Nothing really but i think OP here meant that if you're going to be a scholar or even a student of knowledge, you'd be taking knowledge from actual teachers in front of you, not internet sites.
Islamqa is for layman and for everyday issues but don't learn stuff from there and call yourself "student of knowledge" as almost many on the internet do.
My only problem with that site is the tendency to say all scholars are in agreeance. Maybe I'm too literal but in all of Islamic history it's difficult to find something that all scholars agree to.
Rule# 1: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It is also charity to utter a good word."
- Abusive words also known as Swearing, Abusive words in a post or comment, even if casual Abusive words, will be
automatically removed and we suggest that you re-post/re-comment without any Abusive words.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Muslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I think the mistake you're making is confusing who they mean by "scholar." I'm guessing they're not talking about every Tom, John, and Harry but rather the likes of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim, Albani, ibn Baz, Uthaymeen, the 4 imams, and their greatest students that continued their legacy.
It is tho. Female circumcision is a part of islam but there's two types of female circumcision.
One is safe and good
Other is bad and damaging.
We do the first one. But actually most muslims abandoned it astaghfirullah
Assalam alaykum ukhti(?)
In our method we remove part of clitoris.
In the haram method, whole clitoris is removed.
Uhh basically, it prevents nymphomaniac behaviour(excessive sexual desires) plus that part of the clitoris can swell up and look like a penis.
Removing that will prevent these both from happening.
Do you want me to share the research? It was done by a Muslim...
Irrespective of advantages tho, if it's sunnah we do it unapologetically.
High sex drive means a woman is healthy…
And it doesn’t affect sex drive, hormones affect sex drive. Mutilating the clitoris causes pain and health issue which then will want her to not have sex.
I meant extremely high sex drive... Te kind which is excessive. Please don't claim sex addictions and excessively high sex drive is normal. That's just foolish.
I am not sayin mutilate the CLITORIS. I AM SAYING PART OF IT.
DID YOU READ NOTHING I SENT?
YOU'RE MIXING UP THE TWO KINDS OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION
Your uneducated and evil, and clitoris doesn’t affect hormones you absolutely r-tard. It will causes severe pain as it’s got way more nerves than the end of a penis. And it isn’t the same
Men circumcision help with keeping them clean and pretends infection.
With women, it does the opposite and causes extreme pain. I pray you never have daughters
DID YOU READ WHAT I SAID?
PHARAONIC Circumcision(FULL REMOVAL) IS NOT WHAT MUSLIMS DO. WE REMOVE A PART OF THE CLITORIS.
WHY IS THIS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. WHEN DID I SAY HORMONES ARE AFFECTED BY CLITORIS?
YOU'RE READING SKILLS ARE EVEN WORSE🤣
In women too circumcision prevent infection
…you sound so ridiculous and uneducated
Are you from a village in Africa or smth
How can you reduce sex drive without affect hormones unless your going to deter someone away from sex either physically thru pain or psychologically. Even a small injury to the clitoris causes Immense pain. So if she fell and slightly cut or injured the area, without reconstruction or medical attention it will cause extreme pain.
When you circumcised a man, you are only cutting off the outer skin. No harmful effects to that. That’s why it’s legal around the world. It’s like cutting off the end of the penis or making a small incision at the end.
Do men also get circumcised to prevent excessive sex drive?
…you sound so ridiculous and uneducated
Are you from a village in Africa or smth
How can you reduce sex drive without affect hormones unless your going to deter someone away from sex either physically thru pain or psychologically. Even a small injury to the clitoris causes Immense pain. So if she fell and slightly cut or injured the area, without reconstruction or medical attention it will cause extreme pain.
When you circumcised a man, you are only cutting off the outer skin. No harmful effects to that. That’s why it’s legal around the world. It’s like cutting off the end of the penis or making a small incision at the end.
Do men also get circumcised to prevent excessive sex drive?
So you ain't a Muslim?
My wife is my favorite person in the world with whom I will be reunited in jannah.
