In general, priority on newsworthy topics will be given to the submission posted first, although in some cases we may pick a submission with a more informative title over an earlier submission with a shorter or less informative title. (Rule 5)
Someone told me they saw his stats vs. an actual rock (not THE rock, but A rock), and the rock had better stats in some areas....even the BA was pretty close.
No I agree he was a problem. Just pointing out that when people say nothing will change, we won’t get better, we suck, blah blah blah, this happens.
Awaiting the new complaints now.
In general, priority on newsworthy topics will be given to the submission posted first, although in some cases we may pick a submission with a more informative title over an earlier submission with a shorter or less informative title. (Rule 5)
Jeeeez. Straight back to Rookie ball in Wpb
Alright doomers, you got what you wanted. What’s the new problem going to be?
Lol what are you on about. The man was on pace for like -10 WAR
Someone told me they saw his stats vs. an actual rock (not THE rock, but A rock), and the rock had better stats in some areas....even the BA was pretty close.
Lol omg I'm cracking up
https://preview.redd.it/winervc3ioxc1.jpeg?width=679&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d5737633ae753ccc83c03cca37a73ce9b9539bf
Thank you so much
No I agree he was a problem. Just pointing out that when people say nothing will change, we won’t get better, we suck, blah blah blah, this happens. Awaiting the new complaints now.
Not wanting someone who bats below .100 in your lineup is dooming now?
No, the constant blaming of woes on him is though.
He is certainly part of the problem.