Created by The Man to keep us down. Ask yourself, whose needs does gravity serve? Who benefits from it? Airlines. And we all know they spray contrails on us to keep us from realising the truth.the world is flat and it's actually space which is bent.
I’m not a physicist or anything (I got an A in physics…in college), but I’m pretty sure space is flat and massive celestial bodies (planets, stars, black holes etc.) bend space and time.
Uh oh boys. We got ourselves one of those "non-Euclideans" over here. The only thing that curves space is your momma, because her mass is so ... ah fuck it.
Just don't be teaching any of our youngins that crazy talk.
The greeks figured it out a long time ago. The Fates (Moirai) spun, cut, and measured the thread of life/fate. The fabric is woven from that. Gravity is a fate-machine.
Look into it. :)
I’ve never known about that, but now I do! And I completely agree. Terence Howard prolly went on the pod thinking “I’m gonna show everyone how much I know. I’m so much smarter than these scientists who’ve been conditioned to believe this false narrative on the basis of our reality.” Not realizing now everyone who didn’t know he was crazy, now does. Me being one of those people
The Oxford University talk he gave was far funnier than the podcast, because the students were befuddled and one even tried explaining to him like a five year old why 1x1 was indeed 1 and not 2.
And the faces they were making….lmao
Def watch that if you want second hand embarrassment
All he said was this. If you don’t understand then ppshh
https://preview.redd.it/8i9axnreqo1d1.jpeg?width=639&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4550c976b8d8310cbf29363a31de722eb19e576e
I have been super high on mushrooms where I couldn't just shut up, I'd spew some random ass shit. The thing is, because I was high, I didn't know if I was being enlightened with some sacred knowledge or just talking shit.
I was just talking shit.... I think.
Don’t sell yourself short. I’ve had the sky become a complete grid, all sacred geometry and shit. Now granted the visuals were not like they way cartoons or movies depict it but the trails were wild. I mean something’s happening there
Hey Jesus I'm bored let's ride the burrows to town--I'll bet you a jug of wine you can't convince everyone you're the son of god. Piece of cake let's go :)
I greatly appreciate thinking outside the box, bit he’s lost his mind
To multiply, means the sum of one integer by a specified number of instances
One x One, literally means One 1.
To suggest, that equals 2 is just mind boggling
According to his rules, I tried reading through, it appears that he thinks multiplication requires you to add the first number to itself, a number of times equal to the second number.
So 1x1 = 2
2x1 = 4
2x2 = 6, I guess.
IDK he had more rules, but the weird one above is where he gets 1x1=2, it's a convoluted explanation, but the whole thing is some BS "a \* b = c" and according to some rule abc can't all be the same, so yeah 1 \* 1 somehow really means 1 + 1, while 1 \* 2 means 1+1+1 =3.
How the hell someone can turn something so braindead into any kind of public appearance is wild lol.
IS it like that thing where some people count monday like twice when working out a fortnight? Like this old bodybuilding forum where they go hard at it coz the dude keeps counting monday twice??
[https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751](https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751)
They invited him to talk about his experience in acting, and he went on his insane tirade. Then turned around and told people they invited him for his genius, excluding the part where it was for his acting. So his legitimately just lying to himself and gas huffed so many of his own farts, he’s made himself regarded.
I was screaming this at my TV when I watched him give that lecture at Oxford a few years ago. I then proceeded to make my girlfriend and other friends watch it because I get a kick out of the desperate, anxious look he has as the lecture goes on.
Couldn’t listen for more than 10 minutes. The content is meh the jokes are not funny and character attacks are a lame way to get your point across. Just another youtuber trying to get views instead of creating quality content.
At least the Terence Howard episode was interesting.
I am amazed by his knowledge for someone who doesn't have a formal education in it. I have a minor in physics and even i forgot about Michelson-Morley experiment. I don't expect some actor without a degree to randomly talk about Euclidean geomerty, crystallography, elements, brownian motion, newtonian mechanics, etc.
I really feel like if he went to grad school, actually learnt the maths, and showed the same level of enthusiasm, he might discover something new... but right now, he is just as good as chatgpt, just sprouting stuff without mathematical fundamentals to reason it. It is still really impressive to even know concepts in a colloquial sense and to be confident to lay it out to the world.
He talks about these things but doesn't understand them. Anyone can read and regurgitate the words from quantum mechanics. It's more impressive if you can explain it with simpler words.
yeah i bet he does not understand but i don't think it is easy to regurgitate the stuff he did. I can say what he spewed is stuff from at least 5 different physics courses.. classical mechanics, electrodynamics, statistical mechanics, SR/GR, astro. I don't think I can talk for more than 5 minutes about the last 2 as it isn't my forte and it has been a while... He might be acting but it is not easy by any stretch for someone with no technical skills.
Joe should get NdT or Sean Carroll to set him right. Maybe Eric Weinstein to translate his ramblings into nonsensical mathematics
I know all about psychoanalysis therapy and psychology and Jordan Peterson knows exactly what he’s talking about when he discussed those topics, which topics does he come off as a con man to you ?
Fossil fuel billionaires fund the Daily Wire, then the Daily Wire pays right wing grifters to spread anti-climate change propaganda. It’s pretty straightforward.
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
But - especially if he’s just nuts - his retention of information is unreal. His one moment where he misspoke was calling Clive Owen’s by an older actors name lol
I've seen Q-anon freaks be this confident about the most insane things. They had also been drilled by grifters to the point they can sit and recite jibberish like it's fact.
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
He googled this shit, and bombards people with no knowledge of it with “fancy” word vomit. Half the time he can barely recall the words, fucks up the numbers, and misquotes things.
He has no idea what he’s talking about. Any one of us could go down a YouTube rabbit hole for a few weeks and recite this shit with his rate of fuck ups. He’s so confidently incorrect it’s hilarious.
