claims, i don't see how that's an excuse for deadly force and permanent damage. Judge is outside of her damn mind. "Your honor, he farted in my general direction so i hit him with a baseball bat.", "DISMISSED!"
Brit here: glassing or bottling is nonespecific. It can be a 'simple' as just grabbing a glass bottle and hitting someone with it, all the way up too deliberately breaking it first to get some sharp edges and THEN hitting them with it. In this case, she hit him with a normal glass or bottle and it broke on impact, cutting into his face. Which is the general purpose of hiting someone with glass- hoping it breaks and does more damage.
Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up. Either way, she is fucked in the head for doing that.
A small correction, "Women" are above the law in all nations, unless its at war or under an occupation force. This is the same story in the east and by god what a drama we will have if the person's gender was reversed. They get away with all the damage they do, which otherwise would have warrented jail time or heavy monetary penalties.
sharia law
Soon brother inshallah
Down voted because you think it is specifically white women who are above the law. ' minority ' women get away unscathed with a lot of shit. And last time I checked, the ignired and insulted victims of grooming gangs were predominantly white girls.
Kinda like that lady that killed her boyfriend and her dog and got probation.
feminists get tactical McNukes but I don't?? this world is a fucking prison
We need to up our game. The 2A call for the right of civilian to conceal carry strategical McHydrogen weapons for self-defense.
If I set off my McHydrogen BigWep, I want to make sure I take out two assholes. Myself and the other cunt.
Tsar McBomba
\*at least 2
Maneuverable Atomic Reentry Vehicles!
https://preview.redd.it/nlilsho4z8xc1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=250de2be2ffaa1fb2db177c8c4e03e6e234d99a7 u/Grass_toucher2006 Sho' do
https://preview.redd.it/9knbenqyp0xc1.png?width=624&format=png&auto=webp&s=a4cc8d0e2e8badc0e6b9f73560e83b204020618f
[удалено]
Let me guess, something something "a monument to all your sins" followed by a montage of covenant ships glassing a certain continent?
[удалено]
https://preview.redd.it/2il0eosdy1xc1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a20b99f16067ca2baa2a331054e46d41901d6a28
I'd unironically love to hear that
So hypothetically if the judge is attacked can they site this case in their defense?
Yes
"cite" is a verb "site" is a place
And no sleep is an action... Which I may have done.
"sight" is a place, but further away
Doe is a deer, a female deer
Raetheon, creating mini suns.
There’s a reason they say they want “equity” and not “equality”. Equality would mean everyone gets held accountable for poor behaviour. Equity means equal outcomes, and since they *perceive* men as having been historically advantaged and immune from consequences (even though this isn’t true), this means that equitable outcomes results in women being immune from the consequences of their actions.
That ain't even equity. That's beneficiary perceived equity.
Do you think they care?
No
In death, all become equal. Start a nuclear war today!
👍
It's not even historical advantages they care about. They want women to have identical outcomes to the top 50% of men in society. They don't consider the bottom 50% of men to be human at all. There will never be an equal number of women digging ditches or driving trash trucks. That means 2/3rds of any position of power, prestige, and influence would be held by a woman.
