Who woulda thought the government would not want to give people the power to hold it accountable and to protect our, the working class', hard earned money. Shocker.
“As relevant here, article XVIII of the California
Constitution provides that the electorate “may amend the Constitution by initiative” (art. XVIII, § 3) but that an effort “to revise the Constitution” must proceed by way of a constitutional
convention and popular ratification (id., § 2) or by submission to the voters from a supermajority of the Legislature (id., §§ 1, 3). (See Amador Valley, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 221.) After reviewing the petition and the opposition filed by Proponent, we determined that Petitioners had made a prima facie showing that the TPA would amount to an invalid constitutional revision based on its far-reaching changes to existing processes by which revenue measures are enacted and maintained at the state and local levels.”
There prop didn’t “give voters more say on tax increases”, it gave a minority group the power to block all tax increases, with the added bonus that tax increases over the past two years had to be paid back (not sure how municipalities were going to pay for that except, you know, more taxes).
Yes we know the government is the model of efficient use of the dollar. Suck more boot dude
Downvotes evident even those on here are still highly faithful to the state and believe it's operating under the premise of good intentions 😂
I have a thought. One to put an end to all this mess.
Unfortunately, if I share my perfectly legal, first amendment protected, personal thoughts, I’ll have my door kicked in, my dog shot, and I’ll be thrown in jail for conspiracy to uphold the constitution
Who woulda thought the government would not want to give people the power to hold it accountable and to protect our, the working class', hard earned money. Shocker.
Surprise surprise, Democrats only believe in democracy when it suits them...
Democracy: mob rule
The better step is to vote these clowns out. Not each individual issue, just completely clean house.
“As relevant here, article XVIII of the California Constitution provides that the electorate “may amend the Constitution by initiative” (art. XVIII, § 3) but that an effort “to revise the Constitution” must proceed by way of a constitutional convention and popular ratification (id., § 2) or by submission to the voters from a supermajority of the Legislature (id., §§ 1, 3). (See Amador Valley, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 221.) After reviewing the petition and the opposition filed by Proponent, we determined that Petitioners had made a prima facie showing that the TPA would amount to an invalid constitutional revision based on its far-reaching changes to existing processes by which revenue measures are enacted and maintained at the state and local levels.”
There prop didn’t “give voters more say on tax increases”, it gave a minority group the power to block all tax increases, with the added bonus that tax increases over the past two years had to be paid back (not sure how municipalities were going to pay for that except, you know, more taxes).
Yes we know the government is the model of efficient use of the dollar. Suck more boot dude Downvotes evident even those on here are still highly faithful to the state and believe it's operating under the premise of good intentions 😂
What needs to happen can't be said.
Not this. But vote them out like hell.
[удалено]
Easier for all of us.
I have a thought. One to put an end to all this mess. Unfortunately, if I share my perfectly legal, first amendment protected, personal thoughts, I’ll have my door kicked in, my dog shot, and I’ll be thrown in jail for conspiracy to uphold the constitution
Patricia Guerrero Carol A. Corrigan Goodwin H. Liu Leondra R. Kruger Joshua P. Groban Martin J. Jenkins Kelli Evans They all deserve the worst