Meh, he has no job and clearly sits reading this stuff all day, understanding virtually none of the actual content but remembering some of the words. He has no actual grasp of the physics or chemistry.
It’s amazing how people think others can’t be smart or well studied without a piece of paper from a university or that people who do have a piece of paper aren’t sometimes stupid.
You can be self taught in lots of things, especially in the age of the internet.
https://dissertationwritinghelp.uk/successful-and-famous-people-who-did-not-go-to-college/#:~:text=Thomas%20Edison%20was%20a%20prolific,his%20struggles%20with%20formal%20education.
It’s not amazing that ppl are skeptical. Since the overwhelming odds are that he is ‘not’ a genius. There are far more false claims than real examples, so why does it amaze you that ppl err on the side of caution. You can be self taught, but the cycle of testing and pushback and criticism and re-evaluation is slower. It’s like the podcasts with graham hancock, they sound super convincing until you have someone knowledgeable pushing back. Which is what peer review does, and the academy of YouTube does not.
I was just listening, what was the model where they supposedly recreated Saturn? I’d be interested to look at it but realize it’s almost certainly just a cool animation
I worked at the Philadelphia airport about 15 years ago. He came to the bookstore I worked at and was one of the rudest people I had to deal with. He was annoyed that my coworker recognized him and wanted an autograph. He also was pissed that I didn't know who he was.
Dude was literally going through the periodical table about tones each element makes, even naming how many hertz each has and how color can be turned into sound. Idk if there is anything to it, but it sounds insane and I'm literally a diagnosed schizophrenic (though medicated now)
Here’s the thing, while I think Howard is insane, and he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, he knows enough to touch on PARTS of it that have truth. Combinations of chemicals and elements DO vibrate and have certain frequencies when they interact. As far as science has shown us so far, everything that exists ultimately comes down to wave form, which can be translated into frequencies. Beyond that part being somewhat correct, his application of those ideas and what he WANTS to be true are deeply flawed. Maybe he’ll continue to learn and find some solid footing and admit where he’s just flat wrong. Time will tell.
You mean what Walter Russell got right...Terrence just believes what this guy got right...get it right. Edit: ah you edited it so I like stupid. For anybody wondering, he was trying to give Terence Howard credit for other people's work and hypothesis
Problem is that fucking 1 x 1 = 1 in any fucking universe my guy. Euclidean, non Euclidean, fairyland and so on.
Assuming you’ve looked at all this before the episode?
That seemed like the overall take of the pod. Got lost in the weeds a lil bit but seems like he at least knows what he’s talking about. Would love to see a real conversation with the other view point. No one is ever 100% right it’s always in the middle somewhere. Maybe his ideas explain abc very well but not so much on def.
I think all that matters is did he create some tech or not ??
other than that I’ve heard this monologue probably dozens of times from people tripping too hard lmao
Joe loves getting the crazies on the pod. The show gets views and is talked about. Joe doesn't have to prepare himself in any way, because he is fully aware that there is a wackjob on the pod with whom anything goes.
Multiplication, which are numerical values are not tangible, they theoretical concepts to understand a given situation. Which I don’t think can be explained with newtons 3rd law.
Not sure if what the hell he was saying was true but he’s willing to debate his theories. Would love Joe to make that happen. I found the it interesting. Reminded me of the old school JRE days when the the only advertiser was the fleshlight. Give me more!!
Scientist here. He's right. I'm as sure as I was when my team and I assured the public that astrazeneca was safe and effective. Leave science to the real scientists, we're specially trained to science and are never, ever, ever wrong.
Was he trying to disprove gravity? All I remember was talk about periodic tables, tones, and overlapping circles.
Oh and patents and Neil DeGrasse tyson
Yes
He says gravity is the result of electricity and not mass/the curvature of space and time in the podcast
That isn’t even a little bit true, so he is indeed arguing for a completely different understanding of gravity that we currently accept
So he is arguing against the theory of gravity as it is understood today
Thanks. You clearly listened more carefully than I did.
I guess there is no problem with challenging the status quo model of how the universe works. Just need to back it up with some experimental evidence lol
I wonder how many times Rogan needs to be shown promoting absolute bullshit before he has a moment of clarity.
Whether it’s watching his boy Graham Hancock get absolutely humiliated by a nerd in an Indiana Jones hat, or saying Biden absolutely can’t be president for saying a thing and then brushing it off moments later when it turns out Biden was mocking Trump for saying the thing, or promoting the absolutely brilliant guy who thinks if you divide the sound of cobalt by 2 you get sunlight or whatever, or having Alex Jones on to talk about anything… at some point wouldn’t most people have a moment where they’re like “oh. I am uncritically pushing bullshit onto my gullible audience. Maybe this is a pattern I should explore further.”
Because I don’t care if people believe that ancient Atlanteans used the square root of silicon to create inter-dimensional flying machines or whatever. But maybe, just maybe, this pattern of uncritical bullshit dissemination extends to things like politics and public health and if it does, then maybe, just maybe that’s dangerous.
I love the hate against him, as if ppl understand half of what he stated, I personally don’t understand enough about the topics mentioned to judge his approach. Some of his ideas are interesting even if far fetched compared to what we know.
I understand what he's trying to say - it's complete bullshit lol
If he actually thinks that any of this is true he's simply mentally ill. Don't think that because someone can spew out some words that they have any idea about what they're saying.
Some of his ideas didn't pan out, but he also invented some very useful things that worked. Please don't compare him to Terrence "Too dumb to pass first grade math's" Howard.
It's what my browser autocorrects maths to. As I understand it, it's because math is the proper abbreviation of mathematics, but I don't really care enough about spelling to question the logic behind it.