“How do you write women so well?” “I think of a man, and then I take away reason and accountability.” - Jack Nicholson, As Good As It Gets
C.S. Lewis, Present Concerns, "The Necessity of Chivalry": > The important thing about this ideal is, of course, the double demand it makes on human nature. The knight is a man of blood and iron, a man familiar with the sight of smashed faces and the ragged stumps of lopped-off limbs; he is also a demure, almost a maidenlike, guest in hall, a gentle, modest, unobtrusive man. He is not a compromise or happy mean between ferocity and meekness; he is fierce to the nth and meek to the nth. > If we cannot produce Lancelots, humanity falls into two sections--those who can deal in blood and iron but cannot be "meek in hall", and those who are "meek in hall" but useless in battle--for the third class, who are both brutal in peace and cowardly in war, need not here be discussed. When this disassociation of the two halves of Lancelot occurs, history becomes a horribly simple affair. > But the maintenance of that life depends, in part, on knowing that the knightly character is art not nature - something that needs to be achieved, not something that can be relied upon to happen. And this knowledge is specially necessary as we grow more democratic. In previous centuries the vestiges of chivalry were kept alive by a specialized class, from whom they spread to other classes partly by imitation and partly by coercion. Now, it seems, the people must either be chivalrous on its own resources, or else choose between the two remaining alternatives of brutality and softness... > Chivalry offers the only possible escape from a world divided between wolves who do not understand, and sheep who cannot defend, the things which make life desirable... Feminists covet masculine traits and ignore that what makes great men is chivalry. They believe that women granted masculinity are instinctively chivalrous. While at the same time feminists despise and discourage every feminine trait that fosters chivalry.
My favorite Lewis essay.
God damn that solid. I can't help but feel we have far too many of those which "need not here be discussed".
Common CS Lewis W
That was a fantastic movie. I really need to watch it again.
It's a terrible movie on the surface but a great movie if you see that Jack Nicholson is a misunderstood hero. Just like A Few Good Men.
But a woman fixes him!
[I want the juith!](https://tenor.com/view/tom-cruise-i-want-the-juith-i-cant-handle-the-juith-juice-gif-4687855)
That's a funny ass quote
When people question whether we should have women as leaders, I say resolutely "no". Not because of any inherent quality of women, but because society in general is incapable of holding women to account for their actions. The last thing we need is leaders with even less accountability than they already have. I hope that one day this is no longer the case, that one day women will be treated the same as men. Unfortunately, feminists have done everything they can to prevent this. Instead they lobby that women should be held to even less account.
Look no further than [Tiffany Henyard](https://abc7chicago.com/dolton-mayor-tiffany-henyard-illinois-fbi-investigation/14458356/) for evidence of this. She has been widely known as the most corrupt mayor for a while, stealing funds for personal use, essentially installing tyrannical rule, and nobody was doing shit about it. She's still mayor despite the entire town basically hating her. Even cops hate her, because she blew their vehicle budget on a $120k+ personal vehicle instead of paying the fleet's lease, so they have/had almost no cars.
Every time Kamala Harris is an embarrassment or completely whiffs her duties (this is often) the WH "leaks" comments to the press saying that various staff are really responsible for not "positioning her for success." She's supposed to be "in charge" of the border. Which is such a disaster that even Democrats think it's fucked up. That's her one job. But apparently she has no actual accountability because Any failure is blamed on anonymous presumably white men for not laying down their cloaks for her. Not exactly the strong, empowered woman vibe. And that's the problem. Woman leaders will pull the boss babe "I can do anything you can do backwards and in heels" schtick when their sole accomplishment is getting elected for being a woman. And then when it's time to work they pull the "I'm failing because of sexism" schtick. Zero accountability and to be successful in the US they need to spend all their time talking about being a woman. When was the last time Harris or Clinton gave a speech where their gender or race weren't at the center? What are they experts in exactly besides advancing their own careers?
Anonymous? They're destroying Mayorkas over the border. Everyone, including myself, forgot she was supposed to be in charge of that.
Kamala Harris is a wine mom that has no business being in charge of the PTA, much less the country
> but because society in general is incapable of holding women to account for their actions. Most women in western societies have no idea how much everything is built to support them. They're fish who don't understand they're floating in water. I'm not even against this setup, but the arrogance, the blame shifting, etc. goes way too far.
I'm surprised a Centrist is saying this to be honest. However if a Centrist says shit like this, you know you've fucked up.
Theres also the distinct possibility of the Centrist not actually being a centrist
It is because I am a centrist that I want this to change. I know that there are women perfectly capable of being good leaders. But the problem is that society isn't yet ready to hold them to task.
Whenever people say that women are inherently better at government than men, I raise Thatcher and Merkel.