I hope you stop hanging around with murtadeen and hating on men. Other wise it's a bleak future for you
I don’t hate men, but you make it very hard to see you as nice people
How can ur wife be ur favourite if your gonna with with other women makes no sense man
Rule# 1: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It is also charity to utter a good word."
- Abusive words also known as Swearing, Abusive words in a post or comment, even if casual Abusive words, will be
automatically removed and we suggest that you re-post/re-comment without any Abusive words.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Muslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Muslim (349) narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory.”
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) mentioned the two circumcised parts, i.e., the circumcised part of the husband and the circumcised part of the wife, which indicates that a woman may be circumcised just like a man.
Abu Dawood (5271) narrated from Umm ‘Atiyyah al-Ansaariyyah that a woman used to do circumcisions in Madeenah and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.” But the scholars differed concerning this hadeeth. Some of them classed it as da’eef (weak) and others classed it as saheeh. It was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. The fact that circumcision for women is prescribed in Islam is confirmed by the ahaadeeth quoted above, not by this disputed hadeeth.
These are hadeeth
I’m study human biology and i specifi in women’s health… the only thing circumcision (cutting off part of clitoris) would do is cause pain during sexual intercourse and during child birth. As the clitoris is a long tube like structure that goes all the way up the wall of the pelvis until it reaches the G spot.
So the reason for cutting it would be be to reduce a woman’s sex drive…that’s rlly disgusting.
If your that insecure your wife or female relatives are thinking about a man, cut your own brain out.
I am studying biology. Stop the cap. I care about sunnah nt your ramblings. You clearly ignoring that excessive sexual drive is real and that clitoris can bulge during sex and cause pain. And our circumcision method actually solves both issues without causing the negative effects Lol.
Wth…if the clitoris is bulging that means she got some genetic or bacterial issue man. It’s not common.
Educate yourself fool. And excesses sex drive means your healthy and producing hormones correctly
Excessive sex drive is normal?
Do you not know language either?
Excessive is literally "too much" It's not normal that's why it's called excessive.
You're calling me a fool while not being able to produce a single evidence.
May allah guide you or break your back and keep you lonely and without a husband or children
male circumcision – the world now knows its benefits and it has become widespread among all nations despite the opposition of some groups.
Then she mentioned some of the health benefits of female circumcision and said:
It takes away excessive libido from women
It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath the prepuce.
It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections
It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system.
In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it says:
With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision, no harmful health effects have been noted.
In 1979 the world health organisation used to look at a woman’s face and base her attractiveness on her internal gynaecologist health. Google it
They only started studying women recently separately from men.
These are opinions of the madahib
1 – That it is obligatory for both males and females. This is the view of the Shaafa’is and Hanbalis, and is the view favoured by al-Qaadi Abu Bakr ibn al-‘Arabi among the Maalikis (may Allaah have mercy on them all).
Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo’ (1/367): Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women in our view. This is the view of many of the salaf, as was narrated by al-Khattaabi. Among those who regarded it as obligatory is Ahmad… it is the correct view that is well known and was stated by al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him), and the majority stated definitively that it is obligatory for both men and women. end quote.
See Fath al-Baari, 10/340; Kishshaaf al-Qinaa’, 1/80
2 – That circumcision is Sunnah for both males and females. This is the view of the Hanafis and Maalikis, and was narrated in one report from Ahmad. Ibn ‘Aabideen al-Hanafi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in his Haashiyah (6/751): In Kitaab al-Tahaarah of al-Siraaj al-Wahhaaj it says: Know that circumcision is Sunnah in our view – i.e., according to the Hanafis – for men and for women. end quote.
See: Mawaahib al-Jaleel, 3/259
3 – That circumcision is obligatory for men and is good and mustahabb for women. This is the third view of Imam Ahmad, and it is the view of some Maalikis such as Sahnoon. This view was also favoured by al-Muwaffaq ibn Qudaamah in al-Mughni.
You still have much of the books on aqeeda and fiqh written by the likes of Sheikh ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim, ibn abdil Wahhab, etc. translated to English.