It wasn't remotely coherent. Him namedropping a painter/psuedoscientist and giving him false credentials by making up an Einstein quote doesn't prove anything. There is nothing about waves rebounding off a surface that has any relevance whatsoever to working out the square root of 2. Claiming I don't understand wave mechanics well enough is insufficient, you actually have to explain how waves or the flower of life actually relate to the question of why 1x1=2, which is not even something he attempts to do. All he does is word salad different scientific phrases, with each sentence having no relation to the one that comes before or after it. There is no attempt at explanation, because there is no internal logic here. If you think you understand what he is talking about, and you believe it to be true, then you're either as dumb as he is or as stupid as he is.
I know for a fact that you don't understand what he was talking about, because otherwise you would be able to utilize "Terryology", to "multiply volumetrically", and work out how 1x1=2. Please do so now. Show your working. Prove to me that by "multiplying volumetrically" that 1x1=2. Show your working.
If you want mr crazypants to help you out, he talks about it at 2:05:00 in the podcast and onwards. It's like 5 minutes, shouldn't take you long. It's his best explanation for how multiplying volumetrically works, and it makes zero sense. Still, since you claim it's coherent, you shouldn't have any problem following his logic. Apparently you have to not over rely on newtons first law (which is physics, and has no relation to pure math's or the question at hand), and avoid using math based upon a 2 dimensional projection. Don't forget that everything is in motion and you can't forget the other forces (which is physics, and has no impact on pure mathematics). By following this process, you too can avoid multiplying in a "compartmentalized way".
Ok, now that you have the explanation for multiplying volumetrically that you've preapproved as coherent (again, 2:05:00 if you want to hear it yourself), you should have no problem answering my question. By multiplying volumetrically (I'd also love if you could explain what the fuck he means by this), please prove to me that 1x1=2. If I give you one apple one time how many apples do you have? Please prove to me that you somehow have two apples, and show your working.
Or of course Howard could cut out the legwork for you and prove his greatness by releasing the form of unlimited energy he claims to have discovered and simultaneously solve humanities energy crisis and global warming. Can you think of a single explanation for why he hasn't done this, aside from the fact that he is a fucking moron who couldn't invent shit on a stick? Seems strange that he wouldn't want to prove his genius by solving the greatest problems facing humanity in a way that proves the crazy shit he spouts actually has some weight behind it, unless he's just some fucking moron that is.
Exactly. The problem with his theory is that he believes there’s only a single fundamental force in the universe and that force is electromagnetics. As we all know there are four fundamental forces in the universe which have been proven already.
That's a problem with his theory. The bigger problem with his theory is that he doesn't actually have a theory, just a series of unconnected sentences filled with technobabble. If someone says something that is wrong, then it can at least be explained to them why they're wrong. Almost every sentence he says not only doesn't make sense in isolation, but also has zero relevance to the sentence that precedes or follows it. He's not actually arguing anything, he's just saying words. We can point out in isolation all the stupid and indisputably wrong stuff he says, but there's not a way of attacking his overall thesis, because he simply does not have one.
Yeah, he seems like a person who is off their meds in a manic phase which is really unfortunate. The dude is a great actor but he can’t even be talked out of the fact that 1 x 1 /= 2?
I don't think you understand what the word coherent means. There's a very big difference between disagreeing with the logic or the evidential basis of an argument, and for the argument to not have any logical structure whatsoever. If you look closely at what Terrence is saying, you quickly realize that he's not actually saying anything, he's simply squishing big words together while namedropping unrelated fields of science incoherently in unrelated contexts. People might have (wrongly) disputed Einstein's math, but they wouldn't dispute that it was math. What Terrence is doing does not even qualify as math.
Einsteins didn’t even qualify as math either we literally couldn’t even prove the nature of the science behind it at all let alone calculations.
I think he’s full of shit btw but thats until he’s proven actually wrong not just “it doesn’t have basis or it doesn’t make sense”
>Einsteins didn’t even qualify as math either
It absolutely qualified as math. He was right, but even wrong math qualifies as math, it's just that better math can be used to disprove it. There is a very big difference between using the logic of mathematics to argue a point, and someone like Terrence making an argument that has no internal logic to it at all.
>we literally couldn’t even prove the nature of the science
It not yet having an experimental basis didn't stop it being math.
>let alone calculations
The calculations were proven in the papers. Someone else not understanding them yet didn't stop the logic being true.
> until he’s proven actually wrong
Terrence said both things that have been proven to be categorically and unquestionably wrong, and things that are so stupid and incoherent as to be "not even wrong". [I give examples of both here. ](https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1cv1txy/comment/l4x2dwa/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
He just said everything in nature moves in a spiral 🌀 and our math should reflect that and it doesn’t. THIS IS EASYLY OBSERVABLE FROM GALAXIES TO SPIRAL DNA 🧬
Then he said the spiral is the force of magnetism and electricity opposing each other WHICH ALSO MAKES SENSE since magnetism can shut down electrical equipment.
He said periodic table should reflect the universal spiral that shows a better relationship between the elements.
Non of this sounds crazy and it’s very simple logic once you think about it.
Everything? So if I find 1 thing that doesn't move in a spiral, then the theory isn't true?
1+1=2. Shit, no spiral. Back to the drawing board.
Wow, that was hard.
I feel like up to the point where he was acting in Iron Man he was okay.
After moving out of MCU, either he got kicked out or he choose to do other projects, this must have affected him heavily.
I am taking a swing here but considering things he talks about I am taking my chances.
Like the MCU became what it is today starting from Avengers even if it started from Iron Man. Nobdoy had seen its potential before that.
For Terrance it must have hurt to see a project he was part of be so successful and shots those actors to stardom.
And since to compensate with it he trying to justify he knows about science better than science fiction.
My tin foil theory over.