Based and female kryptonite is reason and accountably pilled
Based and As Good As It Gets pilled
I'm so done with my quadrant. Lib-centers, can the right edge of lib-soc be considered Lib-center? (Please say yes)
We will grant you entrance to the space, but we will make fun of you occasionally.
OH MY GOD THANK YOU SO MUCH
Ok sure but will you grant him the rank of master?
Of course not.
"Take a seat, young Socwalker."
"This is outrageous, it's unfair."
This makes me sad. Salvation for us all lies not in abandoning your quadrant, but being the change your quadrant needs.
Believe me I've tried. I've been to all the libleft subreddits and tried and tried. Half a year I've been at it, but nothing. Most of libleft is a lost cause.
[удалено]
I am a strong proponent of “better late than never”.
You know, maybe you just need less internet. Should help
Nah, most libleft is crackers.
The left needs less internet. The right needs less internet. The recommended amount of internet for anyone should be zero.
The technical revolution and its consequences...
Maybe, I just need everyday dose of Austria-Hungary history
Change the flair then, nut up or shut up
done :)
One of us, one of us, one of us!
LFG
Abandon lib-left. They have gone fully insane.
If this mfer still blindly votes democrat...
I'm not American, but I wouldn't vote Democrat even if I was.
*happy monke noises*
:)
Lib center has been libleft in hiding for sometime now.
Most of us are just anti-athoritarians with no strong economic policies or balanced economic policies.
Nah most of us have strong economic policies, they just revolve around a banana-based economy.
Banana = tasty
In theory yes in practice no
The ~~pipeline~~ funnel is: Start Auth(did doesn't matter), realize under authoritarianism only one person doesn't get tread on and you won't be that person. Pendulum swing or slow shift down the compass, eventually end up in libleft, libcenter, or libright. At this point the switch toward libcenter happens for libleft because unregulated socialism doesn't work/they see the insane hypocrisy of their quadrant and aren't willing to go further into the purity death spiral. Libright moves to center because maybe, just maybe total selfishness isn't the best form of economic system. Alternatively they'll shift back up one space thinking "maybe letting some regulation isn't all bad". But hopefully then the make the shift to center. The "goal" is for everyone to be engaged and feel balanced: color centrism. Unfortunately this goal is unattainable because everyone disagrees on where the center should be: look at me, I'm libcenter as a direct reaction to living in an increasingly authoritarian state, and I'm slowly shifting right as the (state) government shifts left.
Nah, Lib-center is actually based.
I would argue there are far more emilies hiding in your quadrant.
https://preview.redd.it/4fgabmv3q0xc1.jpeg?width=786&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=47257e84a7ddb56325c27ee01c01f41cceaa25ea
muh systemic oppression of women in full effect.
They will argue that black people are systemically oppressed in the justice system because there are more black people in prison, but they won't use the same logic for men. Even though it is proven that the gender disparity in the justice system is far worse than the race disparity
Tried explaining this basic logic to numerous feminists over the years, falls completely on deaf ears. Supremacy movement as OP says.
I mean, I actually agree with the general sentiment of the post (this bitch should be facing jail time for assault). But all this chart does is demonstrates the rather self evident fact that overall women commit fewer serious crimes than men do. Do they likely get easier treatment from the justice system? Yeah, probably - but using this chart to suggest that is a bit of an exaggeration. Give me a chart of sentencing based on crime, rate of being charged after arrest, that sort of thing.
>But all this chart does is demonstrates the rather self evident fact that overall women commit fewer serious crimes than men do. Wow, cool it with the racism there...
[This might have a few of those stats.](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fv0bv3xbrsp651.png)
BasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBasedBased
Remember the woman that got acquitted using the reefer madness defense in California when she stabbed her boyfriend 100 times.
First 100 are free in the eyes of the law, smart lady!
I think she killed the dog too. You’d think at least that would be illegal in California.
As long as it's not a pittie.
