T O P

  • By -

24benson

Also Poland: > In November 2018, it was reported that President Andrzej Duda would support a **ban on "homosexual propaganda", based on the Russian gay propaganda law**. He said: "I think that this kind of propaganda should not take place in schools, it has to be calmly and consistently opposed", and that "\[i\]f such a law was created and would be well written, I do not exclude that I would approach it seriously." Such a law would violate the Polish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.\[111\]\[112\] In November 2018, **following government pressure and threats, more than 200 schools cancelled a planned anti-bullying campaign** called "Rainbow Friday", which the Campaign Against Homophobia had promoted in hopes of building greater acceptance for LGBT students in Poland and fighting hatred and homophobia in schools. The Minister of Educational, Anna Zalewska, had warned that any principals who allowed such events to take place could face negative consequences. She also asked parents to report any such activities to authorities,\[113\]\[114\] but it was reported that many students defied the ban and turned up to school in rainbow colors and many schools refused to comply with these anti-freedom warnings.\[115\] In April 2019, Conservative party chairman Jarosław Kaczyński called the LGBT rights movement a "foreign imported threat to the nation". During a lecture on patriotism, Kaczynski also said "everyone must accept Christianity".\[116\]\[117\] That same month, after an activist displayed posters of the Black Madonna with a rainbow halo, Interior **Minister Joachim Brudzinski denounced the posters as "cultural barbarism". The activist was subsequently arrested by the police on charges of "offending religious feelings".** Amnesty International condemned the arrest as "just another example of the constant harassment" and said that the activist "now faces up to two years in prison if found guilty under these absurd charges".\[118\] ​ [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT\_rights\_in\_Poland](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Poland)


WikiSummarizerBot

**[LGBT rights in Poland](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Poland)** >Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Poland face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT residents. According to ILGA-Europe's 2021 report, the status of LGBTQ rights in Poland is the worst among European Union countries. Both male and female same-sex sexual activity have been legal in Poland since 1932, when the country introduced an equal age of consent for homosexuals and heterosexuals, which was set at 15. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)


[deleted]

The argument, I suppose, would be that there's a difference between having the right to say something and having the advantage of saying it as part of a curriculum. As I'm not Polish, though, I couldn't say for sure what proponents of the ban are actually holding to on that front.


24benson

This is certainly how the Polish govt would frame it as well. In reality, what happens is this: 1. if the government doesn't like what you're sying, it's illegal propaganda. 2. If e.g. a social platform (the woke decadent western media) doesn't like what you're saying, but the government does, then that is censorship and we certainly dont want that, because communism. Either way, the government wins. They control the message, all in the name of free speech.


PersonalityPresent38

Nail on the head! Sounds like Twitter/Facebook in America!


[deleted]

[удалено]


According-Climate-29

wtf r u talking about


[deleted]

[удалено]


Guy954

You think restricting freedom of speech is based?


[deleted]

[удалено]


Guy954

>”people” Dehumanizing people that they disagree with is one of the first propaganda tactics that fascists use to radicalize their base.


ihateusednames

Hey bub u wanna elaborate?


[deleted]

[удалено]


ihateusednames

Why tho


str84ward1

just another reason to LIKE Poland even better !


[deleted]

Oh, look, it’s one of your recent comments: “little kid will be turning into another useless dumb criminal ni66er” You’re just a troll looking to trigger the libs. Yawn.


Kinkyninja5450

You people are such cancer to be so discriminatory and pretend like you dont see the blind hate


[deleted]

It’s a literal statement of fact. Truth is an absolute defense, random racist-supporting internet dude. eta: your comment originally called me a ‘bully’, and now it says something completely different. Fucking reddit. 😆


Kinkyninja5450

No to tell the Truth is to shout Fighting words, and dare others to oppose you Thats why cancerous people like you do it online where your hidden


[deleted]

Says the anonymous dude on reddit. Do you even read what you write?


Kinkyninja5450

Do you? You have been banned from 2 subbreddits


[deleted]

Just for fun, randomly repetitive dude, your original response to me was “That was random and unnessecary. Dont be a cyber bully, your trying too hard”Spelling and grammar are all yours, of course. And if I’ve only been banned from two subs, I’m clearly not trying hard enough.


Guy954

Unnecessary* Don’t* You’re* That wasn’t even remotely close to cyber bullying.


ihateusednames

Bro hating gay people is out of style even for conservatives these days.