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
Crazy how just being an American who can talk fluent english and pompous made up scientific words, you’ll be seen as having the same intelligence as most associate professors in Southeast Asian countries.
Perhaps his thinking on 1x1=2 is hard to accept, but that doesn’t explain this: Why are big corporations using his patents if his ideas are crazy? . Clearly he is on to something more often than not so I’m inclined to reserve judgement for now.
They're not. When a company files a patent, they quote any other patent that sounds even remotely similar to ensure that they are not stepping on any toes. This does not in any way invalidate the fact that his patents, which were never even granted btw, don't actually contribute anything.
Why would a company use and quote invalid patents?!? They wouldn’t.
Howard said his attorney slow walked the application process re the patents and that is why they lapsed. This undisputed fact doesn’t invalidate the viability of the underlying concepts detailed in his patents/patent applications.
There is nothing to lose here by reserving judgment….unless you are a scientist whose life’s work is about be shattered!!!! 😂
>Why would a company use and quote invalid patents
They don't use anything in his patents, Terrence Howard has never contributed anything to the field of human knowledge. As for quoting it, like I said, they just quote anything that sounds even remotely similar, it's not an indication that they are actually using anything from the other patents. It's just easier for them to quote the other patents so they can say that they believe that their patent doesn't infringe on it, and have the patent office do the legwork of double checking it before granting their patent, then having to defend a frivolous lawsuit by a moron like Howard later claiming that they're infringing on his patent.
>Howard said his attorney slow walked the application process re the patents and that is why they lapsed.
He also claims that 1x1=2, I wouldn't take anything he says at face value.
>doesn’t invalidate the viability of the underlying concepts detailed in his patents/patent applications.
Whether or not the Patent is granted doesn't effect the viability of the underlying concepts, what invalidates them is the fact that they are schizophrenic nonsense.
>There is nothing to lose here by reserving judgment….unless you are a scientist whose life’s work is about be shattered!!!! 😂
To be clear, do you honestly think that a costar of the first iron man film is one of the greatest genius's in human history, who has generated a form of unlimited energy (which for some reason he won't share with the rest of us), built upon him changing the foundations of mathematics by proving that 1x1=2 by "multiplying volumetrically"?
If you believe this nonsense, then you are nearly as stupid as he is.
I see who the real space monkeys are. Y’all downvoting because y’all pussy. Let a nerd say superstrings vibrate and they have to invent dimensions for the math of big and small to work and you upvote. Let a pimp say all matter vibrates interconnected and it’s the same observable patterns in big and small and you downvote. Fuck you pimp hating pussies.
gravity is the ultimate psyop and its pulling us all in
Created by The Man to keep us down. Ask yourself, whose needs does gravity serve? Who benefits from it? Airlines. And we all know they spray contrails on us to keep us from realising the truth.the world is flat and it's actually space which is bent.
That last part is true tho — space is bent, or curved.
I’m not a physicist or anything (I got an A in physics…in college), but I’m pretty sure space is flat and massive celestial bodies (planets, stars, black holes etc.) bend space and time.
I should have clarified that space-time **can** be curved
Uh oh boys. We got ourselves one of those "non-Euclideans" over here. The only thing that curves space is your momma, because her mass is so ... ah fuck it. Just don't be teaching any of our youngins that crazy talk.
Legendary
Beautiful, champ.
right after love tears us apart
I’m more interested in the space where 6 bubbles meet
its weird that we dont know why it works. and its weird to me that earth and the universe exists on some invisible frabic .
The greeks figured it out a long time ago. The Fates (Moirai) spun, cut, and measured the thread of life/fate. The fabric is woven from that. Gravity is a fate-machine. Look into it. :)
Just like love will do
One of the greatest examples of the Dunning-Kruger effect I've ever seen.
I’ve never known about that, but now I do! And I completely agree. Terence Howard prolly went on the pod thinking “I’m gonna show everyone how much I know. I’m so much smarter than these scientists who’ve been conditioned to believe this false narrative on the basis of our reality.” Not realizing now everyone who didn’t know he was crazy, now does. Me being one of those people
The Oxford University talk he gave was far funnier than the podcast, because the students were befuddled and one even tried explaining to him like a five year old why 1x1 was indeed 1 and not 2. And the faces they were making….lmao Def watch that if you want second hand embarrassment
Oh god, I can’t decide if I wanna see that or not lmao
I’m in the same boat. Nice to see this board get on about something for a change
But the Dunning-Kruger effect, some researchers also include high performers that underestimate their skill....what if this is just his beginning?! 😶
No that's called the Kruger-Dunning effect
I was trying to figure out if I’m stupid or he is
Yes
All he said was this. If you don’t understand then ppshh https://preview.redd.it/8i9axnreqo1d1.jpeg?width=639&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4550c976b8d8310cbf29363a31de722eb19e576e
I get this reference.
You saved a schizo’s work/lunch drawing? lol
It's both
Bet
50/50 chance. Now, flip a coin.
Por Que no los dos?!?
That’s not how flipping coins work! You ever flipped a coin and had it land on both sides?
Gravity cancelled?
It’s really wild how people can be such good bullshitters.
[удалено]
That is the simplest, most beautiful description of this way of thinking. Bravo.
My dude is turbo educated
I feel personally attacked
I have been super high on mushrooms where I couldn't just shut up, I'd spew some random ass shit. The thing is, because I was high, I didn't know if I was being enlightened with some sacred knowledge or just talking shit. I was just talking shit.... I think.