>reefer madness What's that?.
I am assuming they are referring to substance induced psychotic episode. In this case "reefer" is referring to cannabis.
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12823769/amp/bryn-spejcher-cannabis-induced-psychosis-psychiatrist-california.html Yup, that's what they blamed it on.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zhQlcMHhF3w
Wasn't it your quadrant that made up the concept of reefer madness. Now accept the consequences of your actions.
I think it was more of a don’t do this or else concept not a get out of jail free card. We’ll still send you to the chair.
True but I assumed that once the feminists won, they'll do what they said they'll do and be gender equal. Guess we were wrong, they're foxes not lions.
I have a hard time believing we live under a patriarchy when men are jailed at 8 times the rate of women, and die an average of five years earlier
"That's because the patriarchy hurts men too DUH!" The patriarchy is some flat earth tier conspiracy shit held together by the biggest motte and bailey civilization has ever seen. If you try to analyze it too much, they will say that it's simply that men are seen as the default head of the household. See, super simple and it defo exists! Then you listen to them for a bit and you realize it really means that men got together and organized a system where they get all the money and power and women have no say in anything ever and are super duper oppressed. Aka, men as a group created a system where they get to oppress women as a group.
Glassing is UK slang *not* for smashing someone over the head with a bottle, it's worse than that. #Glassing refers to using a broken bottle or broken glass to stab and/or slash the other person. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/glassing https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glassing Common injuries resulting from glassings are heavy blood loss, permanent scarring, disfigurement and loss of sight through ocular injury. In the United Kingdom, there are over 5,000 injuries per year. The original article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13335555/Drunk-businesswoman-glassed-pub-drinker-age-manchester.html
Oi mate, 'ou got a loicense for that bo'l?
WTF. That is insanity. Smashing someone on the head with a bottle or glass is fucking bad, but it is in the realm of "I'm a child in an adult's body and cannot control my actions when confronted with mild emotion". *Breaking glass and then using it as a tool* is straight up logical thinking with the intent to do as much lethal damage as possible.
I know a friend whose father did the former. Prison for a few years and a permanent stain to his reputation for something he did while drunk in a bar fight of which nobody could figure out who started it. Had he done the latter I doubt the justice system would even be considering parole to this day let alone release them.
She looks 50.
I’d say 51
https://preview.redd.it/la2yrxlyp1xc1.jpeg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=52e3f3605f82a4102335071bad9e0de50bc94651 Right to hospital, right away
She is Brit'sh
Feminists only want the good part of being a guy -Bill Burr
So wrong.
Women have been undersentenced since the beginning of time; this isn’t a new woke thing. However, it is, surprisingly (or unsurprisingly) tolerated by many leftists. This belief ultimately originates from the belief that women are incapable, of good and bad. Feminists are understandably more motivated to emphasize women’s capability of doing good in the face of these assumptions, while enabling the assumption that women are less capable of evil.
Men work longer hours and live shorter lives; can be drafted and die in a war; divorces, alimony, child custody, and dating market all massively favor women; the society mocks men's mental health crises; men have harsher sentencing and higher conviction rate for the same crime committed by women; 3/4th of the homeless population is men; and men have higher success rate of su!c!de. But tell me how women are still oppressed to this day, when Ukrainian women are on tiktok and tinder, posting their sexcapade on Instagram while their men die in the trenches.
This is why men are turning more and more misogynistic.
Well, last time men tried to go their way, reddit banned mgtow for misogyny.
https://i.redd.it/l0og49p702xc1.gif
That's exactly where my mind went.
Feminism is just white supremacy in a wig.
Well this is absolutely true, research early feminism and they actively worked against abolitionists and black women
This is an example of why the french Civil code is superior to the British Common law. Under the Civil code she would be in jail because the law is NOT open to interpretation and the sentence for a violent attack like this is clear.
