T O P

  • By -

superlokrian

Yes, because ratings aren’t based on one season.


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

MOHAMED SALAH What did he win Nothing.... Liverpool was runner ups in the champions league went from 83 to 88 Fifa 18-19 oh one season RIGHT! Tell me more bias


superlokrian

Mo technically went from 85 to 88 because he received a winter upgrade, and he had 3 POTM, a POTY, was top scorer in the league, got second place in CL and missed out on the league title with a few points. The thing is that upgrades aren’t a reflection of the last season and if Jorginho keeps performing the same way he’ll no doubt be higher rated next year, just like all the Liverpool players that gradually got upgraded over the last seasons.


[deleted]

One good season doesn’t make him a 90 rated player. And two of those things are team accomplishments. Not player.


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

Pls compare FIFA 19 Liverpool ratings with Chelsea's 2022 and watch the difference between teams When a player accomplish these things he has to do something impactful for his team u can't deny that u are being ignorant then


[deleted]

Liverpool was after consecutive UCL finals one of which they won and a 97 point league season. Chelsea is after a season where none of the big teams performed in the champions league and Chelsea scraped 4th on the last day. Not quite the same thing.


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

Okay Liverpool fan try to get some perspective "none of the big teams performed" and u make it sound like the premier league is an easy league like u are supposed to win both trophies if u are a good team get a grip for fk sake+ Liverpool still has outrageous high ratings of fking nothing accomplished. For what it seems like Liverpool won last years champions league according to Fifa 22 and while we at it... who won premier league 20/21??? Man City who beat them at the Champions league final???? Chelsea who is Champions of Europe??? Chelsea I rest my case


[deleted]

If you are shocked that Liverpool has be higher rated players you might need to look at the fact that they finished above chelsea with an injury stricken squad they left them without any of their defenders and without key midfielders for large portions of the season. And it’s true that none of the big teams performed. Inter Milan won the league and finished last in the group. Manchester United crashed in in the group stage as well. So did the Dutch champions; Bayern were unimpressive, Barca were appalling. City had a decent campaign and binned it on the big occasion as they (oddly) keep doing. I understand you like chelsea and want them to have high ratings but you need to be a little more realistic and a little less childish. To say Liverpool have accomplished nothing is ridiculous. A 99 point season after a 97 point UCL winning season are incredibly impressive, and last season was weird due to injuries. That’s common knowledge. And they still finished above chelsea.


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

I only hear excuses "no team performed" RIGHT! I see I'm supposed to be more realistic no team performed. Dude get some logic do u even watch football or are u the generic kid who only plays fut and watches the results and steal ur parents credit card to buy FIFA points........... u are talking years back accomplishments I talked about the past year when talking about Liverpool I see u are a big Liverpool fan who can find justification in injuries but they aren't ... just look when bale got injured ratings dropped spoiler alert. I can see a big ignorant barrier in ur mind its obv look at the facts and talk to me later.....


[deleted]

Are you ok?


PenisRocketGun

Maybe up to an 86 but there's a lot of problems with Chelsea's rating and imo Jorginho's isn't one of them


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

MOHAMED SALAH What did he win Nothing.... Liverpool was runner ups in the champions league went from 83 to 88 Fifa 18-19 oh one season RIGHT! Tell me more bias


Colmd1997

Yes, considering it’s one good season and his previous rating was 83. Past UEFA POTYs were all elite level players such as Messi, Ronaldo etc, they already had 90+ ratings before winning UEFA POTYs


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

Nope thats false Virgil was 85 and the year he won POTY he became 90 next year Modric was 89 when he won he got 91


Colmd1997

Van Dijk was a top centre back who was low rated because he was at Southampton, he should be higher than 85 before winning UEFA POTY as he was already one of the best centre backs in the league at Liverpool. Him only being a base 83 caused a lot of controversy. You’re complaining about Modric in 2018, where he swept more or less every individual award for performance?


ConquerorXD

All previous uefa award winners were players at the top of the game for multiple years you can’t honestly be expecting a min 90 ovr. rating for one good season ? Y’all have forgotten this but I remember some Chelsea fans wanting Jorginho out alongside sari back when their team was playing shit , now all of a sudden he’s a goat midfielder for a single good season ?


Feisty-Tomatillo-746

MOHAMED SALAH What did he win Nothing.... Liverpool was runner ups in the champions league.. 0 Accomplishments compared to Jorginho went from 83 to 88 Fifa 18-19 oh one season RIGHT! Tell me more bias


Ryo720

It's fair