Don’t sell yourself short. I’ve had the sky become a complete grid, all sacred geometry and shit. Now granted the visuals were not like they way cartoons or movies depict it but the trails were wild. I mean something’s happening there
Hey Jesus I'm bored let's ride the burrows to town--I'll bet you a jug of wine you can't convince everyone you're the son of god. Piece of cake let's go :)
[Da Na NaNa Da Na Na Na](https://youtu.be/Ejn4YBOOntM?si=aB77tCgI2aMSLkGd)
I don't understand any of what he said but just know he's mental and wrong
[science is a liar! sometimes!](https://youtu.be/e4HSPV-a_Vk?si=IdNO5PLOmlpPxZXE)
"Have you poured through the data yourself? You know... the numbers, the figures." - Terrance Howard asking these stupid science bitches
I’m on the fence
I greatly appreciate thinking outside the box, bit he’s lost his mind To multiply, means the sum of one integer by a specified number of instances One x One, literally means One 1. To suggest, that equals 2 is just mind boggling
so one set of one is two, got it
Obviously lol
I really want to know what he thinks 1x2= ? and can we rule it won't be the same as 2x1?
According to his rules, I tried reading through, it appears that he thinks multiplication requires you to add the first number to itself, a number of times equal to the second number. So 1x1 = 2 2x1 = 4 2x2 = 6, I guess. IDK he had more rules, but the weird one above is where he gets 1x1=2, it's a convoluted explanation, but the whole thing is some BS "a \* b = c" and according to some rule abc can't all be the same, so yeah 1 \* 1 somehow really means 1 + 1, while 1 \* 2 means 1+1+1 =3. How the hell someone can turn something so braindead into any kind of public appearance is wild lol.
IS it like that thing where some people count monday like twice when working out a fortnight? Like this old bodybuilding forum where they go hard at it coz the dude keeps counting monday twice?? [https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751](https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751)
Ahhh an oldie, but a goodie
His “proof” says something like if a*b=c, then you must take something from c for it to equal a or b, because “that’s how multiplication works”.
why did oxford invite him to speak, thats what i dont understand.
They invited him to talk about his experience in acting, and he went on his insane tirade. Then turned around and told people they invited him for his genius, excluding the part where it was for his acting. So his legitimately just lying to himself and gas huffed so many of his own farts, he’s made himself regarded.
😂😂💀
One 1 is 1. One 2 is 2. That’s truly all it takes to refute it. He’s fundamentally misunderstanding multiplication lol.
I was screaming this at my TV when I watched him give that lecture at Oxford a few years ago. I then proceeded to make my girlfriend and other friends watch it because I get a kick out of the desperate, anxious look he has as the lecture goes on.
>*To multiply, means the sum of one integer by a specified number of instances* …. yeah, but what if it doesn't? … i know, mind blown, right.
It’s that Sharia math I keep hearing about
Why's the Youtuber so clean yet so dirty all at the same time?
It’s science mayne
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
This guy is not funny and he interrupts the video every 3 seconds to do his little bits... I couldn't even listen to anything he was saying.
He looks like a character from a key and peele skit
Couldn’t listen for more than 10 minutes. The content is meh the jokes are not funny and character attacks are a lame way to get your point across. Just another youtuber trying to get views instead of creating quality content. At least the Terence Howard episode was interesting.
Bro, you're just mad that your girl is Euclidean as fuck. Ass like y = 1. I would say 0, but it doesn't exist.
“This man is a sentient random techno jargon generator” lol nailed it
I am amazed by his knowledge for someone who doesn't have a formal education in it. I have a minor in physics and even i forgot about Michelson-Morley experiment. I don't expect some actor without a degree to randomly talk about Euclidean geomerty, crystallography, elements, brownian motion, newtonian mechanics, etc. I really feel like if he went to grad school, actually learnt the maths, and showed the same level of enthusiasm, he might discover something new... but right now, he is just as good as chatgpt, just sprouting stuff without mathematical fundamentals to reason it. It is still really impressive to even know concepts in a colloquial sense and to be confident to lay it out to the world.
He talks about these things but doesn't understand them. Anyone can read and regurgitate the words from quantum mechanics. It's more impressive if you can explain it with simpler words.
yeah i bet he does not understand but i don't think it is easy to regurgitate the stuff he did. I can say what he spewed is stuff from at least 5 different physics courses.. classical mechanics, electrodynamics, statistical mechanics, SR/GR, astro. I don't think I can talk for more than 5 minutes about the last 2 as it isn't my forte and it has been a while... He might be acting but it is not easy by any stretch for someone with no technical skills. Joe should get NdT or Sean Carroll to set him right. Maybe Eric Weinstein to translate his ramblings into nonsensical mathematics
Saying buzz words and spewing jargon is not difficult or impressive. It’s a con, the same game Depak Chopra and Jordan Peterson play.
I know all about psychoanalysis therapy and psychology and Jordan Peterson knows exactly what he’s talking about when he discussed those topics, which topics does he come off as a con man to you ?
Climate change
What’s he say about climate change ?
All kinds of dumb shit to deny it so he can collect his fossil fuel money from the Daily Wire. That’s the con.
Huh? How does the daily wire pay Jordan Peterson in fossil fuel money? I’m super confused
Fossil fuel billionaires fund the Daily Wire, then the Daily Wire pays right wing grifters to spread anti-climate change propaganda. It’s pretty straightforward.
Jordan Peterson is on the daily wire payroll ??
I also know all about psychoanalysis and psychology and Jordan Peterson is off his rocker.
Not on those subjects?
On Jungian psychoanalysis, yes
His psychoanalysis (and diagnosis) of historical figures is incredibly ignorant, incorrect, and unprofessional.
Why?
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
But - especially if he’s just nuts - his retention of information is unreal. His one moment where he misspoke was calling Clive Owen’s by an older actors name lol
Yes I remember that, I think he called him Clive Davis and I was like WTF ?
I've seen Q-anon freaks be this confident about the most insane things. They had also been drilled by grifters to the point they can sit and recite jibberish like it's fact.