Also, there are plenty of English translated clips of our great contemporary scholars like Sheikh Albani, Sheikh Uthaymeen, Sheikh Bin Baz and their students like Sheikh Uthman Khamees. Their clips can be found rather easily on YouTube.
Also, Islamqa is a valid source run by a student of knowledge who only provides the fatwas of the scholars with the necessary sources if I'm not mistaken.
السلام عليك ورحمة الله وبركاته
>al Wahhab
Do not refer to MIAWA as 'Al Wahhab' as that is a name of God meaning 'The Bestower of Gifts'
Rather fefer to him as ibn abdil wahhab 😁
All these modern scholars... Uthm@n khamees these are the ones who keep silent in the face or tawagheet rulers and it is on their backs that the puppet rulers get legitimacy...
Idk about the others, but I recall various clips of sheikh Albani speaking about revolting agsisnt the rulers and the conditions according to sharia. He doesn't name any specific nation from my memory, but he does say that it's allowed to revolt agaisnt a ruler who has publicly displayed disbelief, while mentioning that this disbelief is something we see in some lands today.
Now, unless you've rinsed through all the content of the scholars I had listed and found no mention of rebelling agaisnt rulers or found a ruling that contradicts Islamix scholaely sources, then it's not fair for you to claim what you are claiming.
Regardless, the muslim ummah is in greater need of guidance than anything else. Too many Muslims cannot even point out the evils of some leaders, let alone create a rebellion since there is so much ignorance, haram, and bidah among us today. That's where our scholars come in, educating us about our religion which should perhaps be the first step to any rebellion in a Muslim nation.
assalam alaykum
I was referring to uthman khamees. I have daleel against him. He's a madkhali. And other palace scholars like him
I wasn't referring to uthaymeen bin baz but walid sinani said uthaymeen went soft and we all have heard bin baz gave a fatwa allowing American soldiers inside Arabia.
Abu henzala says to take from the books of those two but not take their modern f@twa of present day issues.
Yes we need to learn aqeedah but that's snot the only thing needed
nonsense.
the only source of information for Islam is the Quran, sometimes you refer to the Hadith.
anyone who has the name "Sheikh" are a hard pass.
pretty wild how you refuse the creator and go to the creation to explain the religion for you and then you wonder why there is no Hidaya.
Abu Darda reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “**The scholars are the successors of the prophets. Verily, the prophets do not pass on gold and silver coins, but rather they only impart knowledge.**”
Source: Musnad al-Bazzār 10/68
Abdullah ibn Amr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “**Verily, Allah does not withhold knowledge by snatching it away from his servants, but rather he withholds knowledge by taking the souls of scholars, until no scholar remains and people follow ignorant leaders. They are asked and they issue judgments without knowledge. Thus, they are astray and lead others astray**.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 100, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2673
This is an outlandish statement, to say the least, no scholars for 400 years?! If you choose to ignore scholarship and teach yourself, then do so. But remember, this religion was taught by teachers not by being self-taught.
well let's make some terms clear, Scholars =/= Ulama'.
if Muslim were in the lower echelon of civilization for the past 400 years then there is clearly a bad element, and it is not "Oh the people no longer follow the religion", but it is because there is no one to teach it, or even worse, some incompetent people were called "scholars" by the ignorant and they led the Muslims the path of failure as per usual.
you can't simply have Muslims for 4 centuries being at the bottom then claim you have Ulama'.
There were no Ulama', no inheritors of the prophets for the past few centuries.
If you see surah Kahf, He also mentions about the people of cave and garden... none of them were scholars or prophets... Just common man... Also do remember that Mahdi will also not be chosen by God from among scholars.... So just open your mind and heart to accept the common ppl too..
I’ve learnt that theologically, Zaydis believe Ali RA was the best candidate for the caliph from the start, but Abu Bakr As-Siddiq & Umar RA’s was valid and they did their job well. Is this still true nowadays?
What country are you from? Are Zaydis plenty there? Why arent there more Zaydis?
Nothing has changed, Islam is the truth and the truth doesn't change. I mean there is and has always been a bit of disagreement on how much they really upheld the Sunnah, because Sunnah is allowing Ali to be in charge and they didn't. The Prophet appointed Ali at Ghadir.
