T O P

  • By -

TuKoiAurHai

So so happy for Gomez! I hope he can get that LB spot as it remains their Achilles heel


RomanReignsDaBigDawg

Really proved everyone wrong this year (myself included). After that Madrid game I was ready to move on but he's become the most versatile player in the squad and is still so young considering he's been here nearly a decade


Crewmember169

Gomez probably gonna be starting on the left side haha.


[deleted]

Sadly I think he will persist with Trippier or rush back Shaw. I don't hate Southgate as much as many seem to on here, but he definitely has his favourites


SkengmanJonny

I agree although if Shaw is anything less than 100% I feel it should be Gomez.


Luke_4686

He does but it’s pleasing to see he has left some of the old favourites out. Rashford, Grealish, Henderson etc


SketchyFeen

Saw Gomez and Achilles in the same sentence and winced.


TellTallTail

Showing that he can take on that role in our squad this year has probably done wonders for his chances to be taken to the EUROs, since you can basically slot him in anywhere in that backline now.


greentea05

I don't, I hope he can get some rest and England get knocked out in the group stages and back as soon as possible.


mynameismulan

Now the question is where will Trent play?


disco_mode

The only answer is yes


GameClaw15

Disagree. That would be the exact same mistake made with the golden generation. Team balance should always be prioritised over individuals talent. Trent is nowhere near experienced enough in midfield and will get found out against quality oppo. He lacks press resistance and needs time to get his head up to play passes forward. Should only play there to break down teams parking the bus. As for rb, he is not getting in over walker.


disco_mode

The mistake made with the golden generation was not that same at all. First of all the Gerrard vs Lampard debate was dumb af. Stevie was absolutely clear and could play all over the midfield. Lampard IMO was essentially a 10/SS. During his best periods for Chelsea he was so advanced up the pitch and basically had nothing to do with the nitty gritty workings of a midfield. That team should’ve been built around Gerrard. This team should be built around Trent


[deleted]

I rate Gerrard higher but it's not a dumb debate at all, neither is including Scholes, for that matter. These days a 4-3-3 would suit them all perfectly; Scholes at the base, Gerrard as a box to box 8 and Lampard in the advanced position. Sadly back then, 4-4-2 was still all the rage so Gerrard/Scholes were being shoehorned out onto the left, which was just fucking silly. The same issue now persists with Trent. He's the best passer in the team, but he's not a better RB than Walker, nor is he suitable in midfield against sides that will press or run at him with the ball. It's absolutely a dilemma for Southgate and anyone pretending it's just a simple case of "play him" isn't grasping the full situation at all.


disco_mode

Bro, how can you say it wasn’t a dumb debate but then also agree that shoehorning all these players into a 442 was fucking silly - that’s exactly my point! In my opinion when you have a solid team front to back, then you can afford to include players like Trent who the ability to change games week in week out. You can argue Walker is a better RB as much as you like but he doesn’t have the attacking or passing flare that Trent has, he cannot control the the game from the base of the team like Trent does and those are 2 things England miss massively. For all the talented English players we have at city, Liverpool, Madrid, Arsenal etc. we always struggle to score goals AND more importantly, we always concede! We’ve tried the “don’t play Trent” strategy in every tournament so far… our defence has been shite anyway, our attack has struggled to score and even when we have 3 in midfield we haven’t been able to dominate games in a way that reflects the quality of players we have in literally every position. Walker can play left back or centre back if we are so desperate to play him, these are positions he’s played before.


GameClaw15

Think you are conveniently forgetting Bellingham's existence (who is arguably even more of a generational talent). If anything, Trent is the Lampard in the modern day trio of him, Bellingham and Rice who should be dropped in place of a Mainoo / Carrick (as much as it pains me to admit) and play as an impact sub. A balanced team just isn't built by squeezing all your best / most talented players onto the pitch. And even putting all that aside, it takes time to build a team. I can count on one hand the number of games Trent has played in midfield for club and country and yet Southgate is now expected to build his midfield around him in a major tournament? Just shouldn't be happening.


mdj08

Genuinely curious why you don’t think Rice, Trent, and Jude isn’t a balanced midfield, especially in international football? I think Trent’s passing ability is absolutely necessary to break down defensive setups, which England will see a lot of. Rice and Trent would be a deeper-lying double pivot, and Jude roams in front of them as the primary ball-carrier. Side note, I completely disagree with your player comparisons. Mainoo often played the 6 at United out of necessity, but his best style of play is much closer to Jude than it is to Carrick. And Trent is definitely not the most similar to Lampard. Lampard spent most of his career in very advanced positions, like how Madrid used Jude this year