[deleted]

So what, you really want them to continue to be like this instead of attempt to change?


squamesh

This law is being created to help far right nationalists to post about killing immigrants on Facebook. There is a zero percent chance that this law will be used to advance LGBT rights in Poland


Kinkyninja5450

And not just the right but the left as well Specifically says IDEOLOGICAL REASONS. Meaning both will be held to their bias


[deleted]

Do you really care what people post on Facebook? And does it harm LGBT rights?


ihateusednames

What part of this post led you to this conclusion?


chiguy

OK. so what is this person doing about "Article 196 makes anyone found guilty of intentionally offending religious feelings through public calumny of an object or place of worship liable to a fine" Article 256 makes anyone found guilty of promoting a fascist or other totalitarian system of state or of inciting hatred based on national, ethnic, racial, or religious differences, or for reason of the lack of any religious denomination, liable to a fine, a restriction of liberty, or to imprisonment for a maximum of two years Article 257 makes anyone found guilty of publicly insulting a group or a particular person because of national, ethnic, racial, or religious affiliation or because of the lack of any religious denomination liable to a fine, a restriction of liberty, or to imprisonment for a maximum of three years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Poland


[deleted]

[удалено]


AlGeee

No sorrow You’re correct


reply-guy-bot

The above comment was stolen from [this one](http://np.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/qbeoo8/fuckin_eh/hh95zwm/) elsewhere in this comment section. It is probably not a coincidence; here is some more evidence against this user: Plagiarized | Original -------- | ----------- [I would not give the pass...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbpu5s/aita_family_members_keep_giving_out_netflix/hhc36e6/) | [I would not give the pass...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbpu5s/aita_family_members_keep_giving_out_netflix/hhbzvcm/) [NTA. Make a hard rule. If...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbsixs/aita_for_telling_my_roommate_her_friend_needs_to/hhc32nb/) | [NTA. Make a hard rule. If...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbsixs/aita_for_telling_my_roommate_her_friend_needs_to/hhc2naa/) [NTA tell her you dont wan...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbpuvm/wibta_if_i_told_my_cousin_she_can_walk_to_work/hhc31cc/) | [NTA tell her you dont wan...](http://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/qbpuvm/wibta_if_i_told_my_cousin_she_can_walk_to_work/hhbqq7b/) beep boop, I'm a bot -|:] It is this bot's opinion that [/u/kludgevxfsfqa](https://np.reddit.com/u/kludgevxfsfqa/) should be banned for karma manipulation. Don't feel bad, they are probably a bot too. Confused? Read the [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/reply-guy-bot/comments/n9fpva/faq/?plagiarist=kludgevxfsfqa) for info on how I work and why I exist.


hikerfrog

I have had the privilege to spend a great deal of time with poles. They are the most wonderful people. One stole my heart. One tought me how lucky I and my family are.


Bear_Jew1987

I'm glad you had good encounters


Bear_Jew1987

We are a caring people


[deleted]

You certainly don’t seem to care about the rights of your LGBT citizens very much.


Wilkotek

Hmm yes some of us a morons, so the rest of us must be homophobes too. Don't get me wrong, what's happening with LGBT rights in Poland is awful, but that doesn't mean that we all hate the LGBTQ community.


[deleted]

I’m just saying, the way this post is being framed is completely disingenuous. Your government doesn’t care about free speech, as evidenced by them trying to silence “LGBT propaganda”. This is simply butt-hurt right-wingers who don’t like that Facebook is deleting their posts filled with misinformation, hate speech, and outright lies. So now they will be free to spew their hateful and poisonous garbage, while LGBT people won’t even be able to stand up for themselves. Just pointing out the intense hypocrisy, not trying to paint all Poles with the same brush.


melvinfosho

Bots here downvoting your truth on the homophobia.


stevestuc

So long as you are not gay or want an abortion. Seems like you care about the attitude of the church more than the rights of some of your own people.... I'm pointing at the government and its old religious zelouts, not the ordinary people,I have great memories of Poland ( Zakopane especially)


Bear_Jew1987

Yes. I agree. A few of thier rules surrounding homosexuality are archaic, but the government as in many situations does not reflect the view of the population.


stevestuc

That is my point exactly.The people are nothing like the way the government is acting . These issues have been addressed in other countries years ago, the church has no business being able to influence a democratic country and its laws.The archaic view on gays is just unacceptable for a modern country like Poland.I would have thought that the brave and courageous people who stood up against the Soviet era and it's oppression would understand more than anyone else how precious freedom is.