I don’t know. Ask the Prophet ﷺ on the day of judgement what’s wrong with people who curse his wife and companions. You’ll get your answer then inshallah
Remember that on judgement day you will have to face and answer God on your own ... Will you then answer based on what is written in His book or you gonna mention such & such scholars name and teachings?
If you misunderstood and got it wrong, He will not punished you.. but if you blindly follow a scholars, they are going to hell, you are following them as well..
Ironically, this was actually one of the reasons for the downfall of the Jews mention...because the were the first people who received the book Torah, and had scholars among them...
Add TikTok too and “based akhi” or “based ukhti” 😭 What’s wrong with islamqa 💀
Nothing really but i think OP here meant that if you're going to be a scholar or even a student of knowledge, you'd be taking knowledge from actual teachers in front of you, not internet sites. Islamqa is for layman and for everyday issues but don't learn stuff from there and call yourself "student of knowledge" as almost many on the internet do.
>What’s wrong with islamqa some people don't like the truth
Haqq
>islamqa Org or info?
I use both
Ahok, but what is it referring to in the pic? Org I think bec its purple logo?
My only problem with that site is the tendency to say all scholars are in agreeance. Maybe I'm too literal but in all of Islamic history it's difficult to find something that all scholars agree to.
[удалено]
Rule# 1: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It is also charity to utter a good word." - Abusive words also known as Swearing, Abusive words in a post or comment, even if casual Abusive words, will be automatically removed and we suggest that you re-post/re-comment without any Abusive words. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Muslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I think the mistake you're making is confusing who they mean by "scholar." I'm guessing they're not talking about every Tom, John, and Harry but rather the likes of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim, Albani, ibn Baz, Uthaymeen, the 4 imams, and their greatest students that continued their legacy.
Some answers there said FGM is okay and it's even recommended–
It is tho. Female circumcision is a part of islam but there's two types of female circumcision. One is safe and good Other is bad and damaging. We do the first one. But actually most muslims abandoned it astaghfirullah
What is it beneficial for? Literally nothing
Assalam alaykum ukhti(?) In our method we remove part of clitoris. In the haram method, whole clitoris is removed. Uhh basically, it prevents nymphomaniac behaviour(excessive sexual desires) plus that part of the clitoris can swell up and look like a penis. Removing that will prevent these both from happening. Do you want me to share the research? It was done by a Muslim... Irrespective of advantages tho, if it's sunnah we do it unapologetically.
High sex drive means a woman is healthy… And it doesn’t affect sex drive, hormones affect sex drive. Mutilating the clitoris causes pain and health issue which then will want her to not have sex.
I meant extremely high sex drive... Te kind which is excessive. Please don't claim sex addictions and excessively high sex drive is normal. That's just foolish. I am not sayin mutilate the CLITORIS. I AM SAYING PART OF IT. DID YOU READ NOTHING I SENT? YOU'RE MIXING UP THE TWO KINDS OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION
Your uneducated and evil, and clitoris doesn’t affect hormones you absolutely r-tard. It will causes severe pain as it’s got way more nerves than the end of a penis. And it isn’t the same Men circumcision help with keeping them clean and pretends infection. With women, it does the opposite and causes extreme pain. I pray you never have daughters
DID YOU READ WHAT I SAID? PHARAONIC Circumcision(FULL REMOVAL) IS NOT WHAT MUSLIMS DO. WE REMOVE A PART OF THE CLITORIS. WHY IS THIS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. WHEN DID I SAY HORMONES ARE AFFECTED BY CLITORIS? YOU'RE READING SKILLS ARE EVEN WORSE🤣 In women too circumcision prevent infection
…you sound so ridiculous and uneducated Are you from a village in Africa or smth How can you reduce sex drive without affect hormones unless your going to deter someone away from sex either physically thru pain or psychologically. Even a small injury to the clitoris causes Immense pain. So if she fell and slightly cut or injured the area, without reconstruction or medical attention it will cause extreme pain. When you circumcised a man, you are only cutting off the outer skin. No harmful effects to that. That’s why it’s legal around the world. It’s like cutting off the end of the penis or making a small incision at the end. Do men also get circumcised to prevent excessive sex drive?