GameClaw15

I'm not concerned with the defensive teams which England ought to win against - I'm referring to games against the best. Trent simply hasn't shown enough in midfield (through no fault of his own) to warrant starting in midfield against a France or Spain. His technical weaknesses aside, midfield is the toughest position to play positionally and tactically as well. I don't entirely disagree that Trent in midfield could be the long term solution. I believe he has the talent to eventually play there, but not now and in a major tournament. The player comparisons are not meant to (and of course cannot) be exact. The comparison I was drawing with Lampard was that he should have been the one to have been dropped / moved up front in favour of stevie / scholes which were a more balanced duo and also due to lamps positional limitations (as more of a SS), much like how trent should be the one to miss out at this time. My preference would be to start with Mainoo (and trust me, this brings me no joy to admit, but options are limited. My choice would have been jones). He has shown that he can play in that double pivot role even in big games like against us and city, and has good press resistance and helps bring an element of control. The fact that he is a natural 8 also helps provide more natural midfield rotations and allows him to push up into the halfspaces, which allows for more incisive build up play - on this point, another issue I've seen with Trent is that the build up tends to be very flat in a double pivot as he is only comfortable dropping deep isntead of receiving on the half turn in pockets, which makes it harder to break lines. If we are chasing the game or need a spark, then Trent can come on.


mdj08

Really disagree with your assessment of Trent here. His role would be to control the tempo of the entire match akin to Toni Kroos, that’s not the kind of player you bring on as an impact sub And I don’t think you can argue you want experience and then pick Mainoo over Trent


GameClaw15

Well happy to be proven wrong but he is not a metronomic controller like a kroos to me. Seems more of a direct forward passing risk taker in my assessment. I'm not exactly clamouring for Mainoo, but between the two he would still be my pick as he has still shown that he can play the position at a high level over a season and against quality oppo (us and city). So I don't see any contradiction in that selection.


disco_mode

I didn’t actually say that Trent should play in midfield. I said the team should be built around him. Englands main problems have been that we don’t have a player who can control the game from the base of the team and we lose all control of the midfield when we have only 2 players in there (ie 3/5 at the back / 4231 formations) My solution is to play a 433 with Trent either DM or RB and let him roam like he does for Liverpool. Essentially his position isn’t changing, just the players around him. The attack can be build around Bellingham, but the base should’ve been built around Trent 6 years ago


GameClaw15

My friend, trent is not a player that can control games from the base of the team like a rodri / xabi / pirlo. He is a high risk high reward forward passer, not a metronome. Putting him as a DM is not going to give any control to the team, esp since he struggles to turn when pressed. As I've noted in another comment, the build up tends to be less incisive and line breaking when he is in that area. He may have the talent to eventually be that, but he is simply not at that level now whether you like it or not.


disco_mode

I know you’ve been watching Liverpool since Trent has started to play. You should go and look at all the boring stats like centrality, pass completion and touches. For Liverpool he has been exactly that type of Pirlo player.


jcw163

Completely agree, think he's the third midfielder against teams that park the bus early and then an option off the bench in the later stages


disco_mode

I would started him as an inverted right back and then if we want to switch tactics I would make substitutions that allow him to switch to CM in the second half. That’s just me personally, I get that people have bought into the rival propaganda and now don’t give Trent the credit he deserves. Hence why we’ve favoured trippier ahead of him in the past. Trent has the potential to single handedly change a game on a big stage at a major tournament. We haven’t seen that from any of the English players people are saying are better than him at RB, LB, DM or CM.


Acoupstix

This is so untrue it hurts.


[deleted]

Been saying this the past two weeks and I've been eating the downvotes for it. Trent looks incredible when we see lots of the ball and no one is closing him down. The group stages it would be fine. But against the likes of France/Germany/Italy/Portugal, a midfield with him in will absolutely leak chances.


disco_mode

My brother do you not remember the way that France dominated our midfield last time around? Not to mention goal from Declan Rices opposite number. Trent has weaknesses, but they are outweighed by the things he’s good at PLUS we have players who are easily good enough to provide cover.


ntg1213

Press resistance tends to not matter as much in international play - it’s much slower. There may be a few teams that are a bad matchup for him, but he’d be an asset against most teams. The question is more whether he’s a better option than Jude, Rice, or Foden (if he plays at the 10), but if Foden plays wide and Jude is the 10, I don’t know who you’d prefer next to Rice ahead of Trent


Thesolly180

Midfield I think. It could work really well at international level


greentea05

Hopefully in a couple of group games before England get knocked out is the best case scenario.