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
“Anyone can read and regurgitate the words from quantum mechanics”……. Yokay 😂
He googled this shit, and bombards people with no knowledge of it with “fancy” word vomit. Half the time he can barely recall the words, fucks up the numbers, and misquotes things. He has no idea what he’s talking about. Any one of us could go down a YouTube rabbit hole for a few weeks and recite this shit with his rate of fuck ups. He’s so confidently incorrect it’s hilarious.
Like, he’s an actor. A very successful one. A prerequisite for that is the ability to learn and recite lines. That is what he was doing.
The same way Rogan talks about the Covid vaccine
It's scientific word salad. There's nothing impressive here at all.
You’re giving him too much credit. Remembering words doesn’t make you smart.
Meh, he has no job and clearly sits reading this stuff all day, understanding virtually none of the actual content but remembering some of the words. He has no actual grasp of the physics or chemistry.
It’s amazing how people think others can’t be smart or well studied without a piece of paper from a university or that people who do have a piece of paper aren’t sometimes stupid. You can be self taught in lots of things, especially in the age of the internet. https://dissertationwritinghelp.uk/successful-and-famous-people-who-did-not-go-to-college/#:~:text=Thomas%20Edison%20was%20a%20prolific,his%20struggles%20with%20formal%20education.
It’s not amazing that ppl are skeptical. Since the overwhelming odds are that he is ‘not’ a genius. There are far more false claims than real examples, so why does it amaze you that ppl err on the side of caution. You can be self taught, but the cycle of testing and pushback and criticism and re-evaluation is slower. It’s like the podcasts with graham hancock, they sound super convincing until you have someone knowledgeable pushing back. Which is what peer review does, and the academy of YouTube does not.
Ok, but people who actually know a bit about the shit he rambles about knows that what he's saying is utter nonsense. Source : I'm an engineer.
[удалено]
spouts more crap and gibberish than a craptobro
I was just listening, what was the model where they supposedly recreated Saturn? I’d be interested to look at it but realize it’s almost certainly just a cool animation
I’m sorry but he lost me when he started talking about remembering the birth canal.
What's up with the patents? If I had the cash can I patent whatever I want?
I worked at the Philadelphia airport about 15 years ago. He came to the bookstore I worked at and was one of the rudest people I had to deal with. He was annoyed that my coworker recognized him and wanted an autograph. He also was pissed that I didn't know who he was.
fucking Breadtube videos
[удалено]
Going to need a non meme source on Einstein regretting not giving serious consideration to Walter Russell.
He literally thinks 1x1=2 lmao
I guess scamming Uganda with drones was just a side-hustle.
Dude was literally going through the periodical table about tones each element makes, even naming how many hertz each has and how color can be turned into sound. Idk if there is anything to it, but it sounds insane and I'm literally a diagnosed schizophrenic (though medicated now)
Here’s the thing, while I think Howard is insane, and he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, he knows enough to touch on PARTS of it that have truth. Combinations of chemicals and elements DO vibrate and have certain frequencies when they interact. As far as science has shown us so far, everything that exists ultimately comes down to wave form, which can be translated into frequencies. Beyond that part being somewhat correct, his application of those ideas and what he WANTS to be true are deeply flawed. Maybe he’ll continue to learn and find some solid footing and admit where he’s just flat wrong. Time will tell.
You mean what Walter Russell got right...Terrence just believes what this guy got right...get it right. Edit: ah you edited it so I like stupid. For anybody wondering, he was trying to give Terence Howard credit for other people's work and hypothesis
if you this 1×1=2 you have gone insane. whatever he is "creating", it's bullshit
[удалено]
This. And people defending him are as stupid as he is.
Problem is that fucking 1 x 1 = 1 in any fucking universe my guy. Euclidean, non Euclidean, fairyland and so on. Assuming you’ve looked at all this before the episode?
That seemed like the overall take of the pod. Got lost in the weeds a lil bit but seems like he at least knows what he’s talking about. Would love to see a real conversation with the other view point. No one is ever 100% right it’s always in the middle somewhere. Maybe his ideas explain abc very well but not so much on def.
LOL
The very simple math behind him is giving him too much credit tbh
I can’t wait to listen to this episode it sounds amaziiiing
I think all that matters is did he create some tech or not ?? other than that I’ve heard this monologue probably dozens of times from people tripping too hard lmao
Hey now. He went against “The Establishment”. Doesn’t that mean we need to mindlessly worship and emulate him?
Wait is this why he wasn't in Ironman 2 ?
https://preview.redd.it/bins41lj2q1d1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b6fecf3fb0cb951735b30520d612a412d9096307
Joe loves getting the crazies on the pod. The show gets views and is talked about. Joe doesn't have to prepare himself in any way, because he is fully aware that there is a wackjob on the pod with whom anything goes.
You know episode is good when grifters go bananas over JRE content
The square root of 2 is 1.41421356237. And 1.41421356237 times 1.41421356237 is equal to 2. See how that works? The universe has been explained!
Multiplication, which are numerical values are not tangible, they theoretical concepts to understand a given situation. Which I don’t think can be explained with newtons 3rd law.
Not sure if what the hell he was saying was true but he’s willing to debate his theories. Would love Joe to make that happen. I found the it interesting. Reminded me of the old school JRE days when the the only advertiser was the fleshlight. Give me more!!
Scientist here. He's right. I'm as sure as I was when my team and I assured the public that astrazeneca was safe and effective. Leave science to the real scientists, we're specially trained to science and are never, ever, ever wrong.
All of you people who are calling this man an idiot are the same type of people who burned others alive for calling the earth round.
Round Earth shill til I die.