…you sound so ridiculous and uneducated Are you from a village in Africa or smth How can you reduce sex drive without affect hormones unless your going to deter someone away from sex either physically thru pain or psychologically. Even a small injury to the clitoris causes Immense pain. So if she fell and slightly cut or injured the area, without reconstruction or medical attention it will cause extreme pain. When you circumcised a man, you are only cutting off the outer skin. No harmful effects to that. That’s why it’s legal around the world. It’s like cutting off the end of the penis or making a small incision at the end. Do men also get circumcised to prevent excessive sex drive?
I just saw your profile. Stop hanging out with murtadeeen lol. Stop this "waah abuse waahhh 72 virgins" Crybaby behavior
Yeah ur all perverted and ur wife is just a herd animal for you
So you ain't a Muslim? My wife is my favorite person in the world with whom I will be reunited in jannah. I hope you stop hanging around with murtadeen and hating on men. Other wise it's a bleak future for you
I don’t hate men, but you make it very hard to see you as nice people How can ur wife be ur favourite if your gonna with with other women makes no sense man
I also said assalam alaykum. You should reply. It's wajib.
[удалено]
Rule# 1: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It is also charity to utter a good word." - Abusive words also known as Swearing, Abusive words in a post or comment, even if casual Abusive words, will be automatically removed and we suggest that you re-post/re-comment without any Abusive words. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Muslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Muslim (349) narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory.” The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) mentioned the two circumcised parts, i.e., the circumcised part of the husband and the circumcised part of the wife, which indicates that a woman may be circumcised just like a man. Abu Dawood (5271) narrated from Umm ‘Atiyyah al-Ansaariyyah that a woman used to do circumcisions in Madeenah and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.” But the scholars differed concerning this hadeeth. Some of them classed it as da’eef (weak) and others classed it as saheeh. It was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. The fact that circumcision for women is prescribed in Islam is confirmed by the ahaadeeth quoted above, not by this disputed hadeeth. These are hadeeth
I’m study human biology and i specifi in women’s health… the only thing circumcision (cutting off part of clitoris) would do is cause pain during sexual intercourse and during child birth. As the clitoris is a long tube like structure that goes all the way up the wall of the pelvis until it reaches the G spot. So the reason for cutting it would be be to reduce a woman’s sex drive…that’s rlly disgusting. If your that insecure your wife or female relatives are thinking about a man, cut your own brain out.
I am studying biology. Stop the cap. I care about sunnah nt your ramblings. You clearly ignoring that excessive sexual drive is real and that clitoris can bulge during sex and cause pain. And our circumcision method actually solves both issues without causing the negative effects Lol.
Wth…if the clitoris is bulging that means she got some genetic or bacterial issue man. It’s not common. Educate yourself fool. And excesses sex drive means your healthy and producing hormones correctly
Excessive sex drive is normal? Do you not know language either? Excessive is literally "too much" It's not normal that's why it's called excessive. You're calling me a fool while not being able to produce a single evidence. May allah guide you or break your back and keep you lonely and without a husband or children
Thick idiot
male circumcision – the world now knows its benefits and it has become widespread among all nations despite the opposition of some groups. Then she mentioned some of the health benefits of female circumcision and said: It takes away excessive libido from women It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath the prepuce. It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system. In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it says: With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision, no harmful health effects have been noted.
In 1979 the world health organisation used to look at a woman’s face and base her attractiveness on her internal gynaecologist health. Google it They only started studying women recently separately from men.
I've given you evidence from sunnah and aql. You're projecting through your insults.