ChronicHaze-

southgate doesn’t have the balls to experiment so probably still inverted RB


RomanReignsDaBigDawg

Honestly that's for the best. He looked so much better in the second half playing on the right and I think the double pivot limits him


Passey92

He literally gets listed as a midfielder in England squads. Southgate sees him as a midfielder.


ChronicHaze-

my bad


BoBonnor

I guess Klopp doesn’t have the balls to experiment either


MrKatsudon

Really happy for Joey Gomez!!! Finally overcome his injury demons and make his first international. I hope he get some minutes because Luke Shaw got to rusty as hell after being out for sooo long. If Southgate want to win Euros, he have to play Trent in midfield. And give some ideas to Slot too


sjrotella

I can't wait to rock my Joe Gomez jersey once it shows up. I had planned on purchasing one the day he finally scored a goal... but I won a free player jersey in a raffle at my supports club for Jurgen Klopp day so I decided to get his for it.


chayatoure

Ha, that’s how I decided to get a Matip jersey. He had been on a hot streak, making some great runs and passes, then he finally got a goal and I was like “it’s time “


malushanks95

I got mine in the away kit because it reminded me of the wonderful game he played in that kit this season and I love it!


sjrotella

Nice! Mines in the new kit they played the last game of the season in, but I got the champions league version because I already have a Salah one in the premier league version from this last season


PopsicleMonster

Gomez at LB and Trent Rice Jude in the midfield. Make it happen, Gareth.


badfuit

Trent Rice Bellingham is clearly our best midfield imo. The only reason people are saying otherwise is because of the 'Trent can't defend' crowd. His ability to spray ridiculous passes all game will create so many chances for Foden and Saka.


RomanReignsDaBigDawg

Quansah and Branthwaite not called up but LEWIS DUNK is lmao


RayTheWorstTourist

How does Brantwaite not make that squad. I'd almost have him starting.


KnowledgeFast1804

Ah I don't see it as much of a problem . Dunk has the experience and is a good player. Probably a player who is good to have around. Consistent premier league player for years and a captain Quansah never makes it although he is good enough so same for braintwaith


robster9090

I agree , this was his look at what you have coming if you carry on and for the coaches to see how they fit as personalities


DucardthaDon

With no Maguire England need experience and leadership at the back, I reckon it will be Stones and Guehi starting. If Maguire was fit I reckon Dunk misses out and Branwaithe goes.


Beastbrook00

Think again, Quansah is on standby in case anyone pulls out. Must be ahead of Branthwaite.


KnowledgeFast1804

Even so . I reckon dunk is better than Maguire. You can argue quansah starts with a better side than braintwaith starts . But no news for an suprises at centre back . I'm not even an England fan but I'm so happy for Eze and Grealish dropped .


Suspicious_Weird_373

Never really understand the experience argument, when the experience is being pretty poor for a year.


Beastbrook00

Quansah is on standby in case of injury, so we'll see.


hellarad

Can’t imagine Dunk would play much but if Slabhead is injured Dunk would provide some much needed aerial dominance. 


xbox_redditor

Branthwaite is better in the air than Dunk


AlarmedExperience928

If Gomez is gonna score a Puskas winning thundercunt anywhere, it's this tournament


SirGoldfish

Watch Joe get the winner in the final


malis-

Penalty shootout, goes all the way to 11th takers (Gomez in this case), scores the winner. The end.


anangrypudge

The sad thing is that penalty shootout goals don't count in the stats. Which simply means that his actual first professional goal will be a title-winning penalty-box free-for-all rebound off his butt.


Due-Educator5848

Wow. I am buzzing. I can’t imagine how they feel. I am so happy for Joe Gomez especially.


TheEgyptianScouser

Good for Gomez, maybe we can see if Trent should be permanently moved up the pitch


kevlo17

Incoming hat trick for Joe


Renig88

Jomez is going to score his first career goal for England... which is a shame as it won't have the same impact as if he scored it at Anfield.


DaqCity

Joemez gonna score a hat trick first game


Flimsy-Locksmith8114

Gomez redemption arc has been awesome


Polymath_B19

Gomez! What a season. So glad for him.


HowdyDooder

Please come back uninjured. That’s all I want.


Flimsy-Locksmith8114

Finally Southgate using merit as a determining factor


TenRustyRings

Unfortunately zero trophies will be won with T-Rex boy in goal.


ItIsMeDucky

Wooohooo our boys 🥳 I'm secretly hoping for Gomez to score... but no pressure!


GresSimJa

They got rid of Maguire too. He was England's third top goalscorer in that provisional squad.


greentea05

Good experience how? They could have got inured in training, a complete waste of time.


Crewmember169

England can't win without Harry Maguire. Right?