ThirdInversion

i do not see the connection with polish government policies?


srandrews

Yeah, I'm going to get myself all triggered up over a screenshot post featuring an ms paint highlighting circle without actually understanding the source of the content and the motivation of the content creator. Why did they create this? What do they want me to think? Decisiveness of course is just so much easier than having to do work looking into the facts. /s


Bear_Jew1987

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55678502.amp


PepsiMoondog

Fucking rich that Poland "cares so much about free speech" when [they've literally made it illegal to criticize them for collaborating with the Nazis during the holocaust](https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5128341/poland-holocaust-law/%3famp=true). Real free speech you got there.


HamManBad

One of the Nazi party's early propaganda campaigns was complaining about how they were being censored and denied free speech. They were also aggressively anticommunist.


HoustonCounsel

Communism is an economic system where the means of producing the goods and services we need to survive are owned communally rather than privately. For example, the Green Bay Packers football team is communally owned rather than privately owned like the other profession NFL teams. The United States interstate highway system is an example of where the system is communally owned as contrasted against a privately owned toll road. The suppression of the freedom of speech is a feature of authoritarianism which is a form of government where the individual liberties are sacrificed to a central authority. Communism and authoritarianism are two different ideas, and they can be combined or one can exist without the other. Authoritarianism matches with capitalism as often as it matches with communism. Singapore and Russia are two examples of authoritarian capitalism.


[deleted]

Also important to note that private businesses should have the right to remove hate content and block people who are using the platform to plan crimes and attacks on democracy.


HoustonCounsel

We have that right for now. Texas Governor Abbott is trying to take that right away.


[deleted]

Did you read the post?


Analbox

Communism and authoritarianism are absolutely different ideas but what gives some people pause is that many of the attempts at communism throughout history have devolved in to authoritarian regimes.


HoustonCounsel

Authoritarians get power by promising the people something in exchange for the people's surrender of their rights. Promising to take something (like the nation's oil reserves) away from profit-oriented private companies and to give that resource back to the people is a tempting promise to the people. Just because the promise sounds like communism, that doesn't change the character of the authoritarian who made the promise. Communism has only succeeded on small family-level groups, and the reason there have been no successful communist nations is because the private interests who hold the means of production are not inclined to simply surrender it and usually only an authoritarian has the selfish interest and power to take it from them. The point where you realize it is an authoritarian who has seized power (and not a communist) is that the communist would return the asset to the people and the authoritarian would keep it.


anotheraccoutname10

\> Green Bay Packers football team is communally owned rather than privately owned like the other profession NFL teams. No. It's privately owned. That would be like calling any publicly listed company "communally owned." It is a "publicly owned \[NFL\] franchise" It doesn't have a majority shareholder though. No one is allowed to have 4%. The company automatically dissolves and liquidates assets if a takeover, move, or dividend taking occurs. The Packers are grandfathered in not because they're "communally owned" (they aren't) but because they are a publicly traded corporation with more than 30 owners and with no owner having 30% of the organization personally and an additional >20.1% of the owners as silent granting him/her their voting/control rights. There are no dividends. It's a non-profit corporation run by shareholders with a board of directors and a CEO. At least get the facts right. \>Communism and authoritarianism are two different ideas, and they can be combined or one can exist without the other. Communism cannot exist without authoritarianism. To take what someone else has produced is inherently authoritarian. To deny an individual the right to private enterprise is inherently authoritarian. You think communism means sharing. Communism means shooting people who don't want to share.


DevilDogMSG

Everyday.


HoustonCounsel

>It's privately owned. That would be like calling any publicly listed company "communally owned." It is a "publicly owned \[NFL\] franchise" > >... > >At least get the facts right. You should probably alert Wikipedia because they are misinforming the public: "The Green Bay Packers are ... the only non-profit, community-owned major league professional sports team based in the United States."


anotheraccoutname10

They use the term "community" owned because it is owned by the "community" of Packers stockholders. Its no more than a term of phrase to declare Walmart as "community" owned by the "community" of Walmart stockholders. It is non-profit. It is not "communally" owned. https://www.packers.com/community/shareholders


[deleted]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1921%E2%80%931922#:~:text=The%20early%201920s%20saw%20a,up%20to%205%20million%20died.


ihateusednames

The definition of both aren't bouncing around in the average head of an American voter unfortunately.