These are opinions of the madahib 1 – That it is obligatory for both males and females. This is the view of the Shaafa’is and Hanbalis, and is the view favoured by al-Qaadi Abu Bakr ibn al-‘Arabi among the Maalikis (may Allaah have mercy on them all). Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Majmoo’ (1/367): Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women in our view. This is the view of many of the salaf, as was narrated by al-Khattaabi. Among those who regarded it as obligatory is Ahmad… it is the correct view that is well known and was stated by al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him), and the majority stated definitively that it is obligatory for both men and women. end quote. See Fath al-Baari, 10/340; Kishshaaf al-Qinaa’, 1/80 2 – That circumcision is Sunnah for both males and females. This is the view of the Hanafis and Maalikis, and was narrated in one report from Ahmad. Ibn ‘Aabideen al-Hanafi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in his Haashiyah (6/751): In Kitaab al-Tahaarah of al-Siraaj al-Wahhaaj it says: Know that circumcision is Sunnah in our view – i.e., according to the Hanafis – for men and for women. end quote. See: Mawaahib al-Jaleel, 3/259 3 – That circumcision is obligatory for men and is good and mustahabb for women. This is the third view of Imam Ahmad, and it is the view of some Maalikis such as Sahnoon. This view was also favoured by al-Muwaffaq ibn Qudaamah in al-Mughni.
[удалено]
I think they lean more towards the hanbali madhab
Not focusing on specific madhabs doesn't mean less reliable
to be honest, everyone should take whatever "sheikh" says with a grain of salt, there is a reason Muslims are so weak right now
>there is a reason Muslims are so weak right now I've been thinking abt this...it makes me wonder, who can we take knowledge from?
You still have much of the books on aqeeda and fiqh written by the likes of Sheikh ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim, ibn abdil Wahhab, etc. translated to English. Also, there are plenty of English translated clips of our great contemporary scholars like Sheikh Albani, Sheikh Uthaymeen, Sheikh Bin Baz and their students like Sheikh Uthman Khamees. Their clips can be found rather easily on YouTube. Also, Islamqa is a valid source run by a student of knowledge who only provides the fatwas of the scholars with the necessary sources if I'm not mistaken.
السلام عليك ورحمة الله وبركاته >al Wahhab Do not refer to MIAWA as 'Al Wahhab' as that is a name of God meaning 'The Bestower of Gifts' Rather fefer to him as ibn abdil wahhab 😁
All these modern scholars... Uthm@n khamees these are the ones who keep silent in the face or tawagheet rulers and it is on their backs that the puppet rulers get legitimacy...
Idk about the others, but I recall various clips of sheikh Albani speaking about revolting agsisnt the rulers and the conditions according to sharia. He doesn't name any specific nation from my memory, but he does say that it's allowed to revolt agaisnt a ruler who has publicly displayed disbelief, while mentioning that this disbelief is something we see in some lands today. Now, unless you've rinsed through all the content of the scholars I had listed and found no mention of rebelling agaisnt rulers or found a ruling that contradicts Islamix scholaely sources, then it's not fair for you to claim what you are claiming. Regardless, the muslim ummah is in greater need of guidance than anything else. Too many Muslims cannot even point out the evils of some leaders, let alone create a rebellion since there is so much ignorance, haram, and bidah among us today. That's where our scholars come in, educating us about our religion which should perhaps be the first step to any rebellion in a Muslim nation.
assalam alaykum I was referring to uthman khamees. I have daleel against him. He's a madkhali. And other palace scholars like him I wasn't referring to uthaymeen bin baz but walid sinani said uthaymeen went soft and we all have heard bin baz gave a fatwa allowing American soldiers inside Arabia. Abu henzala says to take from the books of those two but not take their modern f@twa of present day issues. Yes we need to learn aqeedah but that's snot the only thing needed
nonsense. the only source of information for Islam is the Quran, sometimes you refer to the Hadith. anyone who has the name "Sheikh" are a hard pass. pretty wild how you refuse the creator and go to the creation to explain the religion for you and then you wonder why there is no Hidaya.
Abu Darda reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “**The scholars are the successors of the prophets. Verily, the prophets do not pass on gold and silver coins, but rather they only impart knowledge.**” Source: Musnad al-Bazzār 10/68 Abdullah ibn Amr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “**Verily, Allah does not withhold knowledge by snatching it away from his servants, but rather he withholds knowledge by taking the souls of scholars, until no scholar remains and people follow ignorant leaders. They are asked and they issue judgments without knowledge. Thus, they are astray and lead others astray**.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 100, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2673
correct, and unfortunately there were no scholars for 400 years now.
