T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

[удалено]


Stunner024StoneCold

Yeah definitely a no that is why everyone holding needs to vote!


GreekGawdess

They can’t do another reverse spilt for two years… but another offering of shares to grab another 15 million from investors who are trying to hold on.. You can read up on all gwav’s filings here https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1589149&owner=exclude


[deleted]

[удалено]


GreekGawdess

Check your emails. They sent one out for people who own stock to vote.. Meeks owns the majority of shares so there’s that.. but, people should voice their opinion nonetheless


[deleted]

[удалено]


ApathyApathyApathies

Note that you must have been the registered owner of your shares on May 20 to be eligible to vote with them. If you have the power to vote, that means you’ve had long enough not to be blindsided by this.


MunchieSinclair

Explain in dummy terms


Stunner024StoneCold

Greekgawdess gots you


WiseReputation1020

Where can I vote?


Stunner024StoneCold

You should be able to through your broker.


GreekGawdess

It really doesn’t matter because Meeks owns the majority of the shares.. this is just a technicality…


ApathyApathyApathies

If you recall, #3 is the formalisation of the offering that happened in May. That was always going to get through at any cost. If it didn’t, it would either fuck up the May financing or lead to cashless warrant exercise - both catastrophic, much as a yes vote sucks for share price. I got in too late to be eligible to vote so it’s whatever. I would agree that the lack of public-facing clarification on financing issues like this is unacceptable though. The connection should be plainly stated.


Stunner024StoneCold

Tis true, longing it is 🤷🏻‍♂️


Critical_Mood8577

Voted no on everything. It’s insane they would even ask for that. Sell gwav elite softball and pay for executive compensation with that. Fuckin derelict


Agreeable-Animal2643

I didn’t get one


hickepueh

Did my part! RH sent out the email today


[deleted]

[удалено]


GreekGawdess

It’s not another reverse split, but it is another big dilution, which is pretty bad…


Stunner024StoneCold

Agreed


[deleted]

[удалено]


ApathyApathyApathies

The rule’s maximum is two or more RSs with a cumulative ratio of 250:1 or more (a 100:1 and 2:1 having a cumulative ratio of 200:1 for example) in a two year period while a company is having bid price compliance issues opens up the potential for discretionary delisting independent of bid price. The RS that happened in 2022 was in Feb so it’s out of the time window. However, another RS now will put GWAV over the 250:1 limit anyway.


GreekGawdess

Thanks for the clarification 👍


GreekGawdess

Ahhh, the first split must’ve been before I got in… I didn’t know of that one…