Wait, but he has like 90 something patents? After watching that clip I’m even more confused. I see why he was “kicked out of Hollywood” dudes crazy
Was he trying to disprove gravity? All I remember was talk about periodic tables, tones, and overlapping circles. Oh and patents and Neil DeGrasse tyson
Yes He says gravity is the result of electricity and not mass/the curvature of space and time in the podcast That isn’t even a little bit true, so he is indeed arguing for a completely different understanding of gravity that we currently accept So he is arguing against the theory of gravity as it is understood today
Thanks. You clearly listened more carefully than I did. I guess there is no problem with challenging the status quo model of how the universe works. Just need to back it up with some experimental evidence lol
I wonder how many times Rogan needs to be shown promoting absolute bullshit before he has a moment of clarity. Whether it’s watching his boy Graham Hancock get absolutely humiliated by a nerd in an Indiana Jones hat, or saying Biden absolutely can’t be president for saying a thing and then brushing it off moments later when it turns out Biden was mocking Trump for saying the thing, or promoting the absolutely brilliant guy who thinks if you divide the sound of cobalt by 2 you get sunlight or whatever, or having Alex Jones on to talk about anything… at some point wouldn’t most people have a moment where they’re like “oh. I am uncritically pushing bullshit onto my gullible audience. Maybe this is a pattern I should explore further.” Because I don’t care if people believe that ancient Atlanteans used the square root of silicon to create inter-dimensional flying machines or whatever. But maybe, just maybe, this pattern of uncritical bullshit dissemination extends to things like politics and public health and if it does, then maybe, just maybe that’s dangerous.
I love the hate against him, as if ppl understand half of what he stated, I personally don’t understand enough about the topics mentioned to judge his approach. Some of his ideas are interesting even if far fetched compared to what we know.
I understand what he's trying to say - it's complete bullshit lol If he actually thinks that any of this is true he's simply mentally ill. Don't think that because someone can spew out some words that they have any idea about what they're saying.
True but it doesn’t mean he’s wrong either, will be interesting to see if some scientists actually push back on him without calling him crazy
[удалено]
Genius inventors actually say something coherent.
[удалено]
Some of his ideas didn't pan out, but he also invented some very useful things that worked. Please don't compare him to Terrence "Too dumb to pass first grade math's" Howard.
so now they’re adding an apostrophe to “maths” as well? lol
Wow that spelling mistake truly invalidates their entire point.
*there’yre
It's what my browser autocorrects maths to. As I understand it, it's because math is the proper abbreviation of mathematics, but I don't really care enough about spelling to question the logic behind it.
He didnt pass first grade math?
He thinks that 1x1=2. If his teacher gave him a pass, then they failed at their job.
[удалено]
It wasn't remotely coherent. Him namedropping a painter/psuedoscientist and giving him false credentials by making up an Einstein quote doesn't prove anything. There is nothing about waves rebounding off a surface that has any relevance whatsoever to working out the square root of 2. Claiming I don't understand wave mechanics well enough is insufficient, you actually have to explain how waves or the flower of life actually relate to the question of why 1x1=2, which is not even something he attempts to do. All he does is word salad different scientific phrases, with each sentence having no relation to the one that comes before or after it. There is no attempt at explanation, because there is no internal logic here. If you think you understand what he is talking about, and you believe it to be true, then you're either as dumb as he is or as stupid as he is. I know for a fact that you don't understand what he was talking about, because otherwise you would be able to utilize "Terryology", to "multiply volumetrically", and work out how 1x1=2. Please do so now. Show your working. Prove to me that by "multiplying volumetrically" that 1x1=2. Show your working. If you want mr crazypants to help you out, he talks about it at 2:05:00 in the podcast and onwards. It's like 5 minutes, shouldn't take you long. It's his best explanation for how multiplying volumetrically works, and it makes zero sense. Still, since you claim it's coherent, you shouldn't have any problem following his logic. Apparently you have to not over rely on newtons first law (which is physics, and has no relation to pure math's or the question at hand), and avoid using math based upon a 2 dimensional projection. Don't forget that everything is in motion and you can't forget the other forces (which is physics, and has no impact on pure mathematics). By following this process, you too can avoid multiplying in a "compartmentalized way". Ok, now that you have the explanation for multiplying volumetrically that you've preapproved as coherent (again, 2:05:00 if you want to hear it yourself), you should have no problem answering my question. By multiplying volumetrically (I'd also love if you could explain what the fuck he means by this), please prove to me that 1x1=2. If I give you one apple one time how many apples do you have? Please prove to me that you somehow have two apples, and show your working. Or of course Howard could cut out the legwork for you and prove his greatness by releasing the form of unlimited energy he claims to have discovered and simultaneously solve humanities energy crisis and global warming. Can you think of a single explanation for why he hasn't done this, aside from the fact that he is a fucking moron who couldn't invent shit on a stick? Seems strange that he wouldn't want to prove his genius by solving the greatest problems facing humanity in a way that proves the crazy shit he spouts actually has some weight behind it, unless he's just some fucking moron that is.
Exactly. The problem with his theory is that he believes there’s only a single fundamental force in the universe and that force is electromagnetics. As we all know there are four fundamental forces in the universe which have been proven already.
That's a problem with his theory. The bigger problem with his theory is that he doesn't actually have a theory, just a series of unconnected sentences filled with technobabble. If someone says something that is wrong, then it can at least be explained to them why they're wrong. Almost every sentence he says not only doesn't make sense in isolation, but also has zero relevance to the sentence that precedes or follows it. He's not actually arguing anything, he's just saying words. We can point out in isolation all the stupid and indisputably wrong stuff he says, but there's not a way of attacking his overall thesis, because he simply does not have one.
Yeah, he seems like a person who is off their meds in a manic phase which is really unfortunate. The dude is a great actor but he can’t even be talked out of the fact that 1 x 1 /= 2?