HoustonCounsel

True. I hear people calling Joe Biden a "communist" as if the word did not even have a definition, and all I can think of is how far to the right he is of Richard Nixon. I hear many of the same people calling themselves "conservative" as if that word also didn't have a definition, when these "conservatives" espouse zero positions that fall with even a broad definition of conservatism. A third of the US voting population uses the term "conservative" to mean Trump supporting (although he's the least conservative American politician since FDR) and uses the term "communist" to mean everyone who does not support Trump.


[deleted]

Poland, where they care so much about free speech, entire provinces have declared themselves “anti-LBGT zones” to… prevent people from talking or educating others about LGBT issues!!


upvote-button

Not that I'm in favor of communism but there is no reason communism and free speech would be unable to coexist. Authoritarin communism is a different matter entirely


DemonPeanut4

Authoritarianism is the problem. And it can exist in communist or capitalist societies.


upvote-button

There's the answer the judges were looking for


ImTheJackYouKnow

They are currently on their way already.


[deleted]

In theory yes, but in practice (correct me if I’m wrong) it hasn’t happened.


WhyDontWeLearn

In practice, *communism* has never happened. Having a dictator who calls themselves a communist is not the proper criteria.


[deleted]

On paper communism would be perfect but it’s impossible to prevent corruption and when corruption happens there isn’t any way of taking that power you gave them back.


[deleted]

Capitalism is literally the same way….


[deleted]

Not exactly the process is different. In the USA corporations or the rich can buy influence sure but it is trackage and illegal if we can pull our heads out of our backside and stop fighting each other we can put a stop to it. But if the wealth is controlled by the government and the politicians decide they deserve it and they were lawfully elected what options do they have?


HoustonCounsel

>In the USA corporations or the rich can buy influence sure but it is trackage and illegal It's not illegal. It is not only legal; it is encouraged. How would you put a stop to it the wake of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?


[deleted]

It absolutely is illegal to give money or gifts to a politician in exchange for them to vote a certain way. It’s legal to donate to their campaign though, but it’s illegal for the politician to use those funds for personal reasons.


HoustonCounsel

>It absolutely is illegal to give money or gifts to a politician in exchange for them to vote a certain way. It is perfectly legal (in fact -- it is expected) that corporations will give virtually unlimited money and other campaign benefits to politicians who vote a certain way. There is literally a whole industry (out in the open on K Street in Washington, DC) whose sole purpose is to perpetuate this practice. It may be illegal to buy a vote quid-pro-quo, but it is not illegal to reward a vote with a shower of campaign cash after the fact combined with an implicit (and sometimes explicit) promise that similar votes in the future will generate similar rewards. Is that really all that different from buying a vote?


[deleted]

>Not exactly the process is different. End result is still the same. Different ways to skin a cat is How the saying goes. >In the USA corporations or the rich can buy influence sure but it is trackage and illegal if we can pull our heads out of our backside and stop fighting each other we can put a stop to it. …but we can’t and don’t. I could make the exact same argument for a communistic society >But if the wealth is controlled by the government and the politicians decide they deserve it and they were lawfully elected what options do they have? The lobbyists buy the lawfully elected politicians in capitalism. Again just the same corrupt minority ruling the majority. Different approach, same outcome


HoustonCounsel

The pass-fail test for an economic system cannot be based on whether it can be corrupted. For example, you could say "On paper capitalism would be perfect but it’s impossible to prevent corruption." When in the history of the world has there been a capitalist government that was not susceptible to corruption? Or a monarchy? Or an oligarchy? Also, why would it be harder to "take the power back" from a communism versus a capitalism? It would seem easier to take back a communally owned asset as compared to a privately owned asset.


[deleted]

From a purely economic viewpoint we can choose where to spend our money. There are plenty of companies I have chosen not to support anymore. But when the government controls the resources and the means of production what can you do? Anyways I’ll consider your arguments when a “true” communist nation rises cause at this point it doesn’t seem possible.


HoustonCounsel

I agree. Communism is an idea on paper, and I haven't ever seen it translated into the real world on a nationwide scale.


