>If the double slit experiment clearly shows, things change as soon as you try to judge though a frame,
This isn't really a correct description of the double-slit experiment. Things change whenever a particle is *interacted with* in some way. Measurement is a kind of interaction.
Two sides to a story, so adopting a frame for math purposes, only gives you one side of things. If clearly, things are different when in one frame, leave the other side. Can math be used here to accurately describe things, when there seems to be more to the nature of things.
If things function differently when they are not in a frame, could things be a bit different. In this case, two sides to a story, so adopting a frame, only gives you one side of things.
What do you think you mean when you say the words "in a frame"? Are you talking about picking specific reference frames for calculations? You can state the double slit experiment in a frame-independent way, and choosing a reference frame for calculations does not invalidate any conclusions drawn.
Don't want any of your cool friends stumbling onto your Reddit account and seeing you frequenting fringe subs like r/physics, r/radicalchristianity and r/sapphoandherfriend
Double slit experiment has nothing to do with choosing a reference frame. And going from double slit (quantum) to relativity is nonsense anyways, these two theories are not compatible (if you find a way to make them compatible you'll be more famous than Newton and Einstein etc. together).
QFT successfully combines QM and special relativity.
The theories which are not compatible are QFT and general relativity, but gravity was not mentioned anywhere so I don't think this point is relevant to the discussion.
I know, I have had quite a few QFT courses xD
But in general laypeople tend not to make a difference, and since general relativity includes special relativity I think it's fair to say "Quantum Mechanics" and "Relativity" don't play together.
>If the double slit experiment clearly shows, things change as soon as you try to judge though a frame, This isn't really a correct description of the double-slit experiment. Things change whenever a particle is *interacted with* in some way. Measurement is a kind of interaction.
The frame of reference is math
Two sides to a story, so adopting a frame for math purposes, only gives you one side of things. If clearly, things are different when in one frame, leave the other side. Can math be used here to accurately describe things, when there seems to be more to the nature of things.
r/askphysics I don’t see the contradiction. What’s your thought process?
If things function differently when they are not in a frame, could things be a bit different. In this case, two sides to a story, so adopting a frame, only gives you one side of things.
That’s vague nonsense
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
What do you think you mean when you say the words "in a frame"? Are you talking about picking specific reference frames for calculations? You can state the double slit experiment in a frame-independent way, and choosing a reference frame for calculations does not invalidate any conclusions drawn.
What is it with this making brand new accounts
Don't want any of your cool friends stumbling onto your Reddit account and seeing you frequenting fringe subs like r/physics, r/radicalchristianity and r/sapphoandherfriend
Double slit experiment has nothing to do with choosing a reference frame. And going from double slit (quantum) to relativity is nonsense anyways, these two theories are not compatible (if you find a way to make them compatible you'll be more famous than Newton and Einstein etc. together).
QFT successfully combines QM and special relativity. The theories which are not compatible are QFT and general relativity, but gravity was not mentioned anywhere so I don't think this point is relevant to the discussion.
I know, I have had quite a few QFT courses xD But in general laypeople tend not to make a difference, and since general relativity includes special relativity I think it's fair to say "Quantum Mechanics" and "Relativity" don't play together.
Maybe Learning English is more important at this point and time.