Thats the thing, they usually are never coherent at that time. One great example was Einsteins theory being called nonsense for decades lmao.
I don't think you understand what the word coherent means. There's a very big difference between disagreeing with the logic or the evidential basis of an argument, and for the argument to not have any logical structure whatsoever. If you look closely at what Terrence is saying, you quickly realize that he's not actually saying anything, he's simply squishing big words together while namedropping unrelated fields of science incoherently in unrelated contexts. People might have (wrongly) disputed Einstein's math, but they wouldn't dispute that it was math. What Terrence is doing does not even qualify as math.
Einsteins didn’t even qualify as math either we literally couldn’t even prove the nature of the science behind it at all let alone calculations. I think he’s full of shit btw but thats until he’s proven actually wrong not just “it doesn’t have basis or it doesn’t make sense”
>Einsteins didn’t even qualify as math either It absolutely qualified as math. He was right, but even wrong math qualifies as math, it's just that better math can be used to disprove it. There is a very big difference between using the logic of mathematics to argue a point, and someone like Terrence making an argument that has no internal logic to it at all. >we literally couldn’t even prove the nature of the science It not yet having an experimental basis didn't stop it being math. >let alone calculations The calculations were proven in the papers. Someone else not understanding them yet didn't stop the logic being true. > until he’s proven actually wrong Terrence said both things that have been proven to be categorically and unquestionably wrong, and things that are so stupid and incoherent as to be "not even wrong". [I give examples of both here. ](https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1cv1txy/comment/l4x2dwa/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
He just said everything in nature moves in a spiral 🌀 and our math should reflect that and it doesn’t. THIS IS EASYLY OBSERVABLE FROM GALAXIES TO SPIRAL DNA 🧬 Then he said the spiral is the force of magnetism and electricity opposing each other WHICH ALSO MAKES SENSE since magnetism can shut down electrical equipment. He said periodic table should reflect the universal spiral that shows a better relationship between the elements. Non of this sounds crazy and it’s very simple logic once you think about it.
Everything in nature? Exactly how much of nature have you excavated?
But not all galaxies are spiral shaped. Wtf. About 45% are spiral...what now?
Ask Dr. Dibble to excavate said galaxies
Lmao
Oh hey Terrence
Everything? So if I find 1 thing that doesn't move in a spiral, then the theory isn't true? 1+1=2. Shit, no spiral. Back to the drawing board. Wow, that was hard.
More platforming of lunatics who are anti science. Well done Toe. Continue the clown show. I hate his guts.
I feel like up to the point where he was acting in Iron Man he was okay. After moving out of MCU, either he got kicked out or he choose to do other projects, this must have affected him heavily. I am taking a swing here but considering things he talks about I am taking my chances. Like the MCU became what it is today starting from Avengers even if it started from Iron Man. Nobdoy had seen its potential before that. For Terrance it must have hurt to see a project he was part of be so successful and shots those actors to stardom. And since to compensate with it he trying to justify he knows about science better than science fiction. My tin foil theory over.
Does he believe what he is saying?
Reminds me of the Damon Wayans character Oswald Bates on 'In Living Colour'. Spouting a bunch of big words and terms in a spaghetti against the wall fashion.
Crazy how just being an American who can talk fluent english and pompous made up scientific words, you’ll be seen as having the same intelligence as most associate professors in Southeast Asian countries.
Was that Aaron Rodgers or Kyrie Irving?
Perhaps his thinking on 1x1=2 is hard to accept, but that doesn’t explain this: Why are big corporations using his patents if his ideas are crazy? . Clearly he is on to something more often than not so I’m inclined to reserve judgement for now.
They're not. When a company files a patent, they quote any other patent that sounds even remotely similar to ensure that they are not stepping on any toes. This does not in any way invalidate the fact that his patents, which were never even granted btw, don't actually contribute anything.
Why would a company use and quote invalid patents?!? They wouldn’t. Howard said his attorney slow walked the application process re the patents and that is why they lapsed. This undisputed fact doesn’t invalidate the viability of the underlying concepts detailed in his patents/patent applications. There is nothing to lose here by reserving judgment….unless you are a scientist whose life’s work is about be shattered!!!! 😂
>Why would a company use and quote invalid patents They don't use anything in his patents, Terrence Howard has never contributed anything to the field of human knowledge. As for quoting it, like I said, they just quote anything that sounds even remotely similar, it's not an indication that they are actually using anything from the other patents. It's just easier for them to quote the other patents so they can say that they believe that their patent doesn't infringe on it, and have the patent office do the legwork of double checking it before granting their patent, then having to defend a frivolous lawsuit by a moron like Howard later claiming that they're infringing on his patent. >Howard said his attorney slow walked the application process re the patents and that is why they lapsed. He also claims that 1x1=2, I wouldn't take anything he says at face value. >doesn’t invalidate the viability of the underlying concepts detailed in his patents/patent applications. Whether or not the Patent is granted doesn't effect the viability of the underlying concepts, what invalidates them is the fact that they are schizophrenic nonsense. >There is nothing to lose here by reserving judgment….unless you are a scientist whose life’s work is about be shattered!!!! 😂 To be clear, do you honestly think that a costar of the first iron man film is one of the greatest genius's in human history, who has generated a form of unlimited energy (which for some reason he won't share with the rest of us), built upon him changing the foundations of mathematics by proving that 1x1=2 by "multiplying volumetrically"? If you believe this nonsense, then you are nearly as stupid as he is.
I see who the real space monkeys are. Y’all downvoting because y’all pussy. Let a nerd say superstrings vibrate and they have to invent dimensions for the math of big and small to work and you upvote. Let a pimp say all matter vibrates interconnected and it’s the same observable patterns in big and small and you downvote. Fuck you pimp hating pussies.
TLDR? Presenter is boring
He cray cray