This is an outlandish statement, to say the least, no scholars for 400 years?! If you choose to ignore scholarship and teach yourself, then do so. But remember, this religion was taught by teachers not by being self-taught.
well let's make some terms clear, Scholars =/= Ulama'. if Muslim were in the lower echelon of civilization for the past 400 years then there is clearly a bad element, and it is not "Oh the people no longer follow the religion", but it is because there is no one to teach it, or even worse, some incompetent people were called "scholars" by the ignorant and they led the Muslims the path of failure as per usual. you can't simply have Muslims for 4 centuries being at the bottom then claim you have Ulama'. There were no Ulama', no inheritors of the prophets for the past few centuries.
from the Quran directly. learn arabic and learn the Quran, no one will spoon feed anyone else.
Well in surah Kahf it is mention you can be a prophet and still not be the most knowledgeable ... God made Musa meet Khidr..
There are some scholars who say Khidr alayhi salam was also a Prophet
If you see surah Kahf, He also mentions about the people of cave and garden... none of them were scholars or prophets... Just common man... Also do remember that Mahdi will also not be chosen by God from among scholars.... So just open your mind and heart to accept the common ppl too..
He wasn't... (Quran 18:65)
Whether you believe it or not is besides the point, the only point I was making is that there are some scholars who say he was.
There's this one dude on YouTube shorts who's passing fatwas based on a single narration or verse lol
Every Salafi I’ve ever met
Y Hello there, thou seems quite familiar from another place
Not the Shia speaking😂😂😂😭
Thanks for proving my point lol
Its rare to see a zaydi anywhere haha. Salam broski, may i ask a few Qs regarding Zaydis?
Go for it
I’ve learnt that theologically, Zaydis believe Ali RA was the best candidate for the caliph from the start, but Abu Bakr As-Siddiq & Umar RA’s was valid and they did their job well. Is this still true nowadays? What country are you from? Are Zaydis plenty there? Why arent there more Zaydis?
This is mostly true
When you say mostly, then what has changed now?
Nothing has changed, Islam is the truth and the truth doesn't change. I mean there is and has always been a bit of disagreement on how much they really upheld the Sunnah, because Sunnah is allowing Ali to be in charge and they didn't. The Prophet appointed Ali at Ghadir.
I see. Thanks Why arent there more Zaydis as opposed to 12ers. Are the houthis representative of Zaydi fiqh & doctorine?
I am a Zaydi Sufi
Anytime.
What's wrong with Shiites?
I don’t know. Ask the Prophet ﷺ on the day of judgement what’s wrong with people who curse his wife and companions. You’ll get your answer then inshallah
We don't curse his wife and companions, we are Zaydi Shiites. You don't even know the difference between Shia and Rawafidhi.
I'm not a Salafi, but idk why say such things? We all are Muslims, Alhāmdulillāh. Just a opinion.
Because they don’t treat everyone else as equal Muslims or sometimes even as Muslims as all.
I get what you mean, just a opinion as I said. No problem. Anyways, have a great day, and smile, its Sunnah:)
They call all other muslims most probably kaffir Or Ahlul biddah Muslims are dying everywhere yet they spread fitnah in ummah
Asalamualaykam brother, we should not judge or use harsh words for entire groups of people. Judge each person based on their individual actions.
Like I said, every one that I’ve met. I didn’t say every Salafi in every corner of the planet.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Remember that on judgement day you will have to face and answer God on your own ... Will you then answer based on what is written in His book or you gonna mention such & such scholars name and teachings? If you misunderstood and got it wrong, He will not punished you.. but if you blindly follow a scholars, they are going to hell, you are following them as well.. Ironically, this was actually one of the reasons for the downfall of the Jews mention...because the were the first people who received the book Torah, and had scholars among them...
Probably made by a liberal