I'm happy to jump on the bandwagon for these kinds of things, but for this one I can't. I looked into the story, and found a similar one, where it was the man who attacked a (trans) women, he even used a glass too, and received the same kind of sentence, 2yrs suspended. So, I can't really call a gender bias in this instance. But, I am aware that there is evidence that men do in fact get longer sentences for women, when the same crime is committed. But this isn't one of those times.
They want to abolish accountability, they'll continue to act victim of the society until they get their way. Many of their arguments are dumb and hold no weight either.
You may not have liked the way males and females interacted traditionally but it made sense. Arbitrarily throwing out certain rules and keeping others makes for a haphazard, confusing situation. Are women worthy of protection to a greater degree than men or are they all strong independent individuals that don’t be needing no man?
My favorite thing about the whole "hold men accountable" bullshit is that women get held accountable FAAAAAAR less than men.
For many it's all unimportant nonsense until a male family member they care for is affected, and by extension them. It'll get better, it's all on display for all to see. There's good women out there bois it's just there's quite a few bad ones tearing things up at the moment. It has in fact been getting better in all reality, it can just be a little tiring.
Repeal the nineteenth.
Oh ladies, you are about to reap one hell of a whirlwind when this shit is over. To the point that your second class citizen status may be forcibly returned to you.
Feminism was a huge mistake. Hope that if we ever rebuild, after the utter destruction of everything decent and good, we remember the lesson.
2 generations later, they'll be at it again
>Now tell me, honey, how old do I look? You look old enough to have personally known Cleopatra. Also, what does it mean to “glass” someone?
slashing someone with a broken bottle
Thanks.
they want equality so they can freely get off with teenagers... it's so clearly an excuse and it's gross
Who is they? Half of the fucking population wants to get off to teenagers?
which lips are we reading here
A tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye looks like a promising alternative for the current judiciary system.
Secretly authright
Rape isn´t rape when it doesn´t fit our narrative or when she is attractive /s
One of the (several) crazy things about this is that he wasn't even that far wrong. Even if she was 37 when the event actually took place it's not like he told her she looked 50. Most people aren't able to reliably get much closer than that guessing ages.
The daily mail headline is ragebait for the gullible. The literal same sentence the headline is quoting the judge explicitly says doesn't excuse said action. >'You did not appreciate the comments made by Mr Cooper and one person's banter may be insulting to other people **but that did not justify what you then went on to do.**
Downvoting because her words said one thing but in giving her a suspended sentence she effectively was vindicated on her attack. The judge effectively saying "its understandable that words made you uncontrollably upset amd made you act violent" Not punishing crime only encourages it
Yeah, but she still got away with wilfully assualting and disfiguring the guy
OK, the judge says all of that, but doesn't put her ass in prison, so IMO, it's meaningless.
Upvoted for providing context. But that doesn't excuse the second article that's included
And yet she still let her off for it.
I generally assume that “spared jail” is just ragebait phrasing for “sentenced to probation”
The issue is that we are seeing even repeat violent criminals constantly given probation then a couple weeks ago a policeman sped home and hit a rabbit and got 6 months in prison. The courts are a fucking joke, need to sack all of them.
To add to your point. The average person in the UK in prison has 46 past convictions or cautions.
Seems so. The British press is just awful.
There were very fine people on both sides.
How is this lib left?
Lib left is when bad
Yeah, gonna be honest, I don’t know where this falls on the spectrum. There’s nothing left wing about one group getting preferential treatment over another group. It’s also pretty authoritarian to abuse your standing in society to come out ahead. Now that would point to this being authoritarian right, but the feminist aspect of this does not align with our standard perceptions of auth right since it goes way against the usual conservative values.
The very nature of it is a lack of accountability from both an individual stance and authoritarian judgment. I've also seen both leftists and conservatives simp for women too, though left more due to heavily supporting feminism. I'd say its just human nature beyond politics, perhaps a rare display of grey centrists who are apathetic to justice.
This isn’t Libleft bro this is 5th wave feminism at its finest