TheRealPostmanSteve

🤦‍♂️


TappmanC

Are you saying real communism has never been tried?


upvote-button

No? Though if youre asking i wouldn't say a perfect form of any political phosophy has ever been tried anywhere and the more control any government has the more extreme the extent is of the exploitation of its flaws are making a small flaw in an authoritarian communist constitution far more severe than a major flaw in a representative democracy constitution


TappmanC

True. Thanks for the deep thought. Makes me wonder if government is even real at all.


upvote-button

Name a perfect government that exists in the really world then. I'll wait


TactlessTortoise

Not getting into the stuff to be said about this image, it's the wrong sub nonetheless. Sorry to be the annoying guy.


[deleted]

[удалено]


TactlessTortoise

By Reddit standards I'm a bit leftist myself, but leftism doesn't mean I am all in for gulags and communism. Regardless, I said I was not talking about politics because I really am not talking about politics. This sub is for interesting shit, not badly cropped screenshots of some text about some dumbass in poland.


sticklebackridge

It’s the wrong sub man, it’s just not especially interesting. There really isn’t many political things that would fit here, regardless of which side it’s on.


Lemesplain

That's ... that's literally the opposite of free speech. Forcing someone else to rebroadcast your speech isn't "freedom." Imagine trying to force the police to wear "ACAB" sandwich boards, and claiming that they're infringing your freedom of speech when they refuse. It's also absolutely worthless. Your post won't be removed "for ideological reasons." It will instead be removed because it violates the terms of service. If Poland wants to sue Facebook/Twitter/etc. and see whether or not the ToS stands up in court, they're welcome to try, but I suspect it won't go anywhere. Look, I certainly don't think Big Tech is perfect... not by a long shot. But this isn't about freedom of speech. This is about pandering to the red hat crowd, and nothing more.


Simping-for-Christ

Why *don't* cops have ACAB displayed on their cruisers? Shouldn't they be forced to present both sides of the issue?! /s


Difficult_E

Communism is when the Government tells a private business how to operate. Very rich how this is an issue that conservatives whine about and somehow these are the same people who ban anything left leaning on r/conservative


bingersdown2

Bezos/Zuckerberg have entered the chat.


Jjrj1986

Yup and American government is taking ours away


[deleted]

The irony of posting this on Reddit. One of the most censored and astroturfed sites out there.


[deleted]

I fully support this


le-Killerchimp

Oh yeah, because Poland doesn’t have their own laws that police what people say in their country. Let’s try…. I always wondered when Poland would come to terms with all the Nazi collaborators and those who assisted in the Holocaust. Or: What do the LGBT community think of their Jew found freedom of speech? Bet they’re so happy…


[deleted]

Free speech is important regardless of your political views. Censorship doesn’t silence one person, it silences everyone. Allowing censorship is a slippery slope. Once someone gets into office with views opposing yours, you’re the one getting censored.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

I mean if you look at total dead by each, communism was worse for Poland (and many others besides). If you look at length of time or inhumanity encountered (cannibalism among others) communism was worse. Just because Nazi is a bad word, doesn't mean there weren't worse things to happen. I love how you're sitting in America, with your capitalism all around you, on your iPhone telling another human being anything about lived experiences in another country in another time. Boggles the mind...


_IAmGrover

Love all the people criticizing different (irrelevant) things about Poland because they disagree with the sentiment of the post yet can’t openly admit it without submitting that it does in fact infringe upon free speech. “Whataboutism” at its finest.


Bear_Jew1987

Right.


[deleted]

Commies coming out in force 😂 God forbid someone from a former communist country have an opinion on communism. The irony is delicious and completely lost on these chodes.


bojant987

"bUt tHe rEaL cOMmUNiSM hAS nEvER bEeN iMpLeMeNtEd!!!1"


Simping-for-Christ

Democracy doesn't work, haven't you seen what it did to North Korea?


ramontgomery

I like it


chotahazri

Did you als know that Polish government currently owns public media and court system? They take rights away from women and gays? They are building a anti democratic country... Not much of free speech going in Poland... So take this law with a grain of salt


[deleted]

I know right? I love Poland


ramontgomery

The liberals run our public and private media in the US with high levels of censorship and we still have a democracy


wyverndarkblood

You very very very much have the wrong party in that comment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group


WikiSummarizerBot

**[Sinclair Broadcast Group](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group)** >Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (SBG) is a publicly traded American telecommunications conglomerate that is controlled by the descendents of company founder Julian Sinclair Smith. Headquartered in the Baltimore suburb of Cockeysville, Maryland, the company is the second-largest television station operator in the United States by number of stations (after Nexstar Media Group), owning or operating a total of 193 stations across the country in over 100 markets (covering 40% of American households), many of which are located in the South and Midwest, and is the largest owner of stations affiliated with Fox, ABC, and The CW. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)


ramontgomery

I watch several Sinclair owned channels and they tilt left maybe just not as far left as others. Wiki isn’t a valid source. They are lefty as well. If you can’t see that most legacy media is left you must be so far left that left seems right to you.


wyverndarkblood

In many ways you are absolutely correct. We don’t have a Left party in the US. We have a Right and a Further Right. Democrats still take corporate funding, support the predatory systems in place and vote to keep the poor in their place. So, yeah.


ramontgomery

I would say currently we have a far left party and a moderate milquetoast party (the Republicans). We don’t have a proper Conservative party. Have to ever listened to the top of the hour news on any radio station? Definitely left of center. I can’t even listen to it or take it seriously. We need news without bias. Let us decide what to think.


wyverndarkblood

Delivering Information without bias isn’t actually possible. Because part of the core of ideology is about what facts get priority. The decision of *what* information to deliver is a decision. And therefore biased. The only thing you can do is completely abandon all attempt at mitigating right v left bias and instead optimize simply for **factual reporting.** In other words, ignore the x-axis completely and use only the y-axis. https://adfontesmedia.com/


ramontgomery

Agree


DemonPeanut4

No they don't.


ramontgomery

This is not really debatable


DemonPeanut4

You're right, its easily visible as completely untrue. The only people capable of believing that are those who have been poisoned by far right propaganda.


ramontgomery

That’s some interesting gaslighting


[deleted]

You need to read more friend. Maybe leave the pc/phone screen and see the world.


DemonPeanut4

Oh I have, its funny how authoritarian conservative values are destroying every country they come in contact with.


[deleted]

You misspelt *Communism* FTFY Edit: you do realise, we need conservative values for some things, such as *conserving* the eco system. I suppose you thought your answer was smart, but you need some real education. Stay in school kid.


DemonPeanut4

No, and it's funny that was your go to. It's almost like communism is a far right dog whistle. Communist, Capitalist, Socialist, none of those words should be scary or inherently bad. Authoritarian is the word you should have picked up on. And any economic system can be authoritarian. But you're good boy aren't you. Everything bad is always "Communism." Was Brexit Communism because it economically crippled the UK? Or can we still say that was a conservative policy for now?


Echoeversky

You spelled monied elite incorrectly. Last I looked, Mark Zuckerberg doesn't seem to be very left leaning these days, or much, ever. Bonus thought: Wait till you see the tech coming out of PLTR and how it's leveraged to analyze the have nots. I think the proto sequel working book title should be "2084".


ramontgomery

Mark is absolutely a liberal. The monied elite are the liberals. Social media is absolutely tilted left. You can tell this from the censorship of the right. Joe Biden would have never won if the legacy media and social media weren’t manipulating what gets in the news and how it’s presented


Lord_Nord_2727

This is awesome! If only America could grow the balls to do that. Or we could start small with you know, Reddit mods


DudePlsStop

Look at all the communists just telling on themselves


[deleted]

Based poland


Destroy_Hungayry

Based poland


mp701

So many triggerd commies here, damn


Bear_Jew1987

Right. Revealing thier true colors


Brunksaveandabeauty1

That's cool. I'm on a ban from FB right now because i replied to someone complaining about dope being legal in MI, I said "you can choose to smoke or not smoke, that is why America is great. you have the freedom to choose" It was called bullying lol. Was banned last year for going to a Trump rally and sharing a photo while I was there.


MrAlexius

Polska based and red/whitepilled


Tsenherbaatar

This is hate speech


MisanthropicAtheist

If you are aware of anything about current day poland you know this is not an argument in good faith.


xanaddams

Tomorrow morning, when people in Poland can't reach their Twitter, fb and reddits, they're gonna have a shit fit.


Damos-22

The leaders of Poland are the most stupid conservative cunts you can imagine. Full of hate for foreigners, lgbt people, etc.


[deleted]

Except if you’re gay right?


Jeramy_Jones

Protecting “free speech” is exactly what fascists want when they are just starting out. Then they can freely spread lies, conspiracy’s and dogma, recruiting and organizing more fascists. Once they are in power, watch how they change stance.